Norway plis respond.
What kind of shithead deletes a thread with useful information?
Now I can't reference the material because I didn't save it, I didn't save it because it was a normal thread I didn't think would be deleted.
Obviously, this alone is concerning as it points to the direction (imo) that mods are being FAGGOTS who are deleting useful threads AGGRESSIVELY.
Nevermind that there are at least three retarded threads that (while not worthy of deletion in my opinion and containing useful information) are essentially more erroneous shitzones than the deleted thread in question.
>>192941
Norwaynon you had seemingly good interpretive information about the social democracies of gibmedat retards like Norway, Sweden, Denmark.
If you remember please recap.
Nigger mods. Ban me idgaf I just want an answer.
/mlpol/ - My Little Politics
Archived thread
File (): 33623A3E400798DFBFA0861E14E05CFC-513.png (513.0 bytes, 214x155, download.png)
>>194189
If you think about the Social Healthcare versus US Health insurance it was roughly like this.
People who talk about how bad health insurance is usually overlook a few important aspects.
To pay for it all the taxes is 20% and upwards. Some who have next to no income has lower tax, but 20% is for one who works flipping burgers.
>Some examples on taxation (assuming you have no loans or other deductables)
>If you earn $10k you pay roughly $1k in tax each year
>If you earn $30k you pay roughly $8k in tax each year
>If you earn $100 you pay roughly $33k in tax each year
In Scandinavian countries we also pay 25% VAT on all goods purchased (food is 12-14% VAT). This eats up much of what you earned. Imagine getting a price jump of %25 on all good over night to pay for healthcare and schooling for all.
Then you also have the prices of cars, petrol and other goods (deemed harmfull) that has an high amount of extra tax on top of the %25 sales tax.
In addition to all this, dental and eyecare (glasses etc.) is not covered by the social healthcare. So you have to pay 100% of the cost of galsses and all dentalcare. There is a few rare cases where the government covers part of or the whole cost of these, but that is extreamly rare and is conditioning on usually a conditin you are born with.
Here is a comparison of average cost comparison between Norway and the US.
https://www.numbeo.com/cost-of-living/compare_countries_result.jsp?country1=Norway&country2=United+States&displayCurrency=USD
If you think about the Social Healthcare versus US Health insurance it was roughly like this.
People who talk about how bad health insurance is usually overlook a few important aspects.
To pay for it all the taxes is 20% and upwards. Some who have next to no income has lower tax, but 20% is for one who works flipping burgers.
>Some examples on taxation (assuming you have no loans or other deductables)
>If you earn $10k you pay roughly $1k in tax each year
>If you earn $30k you pay roughly $8k in tax each year
>If you earn $100 you pay roughly $33k in tax each year
In Scandinavian countries we also pay 25% VAT on all goods purchased (food is 12-14% VAT). This eats up much of what you earned. Imagine getting a price jump of %25 on all good over night to pay for healthcare and schooling for all.
Then you also have the prices of cars, petrol and other goods (deemed harmfull) that has an high amount of extra tax on top of the %25 sales tax.
In addition to all this, dental and eyecare (glasses etc.) is not covered by the social healthcare. So you have to pay 100% of the cost of galsses and all dentalcare. There is a few rare cases where the government covers part of or the whole cost of these, but that is extreamly rare and is conditioning on usually a conditin you are born with.
Here is a comparison of average cost comparison between Norway and the US.
https://www.numbeo.com/cost-of-living/compare_countries_result.jsp?country1=Norway&country2=United+States&displayCurrency=USD
>>194189
What thread was deleted? What was the scope/topic?
I wasn't even on at the time, and no comments or discussion occurred among staff (as usually occurs when stuff is kill). We're looking into it.
What thread was deleted? What was the scope/topic?
I wasn't even on at the time, and no comments or discussion occurred among staff (as usually occurs when stuff is kill). We're looking into it.
File (): 760060F7F35B03D3C71CA2AFDB967A8C-1179400.gif (1.1 MB, 457x340, _no step on snek.gif)
>>194193
He was being confrontational and trying to start pointless arguments rather than constructive discussion. His threads wouldn't be delet so often if he didn't try to start shit.
He was being confrontational and trying to start pointless arguments rather than constructive discussion. His threads wouldn't be delet so often if he didn't try to start shit.
>>194244
Remember when Pizza Hut funded road repairs in an area with shit government?
Small local government and/or businesses can handle roads.
Remember when Pizza Hut funded road repairs in an area with shit government?
Small local government and/or businesses can handle roads.
>>194193
The topic was just comparing America and Denmark in a facetious way to highlight the fiscal issues in America, "lele look at America, isn't it a fiscal shithole?" then if you're retarded you might think that this equates praising Denmark for being a SHITHOLE democracy.
With both these things in mind the worst thing the thread did was provide a oldschool synthesis of methodologies from two countries and their effects and provided examples of possible solutions to various issues by contributing the positive effects of certain social democratic methodologies that could be unfucked into something useful.
I don't literally think social democracies are logically conclusive and without overal, logically conclusive (negative), -negative effects due to their approaches.
>>194228
I only had one reply in the entire thread and it was a jovial affirmation of information about the 'absolute state' of the various social democracies retardation at the consumer level. Unless you're talking about a different thread as your reply makes zero sense.
The topic was just comparing America and Denmark in a facetious way to highlight the fiscal issues in America, "lele look at America, isn't it a fiscal shithole?" then if you're retarded you might think that this equates praising Denmark for being a SHITHOLE democracy.
With both these things in mind the worst thing the thread did was provide a oldschool synthesis of methodologies from two countries and their effects and provided examples of possible solutions to various issues by contributing the positive effects of certain social democratic methodologies that could be unfucked into something useful.
I don't literally think social democracies are logically conclusive and without overal, logically conclusive (negative), -negative effects due to their approaches.
>>194228
I only had one reply in the entire thread and it was a jovial affirmation of information about the 'absolute state' of the various social democracies retardation at the consumer level. Unless you're talking about a different thread as your reply makes zero sense.
10 replies | 2 files | 8 UUIDs | Archived