We have a dedicated literature thread you could've asked this in.
>I'm a firm believer in knowing one's enemies
Wouldn't it make more sense to read books written by Marxists then?
>Wouldn't it make more sense to read books written by Marxists then?
Thanks. I'm interested in critical analysis of Marxism not re-regurgitated crap the Marxists write.
>>339980Marxist propaganda doesn't provide a good understanding of Marxism, the results of marxist regimes and critiques of the regimes/liedeology do.
>>339978Read Noam Chomsky. He is the best example of Marxism in the modern world.
>>340096I have to agree with
l'oignon hapa-
negre here. Look at the unadulterated stuff first.
>>340097Do you seriously need someone to tell you what to think?
>>340097Imagine hearing this argument being made by the other side:
>"National Socialist literature doesn't provide a good understanding of Marxism, the results of marxist regimes and critiques of the regimes/liedeology do."How fucking stupid would that sound to you? Some people are capable of making their own critiques without being spoodfed by contemporary writing. Fuck off, you mouthbreathing ingrate.
>>339978Gottfried Feder's Manifesto for Breaking the Financial Slavery to Interest. it Anti-Capitalist as well being a National Socialist book
>>340314he isn't a Marxist though
>>340337he's a Neomarxist, not an actual Orthodox Marxist
>>340359I think you typed that out wrong