>What is Really Behind Iran's Unresthttps://www.bitchute.com/video/kSQs6d4mEu6d/It is not about women's rights, but regimen change.
Color revolution.
AKA: Glownigger destabilization.
Notice how it happened almost immediately after Russia mobilized, and the Fed announced that they couldn't fix shit.
Within the same week, the DOD publicly complained that they can't get young men to fight for them.
A federal gun control bill is on the table as well.
For historical reference, federal gun control precedes large scale war.
>>352763This. The whole situation glows brighter than my love of mares and their mare butts.
>>352768Genocide too, actually, if you count the disarming of Native Americans.
>>352772I suppose your right in either case, as the federal government prefers to send young white men of certain political leanings to do the fighting.
>>352798>the federal government prefers to send young white men of certain political leanings to do the fighting.>prefersNot accurate.
It is the dixies who mostly were signing for a paycheck in the army. It is not about preference, but voluntary fresh meat availability. Money in exchange of killing non-Whites overseas.
Negroes and mestizos prefer less risky tasks in the navy and air force.
>>352801It does prefer certain people. Even your shitty dixie example. Why didn't the feds make the niggers fight? Because they preferred white men.
Look at who comprises a majority of the top tier outfits within the US military. Young men of pure European heritage.
You glossed over WW2.
Prior to WW2 is when the US government started the tradition of arms prohibitions before major conflict.
WW2 draft lottery wasn't random either.
Look at this timeline and start filling in where the feds started foreign conflicts.
https://archive.ph/QFRlR