This won't be a blog post but at this point I think I'm ready to leave racialism. I think everyone should at this point and I'll list my thoughts on it bellow. Yes before you ask I'm a regular here and been here since 4/mlpol/ I'm not a shill just read my thoughts and criticize them accordingly.
So let me start with this. Racialism is wrong when it comes to "whiteness". Whiteness is a problematic term since there have been 3 white races throughout time and to say that there is one is wrong when you consider the cultural and spiritual natures of these three different races. The first race of whites were the Greco -Roman which are not Germanic, which is the Western White race. The last one is the Slavic White race. All three groups are separate due to spiritual differences (so culture). At its easiest to explain to a racialist, why is Ukraine and most of the soviet states doing so shit when the Baltic states are doing quiet well? Its because Ukrainians are Slavs and westerns live in the Baltic. The Baltic peoples are Western in outlook and share our lust for technology while Slavs rarely do.
Same goes with Meds. I've seen a meme where it compares a German straw hut to a Roman Colosseum to mock the German for his primitiveness while the Med was at the height of his civilization. The position has largely been changed now with true meds really only living in southern Italy (surprise the shittiest part) while the remaining are all Germanic peoples (Lombard in the case of Italy.) The Mediterranean peoples also have a unique cultural outlook different from that of the Western so its pretty useless to lump these three groups of "whites" into one category especially considering how costly it is to use such a term in modern society.
So why is it that we ended up confusing Western with "white"? Easy two myths got us confused on such a path. The first of the two was created by the Italians. That is they were Romans, when they are not. Again Lombard tribes moved into Italy and kicked the Byzantines out and colonized Northern Italy. The southern Italians are those more Roman-esc but they are a defeated people. But everywhere around them they saw Roman works and soon before you knew it they began reading their works. To them then it became enshrined in myth that they were Rome's successor peoples. Thus they carried the myth to all of Europe that Rome's successor people were the men of the West. After all late Rome was Christian, and the Italians were Western and if they were formerly the Romans then that must mean Rome was an extension of our people. This myth however is wrong. We were the murders of Rome, not their successors.
The myth created with Russia and the Slavs was even more dangerous. Its because the Slavs aren't a dead people who we killed like the Grecco-Romans but a people coming into being. They are analogous to the barbarians North of Rome towards the west, a young people full of Heroism and hatred towards what the west has become. However to survive against the West Peter the great imported Westernism into the Slavic heart lands. To compete against the machine he wooed westerns into his cities where they would form artificial enclaves in places like St. Petersberg. But this would crack and die off soon. The Russian Revolution would be the first step towards the end of Peter's system. Stalin would soon purge most westerns within the Slavic heart lands and when communism broke down the last Western idea within the Russian people too would die off. Now Russia is entirely Slavic in its soul with the big cities in Russia becoming eaten away by true Russian culture.
The remaining parts of the Eastern world has followed suit. Poland and Hungary refuse to be suicidal like the western portions of the EU because they are young and full of potential. Romania and Bulgaria enter the EU like how we 1000 years ago took Jews into our courts. We hated the Jews for they represented and older cultural form of decay but wished to have what they offered, which was growth and the magic of usury. So too Slavs ask for our material resources but refuse the suicide we are undertaking within the west.
Now my last point is the controversial one. Which is that this doesn't necessarily have to do with race. These cultural forms can take place in any human who lives within a culture and is not mentally inhibited to understand its meaning. Take Asians for instance. If they remain separate from their communities they can become nearly exactly like whites in their outlook. I've known too many Asians who are more spiritual akin to me then a Slav. That said I understand that blacks often times cannot ascend to this cognitive capability to be consider brothers of the west. They are unable to process time to our same degree. A few other peoples remain too primitive in this regard as well (some islanders and a few native groups) but even withing these groups many individuals can do ascend to a position of spiritual brotherhood through cultural understanding.
So I call that racialists understand this case but also understand a even deeper problem. It is not a material problem or a strategic problem I care little for either. But it is a problem of the soul. Western culture at the moment is decayed to a point where it may not be able to be revived. Western man is suicidal and wishes to take on those who do not share his spirit because he hates his own soul. I ask, is one's soul worth saving if they wish to take it? I'm not certain anymore on this and have been thinking deeply on this for the past few months (since Ryan had his video claiming he was also leaving alt-right-esc movements and racialism).