>>226457>>226462I quoted both your post and
>>226398, tbh the Jew stuff was mostly for that anon since he was ranting about it harder. I just wanted to kill two goys with one post, since I'm JIDF and all. It still applies to you anyway, since you go on to say:
>his lobby that magically gets what it wants stands directly opposed to what I want. in fact they so control my elected officials that I'm now supposed to support detestable shit like Trump's bold immigration plan for the 21st century. I'm crazy for calling out this obvious bias our political leaders have. I'm peddling crazy conspiracy theories that a foreign lobby exercises immense power over my nation and limits our own sovereignty. See, right here you seem to be proving
>>226464's point, in that you claim not to care about Jews, then go on to rant incoherently about Jews. As far as I can tell, this word salad seems to be
>implying that the Israeli lobby is somehow behind Trump's immigration policy, which is false. It doesn't even make sense. If I'm wrong, feel free to elaborate on how I'm wrong.
>and all I want is what Trump promised in 2015This actually seems like a good place to address your main concern, which seems to be that Trump has somehow reversed course or pulled some kind of bait and switch on immigration, which I also don't agree with. I've read through the whitehouse.gov statement on the "bold new plan for the 21st century" and by and large it's consistent with what he campaigned on. He wants to increase border security, curb illegal immigration, and change the focus of legal immigration so that it prioritizes skilled workers who speak English. Pretty much all of that was in his campaign platform. Is it ideal? No, of course not, but it is consistent with what he campaigned on, and more importantly it's a reasonable alternative to the Democratic plan, which is basically unfettered third world immigration. Politics, like life in general, is mostly a play it where it lays type of game, where you have to make the best moves available to you in whatever shitty situation you find yourself in.
Anyway, if you read his plan carefully, he actually makes some pretty shrewd moves here imo. This section in particular I think is quite clever:
>Increases diversity and equality.>No matter where in the world someone is born or who their relatives are, if they want to become American, they should face the same standard as anyone else applying.>The “Build America Visa” will use a clear, fair point-based criteria—one that prizes extraordinary achievement and potential to contribute to our Nation—to determine who should be issued a green card for permanent residence in the United States.What this is basically saying is that the US can set a universal standard for the kind of people it wants to admit, and hold all applicants to the same standard. In the context of the rest of the plan, the emphasis will be on English-speakers with marketable skills who are not criminals. In practice, this standard already weeds most of the undesirables. A computer programmer from Norway who speaks English and has no criminal record will automatically score higher than some nigger from Somalia who only speaks clickity clack and has no plan other than to immediately get on welfare. What's clever about it is that it effectively rangebans the third world without explicitly using race or nationality as determining factors. Better yet, Trump throws the left's own language of diversity and equality back in its face by pointing out that he's giving everyone from everywhere fair and equal consideration.
My guess is, he learned his lesson from the so-called "Muslim ban" he tried to pull off at the beginning of his presidency. In that situation, he tried to explicitly stop immigration from specific majority Muslim countries, which made it easy for his enemies to call him racist and Islamophobic. All they had to do was send the issue to some Obama-appointed judge to get it squashed, after which all Trump could do was appeal. With this move, he's basically backing the Democrats into a corner where it is going to be harder and harder for them to object to his immigration proposals without flat-out admitting that what they really want is open borders and unfettered third world immigration.
>the social revolution of the 1960s is cancer. everything that came from it is cancer. if supporting that means saving Western Civilization than Western Civilization is already dead.This is an interesting statement. Apart from some good music coming out of it, I agree that the cultural revolutions of the 1960s were cancer and led us to the unfortunate situation we currently find ourselves in. However, as far as saving Western civilization goes, all I suggested was that you should read some books; there's plenty of them out there that were written prior to 1960 if that's a concern for you.
>>226483Trump isn't exempt from criticism and it's fine to have objections and debate the individual merits of his policies. However, what I'm trying to point out in this thread is that anons like the faggot I've been arguing with seem to be taking a self-defeating position, which is that Trump should be outright abandoned because he hasn't done everything we'd hoped he would. Right now, Trump is literally the best chance we've got and I think we should stay on this path and at least see where it goes, because we have no other real options and the alternative is worse. As I said before, you have to play it where it lays.
>>226476Please do, I'd like to read it.