Do people really believe that without jewish cronyism china would still be a US threat?
>>295236>without jewish cronyismPoint me to the Jewish communist party members please?
>>295237why point? you are talking about killing indescriminately. It's pretty clear who the high value targets are, and who cheifly benefits by redirecting that wrath towards the golems instead of the master.
>>295239>you are talking about killing indescriminately.Excuse me mister kike, where did you get you law degree? You know that chinks could be argued as CCP, I prefer chinks because I have no respect for them.
>>295237Easy. Communism is a Jewish invention.
>>295245that. no. you should not trust kiked media to tell you what a golem is buddy.
Isn't it funny how the fantasy jewish roboslave "golem" has a name that sounds so similar to "goyim" which is the jew word for nonjews?
>>295236Yes, what you need to understand about the Chinese is their belief in their status as the Middle Kingdom around which the world revolves. They may be under the guise of communism now, or more accurately, state capitalism, but that's just a mask for the inherent Chinese attitude towards the rest of the world. They fully and completely believe they are the master race and every other country is just a future Chinese province waiting to be ruled by them, and given their poor strategic position and reliance on global markets to sustain themselves, getting rid of the Jews won't put them down as a threat. To put it in terms even an American like you can understand, think of the Middle Kingdom Syndrome as the Chinese version of Manifest Destiny, Chinese rulers even have a term for the legitimacy of their government as it relates to that goal, "The Mandate of Heaven". Even a democratic China would be considered an intolerable threat to the west given the size of their labour and consumer markets, even if they played ball and weren't belligerent, the sheer economic weight they could swing around due to the size of their population would effectively mean they'd run the planet in a couple generations.
Yes, they're a god damn threat, Jews or no Jews, and their shitty strategic position has been our saving grace for decades.
>>295254This is the weakest b8 I have ever seen, first of all, if the average person in their government believed in the mandate of heaven then they would disavow china because it doesn't actually possess the jade dragon. Taiwan has it. That's part of why taiwan is always joked about as the real china and the CCP can suck lemons. Second, my point had nothing to do with what china wants to do. what china wants to do is irrelevant, the problem is the fighting fitness and attitudes of our countrymen who are under attack. They wish to open the doors to china because that is where all their money and power is derivied from. If they are removed from play, there is no body propping the door open any longer. At that point america will cease to be a paper tiger and china will not really have a fighting chance.
>>295255You must be a retard, it's precisely because Taiwan has it that they're a threat, regardless of the state of the US or the Jews. The cat's already out of the bag, even if every Jew on Earth vanished immediately, Chinese jingoism would persist, especially within the CCP. Perhaps they're not a credible threat, that's not the point, they have a nuclear arsenal and are insane enough to salt the earth, so to speak, if the world can't be theirs. Mainland chinks are fucking insane and you're a fool to trust they'll stand down if the puppet masters got the bullet one day.
>>295259>chinese jingoism would persistChina is a paper tiger that can only fight the US because we are made into israel paper tiger. The real power in this world is the economic stranglehold of the jewish elites who can crush a nation into a decade long depression if not worse on a whim. The only cat that's out of the bag is that in china its way less easy for the citizens to rise up and tear down all their wealth. China's military is still shit, their populations behavior lacks most moral fiber, they have an entire ocean to cross to get here, and they arguably can't even take a small island for fear of nations over half the world away from it.
>if the world cant be theirs they'll destroy itJews would also do this.
>>295261There are currently Chinese troops on Canadian soil, upwards of 10,000 troops according to some estimates, not enough to invade the US with, but enough to take and hold Canada's docks and airstrips in British Columbia if they really wanted to. Not saying the Jews shouldn't be dealt with, but pretending every other race and/or country that's being coordinated against us by them will suddenly and abruptly become passive is pushing it. The west will always be in competition with them for resources and influence, especially China since they've got it in their heads now that they can make Middle Kingdom a reality, courtesy of Der Juden. Covert action is just the start, the CCP will have to start a war somewhere to galvanise the population against an external enemy within 10 years or face collapse to internal strife. The way I hear it, the cracks are already forming within the party and the PLA, so Xi won't have a choice but to get a win in somewhere, and Taiwan is very close by. They may be doing what the Jews want, but the Chinese want it too.
>>295262Maybe China should be broken up into multiple countries. Or maybe it and Africa should be transformed into exclusively agricultural powerhouses under the white man's control so healthy white natsoc families can afford to have many children?
>>295281Because enslaving Africans and Chinese worked out so well for us the last time.
>>295281>Maybe China should be broken up into multiple countries.Maybe it could be divided between the ROC, Tibet, Uighuristan, and Inner Mongolia (possibly to reunite with Mongolia).
>Or maybe it and Africa should be transformed into exclusively agricultural powerhouses under the white man's control so healthy white natsoc families can afford to have many children?There are some problems I have with this.
>exclusively agriculturalThat would devastate the economies of areas that flourish in the tech and industrial sectors.
>under the white man’s controlThat sounds like you’d want a return to colonialism, the consequences of which we all know and hate. But a less racist alternative would probably be alliances with the new nations and perhaps bans on products produced under unfair labor conditions, such as child labor.
>>295281>>295303And who do you propose will force the CCP to break up China? They're not going to do so willingly, and they've got plenty of nukes. Better yet, what (((international organization)) is going to assert control over them?
How is this idea anything more than a pipe dream? (Read: y'all smokin' too much of something)
>>295262Got proof of that? I've not seen anything else about that claim in a while.
>>295303I've evolved into a super racist. We are positive forces on the world and we use our power for good when we can and when we have it. No other main race can say this about themselves truthfully.
What makes China and shithole shit-streeet India vital to the tech sector? Availability of resources, land, availability of cheap bodies to underpay, or the west giving its prosperity away to these nations since time immemorial? Anything they could do, somewhere big like America could do better under NatSoc.
I'm sick of greedy niggers and backstabbing chinks. I'm sick of collectivist communist jew lies and their neverending wars on us. Mutually Assured Destruction doesn't work with enemies who would threaten to spitefully destroy the world just to deny you your rightful dominance over it. Niggers and chinks and sandniggers can't be trusted with nukes. I don't think racial integration into our countries is possible considering how happy foreigners are to be used against us. Colonialism was an attempt to spread the light of civilization and science and the peaceful teachings of Jesus, to educate idiots who didn't invent shit to save them from lives without plumbing or hygiene or reason.
Colonialism was supposed to be a good thing but it failed. You can teach a gorilla sign language but you can't teach a bugman or chimp to love. We need to look out for ourselves. Who will take care of the world if we don't? We are the good guys. Nobody will reward us for tying our hands behind our backs and pretending there's something noble in being a cuckservative moral victor in love with the "based blacks". If we're on top, we can set hard limits on how evil others can be. We cannot be afraid of our own power any more, or unrealistically dedicated to old ideas that have been disproven. Old liberal ideals about racial equality or the "necessity" of lifting others up at great expense to us are falsehoods. It's a Hate Fact, a scientifically proven fact, that we have the most empathy and highest IQ. If we shouldn't be on top, who should be arbitrarily put on top so it doesn't have to be us? A nigger? A commie chink? A jew? Some alliance of evil between the three led by the jew? An alliance between all of us that will break as soon as they gain the capacity to break it?
Why should we arbitrarily put them in charge of anything or leave them with more than they deserve when they want to rob us and rape us? Maybe the chinks can be reasoned with but only when they don't think they would profit from stabbing us in the back. And with nukes any demon can threaten the samson option to get its way whenever it wants. Deterrence won't scare the evil if we're deterred from using deterrence. I genuinely don't think chinks would ever agree to any well-intentioned limits on child labour or sustainable fishing or anything else unless they had to. And I don't think economic sanctions or harsh words would be enough to make them behave.
>>295317>we are the good guysThat's the exact thinking that the chinese, the jews, et al operate under.
And it's equally laughable and false. Grow up kid.
>>295318If we are not the good guys, who is?
If there are no good guys, why not selfishly attain dominance so the baddies can not?
>>295319If two dogs are fighting, which dog is the 'good' dog?
>>295322Which do you think, the good boy golden retriever that doesn't bite kids or the feral nigger mutt invading the home and biting kids?
Yeah, YouTube has convinced me the tree of liberty needs to be watered with the blood of CCP chinks
https://youtu.be/4VD5Gx_K_fA>>295339You're evading the point, as usual.
Neither is a golden retriever. Both are mutts. They're fighting over a bone.
Who is good?
>>295281China will break itself up in a manner similar to the three kingdoms deal way back when if the CCP can't maintain control, all the "Han" Chinese will realise they're not actually Han. That aside, China has exceedingly poor farmland and can't even sustain its own population through agriculture, let alone anyone else's, which is the entire reason they went all in on food imports and economic takeover of regions in Africa.
As it stands, there are just three places in the world with the capacity to overproduce a wide variety of crops and livestock reliably for exportation, those being South Africa (when it was run by Afrikaaners), Australia and the United States. South Africa is going down as a producer thanks to nigger communalism being given free rein to run wild. Australian agriculture has been damaged by the fires, as has US agriculture on the west coast.
>>295305I haven't seen anything on it recently myself, /pol/ seems to have forgotten about it completely to focus on the election tampering. There have been videos floating around of entire platoons of armed PLA troops on patrol in the Canadian wilderness as far back as 2017, some of which are probably still on Youtube even, if the CCP hasn't demanded their takedown by now, that is. That's far from the 10k troop count estimates, though.
>>295319There are no good guys or bad guys. There's no such thing as an objective moral framework. There are things that are good for us, and things that are bad for us. One man's good is another's bad. What do you think goes through a commie's head when they do what they do? "Today, I will do evil"? No, they truly and honestly believe their goals are the highest good there is, and that what we want is the highest evil. The point is to have your conception of good come out on top over all others.
>>295342China has taken pol, the reason why I post here to begin with unfortunately. Chink Communist Censorship
https://youtu.be/jTTTEHutIeYChina and Xi will do whatever it takes to keep us silenced.