/mlpol/ - My Little Politics

>>270409
IT may be James Woods from this post
>>270197 →
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8373657/Shocking-moment-Dallas-rioters-hurl-ROCKS-store-owner-tried-defend-shop-sword.html

I think if we want to redpill people on DB, now is the time. People were calling the so-called protesters "rabid animals" last night. A commie who posted a picture in favor of the riots deleted it after enormous backlash.

I didn't realize this but the zigger is the one who posted the picture in question. What a comeuppance. https://twitter.com/woot_master/status/1266928619386896391

>>270414
What is DB?

>>270416
Derpibooru, in both the comment sections of related pictures or on the political general thread.

>>270414
I was wondering how accurate this was, so I went and investigated for myself. In the last ten pages of uploads onto Derpibouru, or the most recent 150 images in about the last six hours, four relate to the protests, and three depict the protesters in some positive or negative light

The most recent image is a bloodied and bruised Zebra holding a Black Lives Matter" flag, and with the description "A drawing i made to show my support for the BlackLivesMatter movement. Keep fighting the good fight friends." This upload has a net vote of -26 (38 upvotes, 64 downvotes). Tellingly, there are six comments, and four of them have been deleted by mods. This is actually the only positive piece.
https://derpibooru.org/images/2363073

The next upload is an image of many zebras in a burning town looting and destroying things. The description is:
"zebra lives matter! such stunning, much brave. honk honk"
This one has a net ratting of 34 (47 upvotes, 13 downvotes). The comments are anti-protest
https://derpibooru.org/images/2363058

The third oldest of the lot is an image that has been posted elsewhere on this site, with, on the one side, an image of zebra (probably originally a fallout equestria drawing) in front of smoke and ruins, with the caption "creatures on 5/30/2020" and two NASA pone style ponies in what is supposed to be the space-x capsule, with the caption "ponies on 5/30/2020." There is no description, and only two out of 15 comments have been deleted. This image has a rating of 55 (67 upvotes, 12 downvotes).
https://derpibooru.org/images/2363029

The final image is a parody image of someone looting Cadance in the Minneapolis riots. It has a vote of 23 (28 upvotes, 5 downvotes) and two comments.
https://derpibooru.org/images/2362988

It definitely looks like anti-protest images, even when they are vaguely racist, are more popular (and in the last six hours, more common) than pro-protest, or even racially neutral depictions of the riots.

>>270420
Well yeah, ziggers gonna zig, and this latest chimpout is ringing alot louder in people's ears because of the pandemic locldown/situation. Woot and others are gonna have a hard time talking their way out of this

>>270409
"Trying to defend your livelihood from being looted and destroyed? Must be right wing! Everyone I don't agree with is right wing!"
These people disgust me. I shouldn't hope for them to have the same thing happen to them, but I can't stop myself from doing so.

>>270452
You should hope for worse things to happen to those bastards.
Rape is wrong, but rapists who rape innocent people are worse than those who rape other rapists.
They want innocents like you and me dead. They are not innocents.

>>270409
turns out the guys a total faggot and possibly a jew.

>>270475
It was obvious that he was a faggot from the title. Rushing a group with a sword only works if A. you legitimately have the skills and plan ready to cut them all down, or b. it's an anime. Seriously, if you dont have a gun just play dead, you'll be better off.
>I know, I'll surprise them with my sword!
<He's got a... sword? Rly? Theres like ten of us
<yeah, and he just standing there, I bet I'm faster than him
<fuck this white boy
>stomping intensifies

>>270493
Do you think if he was angry enough, he could have killed one or two of them and scared the rest off?

>>270511
No Nigel, I dont

>>270511
Swords are heavy you need to have practiced waving them about for a while to get the strength to do any damage. They also need to have a sharp blade and you also need to know how to actually inflict a wound. Purely waving one about wont cause anyone much more than a few bruises unless you use the sword properly.

>>270514
And even then, occurrences during battle, or even catching a bone wrong on a successful strike can snap the blade especially with the sword quality that is conventionally available.
His only chance to avoid a beating would have been some MGS shit, disabling one and taking his weapon, and proceeding to eliminate all the invaders.

Caught this gem of an edit before it was deleted.

>>270528
Meh, the original text is more damning imo

>>270528
It's what he deserves for using main characters as a mouthpiece.

he died this morning

>>270573
F

>>270573
How did you find out?

>>270420
And EQD is here to suck cock right on schedule.

>>270584
>171 downvotes on DB, barely positive overall
>comments locked down after three pages by mods
>actual mouthpiece
"Good message"
How do we troll this guy?

Approximately 3-4 hours ago, Derpi updated their board to remove commenting to newly posted pictures that are tagged in wrong think to aid their censorship efforts to only approved talking channels on pro-riot pictures. Old pictures still have comments enabled, but anything uploaded now has the new standard in effect, I assume until they deem it worthy if ever to open to discourse. Most likely their method will be if it is benign enough, it will open comments back up after everyone has moved on and it rolls off of recent posts, or they will erase it.

I know this isn't all that important and slightly off topic, but I figured that it was worth a brief mention given the current circumstances.

>>270584
Top retardation.

>>270606
Is it being discussed somewhere on the site?
I can't find any discussion in any of the forums on this so its weirding me out

>>270662
F
In the great halls they find one more among them. To make merry, and for the battles to come in word, and in sword.

>>270660
This is what I found in their forums. Looks like a mix of backlash and lack of resources to censor fast enough, with a pinch of controlling the narrative. Not shocked, but I find it interesting that they have that ability. Wonder where it will spread next as they are unlikely to reverse this decision once this has passed. It is just too useful for them.

>>270676
I know they use "Duck" as a slur for people they don't like but what the fuck is a "Chud"?
Also, "Troglodyte season"? That's a funny way to talk about Gay Pride Month.

>>270685
"Chud" is woke faggot slang for "meanypants with right-wing views," as I found out looking at the salt from Stonetoss's haters on Twitter. An insult doesn't really work if it doesn't mean anything to the person it is used against though. E.g., if you call a normal white man a "cracker" they won't flinch because it carries no negative insinuation to them. On the other hand, calling a black man a "nigger" will often offend, because they know it signifies the worst of their race: stupid, impulsive, arrogant thugs.

>>270662
The dude isn't a store owner. he said himself that he just wanted to protect the bar her loved. the guy is an author for a living.

>>270706
I guess that makes this
*puts on sunglasses*
one fucked-up story.
How can you tell if something inside you is broken or not? I've stopped reacting to these things because I expect them to get worse every day.
>>270691
Wait, they had to invent ANOTHER meaningless slur for us?
I thought they were still calling everyone they don't like "Incel", to try and associate critics of feminism with "groups that have a bad smell" commie-style.
They called us Nazi so much, they wore the word out and had to invent the word White Supremacist, then wore that out and had to go back to calling non-feminists Virgins, then wore that out and now they're just calling us a made-up insult.
Was honestly expecting chud to mean another group I've never heard of, and wondering what the chuds did to piss the liberal rot off.
Thanks, dad. Thanks, granddad. Thanks, great granddad, for letting diversity and leftism get this far. The nazis went to heaven, America and the Allies sent their own countries and children to hell.

>>270414
Post on https://derpibooru.org/generals/tartarus
Make an account but you may also post as anon. Mini-boss are Commune, TexasUberAlles, Ereiam... Vivace and his endless bullshit, Typhoon2000 or UserAccount's deliriums. final boss is TheSmilingPony. Good luck.

>>270711
Apparently someone screenshotted this post and posted it there.

>>270709
The virgin chud vs. chad cuck
(in terms of insult quality)
"Cuck" was a beautifully effective word because it immediately brings to mind weakness and handing your rights over to others, reinforced by cuckoldry actually being promoted by the left-wing. "Chud" is one letter off from "chad" and beyond that has no other meaning to most people. Also it's the term for unit types in the game Dominions 5 who are actual chads

>>270721
According to UrbanDictionary, Chud is short for Canibalistic Humanoid Underground Dweller and originates from the 1984 film C.H.U.D.
To my surprise, it seems Liberals actually watched a movie besides the Harry Potter series.
Place your bets, what do you think those pedophile cuck leftists who serve cannibalistic pedophile jews will call us 10 years from now, if they're still around at that point in time?

>>270769
update:
Found out how the leftists know about this trashy B-Movie:
the shitty racebait wokeist film Us by Jordan Peele (the one where the black tards have clones and use scissors to kill people and everything's pseudointellectually symbolic) "references" the film by showing it near the start.

>>270711
I'm fairly certain now this was a false flag post to make it look like /mlpol/ is brigading. I believe so because it came out of nowhere without any prominent anonymous posters in the thread except myself, the diction being something an outsider thinks /pol/acks talk like, and its fixation on persons, some of whom didn't show up.

The reason harping on about different posters (some of whom don't show up at all in recent posts and therefore would not be known to a casual observer) is so illogical is it's not at all difficult to beat their combined "arguments" so long as you remain collected. They hardly ever use sources (even for liberal standards) and never address arguments directly but use only fallacies and passive-aggressive comments. Even a slightly-above-average-IQ anon with good sources can handle them as easily as kindergarteners. I wouldn't put a brigading false flag past one of them.

Has this ID posted anything else?

>>270770
I'm surprised even leftists liked "Us" considering how bad it is. I expected more from them like a reference to a pretentious French New Wave movie or something.

>>270773
Liberals don't "like" things like you or me.
You know how some will "Ironically love" The Room by laughing at it.
Well, Liberals aren't like that. They exist, at the most fundamental level, to be evil towards people like me and you.
They know keeping up the illusion that they're good people and we're bad people will make it easier for them to get away with evil.
They don't have to be convincing enough to convince people. Just convincing enough to avoid causing enough Cognitive Dissonance in normie onlookers to break the conditioning.
If there was a movie that spent a million dollars and ended up just being some womanigger yelling "YOU'RE RACIST" into an iphone camera, Liberals would praise it and pretend it's the greatest thing to ever exist.
Not because they really think that. But because they want to look woke and encourage retards to watch the "popular" film.
Subversion runs through a Liberal's veins like gravy runs through a fatty's veins. They will pretend the shittiest sculpture made by an African is the greatest sculpture of all while pretending all the greatest white writers of all time were literal hitlers. Why? Spite. They turn up their noses at white ballet performances while pretending african twerking is the height of dance skill because they hate white ability. They genuinely hate our ability to create good things, good civilizations, good movies and books, good inventions, and so on. Liberals and Niggers would rather everyone lose than only they lose. They seriously want us dead more than they want themselves to live. They don't really think feminist comedians are funny and they don't really think woke films are good. They're just a cult that supports its members while attacking its scapegoats. If any of them actually believe the obvious contradictory lies they claim to believe, it's because they've spent too long pretending to believe it.

>>270775
This is why I think the best way to deal with them is just to be calm, nice, and rational. Like I said their M.O. is intentionally to needle and harass their opponents so they flip out and either look crazy or break the rules and get banned. They are conceited in their self-worth and will virtue signal to no end while putting on a façade of "balance"–like quoting a raving liberal pastor's tweet about Trump to make it look like "true Christians" hate him though they admittedly hate Christianity. You can't be incendiary–which is why I don't think you would do very well, Nigel–and you can't be very incisive or you'll start to look like them. By avoiding/pointing out bait and logical fallacies, debunking bleeding-heart articles by exposing the context, and presenting a reasoned analysis, you'll automatically look better than them and they'll hate you all the more for it. But the more they attack you and the more you remain placid, the more their moral legitimacy slips as it becomes obvious they have a hugbox and eventually otherwise timid or weary bystanders will take your side.

The important thing of course is to always keep your cool which is a practiced trait. If they're starting to wear on you–which is what they want to do–then it's better to take a break and forget about politics for a time and then save up sources that tear them apart. There is nothing a sanctimonious person hates more than a genuinely good individual. You're unlikely to convert your political opponent but always assume there are third parties lurking. Plus the mods in such forums tend to be left-leaning anyway so don't give any excuse for them to ban you.

>>270773
There have been posts by the anon in question, and of decent quality. Looks like he just got caught up in the moment. While raiding can be fun, it is best to stay out of communist controlled forums and playing into their hand in such a manner. They are looking for justification to their lockdown of certain tags from discussion. Though I doubt that tags such as nazi or other such obvious ones will ever be put back to normal, I figure that if there is enough confirmed pushback from the problem people, they will eventually start taking worse steps. Fighting in their turf in the comments is a lost cause.

However, the best way to fight them in my own opinion is to make art and discuss it here whenever possible. And should you upload there, add the problem tags and people will begin to catch on that the only way to enjoy the art is to be here, where you are free to actually call the art gay if it sucks and congratulate the hard work of people that are actually improving like our art thread anons.

Meanwhile, feel free to watch the fireworks as they start to eat their view base. The reeeing that they aren’t getting enough upvotes is priceless. I’m surprised they haven’t made an auto ratio correction system like YouTube yet.

Anyway, sorry for the derail. Perhaps a new thread is best to further discuss the fall of derpi than the thread about someone that was taken far too soon. I wish we could have had this lad riding with his sword into battle when the day finally comes. Perhaps some artists may take that idea and run with it. That would be a very nice way to honor his memory and perhaps piss off a few ziggers along the way.

>>270792
Good to know. Also afaik he didn't die as he was last seen online on his FimFiction account 13 hours ago, so either he logged on or a trusted relation did.

>>270729
It is intresting to see how these black fags think. I'm mean I would feel emaculated if I fought one guy with a group of twenty (or more) but not they.
I guess the rule is: When they have the advantage they are cocky but when they don't they are timid or already fleeing.

>>270783
>incisive
While i agree that one should be calm and collected and make rational good points, I do not agree with this idea that we should avoid being incise. No. We should make them hurt. We should move the ball on their field and we should attack. We must qwuestiopn how they can justfy shit like this and should point out their flaw and shitty hypocracy.
They often claim that we capitalized but we really should. We syhould remeber what they have said and then bring it up when it fits to show what liars and hypocrites they are.

We should make them eat their words when they talk to us. We should act like they do in someway and just delegitmize them and generally have an indifferent attitue towards them. That hurts more thna our frustration at them because they want us to hate them while they don't want to feel insignificant. Their ego can't handle it. They want to feel like Knights of justice.

Social justice warriors but they are not. Communism is not a real ideology. It is a just a group of sycophants that masquered as subversive.

We shouldn't even bother defending against them at times because they are nothing. Make them feel insignificant. Just attack.

Don't lose yourself in a debate and argue overmeaningless shit. Focus on the points that matter. WE whites should have the right to segregate ourself from the and preserve our heritage. Just as any other people has. It was actually one of David Duke's videos and the anti- racist Hitler videeo that turned me into a nationalist. While David Duke sometimes can sound as a broken record, he always talks about the main issue. Our survival. The fact that we are going towards white genocide and we don't want that and therefore we have the right to resist.

We should also not let their truths rule the debate. Like, yes, you can argue for our stance even if the holocaust happened. Sure, but don't. Say, no I don't belive the holocaust happened but even if it did... Atleast, never let their version of the turht rule the debate. Even if you can't prove that they are wrong in that instance, just declare that you don't believe them. You don't need to believe them and if this subject were to be followed up on and scrutinzed they would be the ones in wrong anyway. Becuase it is always like that.

So attack, rule the debate, don't give them satsifcation or make them feel special: be indifferent towards thesefags but beat them, and make sure yor truth is the one that exist in the debate.

This will also make them back off becuase it ddoesn't feel good to be owned by the people they hate. And since we are in the right, we will own them. Be onafraid to go on a limb and make assumptions because you are probably right and the world will prove you right. Also, remember to call on their bluffs. They like to present themselves as well read about their subjefcts but these people are lazy cucks. It's very doubtful that they are so well taught as they claim to be. Don't let your self be intimated by these posers.

There is such a thing as mutally assured destruction and this is something people respect. These people as welll. Even evil men respect this princple and that's how we assert ourselves. If they come, let's hurt their little egos. Make memes out of them and taunting them. The word cuck was effective because it fucking hurts.

>cuck
It hurts them because it is ture for them.

>>270950
One of my favorite things to do is post information about Antifa's antics and call them a "non-terrorist label." This because they're spouting the MSM lie that Antifa is somehow not terrorists because "they're not a group, they're a label." These people love to argue semantics because semantics are fact-free, so instead of letting them drag you down just use their own terms against them and turn these terms into a mockery. Rhetoric is like a martial art; use your opponent's moves against him.

The same applies to highly subjective topics like President Trump. Trump is a very imperfect person so it's easier to make him look bad than to make him look good (even though the MSM media focuses on the most inconsequential and false things while ignoring Trump's real problems). Don't headbutt over whether it was OK to clear out protesters at that church, but share evidence of protests being pointless, self-defeating or violent to undermine this point.

Likewise, they try to belittle sources (which is why it's important to use "non-partisan" independent sources whenever possible) but reflect it back at them showing how deceitful their precious MSM sources are. Always apply a universal standard so there's no way to escape.

If you want to be manipulative yourself then share information about white cucks being all the worse for their groveling. Liberals actively avoid talking about those at all but post this regularly and bystanders might catch interest. No one wants to be those guys and the implication is that liberal morality must be abandoned.

>be indifferent towards thesefags but beat them, and make sure yor truth is the one that exist in the debate.
That's what I'm getting at. You don't need to like these people at all but appear cool and clinical. Don't make it personal and call them out if they try to make it personal. It's possible to "mock" them using impersonal phrasing like "I've noticed this thread tends to post a link at a time regarding a relatively minor issue, using a partisan source" and the methods I outlined above.

>Be onafraid to go on a limb and make assumptions because you are probably right and the world will prove you right. Also, remember to call on their bluffs.
I think the way to interpret this is perform analysis using facts and reason to show why you think the way you do. Use logic like "the media selectively reported this incident out of hundreds of cases of police brutality; this case is of a specific but somewhat uncommon variety that tends to cause riots: therefore, the media deliberately sought to incite a riot." These people don't know how to use analysis because they've been spoonfed information their entire life. They believe "white supremacists" caused the riots but never question why or how or what motives someone making the claim might have, but because a report suggested it and they hate white supremacists so white supremacists might have done it.

>>270773
No I'm legit concerned about what the 'execs' of this community are trying to do and their influence.
Because I also exist and get tired of being banned there for just opinions and post pertinent facts and criticism of their views.

>>270584
Black lives matter. They have value.
According to what I've heard about Muslim slave trade prices in the Libya slave market, a black life is worth about $200.

>>270514
>Swords are heavy
It really depends on the kind of sword we're talking about.
European styled swords tend to be much lighter than the Japanese style swords. It's a consequence of the relative quality of the locally available metal.

>>270676
Fucking TexasUberAllies.

He publicly lost his mind back when that pet episode from Season 1 or 2 aired. He was screaming all about how it was all about promoting rape. I think I actually screencapped his multi-paragraph rant in the EQD comment section where the episode was being discussed.

I had a run-in with him in that same comment secion, and maybe one more run-in with him on DB a couple years later. He was still absolutely soaked in the kool-aid.

Of all the people to be pre-emptively banned from any fandom community because of well-established past behaviour, I think this person should be pretty high on the list.

>>270721
Cuck was effective, and absolutely EXPLODED into common usage because of a specific article written by a literal Feminist cuck, talking about being a cuck.

https://web.archive.org/web/20160622073143/http://nymag.com/thecut/2015/07/what-open-marriage-taught-one-man-about-feminism.html

>As I write this, my children are asleep in their room, Loretta Lynn is on the stereo, and my wife is out on a date with a man named Paulo. It’s her second date this week; her fourth this month so far. If it goes like the others, she’ll come home in the middle of the night, crawl into bed beside me, and tell me all about how she and Paulo had sex. I won’t explode with anger or seethe with resentment. I’ll tell her it’s a hot story and I’m glad she had fun. It’s hot because she’s excited, and I’m glad because I’m a feminist.

Honestly, before I noticed this article, I wasn't fully on board with the use of the word cuck. I thought it was a little unnecessarily hostile, and that it was inaccurate in the literal sense. Once I saw this article, I was 100% on board with it.