/mlpol/ - My Little Politics


If you want to see the latest posts from all boards in a convenient way please check out /overboard/


Archived thread


fireside.png
Anonymous
## Titan
????
?
No.28291
28301 28391 28435 28450 28458 28467 28490 28842 28944
the explicit promotion of homosexuality should be and is considered shilling
however the right of the people to keep and bear pone shall not be infringed
we had to come up with a compromise to please both sides of this argument without splintering the community
therefore we the staff have come to a decision based on a rule from the former head mod Sapphire:
Spoiler the image if it contains sexual interaction between ponies with the same gender/genitals

in keeping with our rules on transparency we would like the people to vote in a poll and to discuss below what you think
please note: this isn't a democracy, the discussion is more important than the vote so make good solid arguments and try to sway others to your point of view

(edit) we've decided, due to the long arguments in this thread, to not ban or require spoiler for any pony-related porn

http://www.strawpoll.me/12992552
Anonymous
????
?
No.28299
28876
Eh, that seems okay with me, I guess. I don't have a problem with homos, but I feel like a lot of /pol/acks will leave if the first thing they see is gay porn.
Anonymous
????
?
No.28301
28304 28310 28316 28335 28356 28365 28395 28595
>>28291
We should not spoiler gay pornography. First off, a lot of people actually like to post or see it. Second, it's contrary to the spirit of rule three: Ponies allowed. No exceptions. Part of what made /mlp/ less great was that so much was banned from it: all porn, tulpas, milky, and so forth. Part of what made mlpol so great was that there was so much freedom. We lose some of that freedom here if people are forced to spoiler their images or have them spoilered by the moderators.

Spoilering is contrary to rule 10. Another part of the idea behind mlpol is that redditors, newfags shills, and general undesirables are not resistant to horse porn. And you can bet they're certainly scared off by gay horse porn. If we require spoilering of gay porn, we lose an effective part of our porn shield against normies.

Also, honestly, how many Nat Socs that we want on this site are going to tolerate daily mare genitals but are going to hate gay horse porn?
(User is a mod)
Anonymous
????
?
No.28304
>>28301
He makes a good point too though…
Anonymous
????
?
No.28310
>>28301
This.
We can hide threads if we don't want to see horsedicks, and it can be used as repellant.

Only one thread should be allowed on page 1 to not slide other threads though?
Anonymous
????
?
No.28311
gay porn keeps reddit away and you can always hide it
Anonymous
????
?
No.28313
28315
1435875.png
1432899.png
>Spoiler the image if it contains sexual interaction between ponies with the same gender/genitals

Too give an example.

This is fine since the mares are not interacting with each other.
Anonymous
????
?
No.28314
Spoilered
Spoilered
But this has sexual interaction between the same genders.
Anonymous
????
?
No.28315
>>28313
Pls stop. My dick is already sore.
Anonymous
????
?
No.28316
28318 28338
PicsArt_05-18-07.26.11.jpg
PicsArt_05-17-03.19.50.jpg
>>28301
Spoilers until a Rule 10 effect on a thread? Like, if a lez/gay pron thread is posted, spoilers and if it's a 10-D no spoilers so others know to hit it as well?
Anonymous
## Titan
????
?
No.28318
28325
>>28316
the general consensus is that all images that are legal are to be unspoilered and allowed in rule 10 threads
Anonymous
????
?
No.28325
PicsArt_05-18-11.42.27.jpg
PicsArt_05-18-09.33.40.jpg
>>28318
Much true. Just my input on the gaypone. I can easily ignore it anyway.
I need to find a better Img 2.
>Pony. Defense. Force.
Anonymous
????
?
No.28335
28876
convert.jpg
>>28301
Just popped in here to remind everyone that our vice president has a special class for faggots
Anonymous
????
?
No.28338
>>28316
nice twi edit
Anonymous
????
?
No.28339
28876
1438962.png
1438771.jpeg
1280017.jpeg
1434392.jpeg
No spoiler needed.
Anonymous
????
?
No.28341
Spoilered
Spoilered
Spoilered
Spoilered
Spoiler needed.
Anonymous
????
?
No.28342
28343
I like all of pony porn because how aesthic it is. I wouldn't mind spoilers but is this really necesarry? I have yet to see any sizeable group to complain about this…
Anonymous
????
?
No.28343
PicsArt_05-18-07.40.38.png
>>28342
It's good to get this solved now. Early foundations and all. I threw my 2 bits in but whatever is decided aok with it
Anonymous
????
?
No.28352
28354 28409
This kind of brings up the question: What is considered gay? I know this is a grey area for you horse fuckers
Anonymous
????
?
No.28353
28355
>cookie dublicate checking
this is just asking to get spammed
Anonymous
????
?
No.28354
RD shrug.jpg
>>28352
>Spoiler the image if it contains sexual interaction between ponies with the same gender/genitals
Anonymous
????
?
No.28355
28357
>>28353
>cookie duplicate checking

where?
Anonymous
????
?
No.28356
28359
>>28301
Totally agree with you on those points. I personally don't like gay pony porn (heck, I don't really like pony porn in general)but it is one part of our shill shield that protects is from the normies.

I like this board because it allows me to enjoy talking about real politics and issues with people that will not just see my post and then proceed to shitpost and call me a fag. It also gives me the ability to talk about politics with cutie, aesthetically pleasing ponies, adding a unique flavor I can get no where else.

As someone that was on 4/mlpol/ on April 1st, I know that The right to keep and bear pony porn was what allowed for a shill free state. The idea that we should restrict types of pony porn is honestly silly to me. If we are lewding colorful ponies from a show that was originally made for kids, We might as well have gay, filly or any type of kink .

TL;DR, For real discussion and /mlpol/, It is our holy duty to guard against the normie hoards (by any means necessary).
Anonymous
????
?
No.28357
28358
>>28355
Oh right, I see it now. I didn't know this was thing. Is Ip duplication checking better?
Anonymous
????
?
No.28358
28360
>>28357
yes but that still means i can vote 24 times
Anonymous
????
?
No.28359
>>28356
This reminds me that thread we had in the past concerning pedo posting. Thread also partly touched the topic of filly porn. Anyone remember what conseus did we reach on that?
Anonymous
????
?
No.28360
28361 28364
>>28358
If there just could be some way to prevent abusing VPNs to rig votes…
Anonymous
????
?
No.28361
28362
>>28360
lol i just reset my router i have dynamic ip like most people
you could limit it to one vote per range ban tor users and use canvas fingerprinting and cookies
t. knower
Anonymous
????
?
No.28362
28363
>>28361
Canvas fingerprinting sounds like an wonderful idea. Know any polling site that does this?
Anonymous
????
?
No.28363
>>28362
no you can probably make your own tho
none of these methods are infallable
Anonymous
????
?
No.28364
>>28360
>being rigged in favor of gaypones
Anonymous
????
?
No.28365
28366 28395 28430 28439
>>28301

This. Spoilering should be a courtesy, not a rule.
Anonymous
????
?
No.28366
28395 28595 28876
>>28365
>Spoilering should be a courtesy, not a rule.
Seconding this.
Anonymous
????
?
No.28371
28372 28395 28399 28595
th.jpg
wew.gif
1387653__safe_artist-colon….png
large.png
I have no problem with gay shit. Its also the most effective weapon besides diaper.
Like nigger just dont look at it, are you afraid you're gonna start fapping to it or something?
If you cant look at gay stuff then how do you stomach gore or any other garbage from the chans?
Anonymous
????
?
No.28372
28545
>>28371
>If you cant look at gay stuff then how do you stomach gore or any other garbage from the chans?

So much this. If we are to make more ebin raids on something more formidable then /qajp/ crybabies, we will eventually gonna encounter gore and other stuff.
Anonymous
????
?
No.28391
>>28291
>gay porn
>homosexuality

I am squinting my eyes in how dumb are the ones that I am speaking to. But so far the argument seems to have me more inclined to think that you believe any depiction of males to be homosexual while females aren't. Gay = homosexual, gay is no an inference to meaning exclusively to male or female. Though the meaning of words change, gay used to mean overly cheerful and happy. Now it is homosexual and male homosexuality. While lesbian moved to female homosexuality.

Either way homosexuality is any depiction of a couple in which they are the same sex. Male, Male or Female, Female. If you cut your own dick off and think you are female,you are still a male. Dressing in drag as a male, you are a male. Period.

My little Pony is a television show originally created for little girls and as such was marketed towards little girls. The directors behind the show tried to make it more relatable towards them and is why the majority of the characters are female and not male.

But due to how the direction of the show went with the writing and characterations, it caught on with older audiences, not just little girls. Then a fandom was formed in following the show, then it became corrupted by the perverted minds of the fandom. Hence pornography was created.

But since the show prioritize females, the majority of pornography is as such, females. Given that we one, are talking about a cartoon and two, talking about an animal; it must be given that a definition of pornography must be made. After all if given that all is fantasy, no true acts were ever committed. Given that they are animals, is it porn or a realistic depiction of an animal. Animals don't have the need for clothes and have no shame in the display of their own parts. There are thousands of pet owners around the world which their animal genitia are in plain sight of the public ever day.

So then what is pornography other than a graphic (picture, drawing, painting or other wise) which shows an act of sex, designed to entice and arouse the viewer?

Now take that in to account and many depictions here can be classified as such especially with two mares (a female horse) because the show depicts mostly females in sexual acts. They aren't always depicted as naturally or just a "drawn into a realistic fashion" as some artists may argue.

With two Stallions, how is it any different? Either they are two horses in a pasture or they are engaging in a sexual act.
Anonymous
????
?
No.28392
28397

I also hear the argument. That depictions of females are ok but not males. Given if it were two males, two females or a male and a female or perhaps them alone. This is also ridiculous because the argument also further the note that the viewer is a male, and so it is gay only if you allow for male porn. Well when you are online, and especially here you are also anonymous. Your sex isn't known to the world, so how are you to know who else will browse the same place? Be it a male or female, if it were a female browsing she might thing all the mares is homosexual and gay in her own opinion because she is a female looking at females. How do you counter that?

If you disallow all depictions of male porn, you are silencing any females on this board and promoting all male users. If you disallow all depictions of female you are silencing the males and promoting an all female user board.

So if homosexuality is the problem the only way is to allow depictions that show a straight view. One male or One female, or them alone in pornographic manners. As in acts of sex as defined above.

Although isn't it really ridiculous that we are arguing about cartoon horses? For one it just a cartoon fantasy and for second they are animals and not humans.

In the end when we look back at it, we will be as silly as those who think making a dog wear a sweeter is a good idea.
Anonymous
????
?
No.28395
28396 28398 28430
Spoilered
>>28365
>>28366
Thirding this.

>>28371
T H I S

>>28301
T H I S T H I S T H I S

THE RIGHT TO ALL PONY PORN AND A SHILL-FREE STATE SHALL NOT BE ABRIDGED
Anonymous
????
?
No.28396
>>28395
>ABRIDGED
You had one job…
Anonymous
????
?
No.28397
28402
>>28392
Christ, such elaborate message for such simple matter…

I am just gonna say that I hate when people who like one kind of homosexual couple but hate the other kind. Like fapping to lesbian porn but hating on male gay porn.
Anonymous
????
?
No.28398
28400 28401 28406
3ff3ccb24c326d261f5d5f01cc….jpg
>>28395
Hoof holding is so hot :3_
Anonymous
????
?
No.28399
28405
>>28371
The last picture you posted is considered to be gay, it is two lesbians. Thus homosexual and gay. Read my argument. Why is this acceptable to show females and not male? Why is it treated as a lesser offense of the same crime?
Anonymous
????
?
No.28400
28876
>>28398
Holy fuck, dude! Spoiler that crap!
Anonymous
????
?
No.28401
stock-photo-holding-hoof-o….jpg
>>28398
Anonymous
????
?
No.28402
>>28397
That was one of the points I was trying to elaborate on.
Anonymous
????
?
No.28405
>>28399
I know that nigger I just dont have any male on male Maud.
Anonymous
????
?
No.28406
how mlp hooves work.jpeg
>>28398
I guess we just like to discuss things. I am gonna make new thread tomorrow so until then I am just replying.

Have in infographic. With this knowledge, we can finally make real AI ponies!
Anonymous
????
?
No.28409
28411 28412
1493562977282.png
>>28352
Male x male = 100% gay, 0% les
Male x passing tranny = 75% gay, 25% les
Passing tranny x passing tranny = 50% gay, 50% les
Male x female = 50% gay, 50% les
Passing tranny x female = 25% gay, 75% les
Female x female = 0% gay, 100% les
Anonymous
????
?
No.28410
Not a homosex but i dont care if its unspoileres. Its not like we're naturally inclined to turn it into a porn site.
Anonymous
????
?
No.28411
>>28409
This makes sense
Anonymous
????
?
No.28412
>>28409
>Male x female = 50% gay, 50% les
Wew, lad.
????
?
No.28430
28434
my_little_ninja_by_ninja_p….jpg
>>28395
This one touched on all my fav posts so far. Other than that, the only discussion points I have pertains to newcomers and opponents. I comprehend the mentality behind prohibiting 'the gay', but I caution against being too welcoming to newer participants. I am of the mind that 'no exceptions' implies a complete non-negotiability in the interest of ALL horsefuckers, not necessarily 'just' the majority (or winning, haven't voted yet).
Having said, I ALSO point out that ponies are NOT exclusively 'self/board defense tools', that there is more use and demand than attacking shills.
Tl;dr >>28365 Fourthed (fifthed?)
Oh yeah, and any prohibitions we apply are certain to be sploited by outside faggots. Keep THAT in mind
Anonymous
????
?
No.28434
zigger.png
>>28430
>I ALSO point out that ponies are NOT exclusively 'self/board defense tools', that there is more use and demand than attacking shills.

I agree. Another reason I don't want gay porn banned is that I'm a degenerate zigger.
Anonymous
????
?
No.28435
28437 28439
>>28291
>Ban all assault porn.

This is the argument.

First there was a ban on automatics in the 1930's
Then outlawed to open carry
Then there are no concealed zones
They limited out magazines. Increased taxes and the list goes on.

Pornography (no matter how degenerate one will view it) has been a law made by the boards constitution to not be infringed in the same manner as use of a gun in our US Constitution. It is like a building with 5 support columns. You might think that they only need 4, but rest assured, you take any part of the columns out, the whole structure will come tumbling down.
Anonymous
????
?
No.28437
28438 28439
1491741315141.jpg
>>28435
This.

Restricting our weaponry is restricting our militia's capacity to rain terror on our enemies when they invade. Gay and fetish porn is like anti-normie artillery. Ban artillery and we have no way of taking out normie and shill tanks and other enemy vehicles. We must secure the battlefield and our homeland and the only way we can do that is if all of our anti-normie anti-shill weaponry is permitted for ownership, self-defense, funposting, and public demonstration. Do not let us become just another /mlp/.

The less rules, the better, even when it comes to ponography.
Anonymous
????
?
No.28438
>>28437
Amendment II.
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of
a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms,
shall not be infringed.
Anonymous
????
?
No.28439
28443
aryanne pic 1.jpg
>>28435
>>28365
>>28437

Keep /MLPOL/ great! Don't ban ponies!
Anonymous
????
?
No.28441
mrhands.png
So would you a Mr. Hands?
Anonymous
????
?
No.28443
28876
1491100257515.png
>>28439
S H A D I L A Y
Anonymous
????
?
No.28450
28454
1455131709047.png
>>28291
>the explicit promotion of homosexuality should be and is considered shilling
And yet, I fail to see how posting gay pony porn constitutes as shilling. There's a very wide gap between porn and someone coming here to say "Gay is good, wear rainbows, anything remotely against LGBT culture is homophobic and should be criminalized".

I really think this rule needs to have a second thought put into it. Part of the reason people liked /mlpol/ was because only those with a thick skin and with any sense of mental filter didn't give a shit that pony porn was being posted, only redditors, shills, and other assorted scum being flushed out.
Anonymous
????
?
No.28454
1491207971761.jpg
>>28450
This this this this this this this this this pelase don't ban my entire porn folder its just funposting not shilling
Anonymous
????
?
No.28458
28466 28472
1493701045487.png
>>28291
I feel like this is a bad idea. Does anybody even really care about the horsecock? Is there even an issue here? You have to be careful not to create one where there isn't, or you are just asking for trouble.

You're giving those who post gay horses a reason to get indignant and pissy, but more importantly, you are giving the people who don't sanction to make a big deal out of it. We post horse porn here. That's the way it is. That is how it's been and how it always shall be. Don't like it? No one cares, go home. But if we put laws into place on it, all of a sudden there is an official structure in place to MAKE it an issue.

This will only end badly. It will factionalism us, create controversy where there is none, and, as we all know here, the slippery slope is fucking real. I mean, if nothing else, do you mods really want to deal with the headache?
Anonymous
????
?
No.28466
1491258834887.png
>>28458
>We post horse porn here. That's the way it is. That is how it's been and how it always shall be. Don't like it? No one cares, go home.
This makes for a tasty banner Imo.
Anonymous
????
?
No.28467
28468
>>28291
Not even two months in and this board is already falling apart. Congrats.

I am against homosexuality, but I also feel that what ever you do in your privacy in your own home, is your business and yours alone. Pushing it onto other is not ever justified.

Proposed Amendment to the Condition.
Pornography, depicting that of cartoon horses, to which posted here, that might be in public view, shall remain with out agenda. To limit any form or variation thereof here by or other wise shall not be infringed.
Anonymous
????
?
No.28468
28472 28474
1494809096502.gif
>>28467
I fail to see how having a discussion about a topic constitutes 'falling apart', but then I'm not a faggot
Anonymous
????
?
No.28471
Screenshot_14.png
>gay porn
>shilling
That sounds like some complex particle physics right there. Pic related.

Porn is just porn—no exceptions.
Anonymous
????
?
No.28472
28480
73d9b0a953b44af045e25b4f33….png
>>28468
Don't get butthurt, that's how shitposting starts.

S H A L L
H
A
L
L

I won't bother to argue the merit of unspoilered gay porn or the spirit of this place or anything, I'll just point you to >>28458 so you know where I stand. But damn dude, don't sperg. Have some zigger pussy, maybe it will help you calm down.
Anonymous
????
?
No.28474
>>28468
As I mentioned prior. If a structure requires 5 supports, and you take out one, eventually the whole thing will collapse.

When MLPOL was formed on April 1st, the porn (even though I am indiffrent) was an effective weapon against the far leaning left who flooded the board with their shills and shit posts.

Just like guns, the constitution says that it is "necessary" for the continuation of a free state.

The porn, no matter of opinion, are our guns. Hindering any bit or part will result in taking out a support column. And thus the whole thing comes toppling down.

I am not for homosexuality, I strongly oppose it. But will not infringe on the right of others, which is nothing more than cartoon horses, and no people nor real. That of course is circumstantial and opinion. But as I stated as long as there is no agenda or intent to push one, then the right to it shall remain un infringed. Yes I oppose homosexuality but I will not infringe the right which we all agreed upon when the board was founded.
Anonymous
????
?
No.28479
Shilling is against rule 4
Horsedick is required by rule 10

How is this a hard concept
Anonymous
????
?
No.28480
28489
mlfw1316_medium.png
>>28472
Easy now, put some cream on those hemroids. My point is that if anons can calmly and clearly have a discussion about a topic which (just checked) there is a simple majority in favor of, while still hearing all sides and perspectives, it seems sensational to say "falling apart" (don't act like 'congrats' was anything but cheek).
Anonymous
????
?
No.28483
28487 28488 28489
I feel the need to point out that if this rule does get passed, the endless tides of Reddit, newfags, and other shills will abuse this to hell and back. They could spam off-topic threads with ease, and they could very well drown the catalog with them. That was a prime reason why 4chan fell. They imposed such strict rules and regulations on stuff you were allowed to post, that when the time came to defend themselves from the degenerate hordes they had nothing, causing them to become completely subverted by them and end up as a walking caricature of what they once where. Fracturing us like this would be a very good way to cause the complete destruction of everything this board has stood for, as shills and normies poison and defecate upon every thread and topic. We would essentially end up as 4/pol/ and all the other boards on 4chan for all intents and purposes. So please for the love of God, don't do this.
Anonymous
????
?
No.28487
28488
>>28483
T H I S
Anonymous
????
?
No.28488
28876
>>28487
>>28483
The less rules, the more resources the governing body has to enforce the ones that it already has. Therefore, if we do get raided, less banning would go behind gay porn and more behind dealing with the actual problem at hoof.
Anonymous
????
?
No.28489
>>28480
>>28483
>tfw the poster below you should of posted with the picture above you.
Anonymous
????
?
No.28490
>>28291
The majority seems to all be in favor of standing by the original ruling that the right to the porn shall not be infringed.

We have been at this for 9 hours now. Can we finally call a recess to this matter?
Anonymous
????
?
No.28497
My rule is don't make new rules unless there is actually a problem. If gay horse porn becomes a problem in the future, sure, make a rule. But come on, it hasn't been an issue yet, so don't changes anything.
Anonymous
????
?
No.28506
33905
250px-Gadsden_flag.svg.png

Anonymous
????
?
No.28520
28527 28534
We should purge the faggots completely. I've seen them post freely before and it always ends up repelling heterosexuals which will definitely keep our numbers negligibly low. They deserve banning.
Anonymous
????
?
No.28527
28536
18268195_331421730607130_4….jpg
>>28520 If they can't even handle one gay pic then they're a liability, not an advantage. Where will they go when we get raided? Redditfags and shills would just have to flood gay porn to eradicate all activity.
Anonymous
????
?
No.28534
Homosexual vs Faggot.jpg
>>28520
>faggots.
Anonymous
????
?
No.28536
28537 28538
>>28527
So then allowing it wouldn't prevent anybody from posting it, then anybody could just flood the place with gay porn as legitimized by the rules permitting it. Redditfags and shills would just have to flood gay porn to eradicate all activity.

Therefore, ban all faggots and faggot posts.
Anonymous
????
?
No.28537
>>28536
Or delete the spam like we have done countless times before. When they flooded the site with /pol/ threads we didn't ban /pol/.
Anonymous
????
?
No.28538
28560
>>28536
Just ban them if they flood the first page Anon. No need to make a rule.
Anonymous
????
?
No.28541
28542 28544
Thier basic ideals are cancer and will have a slow acting nevegtive effect on the board over time. We would be better off without them.
Anonymous
????
?
No.28542
>>28541
That's the price of freedom.
Freedom isn't free.
Anonymous
????
?
No.28544
>>28541
If you want a board which prevents everything but what you like then I suggest twitter or facebook. I think unless the gay shit becomes a problem then it is pointless to ban it.
Anonymous
????
?
No.28545
28546
Spoilered
>>28372
>we will eventually gonna encounter gore and other stuff.
What about horse related gore?

Anyway, i think that a no-gay-porn rule would be too hard to implement, especially with mlp gay porn.
The grey area is just too big. Too many pics would be questionable. Like: female fucks male with strap-on.

I am against the rule, not because of "Muh, freedom", but because of the inevitable drama it would cause.
As long as the whole site doesn't get flooded with gay porn… why not?
Anonymous
????
?
No.28546
>>28545
Oh, sorry, i didn't spoiler it!
(no worries - we got ur back fam)
Anonymous
????
?
No.28560
>>28538
I don't think homosexual cartoon horse porn is going to be a problem. As I tried to draw the point very much, there are those who are reserved and those with an agenda. If you are promoting homosexuality as trying to push it onto others, then that should be a ban. Simple horse porn, no. Discussing it, no. Trying to slide other threads, yes. Trying to freak out, disrupt, troll or otherwise, yes.

Here I thought everyone came from 4chan. There are more things there more disturbing than a cartoon horse. Seriously.

You don't have to homosexuality, or approve of it. As long as it is cartoon horse porn, I say keep it as a weapon, don't infinge on what is. If the board decides to do so, there is definitely going to be problems.
Anonymous
????
?
No.28595
28597
Since there seems to be a weekly "should this kind of pony be banned?", I'd like to nominate furry ponies for next week. You know, the ponies with fluffy chest and ears and genitals. Fucking furries. Rather than keeping the normies out, I bet the stuff just brings in the furries. Counterproductive. As far as I know MLP never draws furry ponies, so it's not pony, it's just furry.

As to homosexual horse porn, don't ban it. Consider the case of murder, something no one wants in their society, yet the very similar acts of self-defence, death sentences, and war all can have their place, however much murder is despised.
Homosexual pony porn may be degenerate, but this whole website is built upon rule 3.

>>28301
>going to tolerate daily mare genitals but are going to hate gay horse porn?
mods r gods

>>28366
Don't spoiler it in threads that have the attention of shills
Don't spoiler it in gay porn threads
If you want to post it in any other thread, I guess you could spoiler it as a courtesy?

>>28371
hear hear. Getting triggered regularly is part of growing up, lest you become a SJW. I click on the gay porn around this site occasionally and IDK about y'all but I generally remain composed enough to close the image again. Not very difficult.

Atlas, really, where did this come from, look at the arguments in this thread. No one wants pony banned.
Anonymous
????
?
No.28597
28599
1482466002321.jpg
>>28595
>Atlas, really, where did this come from
This is what gets me the most about this whole thing. It seems to have come only as a decision from the staff alone, not from the users actually requesting it. At least, certainly not a majority of them if this thread is anything to go by.
Anonymous
????
?
No.28599
28876
RD playing with ball.gif
>>28597
Mods are probs just bored.
Anonymous
????
?
No.28629
28630
This is my last victim.png
>>28607
It sounds like this site won't last for very long.
Well, /mlpol/ was a good run.
Anonymous
????
?
No.28630
28631
>>28629
What do you mean?
Anonymous
????
?
No.28631
28637 28638 28644
inb4 baleeted.png
>>28630
Anonymous
????
?
No.28637
28645
tmp_30710-1265937199633936….png
>>28631
Yea, I saw that. Didn't really have anything terribly useful to say, but since we're making a big deal of it now I guess I'll just go ahead and say it: Hard to have happening threads when there are only like 3 active users at any one time. That's why this place is more conducive to just pony posting. I don't think it's all lost though, I mean this thread got a lot of action. The topic may have been pony related, but the discussion was genuine and it definately demonstrates this boards capacity to be "political".

>>28632

I guess just the apparent conflict of vision between mods and general lack of direction? I would try not to get too blackpilled though.
Anonymous
????
?
No.28638
28645
1494805291354.jpg
>>28631
Well we could make a button to flag the gay horses as gay horses
So, we just need a button to hide gay horses behind a spoiler that says "gay horse" or something.
That would kill the whole purpose of the gay horses, but thats what the userbase wants?
I mean, there used to be that saying about /pol/fags tolerating pony porn. Then again, there was a saying about horsefuckers tolerating people..

About the mod shit, well, I'm no admin, but I would just ban any mod I don't like.
Ive seen a whole forum falling because of one problem mod that created a little group of people that went against the admin, that little group became a large group and suddenly that large group left, most of those people where donors.
Seeing that the place couldn't stand itself without the donors, the admin left and some crap-head user was given administration, in under one week the forum was shit and irrecuperable.

And yes, there's little pol discussion. Mainly because we are few, the reason for this is mainly because we are too suspicious to just let any one in.
If we open the floodgates, suddenly there will be lots of people and discussion, yet, the quality of such discussion and the board culture may be lost.
Its not easy to start a chan successfully and it's even harder to make it time-proof; At this rate, we will survive, yet if you want more discussion and action in general, maybe we have to bring in some more users someway.
Anonymous
????
?
No.28644
1353191.gif
>>28631
>the old head mod is gone

Sapph? but why…
Anonymous
????
?
No.28645
28646 28918
>>28638
>>28637
Its bit strange how we got over 1000 unique ID's yet the board activity doesn't seem to rise that much…

Anyways, I wouldn't worry about dissent so much. We got strawpoll and mods can also decide amongs themselves according to which option most mods agree with.

Personally I don't think its about whether pony you post does gay things or not. Its not about porn that much either. Pones are generaly kind of distracting like any other offtopic posts on 4/pol/.
Anonymous
????
?
No.28646
>>28645
That being said, its good to use IP duplication checking always when doing pols. If we could also use canvas fingerprinting, that would be really strong.
Anonymous
????
?
No.28665
28876
Keep it without spoilers, It keeps out the shills and ledditors
Anonymous
????
?
No.28842
28850 28853
medium.jpg
>>28291
Hi. Someone from the discord told me to come here and get some digits. Please don't bully or ban.
Anonymous
????
?
No.28850
28876
>>28842
Where do you come from ?
Anonymous
????
?
No.28853
28868
>>28842
Willkommen, but it probably would've been better to post that in one of the get threads, instead of reviving this old "should this kind of porn be b&" thread.
Just so you know, sage goes in the email field.
Anonymous
????
?
No.28868
28876
>>28853
Everyone knows sage goes in all fields!
Sage
Anonymous
????
?
No.28876
28880
1491088854469.png
>>28868 >>28853 >>28850 >>28842 >>28665 >>28644 >>28599 >>28544 >>28488 >>28466 >>28443 >>28441 >>28400 >>28399 >>28366 >>28355 >>28339 >>28338 >>28335 >>28311 >>28299

Wew lads.
Anonymous
????
?
No.28880
28903 28907
>>28876
It's pretty much resolved already. Post whatever you want.
Anonymous
????
?
No.28903
1491088867524.png
>>28880
WEW CHECKD LAD

hurrah btw
Anonymous
????
?
No.28907
>>28880
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-YU0qK1MZyU
Anonymous
????
?
No.28918
28921
1491282300820.png
>>28645
The problem is that there isn't anything to do. we need our own HWNDU to attract posters to the site. maybe restart the RWSS?
Anonymous
????
?
No.28921
40k Fireaxe.jpg
cute fireaxe.png
rwss fire engine.png
Gas-mask  fireaxe.png
>>28918
>maybe restart the RWSS?
I tried that, but it was low-traffic due to Easter..
If we could get any competent Anons here to initiate the hunt (find some /diy/ places to look at), that'd be great. One we get cuckshed shut down, site traffic should explode.
Anonymous
????
?
No.28936
28938
check my 2
Anonymous
????
?
No.28938
1492017621877-1.png
>>28936
Checkd
Anonymous
????
?
No.28940
28956
rd human shrug.png
Wew its about time. So sick of the faggot mods spoilering my filly porn. A great day for justice and the Horse Reich indeed.
Anonymous
????
?
No.28944
28952
>>28291
What about human-related porn?
Anonymous
????
?
No.28952
28953
>>28944
If you're gonna post gay porn here, it had better be pony-related.
Anonymous
????
?
No.28953
28971
Spoilered
Spoilered
>>28952
Alright.
Anonymous
????
?
No.28956
28959
1406830467Kid vid.jpg
>>28940
Every time I see this picture, I am reminded of the 90's Burger King Kids Club character Kid Vid.
Anonymous
????
?
No.28959
>>28956
pretty hip tbh fam
Anonymous
????
?
No.28971
30255
Spoilered
Spoilered
Spoilered
Spoilered
Spoilered
>>28953
Hey, that's pretty good but here's some shit to expand your infantry just in case!

This is really just a funpost.
Anonymous
????
?
No.29057
29065 30679
Thread theme https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h2dJ-JUzhVs
Anonymous
????
?
No.29065
1494316012242.png
>>29057
lmfao anon
pretty accurate
Anonymous
????
?
No.30255
30358
>>28971
please stop posting
Anonymous
????
?
No.30358
>>30255
Sure, friendo.
Anonymous
????
?
No.30614
30677
I believe the ideal aryan society is full of white gay men and women are used only for breeding
Anonymous
????
?
No.30677
>>30614
Lol me too
Anonymous
????
?
No.30679
>>29057
Wew
Anonymous
????
?
No.33905
33907
1494466114527.png
>>28506
Anonymous
????
?
No.33907
33917
>>33905
We have a gatson flag thread. Don't necro-bump "should x be b&" threads like this.
Delet this ( to un-bump) and go post this in the gatson thread.
Anonymous
????
?
No.33917
33944
>>33907
>11 days old
>necrobumping
choose one
Anonymous
????
?
No.33944
33975
>>33917
Alright, I just thought it might be a bit cancerous to restart this discussion..
I overreacted.
Anonymous
????
?
No.33975
>>33944
Dubs, nice.
;