Gay and retarded nonsense
I agree, but also grinds Conservative Inc. credibility and that is good.
>cuckservative faggot attacked by kike shill
The point and the news is not about the any of the people in question. That's the set piece. The backdrop for this for normal fags.>A drafted contract is a piece of shit oh no.
That's the macguffin.
The devil is in the details and oh boy is it yelling out it's purpose and desire. Making wage cage propaganda by wagies in cagies.
That tickles the normal fag pickle in just the right way because a contract that's all retarded purposely sent is a bit more than just a bit of stupidity and an accident.
One of two inciting incidents.
And nothing gets the normal type more excited than drama and scandal, it's a hard wired biological survival mechanism.>"But his fucking take is a novel take for normies that DO listen to him. 1.5 million of them anon.">"normies are noticing something is rotten, obviously they don't know what is rotten, not really."
It's safe to enjoy without worry, seemingly without actual stakes with a bit of mystery.
A bit of entertainment and if solved means there will be more and better entertainment.
When people start to get a little curious, a little suspect, a little bit of emotion. Everything gets rolling.
Depending on the type of GROUND pushing hard makes it stick into the muck, then is time for softer means. When it'a just right or at least hard enough pushing with all one's might imparts needed motion.
Is that Shadiversity? From Fantasy re-Armed? When did he get into politics?
I don't mind the thread or anything. Maybe some good memes and laughs might come out.
That said, Crowder is as good as conservative Inc. And the fact that anyone is still expecting anything to come out of e-celeb drama is hilarious. I hope you are just a newfag.
Why are you so depressed? What happened to Kanye woke a lot of people up. What happened to Crowder woke a lot of people up.
Sorry, but if you can't take that and go on with your day, perhaps you should stay away from politics altogether.>What happened to Kanye woke a lot of people up. What happened to Crowder woke a lot of people up.
The truckers were infinitely more promising that either e-celeb and they still got rekt overnight.
I am very much certain some anons flat out left the site afterwards. Either that or they went practically silent.
Counter Currents actually had a pretty reasonable take on this:https://counter-currents.com/2023/01/the-50-million-conservative-inc-internet-spat/
The tl;dr of it is basically that Crowder has a point, but he also presents his case in a disingenuous way that calls his motivations into question.
The Daily Wire was essentially created as a safe space for neocons, so it's not really surprising that they would be willing to play ball with leftist social media companies. Steven Crowder I've never listened to; apart from the "change my mind" memes I don't really know that much about him. My impression is that he's in the same camp as Joe Rogan or Jordan Peterson, in that he's just a normie with basically milquetoast views who nonetheless markets himself as an edgy provocateur.
I would say that if there is any lesson for normies here, it's that you shouldn't trust anyone who takes a paycheck in the first place. Anyone who monetizes political commentary by marketing themselves as a "media figure" or an "influencer" should immediately be treated as suspect. Even if they are actually sincere about their views, by turning themselves into a "brand" they suddenly have something to lose, which makes them vulnerable to demonetization threats, which means you can't always trust their motivations.
Some anonymous /pol/tard has no reason to give a shit if Twitter nukes one of his 50 sockpuppet accounts, so whether he's right or wrong you can at least take it as a given that he's actually speaking his own mind. Someone like Steven Crowder, or for that matter Milo, Baked Alaska, Nick Fuentes, or any of the similar grifters well to the right of Crowder, have skin in the game simply by being monetized.
The real lesson here is to think critically and not take anyone's political commentary at face value, and that goes double if the person makes a living from said commentary. Whether or not any normies will learn said lesson remains to be seen.
>>357791>My impression is that he's in the same camp as Joe Rogan or Jordan Peterson
This.>he's just a normie with basically milquetoast views who nonetheless markets himself as an edgy provocateur.
He and similar e-celebs play the normie card to avoid to name the jew. After all, shekels are the reason why they are on-line talking, and those dirty coins come mostly from the kikes. E. Michael Jones has a point on that, calling the libs out is a distraction from the jews behind the curtains.
The sheer amount of grifting and gay shit surrounding these faggots is really fatiguing. I can't think of a single commentator on any mainstream platform that isn't a gay shill with an obnoxious normie audience comprised of reddit-tier retards.
>>357791>whether he's right or wrong you can at least take it as a given that he's actually speaking his own mind
I'm sorry, but once the overton window made posting reasonable and very sensible views feel
extreme , even if phrased in an excessively polite manner, then Poe's Law started to kick in. I can't always be 100% sure whether a post is genuine or not.
I'd have to read enough of the post to see genuine thought put in to the expression of views, and be able to trust that it wasn't a copypasta before I'd think it was really genuine.
Then again, I don't really use Twitter a lot, so I could be wrong on this.