The Election is today. Vote if you have not already.
The Early vote counts can be seen here https://targetearly.targetsmart.com/
We have a midterms thread, but I figured a day-of thread would be useful. Links to results will be added later.
/mlpol/ - My Little Politics
Archived thread
1541484274_1.png (518.5 KB, 900x840, don_t_forget_to_vote__by_pixelkitties-d5k8fu9.png)
1541484274_2.png (1.3 MB, 900x504, ballot_day_by_pixelkitties-danu0ey.png)
I hope all the American friends here voted for Republican. The other option is practically a death sentence.
Good luck tomorrow friends. May we be able to enjoy the bounty of the salt mines. I love you.
Good luck tomorrow friends. May we be able to enjoy the bounty of the salt mines. I love you.
It's never to early for numbers is it???
https://mobile.twitter.com/MikeDelMoro/status/1059505198840889346
https://mobile.twitter.com/MikeDelMoro/status/1059505198840889346
>>183451
lol. If those numbers holds out, the blue wave they talk about must refer to the delicious salty tears that will flow in the streets.
lol. If those numbers holds out, the blue wave they talk about must refer to the delicious salty tears that will flow in the streets.
Hoosier here, just got home after voting. Wish my state luck: we've got a Dem to flush out of the Senate here.
>>183454
Thank you for doing your duty. God bless, and the best of wishes to you, Indiana, and the whole of the United States.
Thank you for doing your duty. God bless, and the best of wishes to you, Indiana, and the whole of the United States.
>The final Rasmussen Reports Generic Congressional Ballot before Election Day shows Republicans edging ahead by one point, but in essence, the two parties are tied. The survey has a +/-2 percentage point margin of error.
>The latest Rasmussen Reports national telephone and online survey of Likely U.S. Voters finds that 46% would choose the Republican candidate if the elections for Congress were held today. Forty-five percent (45%) would vote for the Democrat. Three percent (3%) prefer some other candidate, and six percent (6%) remain undecided.
...
http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/mood_of_america/generic_congressional_ballot_nov05
>The latest Rasmussen Reports national telephone and online survey of Likely U.S. Voters finds that 46% would choose the Republican candidate if the elections for Congress were held today. Forty-five percent (45%) would vote for the Democrat. Three percent (3%) prefer some other candidate, and six percent (6%) remain undecided.
...
http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/mood_of_america/generic_congressional_ballot_nov05
>On November 6, 2018, 470 seats in the U.S. Congress (35 Senate seats and all 435 House seats) are up for election.
>The Republican Party holds 51 seats in the Senate. Democrats hold 47 seats, and the remaining two are held by independents who caucus with the Democratic Party The Democratic Party faces greater partisan risk in 2018, as they are defending 26 seats—two of which are held by independents—while Republicans are defending nine seats. The Democratic Party must defend seats in 10 states that supported Donald Trump (R) over Hillary Clinton (D) in 2016.
>Republicans also control the U.S. House of Representatives. As of October 2018, the Republican Party was in the majority, holding 235 seats to Democrats' 193 seats, with seven seats being vacant. The Democratic Party is well-positioned to gain seats in the chamber in 2018; since 1934, the party of a newly elected president has suffered an average loss of 23 seats in the House in the following midterm.
...
https://ballotpedia.org/United_States_Congress_elections,_2018
Wiki has some nice graphics for what is going on, so does the link above.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_elections,_2018
>The Republican Party holds 51 seats in the Senate. Democrats hold 47 seats, and the remaining two are held by independents who caucus with the Democratic Party The Democratic Party faces greater partisan risk in 2018, as they are defending 26 seats—two of which are held by independents—while Republicans are defending nine seats. The Democratic Party must defend seats in 10 states that supported Donald Trump (R) over Hillary Clinton (D) in 2016.
>Republicans also control the U.S. House of Representatives. As of October 2018, the Republican Party was in the majority, holding 235 seats to Democrats' 193 seats, with seven seats being vacant. The Democratic Party is well-positioned to gain seats in the chamber in 2018; since 1934, the party of a newly elected president has suffered an average loss of 23 seats in the House in the following midterm.
...
https://ballotpedia.org/United_States_Congress_elections,_2018
Wiki has some nice graphics for what is going on, so does the link above.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_elections,_2018
Is this make or break for trump?
Since the left hates him if they get the the majority they will shoot down everything that he does and he can only use executive orders, is that right?
Since the left hates him if they get the the majority they will shoot down everything that he does and he can only use executive orders, is that right?
>>183459
Given the present credit bubble and one of the longest bull markets in history, a Democratic victory in the House may be a blessing in disguise. If the economy plummets next year, which is a possibility, Trump could blame obstructionist Democrats and their financial backers. A completely Republican government would work against us in such a case as it would appear to be the culpable agent.
I won't lose sleep whoever wins the House.
Given the present credit bubble and one of the longest bull markets in history, a Democratic victory in the House may be a blessing in disguise. If the economy plummets next year, which is a possibility, Trump could blame obstructionist Democrats and their financial backers. A completely Republican government would work against us in such a case as it would appear to be the culpable agent.
I won't lose sleep whoever wins the House.
>>183462
>If the economy plummets next year, which is a possibility, Trump could blame obstructionist Democrats and their financial backers.
That's exactly what he's going to do. I guarantee it.
>If the economy plummets next year, which is a possibility, Trump could blame obstructionist Democrats and their financial backers.
That's exactly what he's going to do. I guarantee it.
BELIEVE
>>183479
Lucky bastard. Not many Republicans are running where I am. Over half my ballot was blank out of protest.
Lucky bastard. Not many Republicans are running where I am. Over half my ballot was blank out of protest.
1541526397.jpg (211.0 KB, 1080x1019, Screenshot_20181106-114607_Twitter.jpg)
>>183481
Wonder if it is an preemptive strike from the left to seed doubt about the upcoming election result. I have a hard time believing it is because Beto got that many votes.
Wonder if it is an preemptive strike from the left to seed doubt about the upcoming election result. I have a hard time believing it is because Beto got that many votes.
1541533048_1.jpg (594.8 KB, 1080x1678, Screenshot_20181106-133430_Samsung Internet.jpg)
1541533048_2.jpg (123.7 KB, 446x299, msnbc-florida-governors-race.jpg)
https://deadline.com/2018/11/msnbc-graphic-mistake-florida-governor-race-1202496555/
Still investigating, but funny if true.
Still investigating, but funny if true.
How will the House and Senate end up? Here is my prediction.
>>183493
>but funny if true
Actually I am thinking in a sinister explanation.
What about if this "mistake" is a delivered action from a worker at the TV station, to tip the people that everything have been set in advanced?
What about the non uncommon idea the the electoral system is a sham to trick the plebs they are on charge?
>but funny if true
Actually I am thinking in a sinister explanation.
What about if this "mistake" is a delivered action from a worker at the TV station, to tip the people that everything have been set in advanced?
What about the non uncommon idea the the electoral system is a sham to trick the plebs they are on charge?
>>183496
It's possible. For now though I just think it was an internal graphic that was accidentally run.
It's possible. For now though I just think it was an internal graphic that was accidentally run.
1541534642.png (4.2 MB, 1346x7277, Firefox_Screenshot_2018-11-06.png)
Chaos At Polls As Voting Machines Malfunction; Frustrating Delays Plague Midterms
https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-11-06/chaos-voting-machine-malfunctions-and-staggering-wait-times-plague-midterms
https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-11-06/chaos-voting-machine-malfunctions-and-staggering-wait-times-plague-midterms
Various stuff from 4chan.
Early voting.
http://www.electproject.org/early_2018
Dems: 8,278,271 41.0%
Reps: 7,087,855 35.1%
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1OgRzmhXLW6YEHQdhQkpSES3lbsVbRLkz2ZCv2Jh5tf0/edit#gid=1996929977
http://www.electproject.org/early_2018
Dems: 8,278,271 41.0%
Reps: 7,087,855 35.1%
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1OgRzmhXLW6YEHQdhQkpSES3lbsVbRLkz2ZCv2Jh5tf0/edit#gid=1996929977
Interesting stats:
Women vote Dem mostly until over 70.
Men vote mostly Dem until over 40.
Looking at early votes up to 6/20/2018.
Good thing those boomers exist huh? Aging population = right wing? baby boom cycle = political cycle?
https://content.govdelivery.com/attachments/COSOS/2018/06/20/file_attachments/1026849/62018Ballots_Received_by_Age_Party_Gender.pdf
Women vote Dem mostly until over 70.
Men vote mostly Dem until over 40.
Looking at early votes up to 6/20/2018.
Good thing those boomers exist huh? Aging population = right wing? baby boom cycle = political cycle?
https://content.govdelivery.com/attachments/COSOS/2018/06/20/file_attachments/1026849/62018Ballots_Received_by_Age_Party_Gender.pdf
>>183525
I hope people starts listen more to their elders and learn from their wisdom and vote republican.
Instead of normal cycle I think it is more an path of maturing that people go through.
If you look at the women graph I like the suddenly shift towards roughly 50/50 Dem and Rep after the age of 40. So might look like that 40 is a magic age when it comes to maturity.
I hope people starts listen more to their elders and learn from their wisdom and vote republican.
Instead of normal cycle I think it is more an path of maturing that people go through.
If you look at the women graph I like the suddenly shift towards roughly 50/50 Dem and Rep after the age of 40. So might look like that 40 is a magic age when it comes to maturity.
I voted /mlpol/
This picture came out weird though. I guess I left the flash on, because the background should be a church hallway and not a black featureless void.
This picture came out weird though. I guess I left the flash on, because the background should be a church hallway and not a black featureless void.
>>183536
>If you look at the women graph I like the suddenly shift towards roughly 50/50 Dem and Rep after the age of 40. So might look like that 40 is a magic age when it comes to maturity.
I guess that is when the maternal instinct ends.
>If you look at the women graph I like the suddenly shift towards roughly 50/50 Dem and Rep after the age of 40. So might look like that 40 is a magic age when it comes to maturity.
I guess that is when the maternal instinct ends.
Friend provided this pic from cuckchan.
Inb4
>cuckchan
>apple
Inb4
>cuckchan
>apple
>>183571
We are not even technically allowed to be drunk when we vote. I Noway it is illegal to sell alcohol in shops the day before an election. Bars and restaurants are allowed to sell alcohol to guests. But as a citizen you can't buy alcohol to take home the day before an election.
We are not even technically allowed to be drunk when we vote. I Noway it is illegal to sell alcohol in shops the day before an election. Bars and restaurants are allowed to sell alcohol to guests. But as a citizen you can't buy alcohol to take home the day before an election.
>>183575
In the late 1800s parties used to hand out beer and shoot fireworks to encourage voter turnout. Turnout back then was higher than it is today despite no women and less blacks voting. Parties would sometimes hunt down people the census missed to try to squeeze out votes. Granted things were less professional and more corrupt. People also didn't vote for as many positions directly. Regardless its a really interesting part of American political history.
In the late 1800s parties used to hand out beer and shoot fireworks to encourage voter turnout. Turnout back then was higher than it is today despite no women and less blacks voting. Parties would sometimes hunt down people the census missed to try to squeeze out votes. Granted things were less professional and more corrupt. People also didn't vote for as many positions directly. Regardless its a really interesting part of American political history.
>>183584
We probably did something similar, it is just not taught to us in school. Instead "mother state" decided that we are not allowed to drink on election day anymore (and discourage drinking the day before).
We probably did something similar, it is just not taught to us in school. Instead "mother state" decided that we are not allowed to drink on election day anymore (and discourage drinking the day before).
>>183573
Things be good thank you. Hope you are well.
More scraps from 4cuck. Must be nearly time to find a good website for the info? What site are we using?
Things be good thank you. Hope you are well.
More scraps from 4cuck. Must be nearly time to find a good website for the info? What site are we using?
>>183588
I hope the Pelosi quote is really happening.
Not sure what would be a good site. I'm looking at Fox 10 Phoenix stream and Fox News stream... But if it goes as the election, TYT could be a fun stream to watch.
I hope the Pelosi quote is really happening.
Not sure what would be a good site. I'm looking at Fox 10 Phoenix stream and Fox News stream... But if it goes as the election, TYT could be a fun stream to watch.
Voted all red and one libertarian here in OR even though i'm not a resident lel. Also wrote in some memes where only one shitlib candidate showed up.
Bitch ass niggas! Your mom will die in her sleep tonight if you don't give energy to the red wave.
Bitch ass niggas! Your mom will die in her sleep tonight if you don't give energy to the red wave.
First polling stations close in about 12 minutes and we will start to get results in.
KY battle ground.
>>183591
>Nancy Pelosi more unpopular than Donald Trump
Source: https://edition.cnn.com/2018/11/06/politics/2018-exit-poll-results/index.html
>Nancy Pelosi more unpopular than Donald Trump
Source: https://edition.cnn.com/2018/11/06/politics/2018-exit-poll-results/index.html
Mid Term Election Killstream Special on Stream Me (New Main Site)
https://www.stream.me/TheRalphRetort
https://www.stream.me/TheRalphRetort
Fox News live stream: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xqGWIbuXYQs
>>183614
Too early. Looks okay.
---
Another site:
https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2018/11/06/us/elections/results-senate-elections.html
Too early. Looks okay.
---
Another site:
https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2018/11/06/us/elections/results-senate-elections.html
>>183621
Fuck, yeah its getting close for gov too. God, I cant imagine what gillum will do to this state.
Fuck, yeah its getting close for gov too. God, I cant imagine what gillum will do to this state.
Dems: 1,605,429 votes (45.7%)
Reps: 1,890,567 votes (53.8%)
https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2018/11/06/us/elections/results-house-elections.html
Reps: 1,890,567 votes (53.8%)
https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2018/11/06/us/elections/results-house-elections.html
1541551597_1.png (174.0 KB, 1920x1434, Property_Crime_Rates_in_the_United_States.svg.png)
1541551597_2.jpg (88.5 KB, 543x474, ideology-cycle-alignment-dnd-smeared-same.jpg)
I was wondering if the rise in criminal behaviour was associated with voting for the status quo/Dems. I noticed that it peaks in the 80s. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crime_in_the_United_States Interestingly this is also when I propose that the lead nation of the time is most Left.
1541551638.webm (3.3 MB, Resolution:1280x720 Length:00:01:00, Ana Kasparian 2016 The Young Turks.webm) [play once] [loop]
Dick Masterson on Killstream says he thinks the election turnout will be overwhelmingly in favour of the Democrats.
>>183627
Regarding the overlaying comments:
The left wants utopia where everything is given to them by magic. This is how children assume the world works, from there experience as babies. A successful society can hold up this unthought assumption for longer than a less successful society. If you assume stuff comes for free then you can't comprehend being mean to strangers by not giving them free stuff.
Regarding the overlaying comments:
The left wants utopia where everything is given to them by magic. This is how children assume the world works, from there experience as babies. A successful society can hold up this unthought assumption for longer than a less successful society. If you assume stuff comes for free then you can't comprehend being mean to strangers by not giving them free stuff.
Sites:
https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2018/11/06/us/elections/results-house-elections.html
https://www.foxnews.com/midterms-2018
https://www.bloomberg.com/graphics/2018-midterm-election-results/?view=H&filter=none
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/results
https://edition.cnn.com/election/2018/results/house
https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2018/11/06/us/elections/results-house-elections.html
https://www.foxnews.com/midterms-2018
https://www.bloomberg.com/graphics/2018-midterm-election-results/?view=H&filter=none
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/results
https://edition.cnn.com/election/2018/results/house
I think this election night will take another 6-8 hours to culminate
30 DEM : 42 REP
https://www.realclearpolitics.com
Numbers are looking good for republicans overall.
Im worried about Florida tho. I dont want to be the next California.
Numbers are looking good for republicans overall.
Im worried about Florida tho. I dont want to be the next California.
A nice way to watch Florida.
https://www.bloomberg.com/graphics/2018-midterm-election-results/?view=FL&filter=none
https://www.bloomberg.com/graphics/2018-midterm-election-results/?view=FL&filter=none
So glad I live in Texas and I can rely on this state to go red. Any other Texas anons here?
>just voted in Cali
>went full republican
>didn't check mark a single Hispanic name
Fuck all the liberals that gave me looks
>went full republican
>didn't check mark a single Hispanic name
Fuck all the liberals that gave me looks
1541553290.png (169.5 KB, 894x894, FANMADE_Rainbow_Dash_saluting_by_lixr.png)
I think all the blue counties in Florida have reported. DeSantis might have this.
Hmmm....
1541553776.png (238.0 KB, 644x637, 0350__bowsette_mario_series__drawn_by_fream__fcdffacbc.png)
Okay, this is epic.
if i saw it correctly forecast is
reps win house - 35 %
reps win senate 95 %
reps win house - 35 %
reps win senate 95 %
Again the women/young = left, male/old = right stats.
https://edition.cnn.com/election/2018/exit-polls/florida
https://edition.cnn.com/election/2018/exit-polls/florida
>>183653
I know of one nigger who is infamous for spreading a ton of lies on YouTube and other gaming sites, and people buy it up, because they're retarded and political correctness
"he's black he can say whatever he wants."
I know of one nigger who is infamous for spreading a ton of lies on YouTube and other gaming sites, and people buy it up, because they're retarded and political correctness
"he's black he can say whatever he wants."
Nate Plastic hasnt tweeted in 45 minutes on twitter, during election night
Killstream is now raiding Yung Cucks
the water buffalo said the blue wave is not as big as they hoped it would, but they take it
the water buffalo said the blue wave is not as big as they hoped it would, but they take it
>>183652
>>183654
>>183655
Pic says sauce is FiveThirtyEight, they have lots of graphs/predictions:
https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/2018-midterm-election-forecast/house/?ex_cid=irpromo
>>183654
>>183655
Pic says sauce is FiveThirtyEight, they have lots of graphs/predictions:
https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/2018-midterm-election-forecast/house/?ex_cid=irpromo
Nate Plastic might be watching killstream
Florida looks red.
https://www.bloomberg.com/graphics/2018-midterm-election-results/?view=FL&filter=none
69.32% reporting
3,721,226 50.0% - Ron DeSantis (R)
3,627,558 48.8% - Andrew Gillum (D)
https://www.bloomberg.com/graphics/2018-midterm-election-results/?view=FL&filter=none
69.32% reporting
3,721,226 50.0% - Ron DeSantis (R)
3,627,558 48.8% - Andrew Gillum (D)
>>183672
word is dame pesos is recording the stream, if the voting turnout is good we might get a new cringe comp
word is dame pesos is recording the stream, if the voting turnout is good we might get a new cringe comp
A more proper Fox News stream, forgive previous error pls, no bully.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5b-wmxk9V_o
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5b-wmxk9V_o
1541555292_2.webm (4.6 MB, Resolution:640x354 Length:00:03:44, Grün ist unser Fallschirm.webm) [play once] [loop]
https://www.stream.me/TheRalphRetort
Election Killstream Special
Election Forecast is now
70% House goes to Rep
Election Killstream Special
Election Forecast is now
70% House goes to Rep
>>183677
>Election Forecast is now 70% House goes to Rep
The butt hurt will be so large, it will have its own gravitational field. Best timeline.
>Election Forecast is now 70% House goes to Rep
The butt hurt will be so large, it will have its own gravitational field. Best timeline.
The Water Bullalo is now visible sweating
I see you guys coming back to say hello
>>183654
Found the percentages prediction charts:
https://fivethirtyeight.com/live-blog/2018-election-results-coverage/
Found the percentages prediction charts:
https://fivethirtyeight.com/live-blog/2018-election-results-coverage/
Dems still SEETHING obver Kavanaugh.
>>183682
(づ｡◕‿‿◕｡)づ Patron reward
This is patron reward.
Please Join me on patreon for full res and uncensored version of this picture and more Sexy artworks in the future.
https://www.patreon.com/lucknight
TLDT yes there is but its behind a paywall
(づ｡◕‿‿◕｡)づ Patron reward
This is patron reward.
Please Join me on patreon for full res and uncensored version of this picture and more Sexy artworks in the future.
https://www.patreon.com/lucknight
TLDT yes there is but its behind a paywall
>The Results Bot is showing the first emoji of the night. Our Deluxe forecast this morning showed a 7 in 8 chance for Democrat Joe Donnelly to win re-election to the Senate and listed the race as “lean Democrat,” but ABC News is projecting that he will lose to Republican Mike Braun. This comes as a surprise to Results Bot.
KEK, salt from 538.
KEK, salt from 538.
Killstream is laughing their asses off reading twitter and reddit aftert the latest forecast
kek.
TYT just ragequit and deleted their stream on air
>>183701
TYT is live again, killstream reports theres power outages throught the whole country, most likely election related. Stream. me is affected too
TYT is live again, killstream reports theres power outages throught the whole country, most likely election related. Stream. me is affected too
>Teddy Cruz might lose in Texas
Just like in the song...
Just like in the song...
>>183699
Goddamn I hope it's true and not just the shit connection I've been having all night. If true then it's just like 2016. Anyone remember Buzzfeeds stream cutting out at like 11pm est? Gave me electrolytes for the next month.
Goddamn I hope it's true and not just the shit connection I've been having all night. If true then it's just like 2016. Anyone remember Buzzfeeds stream cutting out at like 11pm est? Gave me electrolytes for the next month.
Dems taking house forecast reconfirmed for dipping below 50%
Killstreams seems to be celebrating
>>183708
>House
>4 in 7 Chance Democrats win control (57.1%)
>3 in 7 Chance Republicans win control (42.9%)
538
Becoming interesting.
>House
>4 in 7 Chance Democrats win control (57.1%)
>3 in 7 Chance Republicans win control (42.9%)
538
Becoming interesting.
Ana Kasparian seemingly left the TYT stream, the jew is now pilpuling why Hillary lost, they are also blaming her for the bad turnout now
>>183714
>House
>5 in 9 Chance Democrats win control (54.5%)
>4 in 9 Chance Republicans win control (45.5%)
Creeping up.
>House
>5 in 9 Chance Democrats win control (54.5%)
>4 in 9 Chance Republicans win control (45.5%)
Creeping up.
34 Dem - 44 REP
Nate Plastic is currently on TV, his hair is gone
look at his face
look at his face
>>183717
>House
>5 in 9 Chance Democrats win control (53.4%)
>4 in 9 Chance Republicans win control (46.6%)
Still creeping up
>House
>5 in 9 Chance Democrats win control (53.4%)
>4 in 9 Chance Republicans win control (46.6%)
Still creeping up
I am sure the commies will start with the Russian hackers tale again.
>Polls have closed in North Dakota, a state Democrats need to win the Senate vote in to keep their increasingly narrow path to a majority in the Senate open. But preliminary exit poll data doesn’t look very promising so far. Democrat Heidi Heitkamp has 38 percent of the vote so far while Republican Kevin Cramer has 62 percent. (Again, these are preliminary numbers and could change as votes get counted).
538
538
1541558053.jpg (314.4 KB, 1080x1300, Screenshot_20181106-213314_Samsung Internet.jpg)
How many Mexicans did they smuggle into the voting booth?
>>183732
Have there been irregularities found? Or is it just an normal, it is so close that we do recount so we know we have double-checked.
Have there been irregularities found? Or is it just an normal, it is so close that we do recount so we know we have double-checked.
Florida
Governor
93.14% reporting
Ron DeSantis R 3,937,596 50.0%
Andrew Gillum D 3,841,682 48.8%
Senate
93.27% reporting
Rick Scott R 3,959,023 50.5%
Bill Nelson* D 3,883,844 49.5%
https://www.bloomberg.com/graphics/2018-midterm-election-results/?view=FL&filter=none
Governor
93.14% reporting
Ron DeSantis R 3,937,596 50.0%
Andrew Gillum D 3,841,682 48.8%
Senate
93.27% reporting
Rick Scott R 3,959,023 50.5%
Bill Nelson* D 3,883,844 49.5%
https://www.bloomberg.com/graphics/2018-midterm-election-results/?view=FL&filter=none
Water Buffalo is raging at Democrats
>>183743
WHY?!?
WHY?!?
1541558523.jpg (42.3 KB, 960x644, Slobodan Praljak King of Hyrule mah boi.jpg)
>>183743
Gross.
Gross.
NYT putting up House forecast:
https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2018/11/06/us/elections/results-house-forecast.html
https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2018/11/06/us/elections/results-house-forecast.html
538 House forecast nosedive:
House
2 in 3 Chance Democrats win control (65.4%)
1 in 3 Chance Republicans win control (34.6%)
House
2 in 3 Chance Democrats win control (65.4%)
1 in 3 Chance Republicans win control (34.6%)
So we get a Dem House
and a Rep Senate
>Here’s a reminder of why these good results for Republicans in the Senate contests are such a big deal: There are lots of things the Senate can do regardless of how the House turns out, namely confirm judges and other nominees. Even if the House flips control, as long as Mitch McConnell is in charge, Republicans still have the ability to shape the judiciary. A Democratic House would have investigative powers but no real ability to unilaterally implement policy.
538
and a Rep Senate
>Here’s a reminder of why these good results for Republicans in the Senate contests are such a big deal: There are lots of things the Senate can do regardless of how the House turns out, namely confirm judges and other nominees. Even if the House flips control, as long as Mitch McConnell is in charge, Republicans still have the ability to shape the judiciary. A Democratic House would have investigative powers but no real ability to unilaterally implement policy.
538
>>183752
Why is that? The gap keeps increasing with the Republicans getting more seats, so why does the forecast keep moving in favor of the Democrats?
Why is that? The gap keeps increasing with the Republicans getting more seats, so why does the forecast keep moving in favor of the Democrats?
>House
>11 in 12 Chance Democrats win control (91.8%)
>1 in 12 Chance Republicans win control (8.2%)
538
>11 in 12 Chance Democrats win control (91.8%)
>1 in 12 Chance Republicans win control (8.2%)
538
water Buffalo is now begging for money on stream
also complain about people mass downvoting their stream
also complain about people mass downvoting their stream
seems like what Dick the Spick said was true, dems will seemingly win house and killstream will get his own cringe comp from Dame
>With less than 1 percent of precincts reporting in Missouri’s Senate race, Republican Josh Hawley leads incumbent Democrat Claire McCaskill 51 percent to 46 percent. If McCaskill loses, Democrats essentially have no path to a majority in the Senate, but they will need to staunch the bleeding if they want to have a chance of control two years from now.
https://fivethirtyeight.com/live-blog/2018-election-results-coverage/
Watch Missouri:
https://www.bloomberg.com/graphics/2018-midterm-election-results/?view=MO&filter=none
https://fivethirtyeight.com/live-blog/2018-election-results-coverage/
Watch Missouri:
https://www.bloomberg.com/graphics/2018-midterm-election-results/?view=MO&filter=none
jim just checked out for dinner, said he wont return if the house got to shit
According to Killstream, Tara Strong chimped out at her Uber driver for being a Trump supporter.
>>183772
Flamenco from the daily stormer just tells a story how tary strong flipped out on her pakistani taxi driver
Flamenco from the daily stormer just tells a story how tary strong flipped out on her pakistani taxi driver
>>183779
Nationalistic foreigners. There will always be more civic-nationalists than ethno-nationalists.
Nationalistic foreigners. There will always be more civic-nationalists than ethno-nationalists.
1541562344.png (102.8 KB, 922x867, why_would_you_say_that__by_batmanbrony-d6k7yt8.png)
>>183790
I pray for God is listening to you right now.
RAHOWA is bad and painful, however is the ONLY realistic solution to save our children.
I pray for God is listening to you right now.
RAHOWA is bad and painful, however is the ONLY realistic solution to save our children.
>>183792
Not much seeing as they can't block supreme court justice nominees or remove Trump from office.
Not much seeing as they can't block supreme court justice nominees or remove Trump from office.
Well, here's your map from 2014, compare it to whatever results are gonna be.
>>183797
They won't want to rebel so long as they have faith that everything will be okay. The key to that is to make the democrats freak out and expose their true intentions. That requires the Democrats losing
They won't want to rebel so long as they have faith that everything will be okay. The key to that is to make the democrats freak out and expose their true intentions. That requires the Democrats losing
>>183799
thats partly true. but if they win, tyranny will ramp up, therefore forming a hatred in whites. giving a higher chance of a white revolution.
thats partly true. but if they win, tyranny will ramp up, therefore forming a hatred in whites. giving a higher chance of a white revolution.
>>183801
Whites haven't revolted in South Africa. They haven't revolted in Europe where things are worse in terms of tyranny. Just being oppressed isn't good enough to create a revolt - that will win. You have to create the spirit to fight back first, and that is why America is closer to revolution than Europe, which is more oppressed
Whites haven't revolted in South Africa. They haven't revolted in Europe where things are worse in terms of tyranny. Just being oppressed isn't good enough to create a revolt - that will win. You have to create the spirit to fight back first, and that is why America is closer to revolution than Europe, which is more oppressed
1541563554.mp4 (20.1 MB, Resolution:854x480 Length:00:02:40, Kai Murros - 'Embrace Hate... Hate Is Your Most Powerful Weapon'.mp4) [play once] [loop]
TL;DR: Republicans win the Senate, Democrats win the House. Small flip-flop, shit continues to not get done in terms of social legislation. Shit continues to get worse on the subjects that matter (banking and foreign/domestic power).
In terms of federal funding, you'd think that Democrats would provide significant traction, but the reality is that both parties have voted unanimously for policies that favor (((bankers))) and (((military contractors))). Ultimately, not much will change. Even in terms of foreign relations, this will just mean that Democrats will wag their finger at Pissrael and proceed to not have an actual impact on foreign relations with (((them))).
Reminder that Democrats winning both the House and Senate still wouldn't make a difference in terms of what's killing this country and who runs it.
In terms of federal funding, you'd think that Democrats would provide significant traction, but the reality is that both parties have voted unanimously for policies that favor (((bankers))) and (((military contractors))). Ultimately, not much will change. Even in terms of foreign relations, this will just mean that Democrats will wag their finger at Pissrael and proceed to not have an actual impact on foreign relations with (((them))).
Reminder that Democrats winning both the House and Senate still wouldn't make a difference in terms of what's killing this country and who runs it.
>>183811
you are absolutely right. but i think they have done enough of that already. dont you think?
you are absolutely right. but i think they have done enough of that already. dont you think?
1541564516.jpg (126.0 KB, 2560x1600, my-little-pony-poni-dobrota.jpg)
>>183808
>to send the 1st Marine Division in
I am blackpilled about ZOGbots.
They are brainwashed to think they are rightful and the "good guys", even the NPCs regard them as trustful and the backbone that keep them safe.
Reality is far from that. ZOGbots are loyal to ZOG, not to the people.
Therefore, consider them as a threat and necessary tools for tyranny and White enslavement.
>to send the 1st Marine Division in
I am blackpilled about ZOGbots.
They are brainwashed to think they are rightful and the "good guys", even the NPCs regard them as trustful and the backbone that keep them safe.
Reality is far from that. ZOGbots are loyal to ZOG, not to the people.
Therefore, consider them as a threat and necessary tools for tyranny and White enslavement.
>>183813
I think they have gotten us half way there.
The country we need to model is Spain, where after the Leftists won a major election, the Nationalists in the military staged a coup. What we need is to convince 30% of the country (at least) that it is better to break up the country than to accept the Leftists winning the House, Senate, and Presidency all at once. If we do that, we could have a revolution or at least a succession of Red States. If the Left gets that kind of power and we don't have enough people and the leadership willing to do it, then White America is gone the way of South Africa, and there will be no salvation
I don't think we are there yet. We need more time for people to see how crazy the Left is. We need more salty defeated leftists to show America who they are. And above all else, we need more time to become organized, find leaders, and spread ideas. And that is why we must keep the Left out of power for as long as possible
I think they have gotten us half way there.
The country we need to model is Spain, where after the Leftists won a major election, the Nationalists in the military staged a coup. What we need is to convince 30% of the country (at least) that it is better to break up the country than to accept the Leftists winning the House, Senate, and Presidency all at once. If we do that, we could have a revolution or at least a succession of Red States. If the Left gets that kind of power and we don't have enough people and the leadership willing to do it, then White America is gone the way of South Africa, and there will be no salvation
I don't think we are there yet. We need more time for people to see how crazy the Left is. We need more salty defeated leftists to show America who they are. And above all else, we need more time to become organized, find leaders, and spread ideas. And that is why we must keep the Left out of power for as long as possible
The house may not have gone red, but how about the gubernatorial elections? They are gonna have a chance to redraw districts after all,....
>>183817
Aging is going to increasing the right wing. The aging is going to happen for decades, because low babies.
Aging is going to increasing the right wing. The aging is going to happen for decades, because low babies.
>>183821
Proportionately among whites, but when America won't be majority white by the 2040's it wouldn't matter. Gen Z is moving right at least.
Proportionately among whites, but when America won't be majority white by the 2040's it wouldn't matter. Gen Z is moving right at least.
The US government's currency has been owned by a (((private banking entity))) since the start (Federal Reserve).
Both "parties" exist to oppose measures by one another, such that they stalemate one another quite frequently on the re-granting of civil rights. Marijuana/drug legalization, unrestricted firearms ownership, demilitarization of police, reduced sentences for victimless crimes, so on so forth are GOOD for everyone. These policies being out of the control of a central government, would be only bad for a certain group of (((bankers))).
I see you shills in the thread singing the praises of one party of puppets. Kindly fuck back off to your Shekelberg Pissrael masters for your shekels.
>>183812
Ideology nowadays is a poor label of character, but individuals who (keyword) *intelligently* prescribe to National Socialism are an exception. It is equally-courageous to being an atheist or a worshiper of old gods in heavily-christcucked territories. They risk violent action, loss of career and social standing, so on so forth, just for a perception they built from experience. They are witch-hunted and targeted like nobody else in this day and age.
>>183816
Agreed. Marines are so. Some I've met are good and even intelligent people who kept their heads down and ignored the brainwashing, but overbearingly apparent is the presence of mindless obedience and aggressive enforcement of such. It's especially inconvenient when they have positions of social power or standing.
Both "parties" exist to oppose measures by one another, such that they stalemate one another quite frequently on the re-granting of civil rights. Marijuana/drug legalization, unrestricted firearms ownership, demilitarization of police, reduced sentences for victimless crimes, so on so forth are GOOD for everyone. These policies being out of the control of a central government, would be only bad for a certain group of (((bankers))).
I see you shills in the thread singing the praises of one party of puppets. Kindly fuck back off to your Shekelberg Pissrael masters for your shekels.
>>183812
Ideology nowadays is a poor label of character, but individuals who (keyword) *intelligently* prescribe to National Socialism are an exception. It is equally-courageous to being an atheist or a worshiper of old gods in heavily-christcucked territories. They risk violent action, loss of career and social standing, so on so forth, just for a perception they built from experience. They are witch-hunted and targeted like nobody else in this day and age.
>>183816
Agreed. Marines are so. Some I've met are good and even intelligent people who kept their heads down and ignored the brainwashing, but overbearingly apparent is the presence of mindless obedience and aggressive enforcement of such. It's especially inconvenient when they have positions of social power or standing.
>>183827
Having a snooty attitude like a CNN reporter Isn't going to make your <1% ideology more palpable to those who don't already believe it. Enjoy being forever a tiny minority on even the fringes
Having a snooty attitude like a CNN reporter Isn't going to make your <1% ideology more palpable to those who don't already believe it. Enjoy being forever a tiny minority on even the fringes
>>183830
>Comparing someone to a CNN reporter while ignoring the content of the statements made
>Belittling a group for their size, and insisting that they should make (((accommodations))) and compromise on their beliefs
>Using the terms "fringe" and "minority" to attempt further alienation
Proto-kike shill detected. Reset your VPN and try another flag. You are on the wrong board for this.
You can kindly go back to cuck/pol/ and explain to them where the big, bad pony men touched you.
>Comparing someone to a CNN reporter while ignoring the content of the statements made
>Belittling a group for their size, and insisting that they should make (((accommodations))) and compromise on their beliefs
>Using the terms "fringe" and "minority" to attempt further alienation
Proto-kike shill detected. Reset your VPN and try another flag. You are on the wrong board for this.
You can kindly go back to cuck/pol/ and explain to them where the big, bad pony men touched you.
1541567086.png (416.4 KB, 3305x2605, merrymay_laughing_by_bluemeganium-d5un2ei.png)
>>183832
>You can kindly go back to cuck/pol/ and explain to them where the big, bad pony men touched you.
>You can kindly go back to cuck/pol/ and explain to them where the big, bad pony men touched you.
>>183832
>You can kindly go back to cuck/pol/ and explain to them where the big, bad pony men touched you.
>You can kindly go back to cuck/pol/ and explain to them where the big, bad pony men touched you.
>>183835
Well, if a racial war ignites we will have almost 400 millons shooting each other.
That is a promising prospect.
Well, if a racial war ignites we will have almost 400 millons shooting each other.
That is a promising prospect.
>>183837
And a failed civilization. And the invasion of Russia and China directly or indirectly, to seed your demise. Short sighted. Pic not related but funny and just found it on cuck/chan.
And a failed civilization. And the invasion of Russia and China directly or indirectly, to seed your demise. Short sighted. Pic not related but funny and just found it on cuck/chan.
>>183837
Yes and no. If you exploit the Left and Right division and radicalize one side to at least 30ish percent, then you can have a civil war, as I stated in >>183817. It's not likely but it is plausible.
If you just declare that (((everyone))) is a (((Zionist kike shill))), including the people who are the most primed and most likely to be among your loyal backers in future civil war, then you will find that you have in effect rejected everyone, and you will have no supporters
Yes and no. If you exploit the Left and Right division and radicalize one side to at least 30ish percent, then you can have a civil war, as I stated in >>183817. It's not likely but it is plausible.
If you just declare that (((everyone))) is a (((Zionist kike shill))), including the people who are the most primed and most likely to be among your loyal backers in future civil war, then you will find that you have in effect rejected everyone, and you will have no supporters
1541569081.jpg (46.8 KB, 736x879, 67D76128-E819-4D49-B971-D3DB7BBF7D28.jpeg)
>>183840
>If you exploit the Left and Right division and radicalize one side to at least 30ish percent
I like it how you explain it, it is analogue to the enrichment for weapon grade stuff.
>(((Zionist kike shill)))
Not quite, but you are suspicious.
Are you racially impure?
>If you exploit the Left and Right division and radicalize one side to at least 30ish percent
I like it how you explain it, it is analogue to the enrichment for weapon grade stuff.
>(((Zionist kike shill)))
Not quite, but you are suspicious.
Are you racially impure?
>>183787
This only means that we must double the efforts if we want 2020 to work out. Otherwise, the west is as good as dead as we welcome another dark age.
This only means that we must double the efforts if we want 2020 to work out. Otherwise, the west is as good as dead as we welcome another dark age.
1541569640.jpg (2.6 MB, 3840x2400, 614f04126afbbe58e5397bfe57646aadd53e9c8b.jpg)
>>183839
>And a failed civilization.
Is it not already failed?
The West have been taken over by dark forces and to hope for democratic means to save us is unrealistic.
Better to detonate the System all around the Western World.
At least we will have a chance to rebuild being free from kikes. Otherwise genocide and slavery is our sure fate.
>And a failed civilization.
Is it not already failed?
The West have been taken over by dark forces and to hope for democratic means to save us is unrealistic.
Better to detonate the System all around the Western World.
At least we will have a chance to rebuild being free from kikes. Otherwise genocide and slavery is our sure fate.
>>183844
House:
Dems: 45,178,956 votes (50.5%)
Reps: 42,852,201 votes (47.9%)
Senate:
Dems: 39,552,070 votes (55.3%)
Reps: 30,769,204 votes (43.0%)
https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2018/11/06/us/elections/results-house-elections.html
House:
Dems: 45,178,956 votes (50.5%)
Reps: 42,852,201 votes (47.9%)
Senate:
Dems: 39,552,070 votes (55.3%)
Reps: 30,769,204 votes (43.0%)
https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2018/11/06/us/elections/results-house-elections.html
>>183843
I am a Southern White. In any event, I think most predictions of a civil war are severely optimistic. It is possible, but the path to successful revolt is narrow, and requires an understanding of just how bad things really are. The people of America are blue pilled to a degree that is difficult to fully comprehend. To win, you can't preach only to the true believers, you can't dismiss everyone for not being ideologically "pure" enough, and you have to accept that even when you can get a revolt, you won't necessarily have it all.
I am a Southern White. In any event, I think most predictions of a civil war are severely optimistic. It is possible, but the path to successful revolt is narrow, and requires an understanding of just how bad things really are. The people of America are blue pilled to a degree that is difficult to fully comprehend. To win, you can't preach only to the true believers, you can't dismiss everyone for not being ideologically "pure" enough, and you have to accept that even when you can get a revolt, you won't necessarily have it all.
I wouldn't worry too much on losing the house. Remember, except for 5 states, representatives only have 2 year terms meaning come 2020 there will be another opportunity to remove the dems with perhaps better Representatives than republican Representatives. Plus come 2020 it will be Trump's re-election so there will be even more encouragement for right wingers to go to the polls. Not to mention the senate is still secure and the supreme court is now on the gop's side. Anything the dems try in the house will simply be countered by the Senate, Trump, and or the Supreme Court. If anything, this just shows what we will need to do come 2020 and better prepare for it.
And yes, yes, I know the jew owns both so none of this even matters. I'm just telling you how it is at the current moment.
And yes, yes, I know the jew owns both so none of this even matters. I'm just telling you how it is at the current moment.
>>183848
Not many whites are going to be threatened by the US currently being 77.1% White. And you'll nearly no one caring about X decades in the future.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States
Not many whites are going to be threatened by the US currently being 77.1% White. And you'll nearly no one caring about X decades in the future.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States
>>183850
The United State Census does not accept "mestizo" as a race, and so counts millions of Latino non-whites as "White." If you look up the percentage of non-hispanic whites, you will see that it is actually around 64. Hispanic Whites are usually actually mixed race mestizos and they have a separate cultural identity even where they are 100% European
>>183849
>Same guy on a VPN
The United State Census does not accept "mestizo" as a race, and so counts millions of Latino non-whites as "White." If you look up the percentage of non-hispanic whites, you will see that it is actually around 64. Hispanic Whites are usually actually mixed race mestizos and they have a separate cultural identity even where they are 100% European
>>183849
>Same guy on a VPN
>>183845
There will never be a period of time where humans won't be in conflict with each other. Remember we are all born communist babies whose parents give to them for free in proportion to how much they cry.
The best we can hope for is for the battles to not be kinetic or other directed harm.
Utopia will never ever happen. Dualities never go away.
There will never be a period of time where humans won't be in conflict with each other. Remember we are all born communist babies whose parents give to them for free in proportion to how much they cry.
The best we can hope for is for the battles to not be kinetic or other directed harm.
Utopia will never ever happen. Dualities never go away.
>>183848
>I think most predictions of a civil war are severely optimistic.
Agreed 100%. Civil War needs financing and supplies, and ZOG would never ever would support us.
However, racial war is a totally different situation, the ethnic division lines are very clear and the fight will extend all around in a chaotic manner.
Even if commie Whites don't agree, their choices are pretty limited, it will be to join other Whites or to be slaughtered.
It is a neat way to enroll those not interested. Don't you think?
>I think most predictions of a civil war are severely optimistic.
Agreed 100%. Civil War needs financing and supplies, and ZOG would never ever would support us.
However, racial war is a totally different situation, the ethnic division lines are very clear and the fight will extend all around in a chaotic manner.
Even if commie Whites don't agree, their choices are pretty limited, it will be to join other Whites or to be slaughtered.
It is a neat way to enroll those not interested. Don't you think?
>>183854
A two sided race war is not a great idea. If you say "Either all whites must die or all non-whites must die," you force all non-white to fight against you, otherwise they will die. You place their backs against the wall, that will be dangerous. Second, 1/3 of Whites will chose Death. They will willingly support White genocide. This might be hard to believe, but it is very true. So "kill all non-whites" results in a scenario where more than half off all people in the US will try to kill off the resisting whites, and then later the Whites who aided them.
The better strategy, strangely enough, is a one-sided race war. It's not a war to kill all non-whites, it's a war to save Whites. We are simply acting to protect our future, and do not wish harm to other races. In this Scenario, one third of Whites will still try to kill the other 2/3 (and later themselves), but non-whites won't have an existential dog in the fight. Many of them are convinced Neo-Marxists and will have to be fought against, but perhaps 10% or more will fight to secure the existence of the White race (because they hate communists too) and many more will not participate in the fighting either way. In this scenario, you have something like 44% of the populace fighting against 33%. That is a winnable fight, and the sort of odds you should try to ensure before you start
A two sided race war is not a great idea. If you say "Either all whites must die or all non-whites must die," you force all non-white to fight against you, otherwise they will die. You place their backs against the wall, that will be dangerous. Second, 1/3 of Whites will chose Death. They will willingly support White genocide. This might be hard to believe, but it is very true. So "kill all non-whites" results in a scenario where more than half off all people in the US will try to kill off the resisting whites, and then later the Whites who aided them.
The better strategy, strangely enough, is a one-sided race war. It's not a war to kill all non-whites, it's a war to save Whites. We are simply acting to protect our future, and do not wish harm to other races. In this Scenario, one third of Whites will still try to kill the other 2/3 (and later themselves), but non-whites won't have an existential dog in the fight. Many of them are convinced Neo-Marxists and will have to be fought against, but perhaps 10% or more will fight to secure the existence of the White race (because they hate communists too) and many more will not participate in the fighting either way. In this scenario, you have something like 44% of the populace fighting against 33%. That is a winnable fight, and the sort of odds you should try to ensure before you start
>>183852
You are thinking of another person, I just got on to see the updates of the election. Of course hard to prove since vpn's make it look like a new guy is talking so I'll let you be the judge.
You are thinking of another person, I just got on to see the updates of the election. Of course hard to prove since vpn's make it look like a new guy is talking so I'll let you be the judge.
>>183855
A third or a quarter of non-whites (immigrants?) can be conservative/right wing voters.
https://edition.cnn.com/election/2018/exit-polls
A third or a quarter of non-whites (immigrants?) can be conservative/right wing voters.
https://edition.cnn.com/election/2018/exit-polls
>>183858
... and considering the Right can't even win the popular vote yet, taking them off the table is very premature.
... and considering the Right can't even win the popular vote yet, taking them off the table is very premature.
>>183855
Agreed. A 100% white Bavarian genome ethnosatte will be a bitch to achieve. Getting whites back to at least a 75% majority again is more attainable. It's not about compromise, but what is reasonably attainable.
Agreed. A 100% white Bavarian genome ethnosatte will be a bitch to achieve. Getting whites back to at least a 75% majority again is more attainable. It's not about compromise, but what is reasonably attainable.
>>183855
>Second, 1/3 of Whites will chose Death. They will willingly support White genocide. This might be hard to believe, but it is very true.
I believe it.
Lack of tribal awareness and stupidity is what brought us to the present situation.
>The better strategy, strangely enough, is a one-sided race war. It's not a war to kill all non-whites, it's a war to save Whites.
Well, here I must tell you are wrong.
Mestizos and the rest don't give a damn for White's well-being, on the contrary, they see Whites with envy and contempt. Most non Whites are in White countries to leech and to take over, not to integrate in a subordinated fashion. They are impervious to the left-right paradigm because they are here to own cars, televisions, and phones; nothing else.
Trust me, I have lived many years among these lemmings and I know intimately their thinking.
Whites are own their own.
>Second, 1/3 of Whites will chose Death. They will willingly support White genocide. This might be hard to believe, but it is very true.
I believe it.
Lack of tribal awareness and stupidity is what brought us to the present situation.
>The better strategy, strangely enough, is a one-sided race war. It's not a war to kill all non-whites, it's a war to save Whites.
Well, here I must tell you are wrong.
Mestizos and the rest don't give a damn for White's well-being, on the contrary, they see Whites with envy and contempt. Most non Whites are in White countries to leech and to take over, not to integrate in a subordinated fashion. They are impervious to the left-right paradigm because they are here to own cars, televisions, and phones; nothing else.
Trust me, I have lived many years among these lemmings and I know intimately their thinking.
Whites are own their own.
1541572799.jpg (127.0 KB, 1280x1280, 5c95289fcb517a30bd4b8fba4ef029be5ca30831_1436673146598-1280.jpeg)
>>183852
>Hispanic Whites are usually actually mixed race mestizos and they have a separate cultural identity even where they are 100% European
Not quite.
In Argentina, south of Brazil, Chile and Uruguay, Whites form ethnic pockets with minimal mixing and they are proud of it, and when they go in vacations, Europe is their destination because is the origin of their culture; or what is left of it.
And looking closely you will find from Spaniards and Italians, to Germans and Russians.
>Hispanic Whites are usually actually mixed race mestizos and they have a separate cultural identity even where they are 100% European
Not quite.
In Argentina, south of Brazil, Chile and Uruguay, Whites form ethnic pockets with minimal mixing and they are proud of it, and when they go in vacations, Europe is their destination because is the origin of their culture; or what is left of it.
And looking closely you will find from Spaniards and Italians, to Germans and Russians.
Looks like some good(?) is coming to DC.
>>183863
>Mestizos and the rest don't give a damn for White's well-being
>They are impervious to the left-right paradigm because they are here to own cars, televisions, and phones; nothing else.
I never said they were our equals. A number of them are rabid marxists, and a plurality don't necessary agree with the true Leftism, but will support them because they are the Left's loyal lapdogs. But some of them know damn well that when the white population is marginalized the cars, televisions, and phones will not come in as great of numbers, and they know that there will be no future under a "green" economy or Communism. These people could even fight for us, even if they fight to secure the future of their economic situation and not the future of the White race. We will need all the help we can get. Another large portion doesn't care, doesn't like either faction, or will accept rebel rule where rebel force is superior, and that is good as well.
Think of it this way. In the event of an actual war, the Deep South would be the "core territories" of any rebellion, and would be needed to supply and reinforce front lines elsewhere. These areas from Texas to Alabama to Florida have huge non-white populations, nearly half. Do you want these areas to become like the Jungles of Vietnam with infinite non-white partisans? It's better just to give the non-whites the option "Accept our rule of this area or die" rather than the option "fight to try and kill all of us, or die," because I promise you that in both cases, they will chose life and comfort.
>>183865
Argentina is very far away from the United States, I am speaking of America's future
>>183866
>>183867
Palestinians are the most insane SJW Communists on the planet. They are much worse than the white and Jewish versions of the same. I have had to deal with them at University.
>Mestizos and the rest don't give a damn for White's well-being
>They are impervious to the left-right paradigm because they are here to own cars, televisions, and phones; nothing else.
I never said they were our equals. A number of them are rabid marxists, and a plurality don't necessary agree with the true Leftism, but will support them because they are the Left's loyal lapdogs. But some of them know damn well that when the white population is marginalized the cars, televisions, and phones will not come in as great of numbers, and they know that there will be no future under a "green" economy or Communism. These people could even fight for us, even if they fight to secure the future of their economic situation and not the future of the White race. We will need all the help we can get. Another large portion doesn't care, doesn't like either faction, or will accept rebel rule where rebel force is superior, and that is good as well.
Think of it this way. In the event of an actual war, the Deep South would be the "core territories" of any rebellion, and would be needed to supply and reinforce front lines elsewhere. These areas from Texas to Alabama to Florida have huge non-white populations, nearly half. Do you want these areas to become like the Jungles of Vietnam with infinite non-white partisans? It's better just to give the non-whites the option "Accept our rule of this area or die" rather than the option "fight to try and kill all of us, or die," because I promise you that in both cases, they will chose life and comfort.
>>183865
Argentina is very far away from the United States, I am speaking of America's future
>>183866
>>183867
Palestinians are the most insane SJW Communists on the planet. They are much worse than the white and Jewish versions of the same. I have had to deal with them at University.
>>183868
>Argentina is very far away from the United States, I am speaking of America's future
I know.
I meant to not dismiss these Whites already present here, their thinking from birth make them excellent racists.
>Argentina is very far away from the United States, I am speaking of America's future
I know.
I meant to not dismiss these Whites already present here, their thinking from birth make them excellent racists.
>>183866
>>183867
We can't reasonably say Muslims are Left Wing. Which makes the Muslims rather interesting in the global game of chess. Western nations (not cultures) could go Muslim Right Wing rather than Nationalist Right Wing. They are conservative. It was always a strange "choice" to me to have Muslim immigrants. What if there is a Right WIng conspiracy because the whites are too much to the Left?
>>183867
We can't reasonably say Muslims are Left Wing. Which makes the Muslims rather interesting in the global game of chess. Western nations (not cultures) could go Muslim Right Wing rather than Nationalist Right Wing. They are conservative. It was always a strange "choice" to me to have Muslim immigrants. What if there is a Right WIng conspiracy because the whites are too much to the Left?
>>183863
Integration with non-whites is impossible. However, it may be possible to secure a long-term solution with a compromise by giving them their own ethnostate. Means building more walls but means whites won't have to deal with them from then on.
Integration with non-whites is impossible. However, it may be possible to secure a long-term solution with a compromise by giving them their own ethnostate. Means building more walls but means whites won't have to deal with them from then on.
>>183871
Muslims that come to the United States side with neo-marxism because they like to think of themselves as constantly oppressed and marginalized in this new place they willingly chose to move to. They support the marginalization of whites and the Western world. They also are fond of leftwing economics.
Yes, Muslims in muslim nations are basically Rightwing Reactionaries who are extremely conservative. Good for them, but I don't want anything to do with those parts of the world, and they can stay there and do their own thing.
>>183870
Their thinking has been influenced by American neo-marxists in many cases. Just because a hispanic person is 100% European does not mean that they will identify as such, although many may.
Muslims that come to the United States side with neo-marxism because they like to think of themselves as constantly oppressed and marginalized in this new place they willingly chose to move to. They support the marginalization of whites and the Western world. They also are fond of leftwing economics.
Yes, Muslims in muslim nations are basically Rightwing Reactionaries who are extremely conservative. Good for them, but I don't want anything to do with those parts of the world, and they can stay there and do their own thing.
>>183870
Their thinking has been influenced by American neo-marxists in many cases. Just because a hispanic person is 100% European does not mean that they will identify as such, although many may.
Q's perspective:
https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1060022696703070208
We got what we needed.
Thank you, Patriots!
Senate means everything.
Think Judges (SC) & Cabinet.
DECLAS overrides all potential House blockades.
POTUS has ultimate authority.
Shift to Senate Judiciary (oversight) from House to now occur (stronger position and held in reserve for this scenario).
Lower chamber (House) used as 2-year starter.
Upper chamber (Senate) will be used next 2-year closer.
https://www.judiciary.senate.gov/about/jurisdiction
Military planned.
No impact re: ongoing investigations
Team is stronger [PRO].
Q
https://qmap.pub/read/2444
https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1060022696703070208
We got what we needed.
Thank you, Patriots!
Senate means everything.
Think Judges (SC) & Cabinet.
DECLAS overrides all potential House blockades.
POTUS has ultimate authority.
Shift to Senate Judiciary (oversight) from House to now occur (stronger position and held in reserve for this scenario).
Lower chamber (House) used as 2-year starter.
Upper chamber (Senate) will be used next 2-year closer.
https://www.judiciary.senate.gov/about/jurisdiction
Military planned.
No impact re: ongoing investigations
Team is stronger [PRO].
Q
https://qmap.pub/read/2444
That's all folks
1541583713_1.jpg (17.6 KB, 505x960, C1E82C74-BC6F-4775-8834-1FAA85EA0667.jpeg)
1541583713_2.jpg (43.9 KB, 539x412, A5BDBCC5-1BF2-4995-951B-C9041CCFB10D.jpeg)
1541583713_3.jpg (53.8 KB, 800x450, 2435B4D4-3B3C-4CFE-A591-149CD9FE7131.jpeg)
>>183887
>Oh no, the democrats won the house, they'll obstruct everything
Up until they get overturned by the senate and executive orders, there are checks and balances in the US system to break gridlocking. And the house is up for reelection in 2020 anyway. If you think them having the house is going to do anything but make democrats look bad when they obstruct anything and everything sent their way for no other reason than to #Resist, then you're dead wrong kiddo.
>Oh no, the democrats won the house, they'll obstruct everything
Up until they get overturned by the senate and executive orders, there are checks and balances in the US system to break gridlocking. And the house is up for reelection in 2020 anyway. If you think them having the house is going to do anything but make democrats look bad when they obstruct anything and everything sent their way for no other reason than to #Resist, then you're dead wrong kiddo.
1541589554.jpg (56.8 KB, 264x298, F5FF8FE7-3E68-4E46-BE54-2320FC195745.jpeg)
Tom Woods' commentary:
>So the Republicans will hold on to the Senate and the Democrats will take the House.
>I think a lot of people voted Republican today, despite being told by virtually everyone that only a moral reprobate and a mental defective would do so, not because they sat down and studied policy papers, or even because they're particularly enthusiastic about the candidates.
>They voted straight Republican as a middle finger to the progressives who dominate the media, academia, and culture.
>They look at the Democrats as the champions of those who shout down speakers and otherwise intimidate people into silence on college campuses, who ignorantly and self-righteously blame white men for every evil under the sun, who have encouraged the transformation of America into battleground of squabbling tribes, and who accuse normal people of "hate" for not jumping on every leftist bandwagon within the first ten seconds.
>Republicans, so often craven and unprincipled, are unworthy recipients of these people's votes, but recipients they surely are.
>On policy, though, even in the age of Trump, the parties are not as far apart as they first appear, as Jeff Deist noted today:
>By any objective measure, the ideological and policy disagreements between the national Democrat and Republican parties are not significant. Both accept the central tenets of domestic and foreign interventionism, both accept the federal government as the chief organizing principle for American society, and both view politics simply as a fight for control of state apparatus.
>Similarly, differences between policies actually enacted by Mr. Trump and the existing Congress and those likely to have been enacted by Mrs. Clinton and the same Congress are fairly small. While Mr. Trump alarms the Left with his tone and tenor, his actual views on taxes, spending, debt, trade, guns, immigration (the "Muslim ban" was neither) and war (unfortunately his good campaign rhetoric is largely abandoned) plainly comport with the general thrust of Clinton's neo-liberalism.
>Today's ugly midterm elections are about style rather than substance, party rather than principle, and power rather than ideas. Americans do not much argue about whether we are governed by DC, and only slightly over how we are governed by DC. But we argue viciously about who governs us from DC.
>The sensible and humane way out of this is to decentralize, let people make their own decisions, and call off the low-intensity civil war.
>This is the one solution that will not be considered.
>(Isn't that politics in a nutshell, by the way? There's one sensible approach, and that's the one you know has zero chance of being implemented.)
>We've been told since fourth grade that decentralization is for hicks, losers, and "racists," and that human progress demands that 320 million people be ruled from a single city.
>The result is what we have now: a society in which everything from pronouns to chicken sandwiches is political.
>There's never been a better time to read Harry Browne's book How I Found Freedom in an Unfree World. That's some good advice, believe me.
>So the Republicans will hold on to the Senate and the Democrats will take the House.
>I think a lot of people voted Republican today, despite being told by virtually everyone that only a moral reprobate and a mental defective would do so, not because they sat down and studied policy papers, or even because they're particularly enthusiastic about the candidates.
>They voted straight Republican as a middle finger to the progressives who dominate the media, academia, and culture.
>They look at the Democrats as the champions of those who shout down speakers and otherwise intimidate people into silence on college campuses, who ignorantly and self-righteously blame white men for every evil under the sun, who have encouraged the transformation of America into battleground of squabbling tribes, and who accuse normal people of "hate" for not jumping on every leftist bandwagon within the first ten seconds.
>Republicans, so often craven and unprincipled, are unworthy recipients of these people's votes, but recipients they surely are.
>On policy, though, even in the age of Trump, the parties are not as far apart as they first appear, as Jeff Deist noted today:
>By any objective measure, the ideological and policy disagreements between the national Democrat and Republican parties are not significant. Both accept the central tenets of domestic and foreign interventionism, both accept the federal government as the chief organizing principle for American society, and both view politics simply as a fight for control of state apparatus.
>Similarly, differences between policies actually enacted by Mr. Trump and the existing Congress and those likely to have been enacted by Mrs. Clinton and the same Congress are fairly small. While Mr. Trump alarms the Left with his tone and tenor, his actual views on taxes, spending, debt, trade, guns, immigration (the "Muslim ban" was neither) and war (unfortunately his good campaign rhetoric is largely abandoned) plainly comport with the general thrust of Clinton's neo-liberalism.
>Today's ugly midterm elections are about style rather than substance, party rather than principle, and power rather than ideas. Americans do not much argue about whether we are governed by DC, and only slightly over how we are governed by DC. But we argue viciously about who governs us from DC.
>The sensible and humane way out of this is to decentralize, let people make their own decisions, and call off the low-intensity civil war.
>This is the one solution that will not be considered.
>(Isn't that politics in a nutshell, by the way? There's one sensible approach, and that's the one you know has zero chance of being implemented.)
>We've been told since fourth grade that decentralization is for hicks, losers, and "racists," and that human progress demands that 320 million people be ruled from a single city.
>The result is what we have now: a society in which everything from pronouns to chicken sandwiches is political.
>There's never been a better time to read Harry Browne's book How I Found Freedom in an Unfree World. That's some good advice, believe me.
>>183894
they can increase gridlock and obstruction a bit to fuck up the economy but the senate is more important for things like appointments and it'll be less stressful to get those through now that we got 3 seats worth of breathing room
they can increase gridlock and obstruction a bit to fuck up the economy but the senate is more important for things like appointments and it'll be less stressful to get those through now that we got 3 seats worth of breathing room
Don't forget the illegal FISA usage declassification is a sword hanging over the Dems, which may contain them.
Some day we will vote to exile the juden.
>>183897
it's all about context anon, for the previous president's first midterm the nigger lost the democrats 63 house seats and 9 senate seats. Compared to that losing 30 or so house seats with gains in the senate is a relatively good result for us. There are a lot of problems with this though Pelosi is now speaker of the house and crazy freaks like adam schiff are in leadership roles but you could argue that's good PR for us, this will also be terrible for the economy especially with the Fed raising interest rates 4 times a year
it's all about context anon, for the previous president's first midterm the nigger lost the democrats 63 house seats and 9 senate seats. Compared to that losing 30 or so house seats with gains in the senate is a relatively good result for us. There are a lot of problems with this though Pelosi is now speaker of the house and crazy freaks like adam schiff are in leadership roles but you could argue that's good PR for us, this will also be terrible for the economy especially with the Fed raising interest rates 4 times a year
also we lost alot of ground in Iowa, but Steve King held the 4th district which is important because he's actually /ourguy/ unlike all these rinos and neocons we had no choice but to support. There's more to valor than fighting only when you think you'll win and retreating when you'd lose as far as losing battles go this election was worthwhile
>>183912
Not very much, tbh. This is what happens every time in the election cycle.
Republicans could have saved some house seats if they'd worked together to accomplish more in Congress while they had both wings, imo. They didn't have very many legislative victories to brag about: they're strongest issues were immigration and the state of economy; that's why the President's state-wide level campaigning helped them in the Senate.
Not very much, tbh. This is what happens every time in the election cycle.
Republicans could have saved some house seats if they'd worked together to accomplish more in Congress while they had both wings, imo. They didn't have very many legislative victories to brag about: they're strongest issues were immigration and the state of economy; that's why the President's state-wide level campaigning helped them in the Senate.
>>183887
What you're feeling is basically war-weariness. It's frustrating and emotionally draining to have to continuously struggle against bullshit when you know the only reward is going to be a small victory followed by more bullshit to struggle against. We've all been conditioned by Hollywood kikery to view struggle as one yuge epic battle where you fight, it's exciting, and then you win and everything is great from there, but that's not how it works. You fight battles wherever you can, sometimes you win and sometimes you don't, the main thing is to keep struggling and keep gaining ground. You don't ultimately lose until you give up and accept defeat. Wars are won one hill at a time. Attached is an image that may cheer you up.
What you're feeling is basically war-weariness. It's frustrating and emotionally draining to have to continuously struggle against bullshit when you know the only reward is going to be a small victory followed by more bullshit to struggle against. We've all been conditioned by Hollywood kikery to view struggle as one yuge epic battle where you fight, it's exciting, and then you win and everything is great from there, but that's not how it works. You fight battles wherever you can, sometimes you win and sometimes you don't, the main thing is to keep struggling and keep gaining ground. You don't ultimately lose until you give up and accept defeat. Wars are won one hill at a time. Attached is an image that may cheer you up.
>>183912
>>183913
All things considered this is actually a pretty good result for 2018. The House election math always favored the Democrats, the fact that they had to spend this much money and try this hard to win what should have theoretically been an easy win for them is more telling than whatever spin the MSM tries to put on this.
What irritates me is that from a purely rational standpoint there is absolutely no reason the Republicans shouldn't have won nearly every single one of these races. The country has objectively and measurably improved as a direct result of Republican control, even taking into account the dysfunction of the Republican Congress and the difficulty they had getting anything done.
There is no rational reason on earth why Trump and the Republican party's approval rating shouldn't be in the upper eighties at least, especially when you have the Obama years to compare the current era to, and yet here we are. The Democrats have literally nothing to offer except a visceral hatred of Trump based on feelings, and that kind of empty emotional nonsense works just well enough on shitskins and dumb suburban boomer women and fragile millennials to be effective. Their coalition is basically made up of the emotional and the ignorant. Having to share a country with these morons is like having a retarded, crippled siamese twin. I'm not angry or even demoralized about the way this turned out, just drained and weary, about how I'd feel after spending 9 hours babysitting a room full of toddlers.
In the grand scheme of things though I think we did alright and I think we're going to do alright. Any legislation they try to pass will die in the Senate or get vetoed by Trump, and Trump can still appoint and confirm judges which is probably more important than legislation anyway. If anything I think this country should be repealing laws, not creating new ones. Also I have a suspicion that this is going to be the point where infighting among the left is going to start being more prominent. Hopefully the asinine theatrics the Democrat House is going to spend the next two years wasting everyone's time with will make more people realize how obviously awful they really are.
>>183913
All things considered this is actually a pretty good result for 2018. The House election math always favored the Democrats, the fact that they had to spend this much money and try this hard to win what should have theoretically been an easy win for them is more telling than whatever spin the MSM tries to put on this.
What irritates me is that from a purely rational standpoint there is absolutely no reason the Republicans shouldn't have won nearly every single one of these races. The country has objectively and measurably improved as a direct result of Republican control, even taking into account the dysfunction of the Republican Congress and the difficulty they had getting anything done.
There is no rational reason on earth why Trump and the Republican party's approval rating shouldn't be in the upper eighties at least, especially when you have the Obama years to compare the current era to, and yet here we are. The Democrats have literally nothing to offer except a visceral hatred of Trump based on feelings, and that kind of empty emotional nonsense works just well enough on shitskins and dumb suburban boomer women and fragile millennials to be effective. Their coalition is basically made up of the emotional and the ignorant. Having to share a country with these morons is like having a retarded, crippled siamese twin. I'm not angry or even demoralized about the way this turned out, just drained and weary, about how I'd feel after spending 9 hours babysitting a room full of toddlers.
In the grand scheme of things though I think we did alright and I think we're going to do alright. Any legislation they try to pass will die in the Senate or get vetoed by Trump, and Trump can still appoint and confirm judges which is probably more important than legislation anyway. If anything I think this country should be repealing laws, not creating new ones. Also I have a suspicion that this is going to be the point where infighting among the left is going to start being more prominent. Hopefully the asinine theatrics the Democrat House is going to spend the next two years wasting everyone's time with will make more people realize how obviously awful they really are.
>>183893
>How I Found Freedom in an Unfree World
Sounds primarily about Stoicism. Would recommend "The Meditations" by marcus aurelius. Possibly also Letters from a Stoic by Seneca.
Stoicism flourished in Greece when it was under Roman rule. The Greeks were fairly powerless under Roman rule, stoicism was their way of getting through it. Parallels could be drawn to modern day.
Summary: ht tps://www.quora.com/Can-you-summarize-the-book-How-I-found-Freedom-in-an-Unfree-World
>How I Found Freedom in an Unfree World
Sounds primarily about Stoicism. Would recommend "The Meditations" by marcus aurelius. Possibly also Letters from a Stoic by Seneca.
Stoicism flourished in Greece when it was under Roman rule. The Greeks were fairly powerless under Roman rule, stoicism was their way of getting through it. Parallels could be drawn to modern day.
Summary: ht tps://www.quora.com/Can-you-summarize-the-book-How-I-found-Freedom-in-an-Unfree-World
Two years of gridlock...
So, uh Sessions just got fired by Trump.
https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1060256619383193601
https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1060256619383193601
>>183931
I've never heard of him so I guess we'll see. I actually rather liked Sessions, I think he took a lot more shit than he deserved and made a good attorney general. If he hadn't made the mistake of recusing himself from the Russia probe way back when this likely wouldn't have been necessary.
>>183932
agreed. start one. I'm too lazy.
I've never heard of him so I guess we'll see. I actually rather liked Sessions, I think he took a lot more shit than he deserved and made a good attorney general. If he hadn't made the mistake of recusing himself from the Russia probe way back when this likely wouldn't have been necessary.
>>183932
agreed. start one. I'm too lazy.
1541660499.mp4 (26.2 MB, Resolution:640x360 Length:00:10:10, Wake Up! The TRUTH About Why Republicans Lost the House.mp4) [play once] [loop]
Well poners, I am bringing a hard blackpill.
It is about "demographic is destiny" and why without a White revolution and ZOGs agents at the helm of any White country, we are already fucked.
In the case of this election, Trump ignored his White base and pandered non stop to niggers, and it didn't work. The same goes for other ethnic groups.
It is 10 minutes video made for one of our guys, I believe.
Worth to watch, but the aftertaste will be bitter.
- Wake Up! The TRUTH About Why Republicans Lost the House
https://www.bitchute.com/video/HvBzsF-KdeE/
It is about "demographic is destiny" and why without a White revolution and ZOGs agents at the helm of any White country, we are already fucked.
In the case of this election, Trump ignored his White base and pandered non stop to niggers, and it didn't work. The same goes for other ethnic groups.
It is 10 minutes video made for one of our guys, I believe.
Worth to watch, but the aftertaste will be bitter.
- Wake Up! The TRUTH About Why Republicans Lost the House
https://www.bitchute.com/video/HvBzsF-KdeE/
>>183999
You say it was a blackpill, yet I feel nothing but low simmering anger. Something tells me that this could help in redpilling normies, but I'm not sure how beyond the obvious route of spreading it in the ways that we can. Can someone with a bigger brain than me help out with this?
You say it was a blackpill, yet I feel nothing but low simmering anger. Something tells me that this could help in redpilling normies, but I'm not sure how beyond the obvious route of spreading it in the ways that we can. Can someone with a bigger brain than me help out with this?
343 replies | 182 files | 58 UUIDs | Archived