>>88248You're getting gay marriage anon. Enjoy! Try not to cut yourself over it.
>>88250We shall see bong, we shall see.
>>88251Going to be an interesting proxy for the societal status of Australia.
Care to give us a quick rundown on what this is?
>>88253Left wing agitators want fags to be able to marry.
Politicians have been using this as political leverage to suck in votes.
They finally decide to hold a postal survey as to whether or not they'll change the laws.
No vote is the best result, mainly because it'll tell everyone that we wont make exceptions for fags, thus we wont make an exception for pedos or mudslimes.
>>88253It is literally pic related sent to all Australians. The result is non-binding, of course.
>>88254>>88255Any guess on how it'll turn out.
>>88257There's no telling how this'll go.
The cityfags will mostly vote yes and the ruralfags will mostly vote no.
Australia is faggot country now.
CONGRATS WELCOME TO THE CUCKED WORLD AUSSIES
>>88264This result is not unexpected. Gay marriage is sweeping most of the western world right now. The tide continues unabated. Any possible pushback against this at least?
>>88269Oy vey, that's homophobic!
It probably is rigged, but remember that Australia is definitely more cucked than America is, almost to the level of Canada and West Europe.
We just have to wait until the crash and burn when the leftists wipe each other out. Feel good, at least, that more than a third of Australians have the moral courage to vote against the mainstream.
>>88269>Results across the board average at 60%Straight out of an RNG, there's no way this wasn't rigged with the amount of money being thrown at the yes vote. How long until churches are getting sued for practicing their beliefs?
Don't forget where we are in the cycle, the Right is the minority on the rise. The survey shows a snapshot in time not the direction things are going. A number of Christians have just felt a threat they have not before. Every action creates an equal and opposite reaction.
>>88367What if the cycle doesn't exist though?
>>88369Divide by 0 error.
I guess you have some research to do. Let us/me know your results of your testing of the cycles hypothesis.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strauss%E2%80%93Howe_generational_theory and attached as starting points.
>>88372Yeah I've heard of that, but nothing assures me that the populist wave of 2015, which peaked in November 2016 and has been receding strongly since, will grow
>>88373I can't prove the future. But everything ebbs and flows. The wave you mention is still there, it has no concern with virtue signalling on Twitter etc. It waits quietly for the next time it is needed. A good test will be the next election.
For me, economic decline makes, out of necessity not desire, hard men. So the bulk of what you might be waiting for is when the Depression hits which is speculated to be 2032.
Time will tell, and we have no alternative but to go with the predictions we have already. MA has done quite well if you want to dig up his history. I do acknowledge tho that it is odd to presume to know the future. But countering that is the idea that ultimately this planet is a closed system socially/economically so eventually things would end up repeating.