/mlpol/ - My Little Politics

>>225260
>pro-life is considered porn
Wat. Leftists have even more bizarre sexual preferences than I realized

>>225262
It makes sense if you analyze it. For instance leftists believe that anyone with anti-gay views must be a closet homosexual. They believe this because the left is made up of self-hating miserable people who assume that everyone thinks the way they do. So, it would follow that leftists all secretly masturbate to the things they profess to hate in public. We've seen examples of it already. Feminist women all secretly harbor rape fantasies and cheat on their cuck boyfriends with men who boss them around. Faggots all secretly wish they could be normal, functional men with wives and families, so they perform the whole charade of getting fake married to each other and adopting children.

So, why wouldn't it make sense that womyn who claim to love abortion secretly sit around in their dingy cat-filled apartments, schlicking it to the March for Life Facebook page?

>>225263
That Does Actually make sense. All women want to have children despite whatever programming they have received.

>>225263
>>225280
I think you are both missing the point when you ID the adversary as simple leftist thinking.
The policies of these companies are pure (((cultural marxism))) against Western Christian Culture. First they deployed a tactic of criticism and even ridicule against our traditional values, they call it "deconstruction", and now, the next step is to force (((their))) values on the degenerate and demoralized goy.
These actions are not random or a reaction to certain events, but a planned strategy to demolish the West.

>>225260
Here I found from where the censorship is coming from:
>Koch Brothers Team Up With George Soros, Patreon and Airbnb to Fight Online Extremism
>Representatives for the Charles Koch Institute and the Anti-Defamation League will join executives from tech companies which currently include Eventbrite, Mozilla, Pinterest, Patreon and Airbnb.
https://observer.com/2019/06/koch-brothers-george-soros-patreon-airbnb-fight-online-extremism/

>>225450
They deleted the original YT video of the whistleblower?!??
They truly are in full panic mode. Wonder how hard they want to deplatform Project Veritas, and if they will dare to do it.

Good followup video
>Pinterest Insider Speaks Out: "The tech companies can't fight us all"
https://youtu.be/yuX87JFzLFc

>>225597
Brainwashed children burning dis-information. I can think of easier ways to create slaves.

>>225296
There is nothing "western" about cuckstianity.

> Destroy 99% of Roman art, literature, and scientific works, including works on chemistry, evolutionary theory, and fucking NEUROSCIENCE
> Only reason we know about Greek philosophy and Roman medicine/engineering is because of rare book hunters, along with christcucked monks who wrote refutals while quoting old works at great length
> Pass religious edicts against bathing, and publish works of the first "saints" living in filth
> First "saint" was a filth-dwelling animal who was almost seduced by the Devil in the form of a little boy

Bite me, proto-jewISH shill.

>>225684
Ah, I missed you ISHmael. Welcome back. Keep posting the same graphics and maybe people will buy what you are saying this time.

>>225687
Different person from the one you are thinking of, but the original discussions prompted original research. Not to be confused with christcuck "research", which amounts to listening to whatever their rabbis/priests tell them.

Shhhh, it's okay, Schlomo. Just think that you invented the West. Ignore the entire international banking scheme being propped up by christcucked monarchs who made usury deals with court jews.

>>225597
>>225684

Assuming you are the same person. Could you please read a few books and educate yourself in the outside world.

This level of shit posting is for the lobotomised crows who watch BBC and read The Guardian. I expect you are affiliated to something of similar value.

>>225623
Project Veritas is so cool. I love their videos.

>>225689
And it's ok that you ignore the actual text of the Bible and it's teachings against the jewish faith. You believe what you will. The Bible has given me the willpower to fight on against them. If it was their intent to make something to aid their efforts, they should have tried a bit harder. I would go into it more, but that would derail this thread. It's just nice to see another ISHmael around. Good luck to you sir.

>>225691
>>225696

Let's provide some summaries and literary citations that indicate that the Romans hated christcucks BEFORE they destroyed everything.

Some excerpts about St. Antony:

"[After the seductions of Satan, who had taken the form of a beautiful woman had been thwarted by St. Antony], Satan gnashed his teeth with fury; but he wasn't done yet. He decided to send his trump card: an apparition in the form of a young black boy who prostrated himself at Antony's feet. As he lay there, the demon announced that he was the 'friend of fornication', and bragged about how many chaste souls he had led astray..."
- "Life of Antony", 5-6

*Note in the work ascribed above, it is also mentioned that Antony never washes, and never changes his shirt.

The great Roman neurologist, Galden, often insulted christians and the like, commonly expressing the stubbornness of his colleagues by stating, "one might more easily teach novelties to the followers of Moses and Christ."
- Galen, "De Pulsuum Differentiis", III, 3, quoted from Walzern's 1949 "Galen on Jews and Christians"

An additional excerpt from the above-ascribed work of Galen:

"[Galen] disparaged physicians who offered views on the body without demonstration to back up their assertions, saying that to listen to them was 'as if one had come into the school of Moses and Christ [and heard] talk of undemonstrated laws... It is [Moses's] method in his books... to write without offering proofs, saying `God commanded, God spake.`"

Another Greek intellectual, Celsus, countered the christcucked movement that was gaining traction in 170 A.D. He expressed great worry over the popularity of this proto-jewish cult amongst the fringe groups of Rome. He argued that a Roman soldier had gotten Mary pregnant, while the Creation was "absurd". He called the idea of the Resurrection "revolting" and "the hope of worms". This is a brief summarization of his extensive, vitriolic attack on christcucks in "Contra Celsum".

>>225701
On a related note to the very brief summaries of Celsus, he also was one of many Roman philosophers who prescribed to atomic theory, which he argued did away with the myth of Creation altogether.

To go about understanding the arguments against christcucks today, we should first look to the past. Instead of directly criticizing christcucks' beliefs, Celsus *also* identified many of the same common arguments made about them today. Celsus wrote, "Their injunctions are like this. Let no one educated, no one wise, no one sensible draw near. For these abilities are thought by us to be evils... [Christians] are only able to convince the foolish, dishonourable, and stupid, and only slaves, women, and little children."

In fact, Celsus noted that Christians often called out to children amongst other gullible parties in Rome, claiming "that they alone... know the right way to live, and if the children would believe them, they would become happy." Celsus wrote further on the subject of christcucks' ignorance, "[Christians] do not want to give or to receive a reason for what they believe, and use such expressions as 'Do not ask questions, just believe' and 'They faithw ill save thee.'"

Even Origen, Celsus's greatest intellectual rival in Rome, stated "the stupidity of some Christians is heavier than the sand of the sea." Before 200 A.D., christcucks were already reviled by the Roman community of philosophers and scientists. (Origen, Homilies on Genesis)

>>225701
>>225703
>post a response saying let's not derail thread further with a pointless argument
>ISHmael 2.0 derails thread further by spamming info about people not liking the historically hated Christian faith

Just make a thread already about how cucked it is to believe that Jesus even existed or something. This is just embarrassing.

>>225706
Liars and kikes should be exposed. Trying to implant christcucked double-think in the midst of a discussion is subversion and must be called out by such by honest people. The original reply I was replying to is obvious subversion, with a lack of subtlety rivaling fed-posters.

>>225710
And now you have called out the post with sufficiency. Congrats. Now, stop filling this thread up with off topic material and get back on subject. You can always make a thread to expose le evil Chirstians if you so desire. Now, I'll go back to being sane enough to know that someone with a different religious belief simply mentioned in a post doesn't make them a jewish mole. Hell, it wasn't even mentioned in the post itself, but the related pic. Are crosses that triggering to you? Reminds me of a certain group that likes to take them down because they offend jews and muslims.

>>225711
Eh, now that I look at it harder, it does say Western Christian Culture. I suppose that would get you riled up. I concede that point.

>>225691
>Assuming you are the same person.
Not the same.

>>225701
I think you are using selective bias and being neglectful of the fact that all religions/cults stem from familial relationships. You also should take into account that historically good/bad events and teachings were attributed to named individuals even if they were not the originators. There is also the case that two named individuals are either the same person or went to the same school.

Non of your construts so far include paganism or buddhism and JC was just as much a follower of Buddhist doctrine and Judaism. Christianity is in basic terms a fusion of the both. It also does not take into account that Jesuits would quite often mix their philosophy with local stuff to gain acceptance. All extablished religions do that. The original Buddhist teachers in Japan did not teach Nirvana because it would have not worked with the people at the time.

Essentially if you are going to stick to stuff that happend A.D. then you have not studied enough.

>>225718
My assumption was based on the source material as the jpegs had similar naming structure. If not the same person then I assume both posters source their shit posting from the same corner of the internet.

>>225720
>My assumption was based on the source material as the jpegs had similar naming structure
I don't know the other anon, but the videos came straight from Tube sites with original titles.

>>225721
Fair enough

>>225718
>>225720

Clarifying: I posted replies >>225684 , >>225689 , >>225701 , and >>225703 in response to the baby-boomer-tier kike worship, and to follow up with the shill who responded. I am a distinct individual from the one the shill referred to as ISHmael.

>>225719
The arguments you are making reflect a surface-level understanding of theological distribution in the Old World, and a willing ignorance towards targeted analysis. Further ignorance is demonstrated by the use of the word "pagan" (which is common amongst many quasi-"pagans" too).

> JC was a Buddhist and a Jew in belief

It is highly-unlikely the individual you are referring to actually existed, according to any non-biblical sources.

https://www.jesusneverexisted.org

On another note, if you read the arguments previously made, I state that christcucks used whatever lore they had to, in order to sway people into their brainwashed system. This was well-understood over 1800 years ago. Not once do I state that beliefs do not/should not have any cross-over: you seem to think that being aware of theological exchange makes you more "intelligent", Leddit. The best way to subvert beliefs is to understand how beliefs work.

>Jesuits would quite often mix their philosophy with local stuff to gain acceptance

Correction: (((they))) would forcefully conquer peoples, rape them and corrupt their bloodlines, and then destroy the belief system through subversion. In early cuckstainity, this was internally enforced through religious edicts, and externally enforced through wars on neighboring peoples (let me politically correct for you, Leddit, "missionaries").

The most effective way to destroy a belief system is to subvert it through "compromise"- banning a belief outright creates a culture of resistance, while subverting it distorts and destroys its memory. Break a people through military might, or impose on them your willingness to burn down their village if they don't comply, and suddenly a cucked/subverted version of their solstice festival seems like a fair compromise. Do this to them for generation after generation, and eventually they've compromised away all of the beliefs of their ancestors. It is the same judeo-christcuck tactic employed by neocons in the US to disarm citizens.

judeo-christcuck cultists were very similar in demographic to judeo-bolshevik hordes, as both used/do use the same playbook.

> Buddhist teachers in Japan did not teach Nirvana because it would not have worked with the people at the time

Two decent individuals with structurally-different beliefs can find points of common ground, as they both live in the same world. This is a false equivalence stemming your conditioned, INTENTIONAL ignorance of context.

>>225766
KYS

>>225766
>It is highly-unlikely the individual you are referring to actually existed, according to any non-biblical sources.
Huh, just like the holocaust

>>225766
I like this excerpt.
Saved.

>>225766
Apologies, I meant to indicate that

https://www.jesusneverexisted.com (not .org)

provides a number of clarifications on the origins of christcuck mythos. This is relevant to the reply this is replying to.

>>225817
>>225766
So (((Ishmael))), I Find it very Strange you would take on a jewish name and then try to deceive our posters while attacking Christianity.
http://jewishencyclopedia. com/articles/8251-ishmael

Looks like there is more good coming out about the tech giants manipulation.

>TEASER: New Tech Insider Story Coming MONDAY
https://youtu.be/L-gCRtBun18

Pressconference regarding the censorship
https://youtu.be/kRwr-u0GHIM