https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/executive-order-imposing-certain-sanctions-event-foreign-interference-united-states-election/ Someone explain to me this. Is posting memes now going to land me at Gitmo?
/mlpol/ - My Little Politics
Archived thread
File (): 4D636BA7CE8A0202054D20029458290A-18830.jpg (18.4 KB, 210x240, 1481408218001.jpg)
File (): 2055346EFEB684632A3D7524EF2F77E3-63635.jpg (62.1 KB, 366x320, goodgood.jpg)
File (): B1357BBAFE94B9AD64D3BAFABF09C8D4-41610.jpg (40.6 KB, 676x676, Nouvelle_toile.jpg)
File (): 0378FD90EB76DA13ACC0572E73235A07-47927.jpg (46.8 KB, 453x576, internetlies.jpg)
File (): D4B6AB2C90917AC5DE91B6E8BC367029-45117.jpg (44.1 KB, 474x484, fhgjghjj.jpg)
File (): 60D89927AE798A2B3905C2548BAB6AB9-956464.png (934.0 KB, 858x1390, 1474506456780.png)
>>171734
ignoring the obvious rhetorical question and moving to the link.
>Sec. 2. (a) All property and interests in property that are in the United States, that hereafter come within the United States, or that are or hereafter come within the possession or control of any United States person of the following persons are blocked and may not be transferred, paid, exported, withdrawn, or otherwise dealt in: any foreign person determined by the Secretary of the Treasury, in consultation with the Secretary of State, the Attorney General, and the Secretary of Homeland Security:
>(i) to have directly or indirectly engaged in, sponsored, concealed, or otherwise been complicit in foreign interference in a United States election;
>(ii) to have materially assisted, sponsored, or provided financial, material, or technological support for, or goods or services to or in support of, any activity described in subsection (a)(i) of this section or any person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to this order; or
>(iii) to be owned or controlled by, or to have acted or purported to act for or on behalf of, directly or indirectly, any person whose property or interests in property are blocked pursuant to this order.
I so hope this means that organizations like Soros Open Society Foundation will get all their assets frozen if it turns out that they have received any donations from abroad (this they have) and/or sponsored supported a foreign person that tried to influence any election by giving voicing their support towards or against a candidate.
ignoring the obvious rhetorical question and moving to the link.
>Sec. 2. (a) All property and interests in property that are in the United States, that hereafter come within the United States, or that are or hereafter come within the possession or control of any United States person of the following persons are blocked and may not be transferred, paid, exported, withdrawn, or otherwise dealt in: any foreign person determined by the Secretary of the Treasury, in consultation with the Secretary of State, the Attorney General, and the Secretary of Homeland Security:
>(i) to have directly or indirectly engaged in, sponsored, concealed, or otherwise been complicit in foreign interference in a United States election;
>(ii) to have materially assisted, sponsored, or provided financial, material, or technological support for, or goods or services to or in support of, any activity described in subsection (a)(i) of this section or any person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to this order; or
>(iii) to be owned or controlled by, or to have acted or purported to act for or on behalf of, directly or indirectly, any person whose property or interests in property are blocked pursuant to this order.
I so hope this means that organizations like Soros Open Society Foundation will get all their assets frozen if it turns out that they have received any donations from abroad (this they have) and/or sponsored supported a foreign person that tried to influence any election by giving voicing their support towards or against a candidate.
>>171745
>Increase transnational transportation, communication and finance
>try to have nationalistic separation between nations
>...
>profit
>Increase transnational transportation, communication and finance
>try to have nationalistic separation between nations
>...
>profit
memes are illegal underhanded detractor hate speech designed for international election fraud
>>171745
This, this is targeted at scenarios like Soros funding Antifa, or the Democrats (Or any political party) securing campaign funding from extra-national organisations. Say the fuck goodbye to the oil barons of the middle east buying off presidential candidates, say the fuck goodbye to Soros funding every leftist group under the sun, this will gut the left's financial and propaganda distribution infrastructure, and they can't say shit about it now since they've been claiming Trump was elected due to foreign influence. It's a Rules For Thee But Not For Me scenario if they do.
This, this is targeted at scenarios like Soros funding Antifa, or the Democrats (Or any political party) securing campaign funding from extra-national organisations. Say the fuck goodbye to the oil barons of the middle east buying off presidential candidates, say the fuck goodbye to Soros funding every leftist group under the sun, this will gut the left's financial and propaganda distribution infrastructure, and they can't say shit about it now since they've been claiming Trump was elected due to foreign influence. It's a Rules For Thee But Not For Me scenario if they do.
>>171754
>It's a Rules For Thee But Not For Me scenario if they do.
They have no problem with rules for thee but not for me.
I would have been locked up for years if I were storing classified material on my home computer. At the very least I would be rendered ineligible for a security clearance and any position that requires one. Yet Hillary is still walking free.
>It's a Rules For Thee But Not For Me scenario if they do.
They have no problem with rules for thee but not for me.
I would have been locked up for years if I were storing classified material on my home computer. At the very least I would be rendered ineligible for a security clearance and any position that requires one. Yet Hillary is still walking free.
>>171754
I also like the formulating in the excecutive order
>I, DONALD J. TRUMP, President of the United States of America, find that the ability of persons located, in whole or in substantial part, outside the United States to interfere in or undermine public confidence in United States elections, including through the unauthorized accessing of election and campaign infrastructure or the covert distribution of propaganda and disinformation, constitutes an unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security and foreign policy of the United States.
So running a campaign funded with foreign money to seed doubt that the election was conducted fairly, like running a campaign saying Russia meddled to get Trump elected, also falls within the scope of illegal interference.
>>171759
Leftists never take or is forced to face the responsibilities for their actions. It is like the Labour party here in Norway was shown that they had failed completely in preventing the 22. July incidence in an report. The prime minister from the Labour party, Jens Stoltenberg (now leader of NATO), said "He would take responsibility by staying in the job and continuing being prime minister. Because the failures happened during his watch he would know best what error he had done."
I also like the formulating in the excecutive order
>I, DONALD J. TRUMP, President of the United States of America, find that the ability of persons located, in whole or in substantial part, outside the United States to interfere in or undermine public confidence in United States elections, including through the unauthorized accessing of election and campaign infrastructure or the covert distribution of propaganda and disinformation, constitutes an unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security and foreign policy of the United States.
So running a campaign funded with foreign money to seed doubt that the election was conducted fairly, like running a campaign saying Russia meddled to get Trump elected, also falls within the scope of illegal interference.
>>171759
Leftists never take or is forced to face the responsibilities for their actions. It is like the Labour party here in Norway was shown that they had failed completely in preventing the 22. July incidence in an report. The prime minister from the Labour party, Jens Stoltenberg (now leader of NATO), said "He would take responsibility by staying in the job and continuing being prime minister. Because the failures happened during his watch he would know best what error he had done."
9 replies | 8 files | 7 UUIDs | Archived