/mlpol/ - My Little Politics

>>46174
Sounds interesting.. What kind of places do you intend to leave the pages at?

>>46175
Well the definite places would be numerous sites in my local park as there are always people moving through but sparse enough to pin a few booklets without anyone seeing. I've also thought about leaving them in streets late at night. Slightly more risky, but I know my area well enough to get away.

>>46176
Not sure if viable, might perhaps need a bit (to quite a bit) more logistic and perhaps undercover work. But would inlays in Metro be possible. Might piss of most of the people but if styled correctly they might read a good portion before realizing.
Another idea I can throw out (more risky and perhaps stupid) is leaving them in dentists and doctors offices waiting room. Hard to do that without being seen. But it is an in-out job.

I've always been fond of redpills like this myself, images with lots of verifiable data

Another question: can you be arrested for this in Europe/Britain?

>>46183

Islamic countries have weird laws, you could get away with rape but not "hate speech"

>>46174
Not a bad idea. People can't get enough of these painful truths in their daily mainstream media diet.

As long as these facts are all 100% verified to be true then it's definitely a noble cause.

>>46178
As for logistics I can agree and am thinking of issues that will need resolving. I have figured that enclosing the booklet in a cheap plastic folder with a sellotape seal on the top should protect it from water damage long enough to be picked up.
>>46183
I don't know for sure, but it is VERY likely. Even though these are mere facts- you now what the score is like with certain people.
>>46181
I have most of these already suprisingly but cheers anyway, there might be more i don't have

>>46181
I have better image for add to last image of yours

>>46183
Yeah.. Its littering

>>46183
I think as long as you don't say people should kill someone you are fine. But if you are a muslim this rule don't apply because "you are only quoting what the quran says".

>>46191
Lol

If anyone is willing enough to spare some time for the cause, I am in need of summary lines/paragraphs of 'the big picture' covering zionists and globalists, the coudenhouve kalergi plan, and generally how all of this mess connects each part together coherently.

>>46194
I used to quote the quran from time to time in one of my college sociology courses to piss-off my SJW professor. He hated it, but my sources were always backed-up three-fold by Islamic studies professors, and he knew that I was the only scholar there that bothered to take the class seriously.

I had some fun making some things, i dont have too much time right now so they are quick ones, what y'all think?

>>46228
wow, are those QR codes links to sources i'm guessing? This would be brilliant to print as stickers to slap them around even in the most busy public spaces. Excellent work!

>>46247
Yes, they are we to the archived sources, I'll make more later when I get back to the computer!

>>46228
Those look good. My only suggestions would be to print the URL in small text above/below the QR code so people know what the QR code is for, and also to make sure the backgrounds are basic, if that makes sense. For example, the first and third images are fine, but for the second one you don't want to push people away with skulls and crossbones or make anti-religious types dismiss your message because of a Christian cross. You want to make sure the redpill is as easy to swallow as possible.

>>46174
I don't know if this is your first time here, but welcome to /mlpol/!

>>46354
I didn't think of the skills driving people away, you are right about that.
But tiny link over the qr?
IDK I mean the whole point of the qr is making the thing look cleaner..Maybe a little text quoting “source:” over the qr so they know what is it for?

>>46362
Good point, that would be cleaner. Or maybe people understand QR codes better than I thought and no text is necessary like you originally showed.

>>46369
Ah they know what a qr is but people is too lazy to use them
You had a good idea anon some tiny text over the qr would be really useful, I'll rework them later

>>46174
>can't be caught leaving these.
If you're that concerned, you should be aware that almost every modern printer embeds identifying information in the documents that it prints. If you piss off the right people, they can use that information to try to identify you.

Look up Printer Steganography if you'd like to know more.

>>46416
what, on the physical paper or digitally? that's quite fucked

>>46427
On the paper. It adds a few dots that are hard to notice without magnification.

The patterns aren't all clear, but it's generally information like that printer model and date of printing. Someone seriously investigating can potentially use that information to cross reference with other details and identify you. Don't underestimate small details. Syria general has pinpointed location for air strikes using seemingly innocuous details from ISIS videos and 4pol found the "He will not divide us" flags from details on the live stream.

I don't know the best ways to defeat this embedded data. You might be able to find some ancient printers or some open source drivers that don't insert it in the first place.

Personally I've hypothesized that introducing minor water damage to bleed the ink might destroy the subtly embedded information beyond recovery, but that's just been idle thoughts of mine that I haven't investigated deeper.

>>46440
Just print it in a safe place with a safe printer not connected to the internet.
Or just don't give a fuck and print it anyways, these are facts and studies it's for educational purposes.
This is »not« hate speech.

>>46470
You know "hate speech" is whatever (((they))) want it to be.

I just wanted to make sure that op knew about the Steganography. Most people don't. That's how they manage to get away with such atrocious practices in the first place.

>>46493

(((hate speech))) is the antithesis to free speech, just as free speechs its not defined. The accusations is the evidence in an attempt to blame you for something that is not based upon on objective laws, but subjective feelings.

I like your idea.
However we need to present them in a colorful way in order to catch the attention.

>>46228 look good as a way to start, but need some tweaking.

>>46612
What should I change on them?

>>46646
Mainly font and text color.
Give me some time and I'll send some pics.

>>46181
Go with the first two infographics, and the last.

Holocaust stuff needs to be funny, like the holocoaster. You have to discredit it based on the mouths of Jews, or it doesn't work. In order to expose it as a lie, you essentially have to get a Jew to either admit that it is, or to stick to a position that is completely laughable (They turned muh 6 gorillion into lampshades and soap, and built complicated machines to vaporize us, WE ARE THE CHOSENITES!)

>>46189
That's a good pic to use.

>>46228
I like the idea of the QR codes.

>>46354
Good idea for people without smartphones.

>>46174
The only redpill a normie needs is horse pussy. Post it everywhere on /pol/

>>46783
I agree, but I can't convince people to enlist in the right wing death squads by pasting horse pussy pics on the street.

>>46816
Safety Squads.
Heres something about Judaism, citation needed.

>>46174
morning all, OP is back now

>>46834
these may be of help

>>46369
>>46612
>>46782
I made some, now with the text and qr code, is there something else i should change?

>>46873
perfection

printed some out myself

Guys, we may have been strategically CUCKED. We ally around the hate and Nazi symbol because we think it would be great for the jews to be culled, but this HYPE is the REAL position the jews wants us to hold, to DISTINGUISH us from them. To foil the Zionist plan, we must BECOME ZIONISTS/JEWS OURSELVES! In name of course, so that we become NAZI ZIONISTS, and then PROFIT $$$$$$_$$$$$$

>>46895
KeK, go fucking worship Satin, join the KKK, become sand niggers for all I care, all these activist roles are all ways for the jews to distinguish themselves from us, so the only way to ruin their narratives and thought leadership is to become one, and you can squeal as much as you want that this is being politically correct, it is actually the MOST politically incorrect if we hold jewish beliefs. (Honorary aryans anyone?)

>>47895
go back to 4/pol/

>>47898
no, u

>>48034
you're the one telling us to become jews, faggot.

>>46185
I kekd

>>46893
It's even easier than that.
Show leftists and Antifa how ideologically close are from Nazism and make their heads explode.
Most will follow their double standards but that may cause divisions between themselves.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=derHRFGZ4NU

>>46174

Been reading through a fair amount of the facts.
Even though they all have sources, y'all might wanna evaluate how much you can trust the sources.
One example:
1/4 gay men in America have had over 1000 sex partners. Source: http://www.amazon.com/Homosexualities-Study-Diversity-Among-Women/dp/0671251503
43% of gay men have over 500 partners. Source: http://www.amazon.com/Homosexualities-Study-Diversity-Among-Women/dp/0671251503

Both referring to a book from 1979, a time in which there was totally no stigma attached to homosexuality, with the main data being a survey of 1500 men from the san francisco homosexual scene.

I hope you don't need me to tell you that the san francisco homosexual scene is possibly one of the most promiscuous gay scenes, and not to mention in the seventies, the time of "free love", "make love not war" and so on. A time before AIDS was discovered.

No one who isn't a highly promiscious gay man would even have gone close to that scene back in the day.

So the sample for the study is... very unrepresentative, and almost 50 years old.

I'm very much for redpilling people, but please do so with more legitimate facts.

A fair amount of the facts are good though, all I'm saying is they obviously need more thorough investigation before trying to use them to convince people of anything.

>>46228

Idea of the QR codes is neat, but the facts are pretty "meh".
>between 24% and 90% (...)
Don't use something with a possible error like that.
>79% of homosexual men say (...)
opposed to which percentage in heterosexual men? Over which timespan? Lifetime? Yearly?
>transsexuals who undergo (...)
less issues with that one, but it's only logical that trannies with the most severe mental issues (gender dysphoria or what you want to call it) are most likely to commit suicide.
The last one is a decent stat to use though, IF you mention who they are more likely than to commit suicide. Non surgery trannies? normal people? Other non straight people?

>>48044
I'm saying it maybe an honest idea; we had taken up being MRAs, communists(before social constructionists came), and now Hitler and Nazis, whats preventing us from being BLOODY JEWS??

>>48618
for me at least, self respect. I'm not losing that, even if you try to take it from me.

>>48618
>Becoming ((THEM))

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W17H_BL6jUo

I think this episode of Murdoch Murdoch explains why that's a soul crushingly bad idea.

>>46185
Not appreciating this post is haram.

@46893
@47895
@48618
Are you old enough to post on this site? Your posts, especially your first one, are an absolute mess.
What you're suggesting isn't impossible: Martin Shrekli is a good example, study what he did. I couldn't be a jew if I tried, but maybe you can.

>"We're keeping the swastika. We're always going to be called nazis no matter what we have on our banners. The key to dismantling the jewish narrative lies in understanding Adolf Hitler and everything that happened before the second world war."

>>48441
I just took the text from the library of hate (op's link)
Really if someone has better facts (with sources) i would make more of these, i really don't know where to start looking for such controversial information and i don't want to pull the stuff from my arse for such a thing

>>48860
The metapedia is a great source for controversial information with sources.

http://en.metapedia.org/wiki/Main_Page

Somewhat unrelated, but I enjoy comparing metapedia and rationalwiki pages:
http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Adolf_Hitler
http://en.metapedia.org/wiki/Adolf_Hitler
(Spoiler: rationalwiki is the one laced with appeals to emotion)

>>48865
Thanks anon, i will be working on it!

>>48867
Just checked at least the homosexuality stuff, to compare to what I was complaining about with the "library of hate".
They seem to be pretty good with not using highly controversial publications (i.e. the one that the two claims "1/4 gay men in America have had over 1000 sex partners." and "43% of gay men have over 500 partners." came from), and seem to make sure to mention it if a source they use is controversial.

Pretty good, less inflammatory, but more reality oriented instead.

If I find any shitty practices like with the "library of hate", I'll make sure to tell y'all.

>>48874

Saw a video today how a magazine for teenage girls is now advocating for anal sex. The video host mentioned a study conducted on straight and gay men. turns out, receiving regular anal sex gives you permanent control loss of your bowels, next to other problems. Who would have thought.

>>48876

Tbh if you're talking about what I think you're talking about then I don't think it's much of an issue, if it's in a teen magazine telling how to have anal sex safely.
Teens will do that shit anyway, so why not tell them how to do it safely.

However if it's something else then it's probably some kikery.

Also yeah of course shoving something in your butt widens your rectum, thus increasing the opening in a relaxed state.
...did anyone deny something that obvious?

>>48836
Nice story, good characterization, and the video has good moral points. I think I finally see what you guys are saying, and I obviously agree that we shouldn't fall in to the trap of postmodernist arguments designed by ((them)). ((Their)) strategy this time is the deconstruction of meaning for the purpose of infighting among a already established productive social group, so that ((they)) can come in and establish order. The age old problem reaction solution, where ((they)) cause the problem and ((they)) provide the "solution".

That being said, another important point I took away from the story was that we are not DEFINED by our nazi loving, nor even the fascist ideas, but the GOOD ideas that are in those ideologies. There are fundamental meanings that are required for progress. Laugh in the face of danger "create dank memes". The absolutely REAL existence of hierarchy "securing an existence for xxx...". Unity, "can't go at it alone". There are also great points the comments, like, bearing redpills are easier with companions. The point of ideologies is that our good ideas should always be evolving as our language and understanding is evolving. Nuanced positions, and discourse is the way to go.

So coming back to what I was advocating, I guess I should say, that I'm not advocating to become shills, but I do want to point out that one day, ((they)) will want to spearhead our movement, like how they ACTUALLY did in the past with the nazis and hitler. We would then be expected to advocate the counterarguments, because we have an nuanced position, and then, ((they)) would push forward and sack the reasonable people with labels of jews. To break the loop is to continue to hammer out what is true, seeking and refining knowledge, be able to see what they are doing on stage, and off stage, and know how to counter that also.
I guess my original claim would be then, that there maybe a day, when the meaning of being nazis, is the meaning of being jews, so you'd have to wear the label as vehemently as we do now. I dunno.

>>48881
>mfw this guy went from rambling 12-year-old to microessaying horsenazi within 3 days
>posts with a different IP each time.

You're getting on my paranoia dude, it's almost scary.

>accidentally his proxy
Well… at least you're human.

>Nuanced positions, and discourse is the way to go.
You can hold as nuanced a position as you want, but the media will paint you as racist bigot extremist all the same.
In the last dutch election we had a nuanced right-wing party and they got nothing but "So you believe that [X],", and then they needed to defend their very nuanced position in the allotted fifteen seconds speaking time.
The questions and format were designed such that it wasn't possible for them to defend themselves properly.
Contrast this to the more """extremist""" Geert Wilders. All of his policies fit within 15 seconds of speaking time, and everyone knows exactly what he won't back down on. Some of his claims are impossible or wrong, but if you vote for him you know what direction he will move in.
If you insist on a nuanced position you have to explain exactly where you want to go, which gives media opportunity to mischaracterise and take out of context, while extremist positions are just a direction. When you say "Gas the jews", the media can't twist that. You said it, and everyone heard and understood it. You might never get the opportunity to actually gas the jews, but maybe you get to pry big banks and big media out of jewish hands, and that's all you really wanted.

>Jews spearheading the ""alt-right""
They tried this a few times around the 2016 USA elections if you remember it, but it didn't have a big fallout at the time.
Could you explain in more detail what worries you? It seems like you're trying to avoid a future catastrophy but what is it?
You talk about hammering out flaws in a loop. Is your worry that society will overcompensate and become right-wing totalitarian?

>>46174
I'd advise you wheatpaste them at eye level.

>>48897

> Causing paranoia
How'd I cause paranoia?

> me went from 12yo to microessaying horsenazi
Well, throwing yourself into rabbit holes is a great way to end up like me. (I don't recommend without trustworthy friends, I speak from experience.)

>you're human
You assume too much friend.

> Nuance, Interacting with media, and public perception.
When I said nuanced positions, I meant it more like internally, when thinking and talking about our purpose here together. I like the memes, and I get great laughs out of them, though only through communication we can structure the message that would continue our purpose.
You are right, there is no time to communicate ideas externally, and more detailed ideas require more time. The media by default is an unfair playground of ideas, they are the platform, they are the boundaries, and they are the discussion, so it is pretty moot on hoping your message won't be polarized when passing through the jewed media filters. Modifying our messages in hopes of getting the wanted result on the other side is also nigh impossible, we aren't alphabet soup agencies. I want to point out that, "Gas the jews," may be an uncompromisable position, but that's just it, because your position DOESN'T move, ((they)) would move everyone ELSE's position on the subject, around you.

> Project Veritas Action picture
> Spearheaded "alt-right"
I was very surprised when there was a portion of republicans were taught a version of the bible where the jews are the gods chosen people, and that we should support them. It has passed entirely under my radar, and just the fact that they are able to do such a conspiracy shows the staggering extent of their influential capabilities. What I am most worried about is the inability to keep our arguments together when the pressure on society is continuously cranked up. The jews hold the jewish belief differently, there are those that also believe in the talmud, and those that may be of traditional faith. One of them believes in social constructionism, I think its the those who believe the talmud. Social constructionists are possibly the new face of globalism, of the original jew conglomerates, banks, and the like. They have sold out their people before (honorary aryans), they will do it again, and they will do it through the hard hammering points of antisemitism may be putting forth. It's not that much of we overcompensating and become right-wing totalitarians. It is a repeat pattern of funding the left and funding the right, and picking a side that allows them to grab more control on the general mass. I also think they are trying to shake the jewish legacy label, so they can be come more secretive, meaning, there already could be a moderately sized secret society that formed from the jews/powerful people, and are ready to screw with our minds and our perception in to submission.

On the bright side, I really like our discussions, it makes me think better than I usually do.