>The current state of the democrat party >Just spics spics and more foreigners >BUT MY WOMYNS >FREE HEALTH CARE FOR EVERYONE EXCEPT STRAIGHT WHITE MEN >WE NEED MORE GIBS! >Speaking in a fucking foreign language to American voters Jesus christ HHHHHHHHHHHHHHAHAHAHAHAHA
>this president has gone backwards >our economy needs immigrants >economy better then ever the worst part is knowing that people will actually believe her
>>227406 I hope everyone on the right watches this debate. It's important to be reminded of what we need to take care of before dealing with anything else.
>MY BLACK SON MY BLACK SON >MY BLACK SON >MY BLACK SON MY BLACK SON >MY BLACK SON >MY BLACK SON MY BLACK SON >MY BLACK SON >MY BLACK SON MY BLACK SON >MY BLACK SON >MY BLACK SON MY BLACK SON >MY BLACK SON >MY BLACK SON MY BLACK SON >MY BLACK SON >MY BLACK SON MY BLACK SON >MY BLACK SON >MY BLACK SON MY BLACK SON >MY BLACK SON >MY BLACK SON MY BLACK SON >MY BLACK SON >MY BLACK SON MY BLACK SON >MY BLACK SON >MY BLACK SON MY BLACK SON >MY BLACK SON
>Blumpf won, it must be Russia >Blumpf said he's not a Russian agent, that's exactly what a Russian agent would say >we're not finding any evidence of Russia, Russia must be hiding it >Mueller's Russia report didn't find anything, Russia must have interfered >Welcome to the 2019 Democratic Debate, let's talk about Russia
all i needed to know about the usa i learned from the simpsons and married with children, those were in fact not entertainment shows, but documentaries.
if you think the usa is bad now just wait for the post trump season 2024
they gotta know speaking spanish is controversial. they're doing it on porpose, but what is their endgame? is it just "if people talk about me a lot IIhave publicity?"
>>227527 naturally in the political cycle, the losing party is supposed to deradicalize and the winning party is supposed to radicalize, and the pendulum swings back. Dems aren't deradicalizing for at least 50 years and the right is radicalizing at a snail's pace.
>>227541 true. but you have to remember zoomers wanted to vote for trump at an over whelming majority, even when they are also the most non-white generation in american history. probably because of how far right Z whites are.
so if we add red zoomers to the vote with the gibs goblins that already vote = more red, and that's not mentioning the steady red-pilling of the broader society. With a country as massive as the US, the effects may not be extreme but +52% is still enough.
>>227541 I'm not convinced it's going to be such a cut and dry matter. Best projection it's still going to take them a couple of decades before they have enough spics in the country registered to vote to literally render the white vote irrelevant. A lot can happen between now and then.
I tend to think the divide between "red" and "blue" America is going get worse quickly. Even normie voters on both sides are realizing that there's really no reconciliation because it's not just opposing sides of an argument but two diametrically opposed views of what America is and what it should be in the future. At the Federal level it's likely going to be a massive tug of war with very little being accomplished because each side will do everything it can to undermine the other once it's in power. If one side or the other doesn't openly secede, we'll probably see an increase in States defying Federal orders and behaving more and more like independent entities. I predict an overall weakening of the Federal government and America becoming increasingly fragmented and chaotic, far from the solidification of power by the Left that all the doom and gloom posters are predicting.
>>227544 I keep hearing this urban legend that Generation Z is going to somehow be the first generation since at least WW2 to be further right than the generation before it, despite being more non-white and entirely inundated with leftist shilling, and I honestly don’t see where this belief comes from
>On a range of issues, from Donald Trump’s presidency to the role of government to racial equality and climate change, the views of Gen Z – those ages 13 to 21 in 2018 – mirror those of Millennials >Only about three-in-ten Gen Zers and Millennials (30% and 29%, respectively) approve of the way Donald Trump is handling his job as president. This compares with 38% of Gen Xers, 43% of Boomers and 54% of Silents. >while majorities in Gen Z and the Millennial generation say government should do more to solve problems, rather than that government is doing too many things better left to businesses and individuals, Gen Xers and Boomers are more evenly divided on this issue >the two younger generations are more likely than older generations to say that blacks are treated less fairly than whites in the United States today. And they are much more likely than their elders to approve of NFL players kneeling >Majorities among Gen Z and the Millennial generation say increasing racial and ethnic diversity in the U.S. is a good thing for society while older generations are less convinced of this. And they’re more likely to have a positive view of interracial and same-sex marriage than their older counterparts
Gen Z is more woke than millennials in a couple regards: >Gen Zers are distinct from Millennials and older generations in at least two ways >Gen Zers are more likely than Millennials to say they know someone who prefers that others use gender-neutral pronouns to refer to them: 35% say this is the case, compared with a quarter of Millennials >The youngest generation is also the most likely to say forms or online profiles that ask about a person’s gender should include options other than “man” or “woman.” Roughly six-in-ten Gen Zers (59%) hold this view, compared with half of Millennials
And the Gen Zers who do vote Republican are more ducked than average: >Gen Z Republicans are more likely than older generations of Republicans to say that blacks are treated less fairly than whites. Among Republicans, 43% of Gen Zers say this, compared with 30% of Millennials >Gen Z Republicans are also much more likely than their GOP counterparts in older generations to say increasing racial and ethnic diversity in the U.S. is a good thing for society. >Gen Z Republicans are much more likely than Republicans in older generations to say government should do more to solve problems
There’s actually many more of these in the statistics, and they all show Gen Z to be as bad as the Millennials or slightly worse, but I don’t have enough time to copy paste all of them
>>227643 He had his chance last time, he's finished this time around. The far left is going to go with one of the black female Bernies and the nomination will go to Creepy Uncle Joe regardless.
Everyone raised their hands in support of providing medical care for undocumented (read; illegal) immigrants >>227655 Essentially, but not to the fullest yet
>>227656 >lol bro why even have citizenship? Come on in, we can take everybody free health care and education for everyone! We'll just tax the rich, no problem
>we gotta fix the root cause for why people are coming here >so let's shit up the place with socialism You know, in a roundabout way, destroying this nation with socialism might actually stop the flow of illegal immigrants into the country.
>>227726 He knows he's getting the nomination regardless, this whole thing is a farce. This whole debate is literally just 20 people arguing over who gets to lose to Biden.
>>227750 Nevermind the consequences to the electrical infrastructure, which can't sustain the mere voltage requirement of an electrically dependent society,....
>>227736 Because women make up about half the voters, and an overwhelming majority of those women seem to vote for the left. So if a candidate on the left isn't outwardly 100% in favor of abortion, they will get thrown to the wolves, and be tarnished as the candidate who wants to take rights and autonomy away from women, or will stand by while others do it.
Gotta love how they act like Trump is the worst president in American history when Andrew Jackson wrecked the natives and Ronald Reagan distributed crack cocaine to impoverished neighborhoods so he could fund CONTRA.
<BASED AND BUTTPILLED >BASED AND BUTTPILLED <BASED AND BUTTPILLED >BASED AND BUTTPILLED <BASED AND BUTTPILLED >BASED AND BUTTPILLED <BASED AND BUTTPILLED >BASED AND BUTTPILLED <BASED AND BUTTPILLED >BASED AND BUTTPILLED
>I would like to thank these 19 other literally who's for taking the time to come out and give us the illusion of debate before we nominate Biden anyway
>>227816 >Implying creating retarded gangbangers, crackheads, ghettos, our ineffective war on drugs, and our dogshit prison system is based Reagan is either directly or indirectly responsible for almost every single problem that plagues this country nowadays.
>>227831 >Jackson 2.0 >Baron Trump breaking the Federal Reserve as hard as Jackson broke the Second National Bank There is very little I have wanted as much as this.
>>227815 You're not including Alexander Hamilton, who helped to create the national debt in the first place?
>>227839 Whatever happens it would need to be a coordinated effort. The Hitler thing was too disorganized, too much random energy going off in too many different directons.
>>227839 Might be worth giving it a try, at least. He would certainly have a greater connection with us burgers than we do with even Hitler. We've got little under a year to prepare, as his birth date was on March 15th.
>>227845 You've got to love how they make it look like it's going to be close. I would absolutely love watching a Trump/Warren match though, that would be entertaining as fuck
>>227844 The absolute state of this country might be enough to make him roll in his grave, anyways. It's far flung from the republican values he championed in his day.
I'm not very knowledgeable about how we should go about this. I don't want to derail too far from the thread, but are there materials I could look up between now and then that might explain the process a bit more in detail?
>>227845 >>227846 Gotta love them fake numbers for a fake primary.
>>227847 >are there materials I could look up between now and then that might explain the process a bit more in detail? I would say go to /x/ and ask for any information they can give you about summoning egregores. Evocation is actually fairly simple, the main thing for a mass operation is that everyone be coordinated and focusing their energy on the right thing at the right time.
>>227540 >>227645 >>227665 >>227862 I fear for the future of the US Right without trump. I fear for the future of the US without Trump. I fear for the future of North America, and even the world without Trump. And that's really fucking sad. HONK
>>227541 depends, what the democrats are proposing is basically the end of gibs.
decriminalized immigration is open immigration you cannot have gibs and open borders. the US cannot pay welfare for the world's poor. it will crash the entire system.
welfare used to be better before mass migration into the US. you could think all people on welfare would vote against open immigration. however that's the trick the democrats have played on them. the democrats have them so concerned about ebil whypeepol that they don't notice that the gibs they love so much are being completely undermined.
liberals either don't realize this because they live in a land of fantasies or they're communists trying to destroy the system.
>>227898 If the Democrats open the border they'll end up having the Fed create trillions of dollars to try and sustain welfare payments. We'll end up with an inflationary depression like Venezuela or Zimbabwe and they'll blame capitalism and white people.
>>227898 >you cannot have gibs and open borders. the US cannot pay welfare for the world's poor. it will crash the entire system. This is an obvious flaw in the Democrats' insistence on having both open borders and a welfare state, but Democratic voters don't usually think that hard about it; if they did, they wouldn't be Democrats. There will always be a consistent population of non-wites voting for gibs, because there will always be non-whites who are poor/desperate (especially if new ones keep coming over the border) and vote for gibs because they don't have any other means to feed themselves and/or they've been trained to believe that "le ebil whyte man" is responsible for diminishing social mobility in this country. Democratic politicians especially love mass immigration because it means an influx of impoverished brown people who are likely to become dependent on gibs, and a demographic shift that will ensure more constituents in the future. They don't care if they can consistently deliver gibs so long as enough shitskins keep voting to get them. It's like Tammany Hall: they ship-in fresh uneducated/impoverished constituents from poor countries, and then politically profit off of the demographic bloat. Most non-whites who think they'll get gibs consistently vote democrat, while most non-whites who don't think dems can deliver simply don't vote.
This is why border control is so important: to end the vicious cycle of welfare, demographic replacement, and poverty.