The left-wing, anti-white coalition that is destroying western civilization is very fragile. The contradicting ideologies and objectives are obvious. This has been pointed out by many but has yet to be properly exploited. We see these contradictions when Muslims in the UK protest LGBT education in schools. We see it when Trans activists nail dead rats to an abused women’s shelter for excluding trans-women. We see it when Latino gangs firebomb black residences to terrorize blacks into leaving certain areas. We see it when AOC calls out Nancy Pelosi for being White. We see it when Blacks in New York regularly attack and beat up orthodox Jews. We see it when feminists publicly condemn trans-women competing and dominating in women’s sports. This coalition is united and bound together only by their hatred of the white man, and nothing else. This bond is very weak. The cracks are already there, and the wedges are already in place. /pol/ shall become the hammer that drives these wedges home and shatters this anti-white coalition into a thousand tiny, powerless factions.
What we need are Anons LARPing as leftists and attacking other leftists. We need fake Muslim accounts voicing staunch religious opposition to the LGBT agenda. We need fake Black accounts voicing opposition to the mass displacement of poor Blacks taking place at the hands of Latino immigrants. We need fake Trans accounts condemning feminist opposition to the invasion of protected female spaces by biological males. We need fake POC accounts mocking and ridiculing white liberals over the color of their skin. We need fake Jewish accounts kvetching over the long string of anti-Semitic attacks being committed by blacks in New York. We need fake feminists condemning the treatment of women and gays in Muslim countries. We need fake Black nationalists posting anti-Semitic Malcom X and Luis Farrakhan quotes.
This is the answer to the question “What can we actually do to fight back against all of this?”
/mlpol/ - My Little Politics
Archived thread
This is all 100% legal, requires minimal risk, requires no capital investment, and no central organization or planning. We already know this strategy is effective because it’s been used effectively against us, and because these fractures are already dividing our enemies without us doing anything at all to exacerbate their problems. It’s time to exacerbate their problems, /pol/ style.
We also need memes. As we all know, the left can’t meme. We must to this for them. These cannot be right-wing memes. They must be pro-left memes attacking other left-wing groups. Think of a pro-trans meme attacking bisexuals for only acknowledging the existence of 2 genders. Think of a pro-feminist meme attacking trans women for invading protected female spaces, or for just being cross-dressing male perverts. Think of a pro-Islam meme attacking the degeneracy of the left. The memes must come from the perspective of one protected victim group attacking another victim group.
>>245133
>The left-wing, anti-white coalition that is destroying western civilization is very fragile.
I disagree, the left-wing are the cheerleaders and give consent, but their real power is very little.
The root of the problem is the lawmakers doing as told to write legislation to produce X results, and law enforcement making sure to squash those non compliant. That's right, this is the ABC of a society governed by the rule of law, by the way, it is the overlords' laws.
>The left-wing, anti-white coalition that is destroying western civilization is very fragile.
I disagree, the left-wing are the cheerleaders and give consent, but their real power is very little.
The root of the problem is the lawmakers doing as told to write legislation to produce X results, and law enforcement making sure to squash those non compliant. That's right, this is the ABC of a society governed by the rule of law, by the way, it is the overlords' laws.
>>245133
>We need to lie, so that the lies to be exposed and make real problems look like hoaxes.
>Also, here's a kike star as a topic pic.
Interesting idea, anon.
>We need to lie, so that the lies to be exposed and make real problems look like hoaxes.
>Also, here's a kike star as a topic pic.
Interesting idea, anon.
How about we weaponize the Leo Frank incident? The whole basis for the existence of the ADL is the lie that Leo dindu nuffin and it was the black janitor. We could set up typical SJW accounts on tumblr or twitter, and call out the ADL for framing a black janitor to defend a wealthy (((white))) man, and call them white supremacists. If we get enough momentum, the ADL might have to try and defend itself. They won't be able to use the "antisemitism" card, because black outranks Jew in victimhood, and they won't be able to argue the facts, both because the facts are against them and social justice mentality isn't based on facts.
1569904378.png (521.4 KB, 2250x2250, 37EDCC3C-A204-4587-90E8-FAC365FB818A.png)
>>245142
>black outranks Jew in victimhood
I’m not so sure about that. Aside from the occasional joke about Jews loving money, criticizing Jews outside right wing parts of the Internet is especially frowned upon. “Antisemitism” even has its own category separate from the blanket statement of “racism” (though to be fair, this also covers the Jewish religion). Modern social and economic differences between the two groups don’t matter when one of them can play the six gorillion card and immediately get sympathy from “anyone who isn’t an antisemite”. Then again, this might be changing as of late.
>black outranks Jew in victimhood
I’m not so sure about that. Aside from the occasional joke about Jews loving money, criticizing Jews outside right wing parts of the Internet is especially frowned upon. “Antisemitism” even has its own category separate from the blanket statement of “racism” (though to be fair, this also covers the Jewish religion). Modern social and economic differences between the two groups don’t matter when one of them can play the six gorillion card and immediately get sympathy from “anyone who isn’t an antisemite”. Then again, this might be changing as of late.
>>245133
Good plan OP, however, I can't help but notice you are excluding pedosexuals from all the fun. Who will the pedosexuals attack?
Good plan OP, however, I can't help but notice you are excluding pedosexuals from all the fun. Who will the pedosexuals attack?
>>245521
Creating a fake push for pedophiles to be accepted, and having that be picked up and spread by actual people might be the last straw that drives many(more) to distaste of overly progressive ideologies. Especially if official LGBTQ2+ organizations pick it up and run with it. It could even cause a schism within the LGBT community itself.
>>245133
>We need fake Trans accounts condemning feminist opposition to the invasion of protected female spaces by biological males.
If you choose to go the LARPing route, be sure to be mindful of how you say things, and take time to familiarize yourself with the way these groups think and view things. For example, trans women are not "biological males", they should not be considered male in anyway, despite the fact that they still have a penis, and have not undergone any hormone replacement therapy or Sex Reassignment Surgery. If they identify as female, they are female. Period. Therefore, to deny them access to female only spaces, based solely on the fact that they are not Cis-women, is transphobic.
[YouTube] Cultural Marxism - A CIStory![]()
You can watch this shouting match between lesbians and trans-women for a briefer on the tensions between cis and trans women.
>>245142
>>245146
Blacks definitely do not outrank Jews in victimhood. They're probably below the LGBT community on the hierarchy of oppression by this point. One only needs to look at some of Dave Chapelle's recent standup acts where he talks about LGBTQ. In one he talks about Caitlyn Jenner, and wonders about if trans people are going to outrank black people in oppression. In "sticks and stones" he recounts an experience of having to go see the standards and practices department, and being told not to use the word "faggot" in one of his sketches, because he's not gay(though he could use the word nigger "with impunity"). He then talks about how there's an "unwritten and unspoken rule of show business" that you cannot upset the LGBTQ community. Dave also talks about how Kevin Hart wasn't allowed to host the Oscars because he refused to apologize for a joke he made on twitter about smashing a dollhouse over his son's head if his son seemed gay.
Blacks are getting the white people treatment when they cross the LGBTQ community, and they aren't liking it.
This all reminds me of something I've wondered from time to time. If some of these factions are scorned by the greater progressive community, which ones might drift over to the right in opposition of the groups that scorned them? Even seek a more permanent ally-ship with groups on the right? I've already heard of a group in the UK called "gays against shariah." And then there's the aforementioned Black Community. As far as I can see, they've just been used by progressive ideologues; to test welfare programs, to get votes, to shame opposition. As far as I can tell, even in western countries, non-white communities are still fairly homophobic, even in the current year. In countries outside of North America isn't even more so. I hear in Jamaica that it buggery is actually illegal.
What do you guys think? If they were cast out, do you think some of these factions could be absorbed into the greater right wing sphere? I think this site in itself sort of stands as a testament to the greater right sphere's(younger(ish) and on the internet) acceptance of things that are different, but not openly in opposition to them.
Creating a fake push for pedophiles to be accepted, and having that be picked up and spread by actual people might be the last straw that drives many(more) to distaste of overly progressive ideologies. Especially if official LGBTQ2+ organizations pick it up and run with it. It could even cause a schism within the LGBT community itself.
>>245133
>We need fake Trans accounts condemning feminist opposition to the invasion of protected female spaces by biological males.
If you choose to go the LARPing route, be sure to be mindful of how you say things, and take time to familiarize yourself with the way these groups think and view things. For example, trans women are not "biological males", they should not be considered male in anyway, despite the fact that they still have a penis, and have not undergone any hormone replacement therapy or Sex Reassignment Surgery. If they identify as female, they are female. Period. Therefore, to deny them access to female only spaces, based solely on the fact that they are not Cis-women, is transphobic.
[YouTube] Cultural Marxism - A CIStory
>>245142
>>245146
Blacks definitely do not outrank Jews in victimhood. They're probably below the LGBT community on the hierarchy of oppression by this point. One only needs to look at some of Dave Chapelle's recent standup acts where he talks about LGBTQ. In one he talks about Caitlyn Jenner, and wonders about if trans people are going to outrank black people in oppression. In "sticks and stones" he recounts an experience of having to go see the standards and practices department, and being told not to use the word "faggot" in one of his sketches, because he's not gay(though he could use the word nigger "with impunity"). He then talks about how there's an "unwritten and unspoken rule of show business" that you cannot upset the LGBTQ community. Dave also talks about how Kevin Hart wasn't allowed to host the Oscars because he refused to apologize for a joke he made on twitter about smashing a dollhouse over his son's head if his son seemed gay.
Blacks are getting the white people treatment when they cross the LGBTQ community, and they aren't liking it.
This all reminds me of something I've wondered from time to time. If some of these factions are scorned by the greater progressive community, which ones might drift over to the right in opposition of the groups that scorned them? Even seek a more permanent ally-ship with groups on the right? I've already heard of a group in the UK called "gays against shariah." And then there's the aforementioned Black Community. As far as I can see, they've just been used by progressive ideologues; to test welfare programs, to get votes, to shame opposition. As far as I can tell, even in western countries, non-white communities are still fairly homophobic, even in the current year. In countries outside of North America isn't even more so. I hear in Jamaica that it buggery is actually illegal.
What do you guys think? If they were cast out, do you think some of these factions could be absorbed into the greater right wing sphere? I think this site in itself sort of stands as a testament to the greater right sphere's(younger(ish) and on the internet) acceptance of things that are different, but not openly in opposition to them.
1570213762.png (608.3 KB, 1123x769, GeorgeLincolnRockwellAtNationOfIslamRally.png)
>>245585
I agree 100%. Finding unlikely allies is absolutely helpful, and not in the "lowest black unemployment" Republicuck way. Intersectionality means finding something in common for victim groups, and turns out they don't really have anything except for being victims. Thus social justice is all about fomenting hatred against straight white males, because without this hatred the coalition would fly apart at the seams and turn against each other. LGBT easily turn against Muslims, blacks easily turn against LGBT, feminists easily turn against trannies. You can pry at these nicks until they realize that these opposing groups are worse than white people (which isn't hard, considering that whites have been tolerating and even supporting them). They won't vote for you, but that's not the goal; you want to break the (((enemy)))'s united front and introduce uncertainty that encourages even more in-group behavior.
As for alliance, it's not improbable for certain groups particular in the U.S.A. A black ethnostate is a necessary requisite for a separate white ethnostate, after all, and encouraging black nationalists that want to split off rather than continue modern (((slavery))) of their people can only be good for us. Asian identity is an even stronger potential ally as Asians, although apolitical, are increasingly facing pressure for their high IQ and "privileged minority" status; thousands of Roof Koreans would be an incredible sight to behold. You don't have to win over these entire ethnic populations, but consider that a million on your side is a million against the opposition.
I agree 100%. Finding unlikely allies is absolutely helpful, and not in the "lowest black unemployment" Republicuck way. Intersectionality means finding something in common for victim groups, and turns out they don't really have anything except for being victims. Thus social justice is all about fomenting hatred against straight white males, because without this hatred the coalition would fly apart at the seams and turn against each other. LGBT easily turn against Muslims, blacks easily turn against LGBT, feminists easily turn against trannies. You can pry at these nicks until they realize that these opposing groups are worse than white people (which isn't hard, considering that whites have been tolerating and even supporting them). They won't vote for you, but that's not the goal; you want to break the (((enemy)))'s united front and introduce uncertainty that encourages even more in-group behavior.
As for alliance, it's not improbable for certain groups particular in the U.S.A. A black ethnostate is a necessary requisite for a separate white ethnostate, after all, and encouraging black nationalists that want to split off rather than continue modern (((slavery))) of their people can only be good for us. Asian identity is an even stronger potential ally as Asians, although apolitical, are increasingly facing pressure for their high IQ and "privileged minority" status; thousands of Roof Koreans would be an incredible sight to behold. You don't have to win over these entire ethnic populations, but consider that a million on your side is a million against the opposition.
1570269563.mp4 (1.3 MB, Resolution:480x480 Length:00:00:51, The nigger Knows.mp4) [play once] [loop]
Turning the pets against the (((masters))) sounds fun.
I highly recommend you read the following books.
The 48 Laws of Power, The Prince by Machiavelli, and The Art of War.
These 3 books will guide you on this battle against international Finance.
So far I've read the prince and 48 laws. I'll read the art of war as soon as I get my hands on a copy.
What I've heard from people in the art of war is
"Never attack your enemy on their strengths, always attack their weaknesses"
Yes, Leftist in-fighting is a weakness they have.
But this must be a coordinated attack for it to be effective.
The 48 Laws of Power, The Prince by Machiavelli, and The Art of War.
These 3 books will guide you on this battle against international Finance.
So far I've read the prince and 48 laws. I'll read the art of war as soon as I get my hands on a copy.
What I've heard from people in the art of war is
"Never attack your enemy on their strengths, always attack their weaknesses"
Yes, Leftist in-fighting is a weakness they have.
But this must be a coordinated attack for it to be effective.
>>245869
>Yes, Leftist in-fighting is a weakness they have.
(((They))) are at both sides, look for example our champion Trump and his confederate Pence, both are supporting the globohomo agenda and the marxist factories at the schools and universities.
Weaknesses have to be found at the (((System))) core, in other words, to target the beast's heart instead of to get distracted with one of many hydra's heads.
Eroding their narrative and legitimacy, questioning their pseudo authority, making them look a menace to humanity, awakening their pets to turn them against (((them))), may give more rewards than a cheap lulz.
>Yes, Leftist in-fighting is a weakness they have.
(((They))) are at both sides, look for example our champion Trump and his confederate Pence, both are supporting the globohomo agenda and the marxist factories at the schools and universities.
Weaknesses have to be found at the (((System))) core, in other words, to target the beast's heart instead of to get distracted with one of many hydra's heads.
Eroding their narrative and legitimacy, questioning their pseudo authority, making them look a menace to humanity, awakening their pets to turn them against (((them))), may give more rewards than a cheap lulz.
>not operation David and conquer
17 replies | 10 files | 12 UUIDs | Archived