With the escalation of anti-white politics and the clamping down of free speech, including the coordinated takedown of 8Chan, it is apparent that the unsanitized internet is living on borrowed time. We need to step up our efforts to spread our message while we can and to prepare for when we can't. Unfortunately, NPCs and psychos, as well as those egged on by alphabets, are assuming this means grabbing guns and going after the weakest available "targets." It's clear that this is 100% counterproductive, and I made this thread >>234190 → to assure posters and 8Chan refugees of this fact, as well as the necessity to disavow any random acts of violence.
However, that begs the question: what can be done instead that is actually effective and can be done on a mass scale? Let's discuss that here! I believe I have three answers:
Networking & Infiltration
Redpilling but more organized. You meet up with people who are intelligent and logical and gradually, through friendly argument, convince them and bring them on your side. You then coordinate to bring in more and more people. Be mindful of 6 Degrees of Separation and don't expose yourself. When you have several people you can set up a "secret" club. Then you can get serious and get your network to set up their own groups. It's not a secret society by any means, but a bunch of like-minded people with strong collectivist interest and ties into various organizations.
Guard against infiltration by, first of all, maintaining a low profile. Different but connected networks should not have abundant knowledge of each others' membership to prevent complete compromise in the case of interrogation. Coordination should be done on a personal, informal level and if codes are used, multiple codes are mandatory. Networks should gather intel, recruit sympathetic outsiders and conduct nonviolent or covert disruption. Leftists have long had extensive networks that function in this way so it is about time we use such tactics. Get into institutions first that are most inclined toward us: libertarian groups, churches, and grassroots conservative publications.
Agorism
This is on a broader social level. Agorism, or "counter-economics" is the conducting of voluntary transactions and exchanges outside the purview of the regulated market. A "gray market," it involves purchasing and selling on a personal level; as it necessitates a good amount of social trust (much higher than that extended towards the government) it works best locally in predominantly white neighborhoods. By definition it is untraceable due to using cash or crypto, and is going to become badly needed soon. Agorism can be something as small as mowing someone's lawn for cash and not reporting it as taxes, but more famous examples that thwarted entire governments include private exchanges of needed goods in the Soviet Union and marijuana trade in the U.S. that stubbornly persisted despite draconian laws. It seems to be somewhat accepted in America but is less prevalent in Europe where people are too trusting of government; for agorism to flourish it's necessary to conduct trade outside the purview of government and adopt safety measures to prevent being found out.
The People's Veto
See www.youtube.com/watch?v=pcfFuBLzLC4
The United States has this little-known principle called Jury Nullification. It's illegal in fact to tell an active juror about it, so tell as many people who aren't jurors for when they're called to jury duty. Jury nullification essentially is the quantum computing equivalent of verdicts: it doesn't matter whether the defendant is guilty or innocent because the law itself is unconstitutional. No need to leave it to powdered-hair judges from a liberal arts college or to do-nothing legislators, you can say "This law is unjust" yourself. Hence "The People's Veto." This should be our single greatest weapon on the legal stage, and if it's at all possible county and state-level governments should be pushed to simply nullify federal law, just as California and major cities have done with immigration law. This is a dangerous venture, of course, but if a stand is not taken then we've as good as lost. Broad civil disobedience across the entire country can have a powerful effect, and I doubt that the military–most of whom dislike the elites, if not sympathize with us directly–would dare start a fight then.
Think creatively, not dangerously.