/mlpol/ - My Little Politics


If you want to see the latest posts from all boards in a convenient way please check out /overboard/


Archived thread


Sex-robot-2.png
Sex Bots/Dolls
Anonymous
JqTxF
?
No.245872
245880 245886 245890 245896 245924 245942 247926 248070 252168
Sex dolls are getting cheaper and sex robots are getting more advanced. It is only a matter of time until they become more commonplace. This is going to change the sexual market value of women. How is this going to change society?
Anonymous
haRQz
?
No.245877
245879 247857
You already know.
Lonely men will fuck them instead of slaving away for ungrateful whores
Thots lose their stranglehold on male sexuality
Women have to improve if they want to remain relevant
Women fear self-improvement so they'll slander the sexdoll industry as hard as possible.
Anonymous
4r5XP
?
No.245879
>>245877
>Women have to improve if they want to remain relevant
Will they? Women already date a handful of men. The people who aren't getting laid now are the people who are going to buy sexdolls. This just means women are going to lose "beta bucks".
Anonymous
Oo5UN
?
No.245880
245882 246049
>>245872
>It is only a matter of time until they become more commonplace.
I guess. But like, I think they won't really have that much of an impact. Only the worst losers wwould buy them. I mean only they are on that low of a social standing that they wouldn't care about the shame anymore.
I mean, I who is not a loser I guess would sooner jerk it to porn or my own imagination than to go out an buy a doll. I'm sceptical that this will even really matter.

Anonymous
dLHqu
?
No.245881
Women can get their own sex dolls. The only loss is it won't buy them dinner, which is the only reason they had the "date" anyway. Which means they might try to be relevant to men again... interesting.
Anonymous
dLHqu
?
No.245882
tay.jpg
>>245880
Dolls are a bit silly. That changes though if they get "AI" personality. If they can fake being a person people will readily give them "alive" status. Like what happened with Tay. And then readily actually love them.
Anonymous
nXUQd
?
No.245883
Better option.png

Anonymous
dLHqu
?
No.245884
245889
Will it be illegal to have sex dolls that look like known people?
Anonymous
FsuBK
?
No.245886
>>245872
Call me when they're robotic assistant tier and can take care of all of the chores around the house.
Anonymous
hJwMD
?
No.245889
246049
>>245884
I think when sexdolls are normalized dollmakers will be able to sign contracts with celebrities to make dolls in their likeness for a percentage of the salesprofit as a nice extra income, similar to how music and movie industries work today. Counterfeits and underage look-alikes will probably be made illegal. Big celebrities and famous pornstars will sell really well.
Anonymous
c7qVZ
?
No.245890
>>245872
Why spend probably thousands on a sex doll when I can achieve the same effect with my hand? Only when they're fully articulate, imbued with sapience and otherwise completely indistinguishable from a real human bean would I consider it. Bonus points for artificial womb technology.
Anonymous
9bhkO
?
No.245896
246262
NoFap-benefits-timeline-min-1-1080x608.jpg
>>245872
When dolls can cook and do some other chores I will buy them, not before.
A plastic hole where to cum is pathetic and a surrender to the flesh.
NoFap is the way.
Anonymous
zuzNz
?
No.245906
245918
>actually paying for sex
Sex dolls for me are nothing but a whore you rent for a lifetime and which is cheaper to maintain.

Also what the fuck is with people of all kinds' obession with sex? (rhetorical question)

Personally all it takes for me is jerking off and I can go back to acutally important business.
Anonymous
Xbqsw
?
No.245917
Until they have AI pony sexbots I'll stick to using my hand when I need to orgasm.
Anonymous
ayltt
?
No.245918
245921 245924
1513780022994.jpg
>>245906
>Personally all it takes for me is jerking off
STOP
Anonymous
bD0iJ
?
No.245921
rockvarg.png
>>245918
MASTURBATING
7zfpJ
?
No.245924
245926 246023
>>245918
>Don't masturbate, ever, at all. No matter how, to what, or how often.
Masturbation is a symptom, not a cause. If anon stops masturbating but changes nothing else, there will be no benefit. Many anons (myself included) have stopped cold-turkey for weeks and gained nothing, contrary to all claims from no-fappers. Eating healthier and getting exercise are much more useful things to focus on.
If quitting helped you, well congrats, but you aren't everyone. People often have different problems, or different causes for the same symptoms.

>>245872
Hard to say. I'd expect it to always remain niche, at least until it can do household chores and such. The kinds of men who currently keep going after women don't seem likely to the kind who'd be interested in sex dolls, and the kind of men who aren't chasing women probably don't have much interest in sex dolls unless they can actually do something useful.
Anonymous
bD0iJ
?
No.245926
>>245924
That's like an addict saying that there's no benefit to being sober unless they're doing a program. Yes, its WAY better for you to do the whole shebang, but that doesn't mean that there aren't benefits (even imperceivable) to stopping.
Anonymous
CU5Uf
?
No.245936
245941
I've never believed in the NoFap meme outside of the same basic benefits stopping any other harmful habit would give you, particularly because I haven't seen many NoFap proponents also advocating for us to stop having sex. But, that isn't what this thread is about.

No, I don't think Sex Bots or Sex Dolls will make women obsolete. I think bioengineering would have a better shot at such a thing. You know, making our own women, or mares. Why settle for plastic, silicone, and metal when you can have the real thing, only better? That, and I think we all deep down still would prefer to be in a proper, healthy relationship with a real person/pony rather than an emotionless husk, and we're a while I feel from creating fully-sapient AI.
Anonymous
9bhkO
?
No.245941
245943
SW-1-1024x763.jpg
>>245936
>NoFap proponents also advocating for us to stop having sex
OK, let me remind you of the "Traditional" way and understanding of sex: It is only for procreation, and not to be wasted on recreation.
Sexual energy is to be channeled and harnessed for creative and targeted endeavors like civilization building and war.
And if you came from the older times, you would remember that the priests always were preaching that masturbation is the gateway to wasted lives, sin, vice and defeat.
Anonymous
5fLVQ
?
No.245942
246088
2427862 - Equestria_Girls Friendship_is_Magic My_Little_Pony Rainbow_Dash edit.png
>>245872
>This is going to change the sexual market value of women.
Women have already lost most of their sexual market value, they just don't realize it. Feminism works against women rather insidiously in that it gives them the illusion of being in control of their sexuality, when in reality they're much more objectified now than they were in the past. The value of a beautiful woman is far lower now than in the past because desirable men can now get sex from them with no strings attached. Thots, who generally have little intelligence or talent beyond looking pretty, in past eras would have still been able to marry well based solely on their looks. However, now that they're "empowered," they just screw random Chads and make money selling nudes or bottles of bathwater to beta losers. They only really have a window of about 5-10 years where they can do stuff like this, before their looks fade and pretty soon the incels are buying some other skank's bathwater. After that they have nothing.

As to the sex dolls, I actually rather doubt it's going to make much of a difference one way or the other, since as has been pointed out most of the people buying them will be guys who probably wouldn't be having sex in the first place. I also question how desirable the dolls will really be. There's a concept called the "uncanny valley" that describes how something that doesn't "feel" human actually becomes more unsettling the more human it looks. This is the reason that people get creeped out by the idea of dolls or ventriloquist dummies coming to life and walking around. I suspect animatronic sex dolls would fall into this category, and the more lifelike they get the spookier it's going to feel having one walking around your apartment at night.

I personally think developing immersive VR fantasy worlds and AI companionship bots like Tay are going to be the more profitable niche for companies looking to cash in on the lonely incel market.
Anonymous
bD0iJ
?
No.245943
245949
>>245941
Understand though, that traditionally it was about population control. Without contraceptives, if the peoples went off and fucked eachother silly, without regulation and guidance (and there's plenty to be said for or against on that) the population would have quickly become untenable (for them). Also realize that religion stood side-by-side with the crown, as far as holding the masses in thrall and obedience.
Tl;dr Its not as simple as "sex for fun BAAAAAAD"
Anonymous
9bhkO
?
No.245949
245961 246028 246043
jew-porn-flier.png
6565166.jpg
Screenshot_20191007_141155.png
>>245943
>Understand though, that traditionally it was about population control
Not at all, but structure and purpose.
Before there was patriarchy, women were "property" and meant to breed and to serve in a household setting.
Men were meant to be workers, builders, warriors.
The "to fuck each other" thing is a modern degeneracy brought by the jews to defile and disintegrate the West.
And yes, sex for fun is a weapon against us.

>Also realize that religion stood side-by-side with the crown, as far as holding the masses in thrall and obedience.
Exactly, the masses were given a purpose and a framework to build civilization.


Anonymous
5Awqu
?
No.245961
246026
>>245949
I’ve got a really nice bridge to sell you. Great price!
Anonymous
4HB+M
?
No.246023
246132
>>245924
You do need to have an ejaculation about 20 times a month to prevent prostate cancer. I would suggest most people outside of a NEW relationship have a medical need to have a wank.
Anonymous
nDqgI
?
No.246026
246033
screen555.png
>>245961
>the kike can't hide
Anonymous
etOGQ
?
No.246028
246030
1564021979999.jpg
>>245949
Shout out to Ben Garland
Anonymous
9bhkO
?
No.246030
246032
1500618.png
>>246028
>/leftypol/ meme
>a failure as an artist and at to convey meaning
No comments.
Anonymous
etOGQ
?
No.246032
>>246030
>not having heard of "pic unrelated," spoken or not
>not even writing in intelligible English while evidently complaining about things not conveying meaning

Your point?
Anonymous
Scruffy
3wA5z
?
No.246033
246038 246040
>>246026
>muh digits mean things!
You fags and your digits. I know its a time-honored chan tradition, but its also juvenile and vacuous. Critical thinking would do wonders for you.
Anonymous
LahE/
?
No.246037
P.s. I’m scruffy, but was mobile posting on that trips ID. Funny, it’s pretty faggoty to try and suggest that trips are a bad thing

Anonymous
Si0fB
?
No.246038
246043
1119104.png
>>246033
>>muh digits mean things!
They mean indeed. Universes are math, and math means operations and relations with digits.
And for the record, /pol/ is always right.
It might sound senseless, but for those with knowledge this is real.

Anonymous
c7qVZ
?
No.246040
246043
1344628076754.jpg
>>246033
Checked, also you can't do any proper checking without bateman and I've seen barely any posted on this entire site. Gets aren't what they used to be.
Ninjas
Ninja
3wA5z
?
No.246043
246051
>>246040
You haven't been paying attention then.
And since gets are so precious, I win because of the ID check right? Since that's WAY harder to get artificially than post gets right?
>>246038
So by 'logic' no one can contest my points unless they get a more significant get?
A. that's not what this thread is about.
B. that's retarded
C. THIS faggot >>245949 is the one pushing the idea that anything but what the bible says is jewishness. That's the kind of shitty thinking that gets threads turned into christcuck hate threads. Pretty sure that's ponertrip too. Not my fault he hasn't figured out that its called "Judeo-Christian" for a reason. But nevermind that, his bibley says that sex iss bad! So it must be so! It couldn't be that his doctrine was written by homocidal maniacs who slaughtered people 1000s of years ago because they didn't follow him. No no, its only and ever been a story about a really swell carpenter. Nevermind that more than half the book has nothing to do with the guy and only vaguely alludes to him, no its right so stop having sex except for procreation.
Isn't that Muslim-tier thinking? And while I'm at it, has anyone ELSE noticed that its literally called "Judeo-Christian tradition"? I mean, it almost suggests that the jews come first in the hierarchy. Food for thought.
>>245949
Seriously fuck off with that shit. You do you, and let's get back to not being at odds because I like you most of the time.

We now return you to our regularly scheduled bot-sex thread
Anonymous
MBfSg
?
No.246049
>>245880
> I mean only they are on that low of a social standing that they wouldn't care about the shame anymore.
If they made a doll that would 1) do dishes, 2) do laundy and 3) make my fucking bed, and additionally had a pussy and knew how to use it, well, now that's a compelling story. It's also a good cover story. Hell, make the pussy an add-on option. That's not a sex doll, that's my robot maid. Maybe make the tits and lips smaller so the bot doesn't look so much like a fucking stripper. There's absolutely a market for this. Hell, make the pussy removable by the robot so when a friend gropes your robot maid there's nothing there.

They would sell plenty of those. That level of tech is a way out though. Probably 10-20 years at least.

>>245889
Celebs will get a royalty to be put on the maid-bot. They would have to be altered aftermarket to be fuck bots. Otherwise, no celeb would sign up for it, it's just too creepy.


Anonymous
9bhkO
?
No.246051
my-little-pony-mlp-other-Rarity-406524.png
>>246043
>We now return you to our regularly scheduled bot-sex thread
Okay.


Anonymous
9bhkO
?
No.246063
File (hide): 62185EDBA3930E424C6846FF279B3ADE-23633602.mp4 (22.5 MB, Resolution:872x480 Length:00:06:25, Irontech 169cm intro video.mp4) [play once] [loop]
Irontech 169cm intro video.mp4
Back on topic.
>Irontech 169cm intro video
https://www.bitchute.com/video/8m2NxDpjvkJM

Anonymous
GRG3t
?
No.246088
FeminismBeforeAndAfter.png
>>245942
This. The whole pretending that "sex dolls will destroy the power of women" is similar to "being gay destroys the power of women" or "cartoon waifus destroy the power of women." Obviously they're not morally equivalent but it's all in the same spirit. This isn't going to lead to a more harmonious or wholesome society, but merely cements degeneracy by reinforcing the idea that carnal pleasure is something to be bought and paid for. It eliminates the spiritual dimension which undergirds family structure and is a perpetuation of demographic collapse that the Mouse Utopia Experiment foretells.

Be mindful that white women are not the enemy just as white men are not the enemy. A good number are irredeemable, yes, but many more have been bluepilled through no fault of their own and are pushed through a corrupt culture. The West cannot exist without femininity just as it cannot exist without masculinity; they balance and support each other. "Feminism" is a rejection of traditional femininity as it asserts that the only worthwhile virtues and achievements are masculine ones, ironically, and pushes women to be "the same as" men. If women are "the same as" men, then they are not unique and are perfectly interchangeable; now transgenders are invading female areas. It's a tragic erosion of the very fabric of society and only a dramatic return to tradition can recover anything.
Anonymous
NOWiA
?
No.246132
>>246023
Are there really enough studies to support this? I heard you can train yourself to have full self ejaculations while you lucid dream. I dont think that has a higher risk of prostate cancer compared to just regular fapping.
Anonymous
UPH7S
?
No.246262
>>245896
Im going to take this pic advice
Thanks anon
6pcPH
?
No.247353
Sex dolls will become illegal unless they are modelled after obese women at least 40 years old. Anything younger will be called pedophilic and outlawed. You should know how this works by now OP.
Anonymous
tV44R
?
No.247857
247870 247882
>>245877
Previously my thoughts were similar to yours - if even 5% of men drop out, there will be a sufficiently large gender imbalance to force woman to change their behavior as a group in order to be more attractive to men. And since we are talking about massive groups of people, instinct will dominate. Men instinctively find feminism unappealing and woman will therefore become feminine once more. But that may be dependent on an outdated paradigm.
Monogamous long-term relationships are no longer the norm. Woman are able to act on hypergamous instincts and many would rather be in an alpha's harem than have a gamma to themselves. So these gammas officially dropping out for sex dolls won't have a real impact because they were never really in the game to begin with. 30 years ago this may have been enough to stop feminism, but now I think it won't be relevant. Mentally healthy economically successful men will continue to prefer a real human to a doll and woman will just cluster around those men via tinder, etc. They will of course get old, realize their lives are meaningless, and become obsessed with their dogs and left wing social programs to compensate, but by then they are sterile and therefore also out of the game.. A sex doll revolution would only be possible if average men who are actually in the game drop out in favor of dolls; leaving average woman stranded. They would then change the culture and shame the beautiful woman into acceptable behavior (just like they used to before the sexual revolution). However, as childish as woman are, I still prefer real people to a doll (never tried one, but still). And I imagine other similarly average men as myself feel the same way.. idk. dolls used to be a white pill for me but idk anymore
Anonymous
o9ZAL
?
No.247870
247876
e4an34.png
>>247857
>So these gammas officially dropping out for sex dolls won't have a real impact
This.
>A sex doll revolution would only be possible if average men who are actually in the game drop out in favor of dolls; leaving average woman stranded
>sex doll revolution
They are consolation and pacifier mostly for Whites I believe. The target is to replace Whites for less entitled foreigners slaves.
And it's worth to mention that almost every element in this game is following a script written by the elites and their policies, namely:
- The relinquish of border's security to allow the replacement slaves in.
- The gaslighting of White men about equality with women and even non-Whites so not to oppose resistance.
- Using laws to force quotas to replace men for women.
- et cetera aka Cultural Marxism.

The "sexdoll revolution" will only be allowed only and if, the new non-White slaves can produce as much as the System needs to leech. Let us not forget that it's the White man the horse pulling this circus forward with taxes and investing in a future, in other words, getting into a mortgage for a house, student debt, and all kind of shit to please a cunt; which retro-feeds the System. Starving the System from White money is one of the ways to go but it is insufficient, the System is way ahead flooding White countries with theoretical replacement slaves. ←- This body of text is only valid in a capitalist system which needs innovation and competitiveness.

However, the indicators would point at the (((elites))) switching to global communism (aka judaism), and under the umbrella of "to save the planet from climate change" as a way to exploit the plebs. Then the U.N. plans to seize the farming lands and concentrate (aka to forcefully displace) the countryside population in urban centers, plus the elimination of most transportation and the reduction of consuming goods to a minimum, can give a glimpse of what is ahead. Ah, I forgot, the deployment of 5G will be the checkmate, as every lamppost and appliance will be monitoring the slaves behavior and attitude.

Gentlecolts, I am afraid that you will enjoy the sex doll waifus, only if you submit to the (((authorities))) and accept the new role they have planned for you.
Anonymous
tV44R
?
No.247876
>>247870
Correct. The other half of this is replacement. Pissed off incels (incel for much different reasons than modern incels, but still sexually deprived) used to vent their frustration by going off and eradicating the nation's enemies and either raping foes or gaining the status they needed to get laid. Now they are just watching porn, twitch thots, or sex dolls. IF they end up becoming bots with AIs that can pass the Turing Test with artificial wombs, they are a white pill. But until then, just another vice.
Anonymous
Gi/bX
?
No.247880
Why are the sexdolls horse-faced? And not in a good way?
Anonymous
PIKZj
?
No.247882
247912 248121
>>247857
>So these gammas officially dropping out for sex dolls won't have a real impact because they were never really in the game to begin with.
Oh yes it will. You know why? Beta bucks. Women can currently rely on beta bucks to bail them out of the shitty situations they put themselves in. They are going to be fucked once betaseron start opting out.
Anonymous
tV44R
?
No.247912
247916
>>247882
I respectfully disagree. I do not have the stats but I am fairly certain there are not enough twitch thots out there to impact the gender balance.
Anonymous
9bhkO
?
No.247916
247941
>>247912
>twitch thots
Naaah.
50 years old next door Jane can flip a thirsty beta just with a wink. This is a fact, sadly.
Anonymous
i0orr
?
No.247926
>>245872
waiting for the pony versions to be available tbh
Anonymous
tV44R
?
No.247941
247981
>>247916
Ahhh. Okay that is a fair observation. Do you think that will trickle down to fertile aged woman?
Anonymous
PIKZj
?
No.247981
>>247941
Once they start seeing what becomes of these older single women then yes.
Anonymous
H9yyJ
?
No.248070
>>245872
It will be interesting what tricks the "feminists" will do to stop it.
Can't have any this contender to porn and debauchery because technology isn't what (((they))) do.

>Gov funded research proves "100% without doubt" sex dolls/robots promotes violence in men as it dehumanize women.
Gov Bans Ownership, labeling it a drug.

>The hygiene/sanitation of the plastic/rubber can't be guaranteed since it's not thrown away like a condom after use.
Gov Bans Ownership, labeling it a health hazard.

>Women feel neglected as "sub-human-males" prefer dolls.
Gov Bans Ownership, labeling it a symbol of hate.


Anonymous
uctqC
?
No.248121
>>247882
Yep, when women realize they can't string along a beta anymore, the shit will really hit the fan. I can't wait to see what will happen.

>White knight groups vandalizing sex bot stores and sex bots? Anti-bot groups?
>Gov't intervention? Taxes? Gonna cost you 20$ each time you fuck your sex doll?
>Women find religion to help hate the sex doll menace?
>Men brought up on pedophilia charges? That bot looks only 17yrs and 325 days old, gonna have to take you downtown sir.
>White knight doll hacking groups? DDOS your doll? Turn your doll into an axe murderer?

What fun, I can't wait!

Uz9Mm
?
No.252168
>>245872
Yet another step into the Blade Runner dystopic world.
It does not need to turn this way.
;