>>319256Sounds a bit like they are hoping for someone to raid them to get activity to their board, like the soyjack people.
Also
>derpibooru >>319256Why do they always announce their plans in public for everyone to see?
Thanks I guess but who cares?
I don't know, maybe there is a good reason for it, but I just can't help but to think being warned of incomming raids is pointless. Is there something we can do with this info to prepared ourself? Should we worry about this? We have mods.
>>319259I don't think it'll happen, but we'll see
>>319258Liberals are not that smart, as long as admins and mods are on top of it, it's like pissing in an ocean of piss.
>>319256Lol, good fucking luck, and I hope they bring their A game cuz they're gonna need it. Assuming staff is online and monitoring, one guy can shut down an entire raid single-handedly. The best they can hope to accomplish would be to spam threads and take a screencap before all their hard work is undone by the site code. Its astonishingly easy to btfo spam and raids.
I'm honestly honoured that they all agree we're a great target.
>>319256what a bunch of faggots bring it on. doubt it will happen tho
>>319265It'd be interesting if it did, usually whenever these fags raid they always end up breaking their le ebic troll persona and melt down
>>319256Oh good, they're gonna make some horse porn threads for us.
>>319262Kek someone should keep an eye out on lefty. See how asshurt they get after the raid fails.
>>319256Good. This place could use a good shitstorm. It's been a while.
Don't raids only work when the mods/jannies actively don't care about leftypol instrusions?
>>319368Pretty much yeah, especially with the proprietary site code. I wont claim Pupper is flawless, but his coding 4 site is what I would categorize as "exceedingly/exceptionally proper".
>>319256>mlpol is easy to trolllol. All I have to say is that better altchans than these faggots have tried. Anyway, our board is basically raid-proof at this point.
>>319368>>319373The way our board code works is that the last thread in the catalog will get archived when a new thread bumps it off, but if a thread on the catalog is deleted the last archived thread is restored. So basically even if they wipe our catalog all we'd have to do to restore it is just delete their spam.
>>319382It's not like the threads at the bottom of the catalog are super important anyway.
Really, I'm just bored. I'd welcome the chance to start a flame war.
>>319256You know, it would be more fun to have an acutal argument with these guys. Challenge our sources and all. But I know they wont do it. Fucking cowards.
>>319405>it would be more fun to have an acutal argument with these guys.Impossible, they are psychotic when not narcissists. They are unable to engage in a good faith dialogue because their lies and contradictions will come into the open. It has been tried before and always is like to talk to a kike.
>>319407Cant they just link sources or something? Its sad to see we cant seem to have any good conversation anymore. I would like to be challenge in my belief you know. I'm sure I dont know everything and I am not right about everything.
>>319409Try that again, this time with less suckage
>>>/ub/3866 → >>319408all of your sources can probably be dismissed by appeal to nurture. i.e. patriarchy, institutional racism, etc
all of their sources; well they're from jewrnalists and marxist acadimiae with colored glasses, aren't they?
>>319407You may be on to something. The typical smug shitlib tends to act and argue just like a smarmy member of the tribe. It is like they learned their mannerisms and shitty way of being through osmosis by imitating professors and media pundits.
>>319484Low-IQ leftists imitate liberal celebrities and ecelebs while midwit leftists try to create leftist followings of their own for profit and fame.
>>319532I never expected it to. Kind of disappointed, ngl. I would have jumped for an excuse to fire up the old shitposting machine.
>honeypot site raids us
>we raid them back
>oh shit now they have our IPs because we accessed their site without VPNs
would that suck or what?
>>319646>VPNLike that protects you. /s
>>319646They can't really do anything with an IP except try to hack your local network, which unless you have a badly-configured router they shouldn't be able to do.
Anyway, I've actually been lurking their site a bit and have tried to start real arguments about their ideology with them. They're a pretty low-energy bunch and they can't handle the banter at all. They might actually be kind of fun to screw with long-term.
>>319723They are pathetic, dishonesty is their brand. And when the argument makes them look bad, resorting to delete posts is their way.
The place is a lunatic asylum.
>>319724Bet it would piss them off if archiving sites like archive.is were used to archive copies of threads and posts where the jewlovers are BTFO
Can't delete anything once it's on a site like that.
>>319746Why would it piss them off? What makes you think they would care?
>>319760Because they wouldn't be able to censor it and they'd want to but they couldn't therefore they would feel frustrated