/mlpol/ - My Little Politics

Best mare of G5

Yes, she is very pretty but do we really need three threads for G5? Both of the later threads could just simply be posts in the first.
I suppose there's no problem with more threads on mlpol nor funposting but still. It feels uneccessary.

>>321198
Well, there is a lack of both funposting and ponies compared to the shear numbers of politics on the site. Sometime you just need to let go, make a pony thread, and have some fun. Especially in these times.

Have an Izzy.

>>321199
Fair enough. I guess I'm just worried we'll all be posting G5 stuff in the future. The movie wasn't bad but it didn't provide me with much of intresting world or lore either. I'm not super intrested is all.

Thought about it for a while. I've come to some conclusions about myself and all this.

>Mlp=G4 not G5
/mlp/ was found around the G4 not G5. While G5 has some refrences to G4, its clear that this connect is vague at best. G5 is not the future of G4. How do I know this? Well, you only need to consider what an increadible transition that would be require to change from one universe to another. There's no way the authors are gonna put the work in to explain this stuff. That's just there to hook us in.
I'm not complaining about this. Its just how it is.

This means that its questionable if G5 even belong on the board to being with because this isn't the mlp world nor its characters. They have a few similarities but even more so in differences. The biggest thing that they have in common is that they share the same name but otherwise their world is not the same place as G4.

It's due to them sharing the same name that enables it to be posted here and which excludes similar products to G4 from not being posted here.

All I'm saying is that when you think about it, it makes you wonder.

>My intrest lies within G4 and it doesn't matter what quality G5 is

The G4 world is so much more developed and has more characters but really I shouldn't need to explain my own intrest. It's not about whether or not G5 is good or bad, or better or worse. Just because I like The Lord of The Rings doesn't mean I'd like to see irrelevant posting of it here.

>Having said all that, I'm not against posting of G5 here
I feel like its too early to be for a ban or something like that. If there's a lot of post on G5, then I'll probably just avoid them and one can alsways counter post with G4 trheads. Though, one really shoudln't need to since at such an impasse it might be better to split the board up or something. One shoudl probably just post when one feels like it.

And perhaps G5 content can live in harmony with G4 content but I won't accept the idea that I have an irrational fear. I prefer G4 and that's it. Its not fair if we who do feel this way will be push out of our own places in cyberspace in the future.

>>321204
Sorry about that. I'm just a bit worry.

>>321204
Dude, can you save that discussion for the main G5 thread? This thread is just for Izzyposting.
>>321198
The old thread is about G5 discussion. The other one is about a fox news article. This thread is just for posting one mare.

>>321221
D'awwwwwwwww. That is an adorable Izzy.

>>321225
Well, that's a little rude.

a very cute pone
too bad g5's aesthetic sucks

>>321232
just gotta change the aesthetic, anon.

IWTCIIMB

>>326078
kek

>>321204
What you are stating is: Meghan's mostly soycialist furfag sjw cuckery of G4 led to becoming G5's (((aesthetics))) of being super-soycialist ultra-furfag second-generation-neo-sjw cuckery? Wow. What a shocker.

>>321218
It's shit. Keep being a fuckgoy.