>>48377Woo hoo indeed. Happy times.
>>48375Isn't this like the third time in two months he's been announced dead?
Where are the proofs?
>>48381Well, I remember thevRussians claiming they had killed him a while back, but could not confirm it. So this may just be confirmation that the Russisns killed him
>>48381Although ISIS haven't confirmed it the Syrian Observatory is a reliable source. They have not made this claim before and they have good sources inside the territories. So when they go out and post it I take it as a sign that it is all but confirmed. And since ISIS haven't denounced this information it is a further sign that SOHR is releasing reliable news about Baghdadis death.
>>48375>>48376I'm not seeing any definite proofs in the links, but even if he is alive, he shouldn't be for long.
Thread theme:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PHQLQ1Rc_Js Well I will wait for a body as an actual proof, or AMAQ (ISIS media) statement.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7J0jYKOh2d0>>48389Fully understand. Shame we have to wait until ISIS have "elected" a new leader or something. If they ever will confirm it at all.
>>48389>or AMAQ (ISIS media) statement.How/where do you access that stuff anyway?