First off, no one has contested that jews engage in child sacrifice. Zero. So, you presenting images of jews engaged in child sacrifice is a 'well duh' 'proof'.
Secondly, Ive already referenced that what is commonly viewed as 'satanic' imagery is derived from previous sources. Which is to say (again) 'well duh', the jews associated a previous tradition with their own activity, which they were engaged in both (utilizing/usurping older traditions AND doing child sacrifice).
This alludes to the intellectual laziness that is prevalent when critically assessing one tradition over another, where one/many assume that 'what has been done by people who prescribe to 'this' philosophy are the same as ALL who have prescribed to this philosophy, throughout history that vastly predates the offending group in question'.>what does the Torah have to do with Judaism
Aside from it being their principle revisionist-history document, from which they purport to have any metaphysical legitimacy? Literally, if one can conclusively observe that the Torah/OT is a modified document (which it literally is, sorry Christians but ur first book is jewish lies) THEN it stands to reason that contemporary Christians who give ANY non-critical weight to it are retarded. And Abrahamic. Sorry, didnt mean to be redundant, there.
Now then>hurr, it's jews rejecting God
Incorrect. The CoS rejects (your) perception of God, and the lies that surround it. Their use of the term Satan is for polarity. Being that Abrahamism is the dominant ideology of the world, they use the term to separate themselves as the antithesis of Abrahamism. They get lots of things wrong in that pursuit, but get credit for pursuing a scient position that is unencumbered by the dictates of a really old book that by the way was in the hands of jews for longer than other historical records can detail.>like Islam
LOL, Islam is far more faithful and devout than (((christianity))), in that they recognize the Jewish subversion of the OT, which is the basis of their exhalting of Mohammad. I disagree with their conclusions, but at LEAST they acknowledge that the OT is a flawed and unreliable "historical record".>those 12 images
Golly, one wo ders if there arent a number of correlatable numerical/systemic traditions that involve 12. Jeepers creepers, maybe theres MORW history tonthis than 'hurr, jews use these symbs, therefore jewish'.