>There are some ideas so absurd that only an intellectual could believe them.
http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2017/11/12/pew-77-percent-white-democratic-graduates-cannot-determine-person-sex/
/mlpol/ - My Little Politics
Archived thread
File (): DD72FAD85F4C32A9760D60D30C540ACF-578402.png (564.8 KB, 615x615, 681EF973-98F6-48D8-BD40-76….png)
Gonna take the bait and start off I guess.
>That image
No, a woman has a vagina. If you have a vagina, you are a woman. You can become a transman, if you want, but until you mutilate yourself, you are a woman. Same boat for men.
It used to be when you asked these idiots, they would tell you that sex was physical, gender was mental. They would admit to being a woman, but not feeling like it. Now they want to say that the penis is feminine and the like.
Honestly, I have no problem with trans people, as long as they're willing to admit they're freaks of nature and don't try to bend/break the rules.
>That image
No, a woman has a vagina. If you have a vagina, you are a woman. You can become a transman, if you want, but until you mutilate yourself, you are a woman. Same boat for men.
It used to be when you asked these idiots, they would tell you that sex was physical, gender was mental. They would admit to being a woman, but not feeling like it. Now they want to say that the penis is feminine and the like.
Honestly, I have no problem with trans people, as long as they're willing to admit they're freaks of nature and don't try to bend/break the rules.
Now, do they say "sex" or "gender"? There's a difference according to them.
>>88218
Nobody knows anymore, they've blurred the lines so much that even they can't tell what they're talking about anymore.
Goddamn idiots need to go back to their closet and keep their mental issues in there.
As I said, it used to be that "gender was mental", but now there is no way to tell if someone is a "man" or a "woman" or a fucking otherkin just by looking at them. You're better off just shooting all strangers, because at least you know what they are at that point, dead.
Nobody knows anymore, they've blurred the lines so much that even they can't tell what they're talking about anymore.
Goddamn idiots need to go back to their closet and keep their mental issues in there.
As I said, it used to be that "gender was mental", but now there is no way to tell if someone is a "man" or a "woman" or a fucking otherkin just by looking at them. You're better off just shooting all strangers, because at least you know what they are at that point, dead.
>>88220
>Implying those delusional sodomites and their degenerate volk won't make a big deal about what burial arrangements they have
>Implying those delusional sodomites and their degenerate volk won't make a big deal about what burial arrangements they have
They make the anarchy that validates the Authoritarianism. A Great Depression is looking good at this point. Chemo for societies.
>>88214
It's real
http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2017/11/08/transgender-issues-divide-republicans-and-democrats/
>The survey also finds that Democrats with a bachelor’s degree or more education are more likely than other Democrats to say a person’s gender can be different from the sex they were assigned at birth. About three-quarters (77%) of Democrats with a bachelor’s degree or more say this, compared with 60% of Democrats with some college and 57% of those with a high school diploma or less. No such divide exists among Republicans.
Found this little bit interesting.
>Democrats’ views also differ by race and ethnicity. Some 55% of black Democrats and 41% of Hispanic Democrats say a person’s gender is determined by their sex assigned at birth, a view shared by just 24% of white Democrats.
At least the beaners and niggers are going to get rid of the transfreaks.
It's real
http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2017/11/08/transgender-issues-divide-republicans-and-democrats/
>The survey also finds that Democrats with a bachelor’s degree or more education are more likely than other Democrats to say a person’s gender can be different from the sex they were assigned at birth. About three-quarters (77%) of Democrats with a bachelor’s degree or more say this, compared with 60% of Democrats with some college and 57% of those with a high school diploma or less. No such divide exists among Republicans.
Found this little bit interesting.
>Democrats’ views also differ by race and ethnicity. Some 55% of black Democrats and 41% of Hispanic Democrats say a person’s gender is determined by their sex assigned at birth, a view shared by just 24% of white Democrats.
At least the beaners and niggers are going to get rid of the transfreaks.
>>88225
>They make the anarchy that validates the Authoritarianism
This is the truly sinister part. They intend to whittle away at society so much that people are unable to fend for themselves, then the government swoops in and instills (((order))).
What's important now is that redpilled men like us fight to ensure that we're the ones to rebuild society in our own vision after the collapse, so that it doesn't fall to the hands of (((them))).
>They make the anarchy that validates the Authoritarianism
This is the truly sinister part. They intend to whittle away at society so much that people are unable to fend for themselves, then the government swoops in and instills (((order))).
What's important now is that redpilled men like us fight to ensure that we're the ones to rebuild society in our own vision after the collapse, so that it doesn't fall to the hands of (((them))).
>>88226
That's because this kind of faggotry is intentionally targeted towards young whites: niggers are already easy enough for (((them))) to control.
That's because this kind of faggotry is intentionally targeted towards young whites: niggers are already easy enough for (((them))) to control.
>>88226
>At least the beaners and niggers are going to get rid of the transfreaks.
They won't matter by the time they take over. Transfreaks are there to depopulated whites nothing else. Their target towards us so that we'll have a harder time considering having a family because of how blurred they make things.
>At least the beaners and niggers are going to get rid of the transfreaks.
They won't matter by the time they take over. Transfreaks are there to depopulated whites nothing else. Their target towards us so that we'll have a harder time considering having a family because of how blurred they make things.
>>88226
>At least the beaners and niggers are going to get rid of the transfreaks.
Hopefully. It seems unlikely though, as the odd alliance of bourgeoisie socialists and poor minorities hold steady.
>At least the beaners and niggers are going to get rid of the transfreaks.
Hopefully. It seems unlikely though, as the odd alliance of bourgeoisie socialists and poor minorities hold steady.
>>88217
They're shooting themselves in the foot with all this stuff, really. They're probably going to end up reversing the tide of public opinion that has been favoring them for decades and bring the whole gay rights movement down with them, and I'm going to laugh myself silly when it happens. I didn't even have an opinion on trans people until a couple of years ago. If I'd encountered a trans person I probably would have been a little uncomfortable but I would have likely not minded their presence, and probably would have even been willing to use their stupid pronouns or whatever just to avoid unnecessary conflict. Then they started plastering all this nonsense about gender spectrums all over the place and being a general pain in everyone's ass, and I've since decided I basically hate them. They're a bunch of annoying, mentally disturbed drama queens and I honestly think they just want attention.
They're shooting themselves in the foot with all this stuff, really. They're probably going to end up reversing the tide of public opinion that has been favoring them for decades and bring the whole gay rights movement down with them, and I'm going to laugh myself silly when it happens. I didn't even have an opinion on trans people until a couple of years ago. If I'd encountered a trans person I probably would have been a little uncomfortable but I would have likely not minded their presence, and probably would have even been willing to use their stupid pronouns or whatever just to avoid unnecessary conflict. Then they started plastering all this nonsense about gender spectrums all over the place and being a general pain in everyone's ass, and I've since decided I basically hate them. They're a bunch of annoying, mentally disturbed drama queens and I honestly think they just want attention.
>Sex Not Determined at Birth
It's not, though.
It's determined at conception
It's not, though.
It's determined at conception
>>88239
I almost feel bad for the delusional faggots who were content with just being ignored before leftards made a big spectacle out of this issue.
I almost feel bad for the delusional faggots who were content with just being ignored before leftards made a big spectacle out of this issue.
File (): 7637A800FE9051C8237F7D2E22480DBF-17929042.mp4 (17.1 MB, Resolution:1280x720 Length:00:02:49, E;R on Gender.mp4) [play once] [loop]
>>88239
Most people, myself included, are mostly apathetic on the issue in its base form. The problem is that trans issues have been politically weaponized and does objectively negative things to society. I.e. sterilizing children who don't know better. That shit is unacceptable.
Most people, myself included, are mostly apathetic on the issue in its base form. The problem is that trans issues have been politically weaponized and does objectively negative things to society. I.e. sterilizing children who don't know better. That shit is unacceptable.
20 replies | 2 files | 1 UUIDs | Archived