/mlpol/ - My Little Politics

>>362292
>Transhumanism and the Far Right
>those of us on the right
I really doubt it, you are not on our side.

Fantasizing about having your genes perfected and cyber implants improve your legs and lungs is like fantasizing about the size of the ship you would run if you were a captain in Star Trek, or the colour of the lightsaber you would have in Star Wars.

>>362297
OP is not different than a vapid bimbo wishing for bigger boobs.

>>362292
Technology is a no-no, selective breeding has always been the right way. Consider it like the ''organic'' way.

>>362292
I see your point of view, you as all true leftists want to serve yoursef, on the other hoof, >>362299 as a true rightist wants to serve the collective.
Ironic, isn't it?
Commies ---> fueled by their selfish desires
NatSocs ---> fueled by the desire to serve the group's greater good

>>362300
How would using implants, gene therapy, and pharmacology to improve the collective not help the collective?

>>362299
Why is technology a no-no?
>>362297
We live in the era of brain implants, nootropics, and gene therapy. It's more than fantasy at this point.
>>362298
I want everyone to have the opportunity to be smarter and stronger and to live longer.

>>362302
>I want everyone to have the opportunity to be smarter and stronger and to live longer.
What arrogance you have. It is not up to you the limits of your body, but the Creator. The bimbo analogy applies 100% here.

>>362303
Humans have already drastically extend their lifespans using materials and tools available in this universe, made by the creator.

>>362304
It is not the same than to change the design of the body. OP wants an upgrade not simply help to keep the vital functions going.

>>362305
How do you know the creator doesn't want us to upgrade ourselves?

>>362308
You are crossing the line when you want to become God yourself. Reminder that you are a puny human.

>>362309
I don't think there is any becoming God, but there seems to be a lot of opportunity to be better than human.

>>362310
>atheistic claim
It remind me of those transvestite freaks wanting to change the human design to become something else, kinda a Frankenstein monstrosity.

>>362311
Trannies want us all to play along with their weird ass sexual fantasies. What I want is smart, stronger, and longer lived race that can and will conquer the stars.

>>362312
>What I want is smart, stronger, and longer lived race that can and will conquer the stars
Okay.
KEK

>>362313
The technology for what I want is already in it's infancy and it is rapidly maturing.

>>362314
I will not continue to entertain you any longer, but suffice to say, even if you don't believe a bit, that the "technology" you want is known from ancient ages and is being "deployed", not developed as the news want you to believe. Research it.

>>362309
Humans would not become even close to God even if we did this. This argument is comparing apples to oranges.

>>362315
>the "technology" you want is known from ancient ages and is being "deployed", not developed as the news want you to believe.
Where did you hear this?

>>362292
Based Genetic Engineering<Cringe kike transhumanism

>>362319
Wouldn't genetic engineering eventually lead to transhumanism though? Enough changes over time and we would become something different.

>>362302
>Why is technology a no-no?
You should study Uncle Ted's masterpiece. >>304338 →
Everything is explained there.

>>362320
No, it leads to this

>>362321
There is no putting the genie back in the bottle. All we can do is learn to live with the technology.

((("Learn to live with...")))
Hah! I think not.
God created pureblood humans/life, and talmudic/kabbalist/satanic/commie pedo creatures knowing they'll only ever serve and go down with their satan wretch in the end, are using AI/"transhumanism" (amongst a slew of other dirty tricks and poisons) to turn as many people away from God as possible before their time is up.

These wicked tricks and technologies will never be controlled/owned by those who adopt/absorb them, and in doing so then progressively replace their God-gifted humanity with them.
The best defense is to be like-and-what the worst creatures on this planet hate the most, and becoming more like these creatures (less human/more inhuman) is definitely not going to achieve that.

I'm literally a dog, and I'm already more human/humane than a significant portion of born-humans that have become ensnared in such soul-destroying traps and poisons.
It's confronting to witness, but nevertheless good news for humans, pony stallions and other dogs like me, because the deception is simply becoming too obvious and the positive path forward is becoming clearer. Don't be like the creatures, become and do what they hate the most, strive to be your very best without depending on their tools/mechanisms, starve them of your attention and life/energy, help others as you become stronger. These are things that anyone could still do.

Also - OP's a low-level (((creature))) trawling for input and trying to spread more poison. What this thread needs is more pussy, if you ask me! :3

>>362327
Based Business dog

>>362327
Imagine worshipping a jew on a stick.

>>362327
This anon knows.

>>362340
why is the internet so dead.
where in the fuck did everyone go?

>>362341
about 5 mega websites

>>362342
This. The Internet has also been raped to death by corpos/pozzed govs.

>>362342
>>362343
sad times friends
the good news is that the current path isn't sustainable
time to continue the search

>>362344
Sad times indeed,
>>362323
>>362319
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LIYwvGgOpHQ

>>362292
>OP's faggotry
What is this about? Let's find out.

>Intra-body nano-network - Brief summary by Mik Andersen

>>362440
schizo shit.

>>362817
Debunk it, if you can.

>>362821
I'm not reading all that shit. Nanobots from vaccines has been a schizo talking point for a long time. Take your meds.

>>362824
>I'm not reading all that shit.
Ah, now your point of view makes totally sense,

>>362827
It a pdf of the same schizo talking points with no real sources behind it. Again take your meds.

>>362828
>source
I knew it.

>>362830
You make extreme claims like their are nanobots in the vaccine you need to provide some pretty convincing evidence. The voices in your head aren't enough to convince me.

>>362832
Let me put this way. How do you know there are not nanobots in the injections?

>>362834
Because we don't have nanotechnology that advanced yet.

>>362836
And how you know?

>>362837
Because we would see it in consumer products and military applications if we did.

>>362839
Allow me to redpill you. The lack of publicity is NOT a real hint on the advances on the field.
Video clip from 60 (sixty) years ago.

>>362842
Then do you have some substantial proof that this technology is real?

>>362843
Old corona-chan threads featuring videos from the Pentagon and vaccine manufacturing CEO's describing 'new capabilities".
Dig them well anon.

>>362842
Also I want to point out that such technology (the stuff in the video) was already being used on mental patients at the time. Brain implants today require surgery there is nothing close to nanotech used in brain implants.
>>362844
I highly doubt the pentagon and ceos are talking about putting nanobots in people. And those threads are full of schizo shit.

>>362844
Also there is another video of a presentation at the WEF describing mind reading and monitoring. I don't remember well, but it might be at the Great Reset threads.

>>362845
>(the stuff in the video)
Watch it again because it says that implants are left behind for wireless tech, in the 60s.

>>362845
>I highly doubt the pentagon and ceos are talking about putting nanobots in people. And those threads are full of schizo shit.
Suit yourself.

>>362847
Things like electrodes in the brains were experimental at the time. They also experimented with magnetic fields at the time.

>>362848
Those threads are just 2 more weeks cope. It's been 2 years and the the vaccinated still aren't dead, or posthuman cyborgs, or zombies. Go back to your schizo containment thread.

>>362850
The pic of >>362848 is 100% picrel.

>>362851
I've been in those threads, anon. They are schizo shit. Like flat earth tier conspiracies.

>>362852
>They are schizo shit. Like flat earth tier conspiracies.
So far all those conspiracies are factually true. Go figures.

>>362854
Then where are the mountains of dead vaxxies?

>>362860
Keep lying and gaslightying fren. The excuse of "I'm not reading all that shit" is not flying any longer.

>>362861
Not him, but he does raise a fair point, why aren't they all dead yet?

>>362860
>>362863
Either you people are living under a rock and in permanent denial, or, you're paid shills. What is it?

>>362870
Brother i am simply asking you a question, no reason to be so hostile.

>>362871
Well, there are many corona-chan threads documenting the death toll. Don't tell me you didn't see them.

>>362872
What Anon seems to be arguing is that nothing in those threads indicates that the vaxxies are dying off en masse, or that the vax is lethal to everyone who takes it. Let's just say for the sake of simplicity that every anecdote in those threads is 100% accurate and all of these mysterious sudden deaths were directly caused by the vaccine. This still doesn't prove everyone who takes the vax is going to die from it. If that were the case, we should be seeing massive numbers of people dying, like millions at a time. Again, not even the MSM could cover up something that obvious; there should be mountains of corpses everywhere. At best, all we have so far is circumstantial evidence suggesting that the vaccine may be lethal to certain people under certain conditions.

Ironically, the alt-narrative about the vax is actually similar to the official narrative about the virus itself. Corona-chan didn't actually kill that many people, but it did kill some people. So the government and media and so forth hyped up the 0.02 percent of the population who died from this virus while basically ignoring the 99.98 percent who didn't. They also blatantly ignored the fact that the virus seemed to mostly be lethal to people who were either very old or had comorbidities. The antivax crowd is falling victim to a similar type of hysteria, where a small number of vaccine deaths are being treated as evidence that the vaccine is lethal to everyone who takes it.

Bear in mind I'm not trying to take a pro-vax stance here. The vaccine is at the very least a highly suspicious drug and it's obvious the govt and pharmaceutical companies are not being honest about the risks. Since Corona isn't that terrible of an illness in the first place, it's probably best to just err on the side of caution and not take the vax unless you absolutely have to for some reason. However, if it were really as dangerous as some of the more extreme schizo-theories suggest, there should logically be mountains of corpses all over the place, since the majority of people did take the vax. The fact that there isn't suggests that these theories are either inaccurate or exaggerated.

>>362880
>Since Corona isn't that terrible of an illness in the first place
Corona doesn't exist. The whole virology science is a fraud and doesn't follow the Scientific Method, therefore virologists are well paid quacks.

>>362845
>I highly doubt the pentagon and ceos are talking about putting nanobots in people. And those threads are full of schizo shit.
Actually it is not about nanobots, but a network of radio-electric antennas to interact with and influence humans.
>>362849
>Things like electrodes in the brains were experimental at the time. They also experimented with magnetic fields at the time.
Is the PDF in question correct? Let's find out.
By the way, /mlpol/ is always right.

>>362895
What the lady was talking about was an EEG (ear eeg) not a wireless mind control device. The closest things to what you are talking about would be tFUS and rTMS, but those you need to be right next to the person for those to work.

>>362870
>>362861
Why don't you just answer the question instead of flinging shit like a retarded nigger? That's a completely normal question that would arise when you assert that the vaccine kills people.
>>362872
I've seen plenty of posts claiming that the vaccine was engineered to depopulate the planet or kill people en mass, but aside from a few blood clots (which does support that it's untested and unsafe, but not that it's a death sentence), I haven't seen very many people actually die from it; and anyone who makes that observation would ask those very same questions. Most of the people in in country took the vaccine, but most of them haven't actually died, and if they really were dying at even a 1% rate you'd be seeing mass graves all over the country.
>>362880
>Anon seems to be arguing is that nothing in those threads indicates that the vaxxies are dying off en masse, or that the vax is lethal to everyone who takes it.
>if it were really as dangerous as some of the more extreme schizo-theories suggest, there should logically be mountains of corpses all over the place, since the majority of people did take the vax. The fact that there isn't suggests that these theories are either inaccurate or exaggerated.
Basically this.
I'm not asserting that there's no danger to taking the vaccine, but I'm tired of retards exaggerating it. When you shit-up conversations with untrue/unsupported nonsense, it poisons the well and turns away people who came looking for truth that opposes the media narrative, so it's important to be consistent and clear about these kinds of things. I'm so tired of seeing piles of untrue/exaggerated schizo bullshit all over discussions of vaccine skepticism, because it's annoying to sift through for shreds of accurate information and retards shit up the entire discussion and turn away sensible skeptics.
Sometimes I wonder if it's by design, and maybe glownigs or other bad actors intentionally flood Facebook groups and other forums with schizo nonsense about the vaccine just to poison the well, to keep skeptics distracted and to prevent normies from questioning the mainstream narrative. It's been a tried and true method for them about other topics.

>>362881
Even if you assert that it doesn't exist, that's beside Anon's point that they intentionally ignored statistics of its fatality and who was effected by it. Even if it were a fictional virus, it would still be a very mild virus that only caused severe illness in the elderly.

>>362900
Forgot the memes to go with the glownigger tactics line

>>362881
>The whole virology science is a fraud
Oh good grief, not this nonsense again. Take your meds.

https://twitter.com/neuralink/status/1661857379460468736
Neuralink is entering human trials.

>>363343
Sorry elon you're not putting anything in my brain

>>363344
Nothing in your brain yet.

>>363345
Nothing Ever.

>>363346
That was how it begun.

>>363346
>upset filly
Adorable.

>>363343
I'm immunized against all dangers: One may call me a consumer, good goyim, nigger cattle, it all runs off me like water off a raincoat. I'm going to get a neuralink installed as soon as they are available (assuming they don't cost too much)

>>364229
I would wait a couple months/years to get one. It'll take them a while to work the kinks out.