Any speculation as to his aims?
The content overlap in a mere 10-day span seems too much for a coincidence.
I think this is 5D-chess where he pretends to be pro-circ mocking anti-circ so people will point out the contradiction so he creates an excuse to come around to anti-circ in the name of anti-tranny, noticing the similarity.
Then maybe he can acknowledge metzitza and pretend he never knew about it.
He might also say "I meant those promoting female circumcision" but prompting him to make that clarification still enters it into public consciousness.
>>353107>5DNaaaaah. The normies are too fluorided to notice and even if the CIA host Tucker forces the issue, they will dismiss it and focus on the trannies.
>>353107The way I'm hearing this, it sounds more anti-circumcision, if anything. A "circumcision activist" doesn't really imply if they're for or against circumcision, but the statement earlier in the video seems clearly anti-mutilation. So, either he's referring to two different things, or it doesn't seem pro-circumcision to me. So, I'm not really sure why you would say he's pretending to be pro-circ. I just don't see any solid evidence here that he is, as is, unless you assume that the "circumcision activists" are all anti-circumcision.
>>353123>I'm not really sure why you would say he's pretending to be pro-circ.because of his 2017 convo with lady
https://twitter.com/tuckercarlson/status/859942284409942020 [Embed]she brings up comparisons to male circumcision and he minimizes it
[YouTube] Tucker: Genital mutilation not important to US feminists
[Embed] >>353183Good work, anon! I'm hoping your theory is correct.