>>56374That's where I saw it too. I'm not sure if its a psyop too, but I think its worth reading.
>>56364sounds like divide and conquer to me.
Reminder that this sort of divide and conquer behaviour is exactly what shills and the CIA do.
Also that you should never follow these leaders, they do make good advice, but there is a good chance they may be compromised.
So take OP with a grain of salt, but be careful around these famous people regardless.
Considering that it came from the screenshot that
>>56374 posted it makes me not beleive it even more.
Honestly this is not surprising, the tactic is to spearhead legitimate voices, and then wave the crowd in a direction they needed. Its happening on all sides, they survey the crowd, see what new voices/directions may popup, and place their own people to siphon the crowd. Its the same with Rebel Media, it happened somewhat with the "Alt Media," label, and it will continue to happen in the future with other voices.
I'm going to delete this thread.
>>56496The purpose is to demoralize and to disintegrate the targeted group if the group can't be used to their own advantage. They are afraid of people grouping around legitimate ideologies, and so this is an ideological warfare. They try to control the perception of a group, fear matrix, and divide and conquer. The way to avoid their tactics is to be articulate. Because they can pump out sensational mass spam and logical fallacies, while each of us individually are more able to contribute to the conversation.