Reviews and general criticism of whatever people wrote in this thread, because why not.
>>243124There's not a ton to review here, obviously, but I do have a few things to say:
>Anypony wanna share their's first?You don't need the apostrophe here, "theirs" is the correct way to write it. I know, English is a self-contradictory and stupid language sometimes, but there you have it.
>Rarity pretended to be busy with inspecting the nails on her hoovesI think I understand what you mean, but you may want to find a less awkward way to phrase it. Horse hooves don't have nails, unless you count the physical nails that are used to attach horseshoes, and I've never been entirely sure how that works in Equestria. I'd personally just leave "nails" out of it and say that Rarity was inspecting her hooves.
>Daring Do and The Jungle of TerrorNice reference. Also, titles of books should be in italics.
>poemGenerally, poetry is either freeform (modern hipster poetry that doesn't rhyme or follow a meter) or traditional metered verse (set number of syllables per line, poem reads rhythmically, rhyming is optional). You seem to be attempting metered and rhyming verse here, but it's very, very awkward.
First, Stiller and Hitler don't rhyme, but it's clear you're attempting to rhyme them. You can sometimes get away with this when writing song lyrics, but with printed verse it's much harder to pull off. Unfortunately there aren't that many words that rhyme with Hitler, but Stiller is a long shot by any metric.
Second, "metered" means that the poem can be read according to some type of rhythmic meter similar to how music is counted. This generally limits the number of syllables that each line can contain, and usually there should be some degree of symmetry between lines. It's simpler to demonstrate this by example, so here is a quick limerick I wrote:
There once was a man with a bonerWho stuck it right into a ponerThe pony protestedAt being molestedAnd henceforth Anon was a loner.You'll note that the number of syllables in each line follow a pattern, and the whole verse can be read to the familiar "man from Nantucket" rhythm (they may not have this in Sweden but you can google examples). It can be broken down as follows:
Line 1: 9 syllables
Line 2: 9 syllables
Line 3: 6 syllables
Line 4: 6 syllables
Line 5: 9 syllables
You'll notice that lines 1, 2 and 5 have the same number of syllables and they all rhyme. Lines 3 and 4 both have six syllables and rhyme with each other but not with the other lines. You'll also notice that all the syllable groupings are all divisible by 3 which gives you a hint that this poem is meant to be read in a triple meter (3/4 or 6/8 in musical notation). Now, let's break down what you wrote in a similar way:
Line 1: 8 syllables
Line 2: 12 syllables
Line 3: 11 syllables
Line 4: 8 syllables
Rhythmically this verse is all over the place, I've read it multiple times and can't come up with a way to count it. Rhymes can sometimes give the reader a clue as to how the poem is meant to be rhythmically divided, but you need to establish a consistent pattern. You look like you're trying to establish 2-line rhyming pairs, as 1 and 2 seem (intended) to rhyme with each other, as do 3 and 4. If that's the case, you need to establish a pattern. For a verse like this, it would make the most sense to either have all lines in the poem contain the same number of syllables, or else have the first line of the pair have a set number and the second line have a different set number, and keep it consistent for each pairing. Here's an example of the latter:
I despise the vile Jew,He smells like ass and stinky poo.Oh that Hitler would return,And make those stupid Hebrews burn.You'll note that it follows a pattern of 2 line rhyming pairs, with the first line 7 syllables long and the second 8 syllables.
I find it helpful to imagine that you are writing a song, and try to make the lines of the poem conform to musical measures. Pick a song you like to listen to and try to fit the lines of your poem into the rhythm of the verses. It will usually start balancing out on its own if you do this. Another good method is to pick a common poetic meter like a haiku or a limerick and practice writing verses that conform to these patterns. Poetry is fun.
>>243225>>243226Once again I would like to implore you to consider signing up for Grammarly, or at least proofreading a bit before posting. There are a number of little errors in here that just drive me absolutely bonkers. I can't currently muster the autism to address them all, so I will stick to addressing content.
This piece is actually a pretty good exercise in writing conversation between two parties, and I'd encourage anyone who struggles with writing dialog to try something like this (*cough* Nigel *cough*). You do a good job of maintaining a distinct and character-accurate speaking style for both Rarity and AJ. However:
>Oh but darlinRarity is speaking here, but "darlin" is something Applejack would say. Rarity would pronounce it as "darling". This may be a typo so I can probably let it slide.
>Yeah, you are rightIn this case, AJ is speaking. AJ would probably use the contraction "you're" as opposed to "you are".
>If you have no preference, darlinWelp, you did it again, so I'm guessing it's intentional. Unless Rarity is being ironic here, you'll want to have her say "darling" and save the "darlin" for AJ.
>Arggh, cap'n. Hoist the colors!Rarity is also speaking out of character here, but in this case it's clear she's doing it intentionally to be funny.
>with a symbol on its brim representing a white pony skull and pair of crossing bones forming an `X´.This is a rather verbose way to describe it. I'd just say "pony skull and crossbones."
>neighponiesNeighponese (ese as opposed to ies). Don't forget to capitalize proper nouns.