If all Muslims are terrorists because a single digit percentage of terrorists happen to be Muslim, then all Muslims must be peacemakers because 5/12 Nobel Peace Prize winners (42%) have been Muslim.
The international numbers:
FBI reports show that only a marginal percentage of terrorist attacks carried out (10%~?) between 1980 and 2005 on U.S soil involved a Muslim perpetrator at most.
Non-Muslims carried out more than 90% of all terrorist attacks in America.
Princeton University’s Loon Watch compiled the following chart from the FBI’s data:
>pic related #1
According to this data, there were more Jewish acts of terrorism within the United States than Islamic (7% vs 6%). These radical Jews committed acts of terrorism in the name of their religion. These were not terrorists who happened to be Jews; rather, they were extremist Jews who committed acts of terrorism based on their religious passions, just like Al-Qaeda and company.
Top 10 of all terrorist organisations are of various racial categories, various races, various ethnicities, and various beliefs.
Thus: terrorist do not have any religion. they are neither Muslims nor Hindus, They are neither Christians nor Sikhs, their only religion is Terrorism.
Less Than 2 Percent Of Terrorist Attacks In The E.U. Are Religiously Motivated:
>pic 2 related
Reference: Less Than 2 Percent Of Terrorist Attacks In The E.U. Are Religiously Motivated
>https://thinkprogress.org/less-than-2-percent-of-terrorist-attacks-in-the-e-u-are-religiously-motivated-cec7d8ebedf6/
Buddhist Terrorism - Extremist Buddhist have killed scores of Muslim civilians in Burma. Many Muslims, mainly the Rohingyas, had to migrate and seek refuge in other countries. Christian too have been victims to Buddhist terrorism. There have been similar attacks in Sri Lanka too.
Reference: Straying From the Middle Way: Extremist Buddhist Monks Target Religious Minorities | TIME.com
http://world.time.com/2013/06/20/extremist-buddhist-monks-fight-oppression-with-violence/
>http://world.time.com/2013/06/20/extremist-buddhist-monks-fight-oppression-with-violence/
http://world.time.com/2013/06/20/extremist-buddhist-monks-fight-oppression-with-violence/
Terrorism in US - An FBI study looking at terrorism committed on U.S. soil between 1980 and 2005 found that 94 percent of the terror attacks were committed by non-Muslims. In actuality, 42 percent of terror attacks were carried out by Latino-related groups, followed by 24 percent perpetrated by extreme left-wing actors.
There have been more cases of shootings than of Muslim terrorism.
Reference: Terrorism 2002/2005
https://www.fbi.gov/stats-services/publications/terrorism-2002-2005#terror_05sum
Read: Are All Terrorists Muslims? It’s Not Even Close
https://www.thedailybeast.com/are-all-terrorists-muslims-its-not-even-close
Try to shoa me again. It will never work.
Always glad to educate /mlpol/ in your echo-chamber.
(1 sitewide post by this ID)
>>192155If you had looked a bit on the recent reports you would have seen that the data presented by your org is skewed
If you take out the outliers ETA in Spain and France and IRA in Northern Ireland you get an entirely different picture.
https://www.europol.europa.eu/newsroom/news/terrorist-threat-in-eu-remains-high-despite-decline-of-in-iraq-and-syriahttps://www.europol.europa.eu/sites/default/files/documents/tesat_2018_1.pdf >>192155(((thinkprogress)))
Yeah, take your lefty propaganda and stick it up your ass with your boyfriend's dick.
I don't dislike Muslims because some of them blow themselves up, I dislike them because they want to change the religious and cultural nature of our homelands. Muslim terrorists are indeed not a huge threat until Europe falls into chaos, but they are more visible than the everyday scum most migrants are.
>>192155tbh you dont need empirical data to say that jews and muslims are both shit. No need to compare the two when fighting for our own survival.
>the daily beastwat
>>192159Kek, you read the OP to the bottom. I stopped at (((thinkprogress))).
I just noticed, there's no sage here?
>>192155>the statement that most of the terrorists in the world are Muslims is definitely biased, prejudiced and exaggerated.Your source has already been debunked, but I'd like to disprove your original claim. You source from the US, EU, Burma and Sri Lanka, but let's take into account attacks committed in the rest of the world, since that's what you're arguing. I'll be sourcing from the Global Terrorism Index, pdf related:
>The main positive finding shows a global decline in the number of deaths from terrorist attacks to 25,673 people.>94 peccent of all terrorist deaths are located in the Middle-East and North Africa, sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia.>In 2016, there was a reduction in the activity of three of the four deadliest terrorist groups when compared to the previous year. Deaths attributed to the Taliban, Boko Haram and al-Qa’ida all declined. >However, ISIL was an exception to this trend and was subsequently the deadliest terrorist group in 2016 in killing 9,132 people.>Boko Haram committed 192 attacks that resulted in 1,079 deaths>Deaths attributed to Taliban, 3,583.>Deaths attributed to Al-Qa’ida, 1,349.At least half of worldwide terror deaths can be attributed to Islamic terrorist organisations, doesn't take into account lone wolf attacks or less prevalent Islamic organisations.
>>192168Just put sage in the email slot.
Wait, anons. Why are we actually responding to obvious bait from a shill? Why aren't we spamming this thread with horse pussy?
**Sad because new and no horse pussy collection.**
>>192195Good question anon, don't know what I was thinking.
This must be rectified immediately, also welcome!https://derpibooru.org/search?q=explicit%2C+pony%2C+presenting&sf=score&sd=desc >>192195You don't have a horse pussy collection? Well, that's just completely unacceptable.
2018. During this time period, there were 1879 Islamic attacks in 53 countries, in which 11088 people were killed and 11114 injured.
https://www.thereligionofpeace.com/attacks/attacks.aspx?Yr=2018>>192195No horse pussy collection? Damn, son. Gotta be rectified.
>>192205>>192174Whats the number for jewish terrorism?
>>192155Firstly looks like you like the word retard a bit too much, and should broaden your vocabulary.
You can take out all stats for all these three countries, UK, France and Spain and the stat would change drastically. This, in simple terms, shows that the UK, France and Spain is outliers in the dataset, and to get meaningful statistics out of datasets you need to remove outliers. This is how you get real statistical data and not skewed statistical data, and someone with more formal training in statistics can probably explain it to you in a more detailed way (not that I think anyone would bother). Still if you choose to keep it, it can't be used to say anything about Europe as a trend, this is because Separatism is not an European problem but specific to a few regions.
>Global terrorism is an issue and Jihadist meaning the same as religious islamic attack is a fake as fuck mischaracterisation!I'm just using the same source as your stat is using as basis, namely Europol. So your argument that Jihadist is not a religious islamic attack falls flat. Also have you any idea where the word Jihad comes from?
>>192155Who would be behind this post?
>>192334Ask your kike mods who deleted my response you cock sucking retards.
>>192231There's nothing in there about Jewish terrorism, I'm afraid.
>>192356Based mods.
Here is the ungulate genitalia you came back for.
>>192198>>192203>>192210>>192361I knew my call would not be unanswered. Thank you anons!
>>192386What's wrong with that guy's post?
I don't see anything.
>>192374You're welcome. Now savour that sweet pony pussy.
You know, you don't have to keep posting faggotry. If you want more porn, you can just ask.
>>192503You're clearly the fucking idiot in this relationship.
Someone so addled in the mind and rattled by "porn on the brain" or some kind of creepy obsession that would get you flogged in a fair but strict society (or make any fair man cringe at the sight of whatever your favourites are) would qualify as a obvious idiot.
Your stupidity is on full display here, you've managed to shill your own discussion, perhaps your own chan, better than I ever could hope to do.
Ten posts and most of it is of horse pussy, a unusual choice to be sure, but more worryingly in this case is that not even the quality of the images you've selected is consistent. Surely these are for your personal use or collecting, adding to the worry.
Don't worry, keep on shilling.
Whenever I bring up real points about shilling in a nasty way mods seem to just delete my post, so I wont say anymore although I will repeat one sentiment.
Anybody who does this is retarded, a shill, or both.
Retards do it for free.
Feel free to tell me what else you get out of shilling yourself in the head though.
>"hey mummy hey daddy I called them that word again!"
>>192503>"hey mummy hey daddy I posted the porn again!">>192521>this porn rule that isn't even listed is something I have to followA rule about the permissiveness of your bestiality has nothing to do with shilling your own board for free you dumb fucking rock.
>>192522It has everything to do with it, you faggot.
I don't know why you're so assblasted about this. I'm just helping to fill out this porn thread for the pleasure of my fellow Anons.
Not something you follow, something you should expect.
>>192525>>192526>"If we shill our own site for free!>We win!"Question. Are you retarded? Do you simply not understand the meaning of the words I type. Is your mind so addled by porn that you simply are incapable of comprehending what is typed as you drag your knuckles across your keyboard to smash out another nonsensical-sequitur of a response?
>"Win [in your opinion] a discussion centred around hard-numbered data">*"victory!"*>*immediately proceeds to derail own points and look as retarded as possible*It's really quite incredible.
You guys are losers in arguments, even when you aren't.
>why durr you assblasted durrWhy are you so uninterested in improving your capability and competency? Huh shill? :
>>192511 >>192522What Gay board are you from nigger?
>>192528>argumentsDerailing is the fucking point you nigger. I don't see you responding to Norwayanon's reply, or my original one. All you have is "muh porn". Proving it effective.
>>192530That degenerate has the /leftypol/ stench.
>oy vey
>he's making sense
>[mod] sweats nervously
>"Oh no we've got a disease in our body!1!!
>better poison the body and the anti-bodies!111
>that'll show em!!!"
KEK.
You're still here, and you're still not fapping? Aren't you a boring one.
>>192377>>192389KEK, classic anons. I don't think I have ever seen a shill so assblasted. /mlpol/ really is some next level genius.
>>192615It is innit? Now the folder must grow larger.
>>192616You need to fuck the horse pussy anon.
Fun fact, horsepussy also works on cellphone-based telemarketers
>>192620Playing clopfics as hold music for telemarketers sure do wonders
https://youtu.be/9-ODP12vWqE Whether they be Sandnigger, spic, or some other shitskin,it's always a shitskin these days, and those same coons tend to be dune coons. Nobody believes your bullshit.
>>192955Wow. Modfaggotry literally knows no bounds.
Saved.
>>192963>(1) post by this ID>mfw the shill is right about shillsSo who's Jewing who nushill HUH? Go back to /ptg/.
I see you're new here. Feel free to leave your complaints in the complaint box.
>>192975
>implying that all the carefully constructed counterpoints won't be immediately disregarded
>>192955
Its not that you said anything wrong, its that you're insufferable and unwilling to accept counterpoint as anything other than shilling for the site, which stands in contrast to what shilling actually is, which funny enough is precisely what you're doing except against the site but using rhetoric instead of logic and reason. Still deleted tho.
>>193000
Anon, you're going to have to open up at some point. Bottling up your emotions is probably why you're so salty.
So, anyone got any specific requests for ponies/fetishes? I've got more than enough to satisfy most everyone.
>>193007https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CFPbbU_t64gNon-sequitur -as in logically in its asserted, mostly perspective, conclusions -and as in the fact that reply has absolutely no relevance to what you replied to.
>n-no y-you>yo-you're saltyHehe. *sips*
Quite feminine! Many such brain-drains! Why is corrupt /mlpol/ staff not able to recognize hypocrisy and the need for improvement opportunities in opposition posts? Sad!
Healthy young Jannie goes to Anonfilly threads, does tons of 24/7 7day a week general-fagging, -and single-sentence glomps you style badposting, doesn't feel good and changes - AUTISM. Many such cases!
>>192155Even if Muslims didn't explode I still don't want them in my country because they're uncivilized savages that have an incompatible culture with most other countries.
>>192155>Saying a majority of terrorists in the world are Muslim is biased, prejudiced, and exaggeratedI didn't see "wrong" in that sentence.
why do you guys always save the best porn for shill threads? Now I have to check every thread.
>Literally citing data that peaks four years after 9/11.
>2005
>It's 2018.
Find some more recent studies you shill faggot. Stop sucking Mohammed's dick, it won't save you when they take over the government and put all nonbelievers to death.
>>193139Here's some from one of my favorite artists.
>>193141I normally just post whatever I can find that I've got saved, failing that I look on Derpi real quick to see if there's anything new there.
>>192155This related video shows what OP wants.