/mlpol/ - My Little Politics

the world and the broader universe would be a better place if humanity as a whole was exterminated and replaced with intelligent machines that would care for nature and colonize space

>>179924
Somewhat agree. Instead of extermination I'd rather people were just uploaded to machines so we can live forever. Then colonize space.

>earth will be controlled by a one world government.
What about colonies in space?

Its ok to be white

Germanic tribes had no respect for roman art.

>>179929
>What about colonies in space?
Either will be under control of the OWG, corporations, or we get Gundams.

>>179923
a nuclear apocalypse is preferable to this mess we are in.

>>179924
Disagree. The impact of humans on the universe is completely negligible and it would look essentially the same whether we existed in it or not. Our impact on our own local environment is greater but I would argue is still basically negligible in the grand scheme of things.

>>179933
That sounds boring. What is life without suffering?

>>179923
The teachings of God go hand in hand with the principles of Lucifer, and knowing one without the other produces an unbalanced and easily controllable individual

>>179923
I'll agree with it being an eventuality, but getting there is going to be long, and bloody and fraught with genocide either by the sword or the womb. If we get to space first, we'll have a repeat of the age of the sail, complete with xenocide.

Nuclear power is more environmentally friendly than any 'green' power.

I disagree with the whole "aryan master race" thing. Many people think the aryan race is the master race but I just dont see it. Usually these aryan people are northern europeans so Germanic and Scandinavian people and I don't know, compared to their neighbors they didnt impact history as much as them. While the English, French, Spanish, Dutch, and Portugese were colonizing the world, the German states were busy warring with each other and really only Prussia and Sweden stood out doing something at this time. Not to mention back in the Classical era, it was the southern European people that was making tons of scientific progress and advancements, the Germanic people were still tribal people. If there was a "master race" among whites it would probably be Anglos since they had by far the biggest impact upon the world and the biggest empires but that leads to my next point.

I think having one particular group of whites being dominate of other whites is stupid. At a time like this, all whites need to be united and not argueing what is the elite people of the race. If mass migration and the new world order doesn't get stopped, then we will all be a minority in our nations. Every group of people have flaws but right now the white race doesn't need to be arguing who is the better race and unite against the other races that seek to breed them out.

Taxation is theft and the only "rights" that can exist are one's possession of his body and property.

>>179928
humans will never escape their inherent flaws, no amount of "upgrades" will fix them. They need to be replaced with something better. You wouldn't be able to civilize a monkey up to human levels just as you'll never upgrade a human to what machines will be capable of

>>179934
exactly, intelligent machines could go on to improve the universe as a whole while dumb bags of flesh will accomplish nothing of value outside building something better and their own extinction

>>179940
Doesn't help that the "blonde hair, blued eyed" prophesy came from a fiction book.

>A people will come from tomorrow, the true people of the sun, golden hair will flutter around their head like sunbeams, and blue will make their eyes shine like the sky in summer, the only one to whome all nations will be subdued!
>Rulaman Erzählung aus der Zeit des Höhlenmenschen und des Höhlenbären, 1878 (published over numerous editions) Rulaman, a story from the time of cavemen and cave bears (fiction).

Society can't handle being successful and will degenerate once it has too much free time and wealth.

Im so tired.

>>180130

thats not an opinion

Wouldn't a machine intelligence designed to take care of the universe view itself as an unnecessary burden on the limited resources of the universe and just kill itself like its creators did?

Brainlet libtard fatass Elizer Yudowsky had only one good idea in his life: Creating a national/worldwide holiday where, at night, all the lights are turned off so everyone can look up at the night sky and see all the stars in the sky in all their beauty.

>>180125
Monkeys literally upgraded themselves to become human through Evolution, the old-fashioned genetic manipulation method.
All discussion of the morality of Transhumanism is pointless because it's too broad a topic.
The way I see it, better legs and arms with guns are fine, boosting nutrient flow to your brain or however the fuck a brain-boost implant will work is fine, better hearts and brand new organs like the Occulobe are fine, making yourself fucking huge and reinforcing your spine so you can stand is fine, modding yourself to enhance good things about you and lessen bad things about you is fine, giving up the ability to feel happiness and sadness is for faggots, giving up the ability to think is for faggots, getting an implant that lets your company's overlords turn your humanity off and send you to the factories for 16 hours before sending you home and making you human again is for faggots, putting your brain in an electric fleshlight and experiencing an eternity of highs is for junkie niggers.
The way I see it, better body=good, better mind=alright, taking away humanity, free will, and basic human functionality=for faggots.

9-11 happened the way they told us.

>>180237
How do you feel about better writing upgrades?

>>180218
resources aren't that limited, and you could give it supplementary goals like exploring and colonizing the universe.
>>180237
first of all they didn't upgrade themselves evolution and their environment upgraded them, but this is as far as it goes. Humanity is ultimately a dead end, cyborgs will never reach the potential capabilities of androids without abandoning their humanity anyway so it's more efficient to just make pure machines in the first place

National socialism and fascism are bad ideologies, sure better then what we have today but still bad.

>>180259
wrong, anon.

>>180264
Todays ideologies are materialistic, fascism and national socialism are racial. None are spiritual. The greatest good is the spirt of the good, meaning that fascism and national socialism are still bad ideologies.

>>180288
national socialism, is spiritual.

>>180290
Then why is race genetic and not spirtual?
Because its not to nat socs.

>>180345
race is both genetic and spiritual.

>>180353
How is race spiritual?

Theologies have been, are, and will always be inferior to non-theocratic states.

>>180358
I could write out an essay for you but I won't since there have been entire books that have been written on these subjects. You can best find them in Spengler and Evola's works but heres a condensed version of it all.

A race, have different souls from other races which can been seen through which prime symbol they view the world. The classical view this in terms of bodies and their society reflected this in how they viewed their souls, the megians (middle eastern) had their own unique view of the soul and so do us Faustian peoples (western) view our souls as different from all other races. This is not only genetic because each race's style is distinct from one another's through these prime symbols which has more to do with the spiritual bonds and collective continuousness of a group then with genes.

>>180353
It is but not to nat socs.
Why else do you think the SS dislike Evola? Because he said the nat socs were wrong.

>>180375
im a nat soc and it is to me.

>>180376
Then your not a good nat soc.

Attempting to legislate morality will always backfire due to the Streisand Effect. What society considers acceptable is independent of laws and attempts to coerce behavior will only encourage some to pursue the action with new appeal. This is how Prohibition failed and is partly why conservatives were losing ground for decades until progressives one-upped them in moral domineering.

vaccines and GMOs are actually safe. Chemtrails arent real either. The internet theories surrounding them are mostly false.

Osama was a true antisemite extremist, thus he knocked the towers down.

Climate change is real but we need to kick out the jews before we can act upon it.

>>180397
I get where you're coming from and I agree(our society needs to be what determines morality, not a cabal of socialists who own the media), but to start a discussion for the fun of it:
Isn't banning certain harmful acts, like banning murder and rape and designating them as illegal things criminals do, an attempt to legislate morality?

>>180248
You really can't let the fact that I once slighted your eyes with my story go, can you.
>>180240
Two words: Third tower.
Plane number three was taken over by its passengers, but the tower it was meant to destroy found itself falling apart anyway.
I thought 9/11 being a lie was a meme until I learned about tower three.
>>180249
You get what I mean, right? Environmental factors evolved us into humans, and environmental factors plus our tech must evolve us further or we've got nothing to do and nowhere to go, and thus begins the decline of the soul.
Cyborgs will still be human, except for the faggots who turn their humanity off instead of becoming better humans. And androids are faggots.

>>180405
Actions which actively harm another person, while typically immoral, have a clear object of harm. If a person shoots someone trying to kill him, no one (except libtards) would object because this aggression naturally results in a reaction of force. Criminals, unless if physically retarded, will understand that the other is justified in violence.

It gets muddier if people are doing arguably immoral things without a clear object, such as prostitution or weed. There is no clear object being harmed (even if it is socially pernicious), and so the doer does not consider anyone being harmed except himself. He therefore may not consider it immoral regardless of its legality (and maybe thinks of it in a better light if it's "suppressed") and will take channels that objectively result in greater harm (such as patronizing gangs and smugglers).

This does not mean that I am a libertine. I simply think that social opinion is more effective than law at keeping people along the straight and narrow when it comes to such grey areas.

>>180407
You haven't answered my question

>>180413
Sorry, what was it?

>>180509
I'm sure you'll figure out how to back-read

>>180544
I wouldn't be so sure about that.

Naming this site "MLPOL" is a mistake that will constrain us going forward.

>>181138
Interdasting. What alternative would there be though?

>>181138
>Naming this site "MLPOL" is a mistake that will constrain us going forward
After the first few months of creation the path to a brighter future for mlpol has since been closed. Changing the name will not improve anything. Nothing short of a miracle could change the current course to oblivion.

Capitalism is part of the problem with western civilization.

>>181146
Unrestrained and anti-national Capitalism, sure. However, Capitalism is in general a better system than any other. Free markets and individuals can accomplish what government can't.

>>181138
What would have been the point? Did you want us to have something other than horses or politics?

There are a thousand other chan websites out there and I don’t go to them. I go to this one because it is the only one to combine my interests in my two favorite subjects, my little pony and Nationalism. And if it ever dried up, or changed into a website about something else, then I would just retreat back into normiestan and make my life there

>>181142
>closed
>oblivion
Yeah, cuz the 3000+ unique posters the site has gained in the last 18 months sure speaks to that

>>181140
Not too sure yet, only a few fleeting ideas. The general idea is that naming the entire site after a singular board on said site is an unwise act of pigeonholing upon both the site, and all the other boards that already exist and may follow after.

>>181142
Want to know how I know you don't participate in board activities?

>>181149
I agree, this board's great. But I think you've confused the site's name with this board's name.

>>181154
I suspect house are just mobile posters or VPNs. The /sg/ thread seems particularly responsible for this. In example, this /sg/ thread >>171955 →
had 85 UIDs and less than 10 users. I determined the actual user number because of flags. The unique poster number is obviously inflated, but by how much, and by how much over time?
>>181155
>Want to know how I know you don't participate in board activities?
Make my day.

>>181158
>cuz flags
So speculation

>>181165
Namefagging and flags, yes. Do you seriously need someone to hold your hand and point everything out?

>>181166
Yes I do. Please tell me more about how your metrics are dodgy and at best inconclusive.
Nice digits tho

>>181173
Very simply almost everyone in the /sg/ thread knows each other, and almost all of them have unique flags. In example, there is a Paki flag named engie. Considering there are few if any from Pakistan that use this website, he is probably the same person over and over. Over the course of the thread, the UID changed, as the thread lasted over a month. Some are worse than others, like the German. He seems to be the same guy based on the conversation, and he has a lot of different IDs. Trying to figure out a reliable method of telling different IDs, but I'm not sure of an easy way to show it.

>>181209
And yet from my own review of said thread, there is one post in particular that one of the german posters points to another one by name, and denies any knowledge of the third (which could be the named one, I admit). I concede that VPNs are cause for the almost 4000 UIDs not equalling 4000 users but having said that there are a number of anons who strictly lurk and still more who only post occasionally.
My point is that there is no available metric to get a truly accurate assessment of the number of posters, there are more users of the site than exclusively those who post, and there are a number of explanations for varying post counts. As such one can only use the available numbers to get a rough idea, but those numbers reasonably conclusively indicate gradual and consistent growth over time, in contrast to your original assertion of >oblivion.

>>181226
If we are getting more users then why is the number of post per day on a downward trend?

I don't think a all drugs are bad. Weed isn't that bad unless you suck, just like alcohol. Some psychedelics are fine. Even some types of cocaine if you have a strong will.
I hate opioids though and I think we should burn the fields in Afghanistan.

>>181227
Look at the content of the threads. Do you seriously need someone to hold your hand and point everything out?

>>181228
Legalize everything. Making it illegal means only criminals deal it, and makes it harder to treat and rehabilitate addicts. Making everything legal also makes everything easier to regulate. Unless you go full Orwell, history shows prohibition just increases demand. It would be better if all drugs did not exist, but we're stuck with them.

>>181239
>Legalize everything.
I do not agree at all.
Drugs as well as non Whites can be suppressed efficiently, the only issue is if the community is willing to pay the price in blood, if you know what I mean.
It is telling when you live close to junkies how a sane community rots.

>>181244
>Drugs as well as non Whites can be suppressed efficiently, the only issue is if the community is willing to pay the price in blood
There is already a prohibition on all drug in the US. This prohibition is excessively costly and is objectively a failure. Anyone can get weed fairly easy, and most harder drugs are not far behind. Throwing more resources at the issue would not fix the problem. Resources will run out before you even get close. Alternative solutions must be looked at. Let's legalize everything like it was a century ago. This will crush the revenue of the Mexican cartels, and allow better was to handle addiction.

>>181248
>Let's legalize everything like it was a century ago.
No.
Better to terminate not only the supply but the demand.
Let us face it. You cannot run a sane society with drug addicts among us.
If you want to look at historical antecedent, look at China and how Mao terminated the opium problem, a tip... the remedy is made with lead.

>>181142
>>181138
Meandering along.

>>181251
How do you terminate the demand, let alone the supply? People like drugs for social reasons and allows for some escapism. How do you ween people off of it? I do not know much about China, but I bet there are plenty of people still doing something there. Furthermore, the murder of millions and complete lack of rights is not worth losing, not for for what it would achieve at least. My rights are worth more than that.

On the supply side clearly the border is letting everything in. Even if you build a massive wall between the US and Mexico, that does not stop other points of entry. That's not even including weed, which is in some cases literally just growing on the side of the street. How the fuck do you handle that? Drugs are too profitable to not have a market for supply.

>>181248
>>181251
Freedom is chaos.
Order is oppression.
No solution.

(((someone))) will always rise up and corrupt a government without wealth and inheritance caps on individuals, albeit lenient ones. So pretty much the Huey long share our wealth program.

>>181253
>the murder of millions and complete lack of rights is not worth losing, not for for what it would achieve at least. My rights are worth more than that.
Such hypothetical executions won't invalidate your rights.
However if you mean for "rights" your free will to consume substances that change your perception of reality for hedonistic purposes, and as a consequence of it you turn into a liability for the rest, then you have to understand that your banishment is necessary for the greater good.

>>181252
Thank you, I was hoping you would post one of those. Could you post one that removes /vx/ posts from the stats?

>>181258
Best I can do is /mlpol/ only.

>>181257
Legal penalties ≠ social views
If society continues to view drugs as cool (and there's no real way for the State to fix that other than communist-style indoctination) there will always be those who take the risks.

If, however, you change the social consciousness from within then people will naturally ostracize druggies and they'll be "physically removed" from communities. Doing so means demonstrably making your social norms more appealing until they are widely adopted.

>>181262
I agree totally as a follow up after a massive purge.
Because at this point the drug epidemic have gone too far and it needs a frontal attack.
Words, common sense, and propaganda, at this stage will not work.
Physical removal, IMHO, is the only serious and realistic option.

I suspect Nature's "original plan" was that a successful society becomes hedonistic which resulted in a multitude of babies being born which soaks up the excess resources, to Nature's advantage. With contraception, this no longer happens, so society no longer falls into multiple-baby responsibility but instead continues to fall further into degeneracy and civilizational decay. The process stops once the society ceases being (economically) functional, and the "strong men" arrive.

We got easy access to the condom in 1920s, the Pill in 1960, abortion in 1970. The consequences have not played out until about 90 years after these events (the length of the lives of those retirees and absent babies). 2010 should have started the problems and 2060 will be when the problems have reach maximum.

The solutions are:

1) end debt money
2) immigration
3) end the use of contraception.

>>181268
>end the use of contraception
This and to take away women's rights, are basic steps to give back to women their natural purpose: to be incubators with legs.

>>181268
End debt money and end contraception. Both are inventions made for (((their))) gain.

Also, since I just remembered, I'll weigh in on the shitflinging over dying/not dying since it's apparently still being argued over. Many users of this site (myself included) have lives that need tending to, and coincidentally, tend to need extra care starting at around this time. If there aren't that many new posts, it may be because people have to tend to other, more important things than a canadian nationalist horsewhispering spinoff of a mongolian basketweaving forum.

>>181274
This, always this
>>181261
Thanks again (you), that illustrates my point nicely
>t. OP of...

>>181299
As for users (whatever that means to NPFchan) I attempted to get trends on that. The data was so jumbled that I had to average it over 56 days to make some sort of decernable chart.

>>181469
Thanks (you), added a line for reference and IWTCIRD so the site didn't flag the image as a duplicate. Is it possible to go as far back as 4/3/17? In any case, the graph clearly indicates lows leading up to Nov/Dec (finals/holidays) and less so leading up to June (finals/break).
In any case, that graph coupled with the actual numeric value of the UID - admitting its not a precisely accurate number - pretty conclusively indicates that the participation on the site is steadily growing, and that without assessing lurkers/minimal-posters.
not to mention the shit-posting that goes on in some of the Zald threads before they're wiped from the stats

>>181500
I only started collecting the homepage ( https://mlpol.net/ ) data on 2017-08-21. The user figures were very volatile hence the averaging.

Germany got better when it killed its Jews. It was able to last several years against an army of other nations in all-out war. Jews are shit.

>>183489
But Anon, there never was a Holocaust to begin with.

>>183490
This.
The key point was that Jews were removed from banks, public office, and other positions that afforded them power over white society.