CATALONIA IN FLAMES
Barcelona is quite literally on fire, with protest rising up all across the Province synced with the release of the sentence of the Catalan politicians that were being judged for the events 2 years ago with the referendum. Here's a summary of the whole thing.
SENTENCE
On Monday, it was released the sentence for the Catalan politicians that organized the referendum for independence 2 years ago
The result was 9-13 years for each, with a total of 99 years and a half among all of them
The sentence is very well redacted, and it explains in detail how these people decided they were going for the independence of Catalonia, signed laws for it, and when those laws were nullified and were warned by the Supreme Court, they kept going, celebrated the referendum for independence, declared the independence and suspended it shortly after, and people from different parties signed another declaration of independence placing the Spanish state to sit and dialogue to go towards independence.
Among the proven cases of high violence is the counseling that was besieged and the justice functionary had to jump from a roof to the building nearby to be able to get out, politicians stood on top of police cars with megaphones to rile up the masses, the cars themselves were completely wasted, and more.
The rebuttal of the arguments for the independence that the Catalans wield is also very well done, not only it has no legal basis in international law, federal law or regional law, but it is also missing from most of all the constitutions of the EU and its legal systems is forbidden, and in many of those countries, the secessionist parties are illegal, and of course, no public money
After the fantastic description of a textbook case of a crime of Rebellion across hundreds of pages, the supreme court decides it is a case of sedition, which is a crime with much lesser legal consequences, similar to thievery and robbery
The crime of Rebellion goes like this
>Inmates of the crime of rebellion are those who rises up violently and publicly with the following ends:
>1.º Derogate, suspend or modify the Constitution partially or totally
>2.º Remove or strip the King or Head of State totally or partially of his prerogatives and faculties
>5.º Declare independence of part of the National Territory
>7.º Subtract any kind of armed forces from the obedience of the Government
Sedition is rising publicly and tumultuously to stop the application of the law, but it does not name remove the head of state, nor take over an armed forces nor declare the independence of the national territory
It gets better. How do the Supreme Court justifies this?
Well, because these people didn't want independence, just to force the government to negotiate independence, despite the sentence itself declaring there was a declaration of independence, a law of disconnection for the independence, a legally binding referendum for independence, and after the independence was suspended there was a document signed by all the deputies (who will probably never sit before court) saying they were going towards independence, and the conclusion of the supreme court from their own narration is that there was no attempt to create an independent state.
IT WAS A PRANK ALL ALONG
Is there more? Yes there it!
Not only they didn't actually want the independence despite signing the declaration for it, but is impossible to have a crime of rebellion because the rebellion would never triumph, as the state forces would truncate it before it happened.
So you know, in Spain, going to the bank with a gun, taking the money out of the vault and attempting to run away is not a bank robbery as long as there are 20 or so policemen waiting for you outside, this is just a minor theft, because it was impossible for you to commit the crime
Thanks to this new fantastic jurisprudence from the Supreme Court, anybody who ever tries to take part of the territory, they will only be judged by sedition, and not rebellion, since this is a special crime where you don't get judged if you actually succeed
IT GETS BETTER!
The supreme court also rejected the petition from the prosecutor to stop the inmates from receiving the third degree till they have go at least through half the sentence, which is basically "semi-freedom", which requires them to spend at least 8 hours a day in prison, and have the rest of the day free, as long as they have a security measure like a wristband or something
And since they are jailed in the prison of Catalonia under the Catalan jurisdiction, that is still threatening to declare independence through violence, can be given conditional freedom at any point, we might see them out of jail by the end of the week
They also didn't even glaze towards the testimony of the ministry of economy Montoro that gave hundreds of millions to a government which was well known to be conspiring to break the state, yet lied saying there was no money being used for the act
Maybe they just assumed it was for beer and called it a day
This whole thing sets a fantastic precedent for the future of Spain, making it clear that NOBODY will be judged for the crime of Rebellion, and they will just get out of jail pretty much instantly
The message is clear, trying to break the State is free.
In other words impunity.
TL;DR: THE MISERABLE AMOUNT OF POLITICIANS BEING JUDGED FOR THE REFERENDUM ON THE 1ST OF OCTOBER 2017 AND THEIR MANY CRIMES GET OFF SCOT-FREE WITH A PAT IN THE BACK THANKS TO THE MENTAL GYMNASTICS OF OUR CORRUPT JUDGES
Cont part 2