>>353107>5DNaaaaah. The normies are too fluorided to notice and even if the CIA host Tucker forces the issue, they will dismiss it and focus on the trannies.
>>353107The way I'm hearing this, it sounds more anti-circumcision, if anything. A "circumcision activist" doesn't really imply if they're for or against circumcision, but the statement earlier in the video seems clearly anti-mutilation. So, either he's referring to two different things, or it doesn't seem pro-circumcision to me. So, I'm not really sure why you would say he's pretending to be pro-circ. I just don't see any solid evidence here that he is, as is, unless you assume that the "circumcision activists" are all anti-circumcision.
>>353123>I'm not really sure why you would say he's pretending to be pro-circ.because of his 2017 convo with lady
https://twitter.com/tuckercarlson/status/859942284409942020she brings up comparisons to male circumcision and he minimizes it
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SMllr87dVxs >>353183Good work, anon! I'm hoping your theory is correct.