To spur some fun thoughts, understand how we got here and perhaps imagine a brighter world, let's have a chain prompt. Answer the "what-if" question above your post and leave one of your own. The question should be about the effects of one specific detail about the world or history being different. I'll start:
What if, instead of liberals and Jews building the "Big Tech" internet companies, some of /ourguys/ were gifted with foresight and became wildly successful instead?
/mlpol/ - My Little Politics
Archived thread
File (): D0A8A30955A19CD894B6CAA97F31FC1A-230694.jpg (225.3 KB, 768x1152, TomorrowlandPost.jpeg)
>>272656
>What if, instead of liberals and Jews building the "Big Tech" internet companies, some of /ourguys/ were gifted with foresight and became wildly successful instead?
Refer to the Neo-Babylonian Empire.
>What if, instead of liberals and Jews building the "Big Tech" internet companies, some of /ourguys/ were gifted with foresight and became wildly successful instead?
Refer to the Neo-Babylonian Empire.
>>272656
>What if, instead of liberals and Jews building the "Big Tech" internet companies, some of /ourguys/ were gifted with foresight and became wildly successful instead?
Infiltration and subversion which /ourguys/ would very likely cave to since we're meritocratic and don't do purity testing. Unlike lefties, who are nepotistic as fuck and purity test out the ass.
>What if the allied troops at Dunkirk had been subjected to an encirclement and taken prisoner instead of being allowed to flee across the channel?
>What if, instead of liberals and Jews building the "Big Tech" internet companies, some of /ourguys/ were gifted with foresight and became wildly successful instead?
Infiltration and subversion which /ourguys/ would very likely cave to since we're meritocratic and don't do purity testing. Unlike lefties, who are nepotistic as fuck and purity test out the ass.
>What if the allied troops at Dunkirk had been subjected to an encirclement and taken prisoner instead of being allowed to flee across the channel?
>>272656
>What if, instead of liberals and Jews building the "Big Tech" internet companies, some of /ourguys/ were gifted with foresight and became wildly successful instead?
Not possible because these "Big Tech" have unlimited flow of cash through (((investors))) aka (((hedge founds))) aka (((stock market))) aka government using their services.
It's all a closed circle of Jews and golems taking over and sinking the competition to consolidate monopolies.
I wouldn't be surprised if most, if not all, of those companies' shares are being possessed by Rothschild's fronts. I remember that I read an article describing how in the 20s 30s and 40s, most of the railroads, oil companies and food grain stocks already were in the hands of Rockefeller and half a dozen kike bankers in Wall Street, imagine what it is today.
>What if, instead of liberals and Jews building the "Big Tech" internet companies, some of /ourguys/ were gifted with foresight and became wildly successful instead?
Not possible because these "Big Tech" have unlimited flow of cash through (((investors))) aka (((hedge founds))) aka (((stock market))) aka government using their services.
It's all a closed circle of Jews and golems taking over and sinking the competition to consolidate monopolies.
I wouldn't be surprised if most, if not all, of those companies' shares are being possessed by Rothschild's fronts. I remember that I read an article describing how in the 20s 30s and 40s, most of the railroads, oil companies and food grain stocks already were in the hands of Rockefeller and half a dozen kike bankers in Wall Street, imagine what it is today.
>>272660
>What if the allied troops at Dunkirk had been subjected to an encirclement and taken prisoner instead of being allowed to flee across the channel?
I'm not the most knowledgeable on this, but the way I understand it, things wouldn't have changed much in terms of stopping the war from going further. If anything, it probably would've made the English and other allied troops push harder for german blood to be spilt, maybe even enough to make up for the troop defecit they would then be suffering. On the other side, the Nazis would've likely had to execute these other prisoners of war to avoid any kind of internal sabotage from disgruntled soldiers and the extra wear on their resources that containing all of them would cost. Tl;dr: Not much would've changed, there were too many other factors at play. Sure, it might've been an allied setback, but there were other reasons that Germany ultimately lost that had more to do with resource management, something that keeping prisoners tends to strain.
>What if the allied troops at Dunkirk had been subjected to an encirclement and taken prisoner instead of being allowed to flee across the channel?
I'm not the most knowledgeable on this, but the way I understand it, things wouldn't have changed much in terms of stopping the war from going further. If anything, it probably would've made the English and other allied troops push harder for german blood to be spilt, maybe even enough to make up for the troop defecit they would then be suffering. On the other side, the Nazis would've likely had to execute these other prisoners of war to avoid any kind of internal sabotage from disgruntled soldiers and the extra wear on their resources that containing all of them would cost. Tl;dr: Not much would've changed, there were too many other factors at play. Sure, it might've been an allied setback, but there were other reasons that Germany ultimately lost that had more to do with resource management, something that keeping prisoners tends to strain.
5 replies | 1 files | 5 UUIDs | Archived