>>226816Hot damn nice ID.I'd argue if the person states what they want their organs used for they should be allowed that. If you are a donor they won't try to keep you alive, just long enough to get to the next payer or recipient.
>>2265261. Fix yourself, and then others. All else follows. I agree.
2. I agree. I'd recommend mandatory labor if applicable to change their mind. A cool down period depending on a case by case basis. With extreme, and bizarre treatments available.
3. Currently, Christianity even as a puppet is providing resistance to the other dune religions. Later I believe that those religions will fail.
4.
>>226552 this.
5. Indeed.
6. I don't trust the state enough, or other people. The Treasury of the 'bank' ought to be able to be exchanged for the currency they provide.
7.
8. Sounds good. Gene editing nearby will be helpful. We just can't lose the flawed genetic code just incase something stupid happens. Don't want to doom everyone because we are too similar that we get wiped out for a variety of reasons.
9. I disagree it's a social contract the implies a returned favor at a later date. In this case understanding the person, and situation. People can't demand empathy, or sympathy.
10. Most people are sheep. They should not be allowed to make changes. Short term ill planned ideas hurt so much. Either they are removed from the gene pool, naturally filtering them out. Or they are related at second class citizens for enacting long term change. The later is doomed to fail after a while. I have made some stupid choices in the past so I should make sure the ideas, and plans I have are not idiotic.
11. Eh... If China doesn't go through it's revolution, and all of Korea fully unites, and has a full military, if Japan has a full military...
12. Important Utilities, Must not be Denied. It all boils down to resources, time, and efficacy.
13. I believe in the value of the people that put work to create the 'rights'. The one's I agree with. I think the problem is that those arn't human rights (((they))) designed. It's as you say malicious manipulation.
14. I agree with that. I would extend that to business, corporations, groups, gatherings, and people.
15. If they believe in censorship they will be the first to taste it.
16. I disagree. Currently we have all the shit, but some fuckers are preventing us from going all in. I mean ffs we can make better nuclear reactors, but we aren't. It's costly, and time consuming because we Have to devote so much shit to these fucks that keep dragging us down. We are caught in a web of lies, and promises. The sooner we are free from that bullshit the sooner we can start making stuff better.
17. One day...