I can't post on forchen because of ""rangeban"" so i will post here instead.
I will advise all of you against saving just about any picture off a chan, for pictures can be backtracked to threads/places within a certain lifespan, think of it as a watermark but hidden. The less shared a picture is, the more likely it is to backtrack it to it's source.
Some pictures might be purposely "marked" by an user or group in an attempt to profile certain users of interest (for example, repost a picture you downloaded from a chan in any site that is not a chan and now you have succesfully entered the watchlist of suspects for further analysis)
I'm just throwing this out here, i don't believe there are many users of interest on mlpol nor on chans in general, but if you value your opsec, be very mindful of this fact and try not to repost pictures on non-anon sites, at least do not do so if said pictures are "fresh"
Unrelated khajiit picture cause khajiit cares about this little community.
/mlpol/ - My Little Politics
Archived thread
File (): CA8615CBCF222F9300F8000CBF3B1173-37970.jpg (37.1 KB, 640x669, 1630910850867.jpg)
>>319576
Thanks OP, I'm aware of the database ZOG is running and the private 3rd parties collecting sources and dates to feed such a db.
They collect the pic, hash and name. I'm not aware if they have the manpower to tag them.
It looks like they got upset when anons pass the pics through an graphic editor and the hash changes, making their filters useless.
Thanks OP, I'm aware of the database ZOG is running and the private 3rd parties collecting sources and dates to feed such a db.
They collect the pic, hash and name. I'm not aware if they have the manpower to tag them.
It looks like they got upset when anons pass the pics through an graphic editor and the hash changes, making their filters useless.
>>319580
Just open the image with Paint, for example, and modify a couple of pixels, that's enough to change the hash.
But there's a catch, the jews have invested* in, according to them, artificial intelligence; this is a fancy term to describe algorithms meant to recognize similar images. For example, the algorithms can recognize the same image at different resolutions (sizes), also some are able to read the text and inject it into other algorithm which will trigger an event if some key words or phrases are present. They are getting more sophisticated every year, but they are unable to recognize subtle innuendos like "implying", "irony", or "sarcasm".
*invested= actually the fuckers are taking open source projects and scale them for their needs, also they wrap them with a proprietary GUI and obfuscate the code to charge millions for the software license.
Just open the image with Paint, for example, and modify a couple of pixels, that's enough to change the hash.
But there's a catch, the jews have invested* in, according to them, artificial intelligence; this is a fancy term to describe algorithms meant to recognize similar images. For example, the algorithms can recognize the same image at different resolutions (sizes), also some are able to read the text and inject it into other algorithm which will trigger an event if some key words or phrases are present. They are getting more sophisticated every year, but they are unable to recognize subtle innuendos like "implying", "irony", or "sarcasm".
*invested= actually the fuckers are taking open source projects and scale them for their needs, also they wrap them with a proprietary GUI and obfuscate the code to charge millions for the software license.
>>319580
Changing a bit of the image, reencoding it as jpg insted of png, will be enough to change the hash. But if they use watermarks or something it could probably be a bit more tricky. I would assume saving it as jpg if png and visa versa would destroy the watermark but I am not that familiar with all the techniques used to embed watermarks and how to destroy them.
Also what >>319581 said.
Changing a bit of the image, reencoding it as jpg insted of png, will be enough to change the hash. But if they use watermarks or something it could probably be a bit more tricky. I would assume saving it as jpg if png and visa versa would destroy the watermark but I am not that familiar with all the techniques used to embed watermarks and how to destroy them.
Also what >>319581 said.
>>319581
>Just open the image with Paint, for example, and modify a couple of pixels, that's enough to change the hash.
Also cropping and resizing will do the trick.
>Just open the image with Paint, for example, and modify a couple of pixels, that's enough to change the hash.
Also cropping and resizing will do the trick.
>>319582
>I would assume saving it as jpg if png and visa versa would destroy the watermark
This.
JPG as its core is a compression algorithm, change the compression rate and any hidden watermark will be destroyed.
>I would assume saving it as jpg if png and visa versa would destroy the watermark
This.
JPG as its core is a compression algorithm, change the compression rate and any hidden watermark will be destroyed.
>All these recommendations that deliberately degrade image quality.
>a chan
>reposting anything from here somewhere that has your real name
>thinking you're not already on a list just for viewing the site
>a chan
>reposting anything from here somewhere that has your real name
>thinking you're not already on a list just for viewing the site
>>319740
I'm just saying anon, don't have to go all conspiracy theory on this shit but you should be careful what images you post where because some images can be backtracked to the post where you posted said image and if someone really really really wants to keep track of a certain user or users, this can be exploited.
Of course, not everyone will be "lucky" enough to be a person of interest tho
It is just a good thing to keep in mind, pictures are usually overlooked when talking about OpSec.
I'm just saying anon, don't have to go all conspiracy theory on this shit but you should be careful what images you post where because some images can be backtracked to the post where you posted said image and if someone really really really wants to keep track of a certain user or users, this can be exploited.
Of course, not everyone will be "lucky" enough to be a person of interest tho
It is just a good thing to keep in mind, pictures are usually overlooked when talking about OpSec.
File (): DF64179950EF6D6C0CC89A26EC9144D8-6382486.png (6.1 MB, 3100x2968, 00f4ebf72850cf712990627ad8c6f8c9.png)
>>319581
There are a ton of software out there that finds duplicates, from files to images and I personally use them both just to go over the sheer amounts of Porn on my hard drive. XnView MP even comes with this software built in and is free. Oh and I can use it to organize and tag my Porn too.
Because there is no such thing as too much horse pussy to keep the normies away.
There are a ton of software out there that finds duplicates, from files to images and I personally use them both just to go over the sheer amounts of Porn on my hard drive. XnView MP even comes with this software built in and is free. Oh and I can use it to organize and tag my Porn too.
Because there is no such thing as too much horse pussy to keep the normies away.
I don’t give a fuck if zog knows I browse the internet’s. And you’re a faggot for caring too. Hopefully they do escalate and start arresting people, it’s the best acceleration outcome we can hope for. Could be enough to trigger miga tards to rise up.
every single “durable image hash” software shits the bed hard if you add a noisy border to the image. A few unironic ifunny banners (5-10% of the image size) or whatever and a jpeg reencoding and you’re golden.
13 replies | 3 files | 13 UUIDs | Archived