>>178675>>178675I had a fairly indepth response I wanted to make about a possible civil war in the US and what could cause it, but I found it was longer than I though, so I will just post this completed tangent now
>Targets are being picked by Skin colorTo do this would be a massive and utterly fatal error for any side that attempted it. I am sure that gangs in places like Los Angeles would probably target white people just because they are white, and that would be useful propaganda to motivate an otherwise unmotivated population. But if reactionary militias are killing non-whites for no reason other than they are non-white, this would feed perfectly into the propaganda the left has been feeding non-whites for generations, motivate otherwise neutral parties to side with the Marxists, and discourage any non-whites from allying with the white population.
For the sake of illustration, look at the current racial composition of the political parties. To be sure, the breakdown of the supporters of sides in a potential civil war would not be the same, and indeed would be different depending on the scenario, but I don’t expect it would change all that much. The Democrats, for all appearances, are still more than half non-Hispanic, non-Jewish whites. These whites are largely dedicated Neo-Marxists, and they will never switch their allegiances, even if they understood explicit White Genocide to be the ultimate goal of their revolution. Republican voters are 90% white. That is to say, that 10% of Republicans are non-white. That may sound like a tiny percentage, as if that 10% could be sacrificed without much loss. But in any coming civil war, the struggle will be nothing less than existential. Everything – our way of life, our children, or very lives, our future, our past, our values – will all be on the line. 10% is a margin that is far above the margin of victory or defeat in elections, and it can make all of the difference in a war. The stakes are far to high to make gambles based on arrogance.
There are about 130 Million non-white persons in the United States. To compare that to the population of nations at the beginning of WW2, it is the same as America's population in 1940, almost twice Germany's population, and three quarters of the population of the Soviet Union. Of this population, to be sure, many millions would be among the marxists that would need to be dealt with in any violent confrontation. Non-whites are more liberal than whites, and a disproportionate number of them would have to be fought against. But millions of American non-whites, more so Latinos and Asians, would be willing to actively fight against leftwing extremists, many millions would stay out of the fight, and many millions would be willing to stand aside if they were outmatched by militia garrisons. They are distributed in large part in areas that would be core territories of any reactionary movement, like Texas or Georgia, areas that will need to be stable and safe if there is to be any chance of fighting elsewhere, or staving off invasions from elsewhere.
If you start killing targets based on skin color, you will have made the war existential for non-whites in this country. Without a genocide of non-whites, most non-whites would probably be content to sit this one out, as both cultural Marxism and the various reactionary ideologies are deeply held primarily by non-hispanic, non-jewish whites. Indeed, many millions of non-whites support some form of anti-Marxism. But when the war is a race war, every single one of the 130 million non-whites would have a very strong incentive to make sure the left wins. About 1/3 of the whites of the country vote democrat, which already reduces your base of whites willing to fight for their future to about 130 million, and these leftist whites combined with the totality of the non-white population, gives the Left about 200 million supporters in a war for the soul of the country that is also a race war. Yes, perhaps some of the white leftists will come to reason, or maybe a force of 130 million can defeat 200 million in a total war. Is that really the dice roll you want to make, given what is at stake?
What exactly do you intend to accomplish by selecting targets based on skin color? Do you honestly believe that all 130 million non-whites can or will be disposed of by bullets? People on these forums often say that killing 6 million Jews would have been a logistical impossibility for the industrialized and stable Nazi Germany. You want to kill 22 times that number in the middle of a war that will likely disrupt the transportation infrastructure and leave not a single state without large blue enclaves? 130 million is more than the totality of all of the victims of Communism through all of its gory history. In fact, while you are likely skeptical of the claims of the victims of Nazi genocide, you’d need to add the alleged 20 million killed to the 100-110 million victims of communism, to add up to the number of people targeted here.
And if your intent was never to kill all of them – I am almost certain that that is not your intent – then what is the point of placing all of the non-whites in fear? If non-whites must be dealt with in some way, be it by segregation, repatriation, or what have you, then it must absolutely be after the bullets have stopped flying, and not during or before any conflict.
\r