Is Edward Snowden still /ourpony/?
/mlpol/ - My Little Politics
Archived thread
Snowden has been dead for two years.
File (): 0006B75E60D93F09EC76FB8436FB1AF0-486979.jpg (475.6 KB, 1080x2220, Screenshot_20180910-122025_Chrome.jpg)
>>170629
Actually I was just baiting the spooks (pic related)
Was showing one of my mates the internet spooks in action by Snowden posting on /mlp/ and then I made similar posts here and on ponychan. But it appears they caught on and avoided dropping any more red pills about their existence.
Another bite would have been nice and definitive but either way. I doubt some turboautist barbiefag is ready to pounce on an off topic post just to call Snowden a traitor that eagerly.
Actually I was just baiting the spooks (pic related)
Was showing one of my mates the internet spooks in action by Snowden posting on /mlp/ and then I made similar posts here and on ponychan. But it appears they caught on and avoided dropping any more red pills about their existence.
Another bite would have been nice and definitive but either way. I doubt some turboautist barbiefag is ready to pounce on an off topic post just to call Snowden a traitor that eagerly.
File (): 8E5C0B25AE3F652A1D535D845FF593BD-334257.png (326.4 KB, 733x579, cia-kid-watch.png)
File (): 29FA6487485DF2B8EE8770BABC8FF49C-337489.png (329.6 KB, 799x520, cia-porn-folder.png)
File (): D1B8EFEAF3AD1F042FCA61031554BE27-154914.jpg (151.3 KB, 632x534, ciaspiesyourhome5.jpg)
File (): CB1EC280CC921BF029305BAB9CAFA523-339119.png (331.2 KB, 720x482, cia-toilet-db.png)
File (): 1BFC211FACC90F841EFCFD605A052E39-229586.png (224.2 KB, 660x504, cia-watch-safer.png)
>>170627
>Edward Joseph Snowden (born June 21, 1983) is an American computer professional, former Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) employee, and former contractor for the United States government who copied and leaked classified information from the National Security Agency (NSA) in 2013 without authorization.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edward_Snowden
>Clowns inserted [Snowden2] last year.
>Operation failed.
https://qanon.pub/?q=snowden Q#1997
Q would suggest that Snowden was a CIA operative who infiltrated the NSA in an attempt to discredit the NSA.
The counter-punch seems to have been Vault 7:
>Vault 7 is a series of documents that WikiLeaks began to publish on 7 March 2017, that detail activities and capabilities of the United States Central Intelligence Agency to perform electronic surveillance and cyber warfare.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vault_7
The source of Vault 7 is unknown but a NSA counter-strike seems likely.
So OP, it depends on which team you are barracking for. For me, because the CIA did MK Ultra I am going to be biased towards the NSA which makes Snowden not my guy. However we don't know exactly how "good" the NSA is, and we don't know if the NSA's spying is acceptable due to the exceptional circumstances caused by the Clinton cabal.
Technology provides a new opportunity for power, and nature abhors a vacuum so someone is going to fill that power opportunity, the CIA has a bad track record, they should be scattered to the wind.
>Edward Joseph Snowden (born June 21, 1983) is an American computer professional, former Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) employee, and former contractor for the United States government who copied and leaked classified information from the National Security Agency (NSA) in 2013 without authorization.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edward_Snowden
>Clowns inserted [Snowden2] last year.
>Operation failed.
https://qanon.pub/?q=snowden Q#1997
Q would suggest that Snowden was a CIA operative who infiltrated the NSA in an attempt to discredit the NSA.
The counter-punch seems to have been Vault 7:
>Vault 7 is a series of documents that WikiLeaks began to publish on 7 March 2017, that detail activities and capabilities of the United States Central Intelligence Agency to perform electronic surveillance and cyber warfare.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vault_7
The source of Vault 7 is unknown but a NSA counter-strike seems likely.
So OP, it depends on which team you are barracking for. For me, because the CIA did MK Ultra I am going to be biased towards the NSA which makes Snowden not my guy. However we don't know exactly how "good" the NSA is, and we don't know if the NSA's spying is acceptable due to the exceptional circumstances caused by the Clinton cabal.
Technology provides a new opportunity for power, and nature abhors a vacuum so someone is going to fill that power opportunity, the CIA has a bad track record, they should be scattered to the wind.
>>170739
Honestly it sounds more like factions within the government fighting each other for power. None of them are clean.
Honestly it sounds more like factions within the government fighting each other for power. None of them are clean.
File (): 485B586FE47C02C85D8795A279201F52-1008349.png (984.7 KB, 900x691, Jewish_TyrannyBenGarrison.png)
>>170739
I'm inclined to hate the CIA more because of what they've done but, to me, choosing between them and the NSA is like choosing between Satan and Beelzebub. There's nothing concrete to suggest that the NSA are "good spies," or that Snowden's a CIA plant (why would the Russians grant asylum to such a threat?)
Indeed, even if Q is working for Trump, becoming complacent and "letting the white hats do their thing" is a terrible idea. This complete trust in elected officials is how we arrived at this mess to begin with.
I'm inclined to hate the CIA more because of what they've done but, to me, choosing between them and the NSA is like choosing between Satan and Beelzebub. There's nothing concrete to suggest that the NSA are "good spies," or that Snowden's a CIA plant (why would the Russians grant asylum to such a threat?)
Indeed, even if Q is working for Trump, becoming complacent and "letting the white hats do their thing" is a terrible idea. This complete trust in elected officials is how we arrived at this mess to begin with.
9 replies | 8 files | 9 UUIDs | Archived