>>371583What do u think of the op image? Not sure if the image pops out as much as I'd like in the catalog.
Do we really need a designated porn thread? Porn is allowed in all threads, and I think porn threads should be made for specific kinds of porn, not general porn. I feel like there's been an unhealthy trend toward consolidation of thread topics (aka, trend towards generals) on this site, which this site was made to avoid.
Also, I'd prefer porn dumps to me made without poster IDs.
That's just my opinion though. Carry on.
>>371585Yh, I think I agree with you, actually. I was just prompted de to it being almost tradition to have one of these threads at this point. So I wasn't really thinking past the point of, "Ooh, I can post this image for the porn thread. Oh, it reach bump limit well then I can make a new one. "
>>371583Thanks!
>>371584I think it works.
>>371585>NeedDoes a fish need water?
>>371588To be fair other threads could also always use more pony pussy. It is however a cultural heritage to have the hoers pussy thread.
We ought to have these kinds of threads.
This one is mostly vanilla with surprise bonus scoops and toppings.
This is the lighthouse preemptively annihilating reddicucks, shills, glowniggers and other faggots.
This thread is the cookie jar on the counter anyone can dip into.
Calling this a general misses the point. The fire has been fed and has continued to do so.
A torch that has been and continues to be alight.
>>371589>It is however a cultural heritage to have the hoers pussy thread.It is cultural tradition to have threads (plural) about horse pussy, not a single thread.
We once had an entire board dedicated to porn, but we deleted it to avoid consolidation.
>This is the lighthouse preemptively annihilating reddicucks, shills, glowniggers and other faggots.>This thread is the cookie jar on the counter anyone can dip into.The content in the thread serves that purpose, but the thread itself does not. Shills and redditors are not deterred by a single thread that they can just hide: they're deterred by dozens of threads, and the content being posted in every political thread.
>Calling this a general misses the point.A general is a general.
>>371590>did you want to order something from my 'secret menu'?Yes, ma'am, do you guys still have the McRib?
>In a heavy stereotypical Asian accent of unknown origin.
Lucky Pony Slutto!
START!
Fili-second!
>>373990When you bump, bump with content