/mlpol/ - My Little Politics

>>170065
>There is no chance any other party with our ideas will not be able to gather the 4% of the votes that is need to be in the paralament.
I meant they will never be able to enter the paralament.

>>170065
Will elections change anything? Your country seems fucked at the moment.

>>170065
How will it be after the election? As I understand it there will be a far-left block and a center-block that neither have majority and neither agree on policy, and neither of those block will work with SD. So will there be any working government or policies made, or will the two blocks only agree that the borders have to be kept wide open and nothing else will be agreed upon.

>>170067
>Will elections change anything?
No.

>>170067
It can probably get worse. The only thing that can happen that is positive is if SD becomes the biggest party and the other parties in the parliament has to work together. That is right-center-winged block and the left-winged block (Everyone in the parliament that is not SD) will work together, which they already have once during this mandate. This would be good because it would prove how they all are puppets. Well, it would prove it even more.
>>170075
>or will the two blocks only agree that the borders have to be kept wide open and nothing else will be agreed upon and nothing else will be agreed upon.
Yeah, something along the way. Here's what I imagine.

I think that the powers that control everything want the average news-following-joe-to-swed to take a liking to the idea of a merge... I mean party collaboration as it is so nicely called. They have a perfect excuse for that now. SD is nazis in disguise and due to our integrity, we cannot support any policy that they support or whatever.
Also, I would claim that the whole thing is a theater. Even SD's policies aren't that extreme compared to the Moderates and another party when it comes to the question of immigration. The only difference between different politicians is that some of the leftist ones are crazier than the others. They keep telling us how different they are. I don't buy it.
They want a one-state party for Sweden and we are supposed to get used to it.
That's what I believe anyway.

>>170091
>one-state party
I mean that here is only one party.

>>170091
>>170093
A one party state; how progressive of them. But sadly I think you are right. The labor party will force their will because if the other parties don't support them they will be "supporting SD". Then after a couple of elections a Muslim party will arise and get around 30% of the votes. Then the "one party" will have to decide, do they want to switch and support SD or agree that Sharia law is not a bad thing after all...

>>170094
This.
Agreed that is what will happen if nothing changes.
I do think will already have sharia police in some areas in Sweden.

>>170119
>I do think will already have sharia police in some areas in Sweden.
Would not surprise me at all. There is moral police in some areas of Oslo in Norway already, so would surprise me if they are not present in Sweden. They are so far only enforcing their will, and shartia law, on other Muslims so they sort of fly under the radar at the moment. But if a gay couple walks into one of these areas at night they could be subject to a mild form of Sharia; i.e. they get a beating and chased away instead of being thrown off rooftops.

>Panic Grips Swedish Establishment Facing an Election Beating
(Bloomberg) -- The birthplace of Ikea flat packs and Volvo cars is starting to look just as vulnerable to the populist movement as Italy, Hungary and the U.S.

>A bastion of welfare and equality, Sweden faces an election on Sunday that could be its most tumultuous in a century. As in other democracies across the world, the establishment is being challenged on multiple fronts. The long-dominant Social Democrats are headed for their worst result since general voting started in 1921. The biggest opposition party, the conservative Moderates, may see its backing cut to about half the electoral support it enjoyed at the start of this decade.

>For a country that prides itself on stability and is seen as a model for social democracy across the world, the development is hard to grasp. But voters are now flocking to a party that was born of Sweden’s neo-Nazi, white supremacist movement.

>The Sweden Democrats, whose stated goal is to rip their country out of the European Union, could win about 20 percent of the vote on Sept. 9. Fifteen years ago they weren’t even big enough to make it into the parliament. Meanwhile, the other end of the political spectrum is also poised to do well, with the former communist Left Party set to win almost 10 percent.

https://www.bloombergquint.com/business/2018/09/07/panic-grips-swedish-establishment-facing-an-election-beating#gs.Vm1S6YI

↻ See pic. DooM!!!

>>170244
lol. I am actually looking forward to the election results. That and the inevitable call from leftist to ban political parties like SD from elections so people don't vote for them thus restoring "democracy".

>>170251
>Public going to the right and getting informed.
>Cabal needs this to stop
>Nukes
...
This explains why a WW deep state clean up is needed. Hi, Q.

Interesting decade or two in front of us. "May you live in interesting times."

>Sweden is set to see a major political shift after national elections on Sunday, as the populist Sweden Democrats have a chance to become the largest party in the country.

>Sweden goes to the polls on Sunday to elect a new government, and the ruling Social Democrats, who have been the most dominant party in the country for decades, could not only lose power but, according to polls, possibly even lose their status as the largest party in the country.
...
>The eurosceptic, anti-mass migration Sweden Democrats (SD), led by Jimmie Åkesson, have seen a meteoric rise in the polls since the last national election in 2014, where they received 12.9 percent of the vote.

>Much of the support for the party has come following the 2015 migrant crisis, with many voters favouring its tough stance on mass migration. In a party leaders’ debate earlier this year, Mr Åkesson dominated his rivals on immigration and law and order issues, leading to viewers declaring him the victor in a post-debate poll.

>The SD have also put forward policies to crack down on organised crime, including proposing that the Swedish army should support the police in no-go zones where they, and other emergency services, have come under attack from residents.
...
>An average of recent polls shows that even with the support of the Greens, the Social Democrats would only have 29.4 percent of the vote, compared to the Alliance with 37.6 percent — but in either case neither would be able to form a majority coalition alone, which could afford the Sweden Democrats major influence in the legislative chamber.

https://www.breitbart.com/london/2018/09/08/sweden-election-populists-set-for-major-gains-social-democrats-grip-on-power-fading/

↻ SOON.

When does the polling stations close and we can expect to start getting the results ticking in?

>>170358
I read somewhere voting closes 8pm Sunday. Wiki link also https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Swedish_general_election,_2018 which is source of pic. SD /ourguys/

>>170360
Going to be fun to see how many of the votes SD will get.
>on a positive note Sweden do have Voter ID laws like ever other European nation

>>170361
The other interesting party is:

>The Moderate Party (Swedish: Moderata samlingspartiet, M: "Moderate Coalition Party", commonly referred to in Swedish as Moderaterna: "the Moderates") is a liberal-conservative[7][8][9][10] political party in Sweden. The party was founded in 1904 as the General Electoral League by a group of conservatives in the Swedish parliament. The party has had two other names during its history, namely The Right (Swedish: Högern, 1938–1952) and Right Wing Party (Swedish: Högerpartiet, 1952–1969).
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moderate_Party

Which gets comparable vote percentages. Left is looking pretty screwed.

>>170362
True, I hope Moderatana also gets relatively high number of votes. The sad thing is that it is only SD that wants to limit immigration as I have understood it. Moderatana might want to limit it a little but they are still open to have more or less open borders.
If I remember correctly Sweden have taken in 600.000 immigrants the past 5 years (I couldn't find the article right now). These 600.000 immigrant have arrived without Moderatana raising any questions whether this was a good idea.

>>170365
Interesting, thanks. Go SD!!

Raiding 4pol for some edge. Looks like AfS is the new edgy.

4/pol/ says SD controlled opposition. Pic #2

my knwoledge of the swedish politics scape is superficial at best, but i do hope for the best of the country that the platform that is closest to ethnonationalism wins the elections most favourable. Good luck, Sweden. You need it as much as most of the rest of us.

Poll close in 8 hours (I think)
4/pol/ says first results in about 10.5 hours (22:30 local)

Looks like results will be here:
https://data.val.se/val/val2018/valnatt/R/rike/index.html

>>170368
>>170369
Wish they were up-and-coming instead. A rule of politics should be: if you're going to be in power, you will get Jew'd.

Not that I'm knowledgeable about Swedish politics, but wouldn't it be easier to infiltrate and subvert the controlled op to /ourside/ rather than make a hardline party? Basically out-Jew the Jew. My logic with AfS is that if they ever get to appear powerful (unlikely imo) they'll just get Jew'd as well.

Nice Art!

>>170373
Nice. Thanks for link.

>>170371
Found a stream of the Swedish election.
Looks according to it the countdown says the polling stations closes in 6h 30min, so 6pm UTC
https://youtu.be/0BqwzsHFRlI

I hope Sweden becomes a first world country once again
Godspeed

>>170386
Thanks

AfS speech with English subtitles.
https://youtu.be/Mvs5HoyD0Zs

4/pol/ poll
https://www.strawpoll.me/16425421/r

Alternativ för Sverige 115 35%
Sverigedemokraterna 98 30%
Jeb! 36 11%

>>170065
I know 3 horsefucker(brony) swede who are in this Natsoc organisation movement https://www.nordfront.se/english
funny shit right ?
AfS is basically a copy version of Afd (Alternative for Germany)but less kosher. Sweden will collapse before any legit pro swede will form. When shit hit fan the (((EU)))alone will not able fix it this shit maybe the US it may also depend on if the jews are succesful at converting the Muslim( not the Niggers because they are slave minded and easier to enslave)to be libs cuck slave to the Kikes new world order Agenda 2030 if not they can use US,Slavs army
+ anti Muslim kosher nationalist to fight Radical Muslim into submission.

Agenda 2030,2021 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zfMxsrcr1D0
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7nBvRYmubhA
https://twitter.com/one1europe/status/588626781290237952
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EbozEMQuPYA

https://www.thelocal.se/20180909/live-blog-swedish-election-day-sweden-2018-vote

Live thelocal.se blog should start shortly.

Two SD politicians and an voter was given death threats outside a polling station. Naturally the police have not released a description of the perpetrators, but they say they are looking for some youth that came with the death threats.

http://archive.is/Nio4t (Norwegian article)

>>170386
ANother stream https://www.nrk.no/nyheter/valg-i-sverige-1.11200732

>>170409
Sadly I am on metered internet, and since NRK don't give you the option to set the quality, but rather gives you the highest speed possible regardless, I have to forgo their stream.

>>170410
I am 240p'ing your one :)

>>170411
Doing 144p myself just to be sure I can watch it all :)

> So, what do you need to know about today's election, or elections? Voters are casting their ballots in three elections today: national, regional and local. Understandably, the national one tends to get the most attention.

>What's at stake? Well, 349 seats in Sweden's one-chamber parliament (riksdagen). Here's some trivia you can impress people with at parties (this is why I don't get invited to parties): Sweden used to have a 350-seat parliament. The election of 1973 saw the seats split between the left and the right-wing bloc, leading to MPs occasionally having to draw sticks every time both sides had the same number of 'yeas' or 'nays'.

>This was considered very impractical, and so it was changed to 349 MPs in 1976. But I digress.

>There are eight parties currently represented in Sweden's parliament. On the left, the two incumbents in Sweden's minority government: the Social Democrats and the Greens, who enjoy the informal support of the Left Party in parliament. On the right, the so-called 'Alliance': the Moderates, Centre Party, Liberals and the Christian Democrats. In their own little corner, the far-right, nationalist, anti-immigration, populist (what SHOULD we call them?) Sweden Democrats. We'll talk more about them, and the rest of the parties, later.
...
https://www.thelocal.se/20180909/live-blog-swedish-election-day-sweden-2018-vote

>>170414
>mfw
>and on the right, the Moderates (M), Liberals (L), Centre (C) and Christian Democrats (KD)

WTF?

>People weren't able to vote for AfS. The (((workers))) thrown them all over the driveway out back.
Link: https://twitter.com/GunnarBernst/status/1038751380834590721?s=19
https://boards.4chan.org/pol/thread/185104430

>>170419
That is truly fucked up, but it is typical for leftist view on democracy. Allowing people to vote for opposition parties is not democratic in the eyes of leftists.

>>170420
An AfS vote now might be a wasted vote. Those people would then have to choose SD. Maybe not a completely bad thing for now.

>>170419

I find it absurd how the Eu and the USA pretend to be the golden standard for democracies when these open election frauds happen all the time when the jew marionettes are challenged to lose their power. The absolute state of western democracy. Its all but a banana republic.

>>170421
True. The chance for AfS to get into parliament is next to zero at the moment.

>>170422
The whole world is fucked. "Democracy" is just a pretty word in this age, to retain a shred of dignity beneath the globalist corruption that is eating the West from the inside out.
Western countries are arguably more democratic than third world shitholes, but that's just a matter of comparison. When people try to claim the EU and U.S.A are beakons of democracy, what they really mean is "at least we're not some Afrikan dictatorship that has a violent coup every two years".
At the same time, nothing is perfect. The worst thing next to anarchy is government, and we can only try to make it a little bit better, no matter how rigged and unfair it may be.

>The rural-urban divide

>The Local's Malmö reporter Richard Orange visited the nearby town of Sjöbo earlier today, the anti-immigration stronghold where the Sweden Democrats hope to get a third of the vote in the local election.

">You can get upset about the party and you can say bad things about their supporters, but the Sweden Democrats are a result of bad politics in my opinion," one voter told him. "They way I see it SD is a protest party and they wouldn't have needed to exist if politics had been done in another way."

>The Sweden Democrats tend to have larger support in rural areas of Sweden, capitalizing on voters who often feel they have been left behind by an increasingly urban middle class. But many are still uneasy with the party's roots in neo-Nazi movements and dormant racism that still occasionally rears its head. More than a dozen prospective representatives have been crossed off the party's ballots in recent weeks for spreading neo-Nazi or anti-Semitic propaganda on social media, after it was reported by Swedish media.
...
https://www.thelocal.se/20180909/live-blog-swedish-election-day-sweden-2018-vote

"""Democracy"""!!!

I would recommend Pinning this thread until the aftermath of the swedish elections is over.

(granted and pinned)

>>170436
This might be the longest pinned thread in /mlpol/ history as we could be faced with numerous extra elections before a government is formed.

>>170448
Thanks for video link. Music that is going into my dl list.

https://youtu.be/_y5TzeLjDbY <- be patient play it all.

Swedish version of Pepe: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CX_TZ7Lu824

---

>19:45 The world is watching

>Paul O'Mahony, reporting from the Sweden Democrats' election night party, writes: "International interest in the performance of the Sweden Democrats is huge. Journalists from all over the world outnumber the party faithful here in the early stages. Everyone seems to expect a full-on party later since it's almost inevitable the party will record its best ever score."

>"There's a noticeably sizeable Norwegian contingent in place to document the neighbours' embrace of the far right (although the Norway-Bulgaria football match happening simultaneously is also generating interest.)"

https://www.thelocal.se/20180909/live-blog-swedish-election-day-sweden-2018-vote

>>170451

i was wondering if that was pepe, then i noticed the ears. is this a bear or just a generic muppet character?

>>170454

third place isnt too bad, thats about the same as the ADF in Germany. pretty alright and according to statistical expectations

>>170455
>i was wondering if that was pepe, then i noticed the ears. is this a bear or just a generic muppet character?
It seems to be some popular children's character of their so Swedish chan (????) made it a Nazi.

Also some people are saying the 16.3% is exit poll numbers.

SVT prognosis (10.000 people polled)

>>170457
Thanks for clarification :)

>>170458
Hoping for way more as the night progresses.

>>170458
Let's hope for the best.

>>170461
May the tide turn and honor return to Sweden.
>hope sweden yes becomes a proud example of how to retake your country

TV4 poll:
SD 16.5%

>>170467
I hope so, because since a decade and more, Sweden is the country to absolutely not follow with all the socialist bullshit. This country need to be saved before becoming the "nordic" africa.

(I talk a lot about hope today, this election is making me feel thing.)

>>170468
I think the TV4 poll was using a vastly smaller sample size thus greater +/- error (2000 people or so if I recall what they said). So the SVT poll should be more accurate.

>>170470

< 2014
Found a comparison of poll vs results from 2014 to give us an idea of accuracy.

>>170471
In about an hour the real election result should start to give a small pointer on how it will go. Using your link to official results
https://data.val.se/val/val2018/valnatt/R/rike/index.html

>>170472
I also saw it, and I am not sure. I think it is results from election areas where counting is completed. But these are small areas with few voters so they don't tell too much of the overall result.
As I understand it the 1/6004 is showing that the result that is shown is based on only 1 of 6004 election constituency that counting is completed.

We're getting a shocking last minute surge in the polls! It looks like we'll have a new party in power in Sweden.

>>170473
>the 1/6004 is showing that the result that is shown is based on only 1 of 6004 election constituency that counting is completed.

Good info, thanks.

>>170453

i just realized, did this guy from 4pol vote for the swedish feminist party? i hope this is just a joke.

not even sweden wants these faggots. they dont even have 5 % of the votes.

>>170472

i expected the new nationalist party of the country to do semi-decent but that is just comical. i cant believe they would get so many overall votes. must be a regional counting.

>>170474

D:

>>170476
>must be a regional counting.
Must be. If it is first counted it must be a small area.

Alleged official results so far. Unconfirmed.
https://data.val.se/val/val2018/valnatt/R/rike/index.html is timing out.

>>170479

>Christian Democrats
>Centrist Party
>Moderates Party

I dont know about Sweden but not only does that sound exactly the same to me, this is literally the same Party in Germany. Does Sweden have no diversity of thought in its political landscape? Also if SD really scored 20%, congratulations.

SD 21%

>>170483
Scary how many that don't think it is a good idea

I think https://data.val.se/val/val2018/valnatt/R/rike/index.html has been blocked for international?
Pic from 4chan.. SD at 21%

>>170486

Assuming this is you Vril, I can see the swedish vote data site just fine. Cap related.

Just one area... SD = 41%

>>170487
Keep us updated, anon :)

>>170489

Will try. the site seems, understandably, have to get a heavy traffic load. some DDOS might be involved with this too.

I will post a new cap in 20 minutes and one in 50 minutes before i leave.

got this error now

>>170492
I guess they are struggling.
https://youtu.be/0BqwzsHFRlI seems to have updated stats on the screen most of the time.
SD = 21.7% currently 204/6004 counted.

New link for stats: https://valresultat.svt.se/2018/10000.html

>>170494

SD sitting at exactly 20% at second place.

>>170496
I think that is pretty much how it will end up.

>>170488
Checked

>>170488
Check. Sounds like a lovely place to live if you are in Sweden.

>>170494

can no longer reach data.val.se. either the site is offline or they banned me after they noticed im not from sweden.

SB is now down to 18,8 percent. Moderates catching up at 18,0 %

>>170500
I can't reach it either. I think their site broke due to traffic overload.

>>170500
I had one random luck reload and got the site. But can't reload anymore.

>>170500
I've been wondering if the cities are counted last due to size and thy will pull down SD.

Pic related at the bottom shows change in seats due to the recent percentages. Looks decent.
SD +18 , C +11 and KD +7 up ... all were considered to be right. ( >>170415 )

Another positive side with the election is that if The Green party gets below 4% they loose their spot in parliament.

M 2nd 18.7%
SD 3rd 18.3%

I will attempt to reach the main site ina few minutes.

If you catch any important current events or drama elsewhere, feel free to post it here. Sweden is next to germany the Petridish of the new Nationalist world order. if that shit fails, we best gear up for war.

>>170506
Will keep my eyes and ears open and post if anything big (or smallish) happens

Dataval remains unreachable. Cap taken from Valresultat.

latest countings. seems like the urban areas are dragging down the SD pretty hard, but i think they will hold 3rd place.

>>170507

Thank you for your engagement, Norway Anon. I think this topic is of great interest to the whole site. Good Luck and Good Night!

>>170510
Good Night.

1/3 districts counted.
SD 3rd 17.9%

>>170510
>seems like the urban areas are dragging down the SD pretty hard
Stockholm: SD = 10% 4th place so far.
https://valresultat.svt.se/2018/10180.html

>>170510
Good night and sleep well

Another display of stats
https://www.aftonbladet.se/a/0EyBX0

Apparently once around 5000 election constituency is counted we should see roughly what the end result will be.
>1000 more to go

>>170518
3rd place for sure.
16%?

Taking bets now.

>>170519
I think at least 17%
>would be a bit let down if it was lower even thou 16% is a respectable result

>>170520
SD has controlling votes?

3/4 districts SD 17.7%

>>170519
But also I don't think we will see big swings from what we have now.

>>170521
Yes they do. There is four scenarios as I see it
1. Moderatana chooses to talk to SD and form a government with support from SD
2. Left and right block form some sort of agreement just to keep SD out of any sort of influence
3. Neither block gets enough votes to form a government and new elections is held
4. Moderatana or Socialists will rule on an minority government (with support initially from the other block)
4b. The budget is not agreed upon and new elections is held

>>170523
>Neither block gets enough votes
Votes in parliament forming government. Any single party or collisional needs 50% of the votes in parliament to be instated.

Geert Wilders and Marine Le Pen congratulates SD

>>170526
Wouldn't SD and M work together?

4999 of 6007 election constituencies counted

>>170455
>>170523
Pim Fortuyn and Wilders both had the third-largest party at times, and here the other parties consistently choose to form a minority government. They keep saying true cooperation with (people like) Wilders is unnegotiable, but are willing to form an "acceptance agreement", to have minority government without full governmental paralysis.

The excluded third party has enough votes to stop the government from progressing the currentyear, but not enough power to repair any damage already happening.

Not worth it IMO.

Graphic over who SD "took" voters from
https://www.svt.se/special/valu2018-valjarstrommar/

Well, this thread blew up while I was gone. German anon and Norwegainanon really did a good job reporting on this event. They make me feel inadequate.
I will look through the thread later. If I find something I can give some insight on as a nurse in this mental asylum named Swedenistan.
Also, I can't believe that the social democrats are in the lead with such a margin. It is them, S, that has been the ruling party for the last mandate period and they have become known as the party who made the worst government for Sweden in, like, I don't even know. Even though I don't know Swedish political history very well I am tempted to say the worst rule of all Swedish history and now they are winning. WTF!
It would be more acceptable if people vote for the Moderates not because they are a solution. The reason it would be more acceptable is that they don't have the same track record of steering straight off the fucking road.
I guess the reason is that Sd have been getting the Moderates votes and the morons that vote S in the last election just does what they always have done. Muslim votes might also vote S but I don't think they have managed to do such a large impact yet.
Well, let's do a fucking recap of this niggers.
S broke six election pledges in the first half year. They had a recent security leak but then again we don't have a military so it really doesn't matter. When the time comes we will have to suck nato cock. That is when Putin decides that he will come and take over SwedenCan you hear my ironic voice but that is seriously what they believe here. Not because I actually want any military since both the military and the police replace their flag during the pride parade from the Swedish to the rainbow flag. Anyway, the list goes on S have done so many scandals in this Mandate period that it is almost like an achievement in itself.
Here is our current prime minister btw
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5pwhgQdJKIw
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KP3HuQOqKS4
Anyway, I am happy that Sd is making progress. Even if they are controlled opposition people vore for what they think they are not what they are.

Another good news from the election is that "Feminist Initiative" that last election got 3.1% is now downgraded to the "Other" category that is collection of all the small parties in Sweden (FI, AfS, and some others).
"Others" have 1.4% combined

>>170481
No, people think there is diverity of thought because most of them projects things on to the different politcians. The sweden democrats are not at all radical it is a complete projection or rather since the left is so strong here. The extreme is not being extreme left.
Package is everything in this stupid place.

>>170533
All the best of luck to you Sweden. This is a great sign for the future. One thing you should always be proud of is that Nordfront and others can hold rallies in Sweden, that is next to impossible in Norway.
If new elections is held because no government is formed I think and hope SD will get even more votes.

>>170530
Well, I was wrong I thought that Sd had got its voters mostly from M and Kd.

>>170539
That graph seems a bit weird. The seats could be said to be coming from M.

>>170539
Well relative to the parties sizes it could still be true (% loss of own voters to SD). Not sure if I read the graph correctly (seeing where voters went).
>14% of the M voters went to SD
>13% of the KD voters went to SD
>11% of the S voters went to SD
... but I am not sure if the numbers add up

>>170538
>This is a great sign for the future. One thing you should always be proud of is that Nordfront and others can hold rallies in Sweden, that is next to impossible in Norway
Yeah, that is good.
>If new elections are held because no government is formed I think and hope SD will get even more votes.
It is possible but I fear that it will have a little effect this time. This situation is nothing new. In eight years now have it been theoretically impossible for any government to form but that hasn't stopped it from happening. After the election of 2010 Sd could stop the liberal-block, aka Alliansen, M, KD, L, C, from building a government but they didn't. Why? Because they didn't want to cause disorder for the potential government by stopping their new laws to be implemented. They did this because they wanted to be taken as a serious party, they said. And this if anything should show you that they are controlled. They got into the parliament by their voters which means that they have to do what they want. Side note. you vote on a party. The amounts of votes that your party has determined what percentage of the parliament seats you will get. The party with a majority in the parliament can create a Government. But if you don't have the majority in the parliament, then no new laws can pass through the government. SD was in the position from the beginning that they could stop the government from doing anything unless they went through them or began to collaborate with the opposing block. They did nothing and have done nothing during the first years and seemingly nothing impressive at least during this four years. Only 2014 did they deny the current government. Then something called DÖ happened. Basically, the Moderates said, "Hey, why don't we collaborate with our supposed enemies". Dö broke up and I think that stalemate has been for like four years now and since no one is reporting on it is has become normalcy.

>>170544
>theoretically impossible for any government to form
I mean to get their will through the paraliment.

But yes even if the development isn't new it is great that SD has so high procentage of votes. Because again, here in Sweden people vote for what they believe something to be not ffor what it actually is.

>>170546
I think the same. If they manage to get through the initial vote and actually form a government, they wont be able to agree on a budget. It all hinges on how much the other parties hate SD and want to keep them from having any influence on the policies.

>>170544
>Sd could stop the liberal-block, aka Alliansen, M, KD, L, C, from building a government but they didn't.
Yes it is a shame parties like SD does this. But Jimmy said he wanted influence this time. Worst case if SD chooses to support Moderatana is that the immigration will be lowered to a tolerable amount but still too much. I hope SD actually sets hard against hard and don't bend the knee.

It's rather funny that SD didn't get 20+%, for some reason people overestimated their gains this election. Anyway, this is still a great win for SD, I wish it would at least of been around 20% instead of its 17.6%.

Regardless, Sweden is fucked. People voted mostly on healthcare, education, and geriatric care but largely ignored immigration. Boomers voted on the left, be it Vänsterpartiet or Socialdemokraterna, to save their pensions and healthcare. Haha! Fucking retards. They missed the fact that immigration hollows out their precious services whilst increasing debt for future generations, which lowers their living standards. A vicious cycle is born from this desire of the boomers to force the government to give them gibs and to maintain a dying system.

A couple of things on the results. (fuck the captcha by the way)

What is being reported right now are the results of the PRELIMINARY count of votes cast, this count is done at the polling stations and then reported to be registered and summed elsewhere.
The actual, final, count will take place later, during next week. "Ahead-of-time votes" (förhandsröster) are not cast at polling stations, and as far as I know they wouldn't be counted there as part of the preliminary results.
Voting early has become increasingly popular, and we don't know if early voters will follow the trend we have seen so far. Election day votes could be disproportionately boomer votes, for example. "Shy nationalist voters" could disproportionately have voted early to avoid being seen voting for the wrong side in a crowded polling station.
The anomalously high number of invalid votes that 4/pol/ has been talking about could also be a mystery that is solved when the ballots are looked at again in the final count of votes. (Fake ballots being placed at some polling places? Misprint?)

>>170535
>"Others" have 1.4% combined
"Others" were projected to be what, 4.5% this year? AfS were also supposedly the largest party of "Others" by far. I know for a fact that AfS will be counted separately in the final count, as will FI, NMR (yes, really) MED and a whole bunch of meme parties nobody has heard of.
Going from >4% "Others" to 1.4% is unexpected to say the least. It COULD be that AfS are not included in that figure of 1.4%, and that we'll get some interesting results later on when the final count is being done.

>>170554

A high number of invalid ballots?

At any stretch, I'm not reading this election as a massive gain for the nationalist right. A support around 18% after years of failed immigration and leftist politics is a tepid response from the voters. This election sort of sealed the deal for me that accelerationism is close to being the only legitimate response to combat the left. Give people what they want and they'll learn to hate it enough to abandon it.

>>170556
val.se seems to be working again, here's what it says at the moment:

>Ogiltiga röster - inte anmälda partier (parties not registered)
2014: no data
2018: 3944

>Ogiltiga röster - blanka (blank votes)
2014: 54123
2018: 50740

>Ogiltiga röster - övriga (other invalid votes)
2014: 1936
2018: 24444

>Övriga anmälda partier (other registered parties)
2014: 57566
2018: 63635

That's still only 0.4% of the total votes cast, but an ~1100% increase in invalid votes from last election makes it look like it's something in that category that shouldn't be there.

Also, S and M are losing seats and SD is now officially a "main party", playing in the same league as they are with everyone else far behind. MP is almost cut in half. We are in a situation where traditional left or right coalitions just can't work, and where broad left-right coalitions will make SD the natural main opposition party whose political perspective will have to be considered in any news reporting.

It may not be a huge nationalist victory, but I don't think it's right calling it a defeat either.

I assume Swedes don't have a system like the electoral college which moves policy interests away from being dominated only by coastal and inland city interests?

>>170562

>Nationalist defeat

It isn't really a defeat, it isn't a victory either; the result falls in between defeat and victory if we look only at the figures.

Swedish Democrats will face stiff opposition, as the third biggest party in parliament they can be safely ignored and blamed for much discord in the formation of a new government. When the government is formed they will be used for cheap political points and the retarded females and needy boomers will swig it down with glee.

>Invalid votes

There are several examples of the left tampering with the ballots of nationalist right parties. We need to wait and see if anyone digs up something more on this development.

>>170563

No, we have proportionality with a cutoff point (4%) to be eligible for seats in the parliament.

>>170564
I sort of got that from the concern over certain parties being eligible or making it for voting.
I guess my point is don't you have something else?
Hasn't there also been something else besides the various political maneuverings from the parties?

>>170564
>as the third biggest party in parliament they can be safely ignored and blamed for much discord in the formation of a new government.
What, "it's your fault that we can't get along"? I don't really see that working, even with our electorate.

But yes, they could cause some trouble, sit on the sidelines while the others are squabbling and say things like "X proposal makes sense, we would have supported it and I don't see why Y party has a problem with it", while not having to actually compromise on anything since bringing SD into your coalition is taboo.
The other parties won't be able to keep a united front against them for long, they disagree on too many things.

>>170565

Nooo-eee . . . there isn't. Sweden is a society of neurotic scared people who've been taught to lick the leftist vagene. The boomers enabled the dominance of the left by ensuring that their children wouldn't encounter the world with a set of morals beyond "me", "what can I get", "fuck tradition", and "no people". This was handed down to their children, of course. Any vying for political power was short when parties on the left gave utterance to their reality impaired goal of a society governed by the left.

Females being the largest voting group, generally voting for the left, ensure that Sweden will skip down the merry road of diversity under socialist rule. Supported by migrants they're basically unbeatable.

>>170566

We'll see. It worked so far blaming the nationalist right for whatever and warning people that caring for their people, to be nationalistic, or refusing replacement is wicked White nationalism and not basic survival instincts that most cultures dabble in. Even as figures showed that people want restricted immigration policies and some kind of cooperation with SD most parties refused to listen to the people, even when around 70% were in opposition.

SD can't survive as some vulgar version of Cassandra by pointing out facts, being ignored, and when shit hits the fan explain that if people would just cooperate with them things wouldn't be as bad.

Now we have to live under another four years of screeching leftists enabling another massive import of third worlders (At least 300,000 to 2021), higher taxes, worsening crime statistics, racism against natives, and asking themselves why society isn't improving.

S lost quite some votes in Sollefteå Kommun. Well fucking deserved. I don't get it. The females around the rest of the country who voted for them (S) are fucking retarded. S shut down a very important section (BB essentially the care for pregnant women). This has lead to a bunch of women giving births in their car to way to far away places to reach in time. And it's only a matter of time until it leads to deaths.

If this does not prove that women are nearly incapable of voting for logical things that actually
help them then I do not know what.

Same goes for women voting for MP. MP has very heavy ties with Islamist fundamentalists. Who have proven time and time again that they give no single fucks. Their own fucking "speaker" refused to admonish some muslim MP for not shaking a womans hand. But they will still vote for the party because muh trees. It's not as if they shut down another nuclear reactor, which funnily enough means we will have to import even more unclean energy. Good job retards.

Giving women voting rights was a mistake. They vote for whatever the fuck fancies them without giving any logical thought to it at all. And it drags the rest of the country down with them.

And when you confront these completely emotionally driven idiots. They shut down or spout some bullshit they read in a book. It's hilarious on the level of just being sad.

>>170570

Typical of the autistic male brain to use reason and logic. What did you believe, that females would care to part the veil of faux virtuousness, accept their way didn't work, and vote for responsibility? Pfft! Embrace the way of the female and you'll find salvation through fee-fees!

Singed by Kill Me Now.

Soo? Anyhting will change? Or shit's fucked brahs?

>>170574
Officially nothing yet, but a 99% guarantee that shit is still fucked.

>>170577
Dubs confirm, something's rotten in the country of Sweden still.

>>170571

>From 1973 through 2008, nine surveys of women's rape fantasies have been published. They show that about four in 10 women admit having them (31 to 57 percent) with a median frequency of about once a month. Actual prevalence of rape fantasies is probably higher because women may not feel comfortable admitting them.
https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/all-about-sex/201001/womens-rape-fantasies-how-common-what-do-they-mean

It has been suggested that women are not as concerned by the fantasy of being raped as men might expect them to be. And this coupled with the maternal instinct might make them less anti-immigration than men. ( >>170416 ) And from Nature's perspective it has no nationalistic bias. One could say that Nature is solving the "West won't make babies" problem.

>>170574
It all depends on what kind of coalition or minority government gets into power.
According to the preliminary results the center-left and center-right blocks are almost perfectly balanced with about 40% of votes each, and with no clear winner things might get interesting.

But I agree with >>170577 there's nothing about the result per se that says policy will change significantly, nationalists are still a minority and don't have enough seats to make them the obvious coalition partner for the main center-left or center-right parties.

I just watched the episode with the parasites and it reminded me of refugees but instead of being cute they do the bleeding heart shit
First a few then their family and before you know it your cities are in ruins and your wives are raped

https://valresultat.svt.se/2018/10000.html

Final Exit poll results
SD is at rank 3 with ~17,5 Percent

>>170624
Lost in translation? It's not an exit poll, it's the preliminary count of the actual votes.

And we can now see the results of the final count start to come in:
https://data.val.se/val/val2018/slutresultat/R/rike/index.html

Invalid votes at 0.04% so far. (instead of the 0.4% in the preliminary count)

>>170642

that Red Party got 3 percent AFTER the final county was counted. very suspicious.

still, SD is at 3 place with 14 somethign percent. Feminist Initiative failed with 0,5 percent and will not be represented. I dont know about Alternative for Sweden, they are not listed.

>>170646
Looks like it is a "complete" tally, or the doublecheck or counts, including mail in votes and votes cast from abroad. And the total in that overview only includes 49 of 6325 electoral constituencies.
>Slutlig rösträkning hos länsstyrelsen pågår. 49 av 6325 valdistrikt räknade.
>The final count of the county administrative board is in progress. 49 out of 6325 constituencies counted.

>>170648
>>170646
If you click "Valnatt" ("Election night") you get the tally they got then. The final count that is being conducted now is a more detailed count and can take some time before it is finished (waiting for all votes cast from abroad and such has arrived and is counted, and contested votes checked and tossed or included). But the end result should not deviate much from the election night result.

Looks like SD is getting an extra representative as one of the constituencies submitted wrong results on election night.

>De hade rapporterat in siffrorna för landstingsvalet i stället för riksdagsvalet, säger Lars Aden Lisinski till TT.
>They had reported the numbers for county council elections instead of parliamentary elections, "says Lars Aden Lisinski to TT.

http://archive.is/fkpvE

>>170646
>I dont know about Alternative for Sweden, they are not listed.
They are listed under "Röstfördelning övriga partier" near the bottom of the page.

>>170648
>>170650
Exactly, the "real" count is what's going on now, including absentee ballots and votes cast ahead of the election. This count also separates out all parties including write-ins.
The one that's done on election night is usually pretty accurate but is more to get politicians something to work with and journalists something to report I guess.

50/6325 districts counted as of now, expect things to move quicker today.

Looked a bit at the district level of the area I'm familiar with, and it's mostly what you'd expect. These are the voting patterns that stood out to me:
In several rural areas SD are the largest party, or neck and neck with S. Support for SD is between 21-30%.
Well off suburbs/areas in towns leans pretty significantly Green (MP) - and Left (V), for some reason - and have very low SD support at 8-10%.
Immigrant heavy areas have lower turnout, leans heavily S, and have about average numbers for SD. SD did well in those places in 2014, the difference could be an effect of S encouraging immigrants to vote, and vote for them.

>>170812

who is allowed to vote in Sweden anyways?

While the results may be bleak, let us remember how it got to this point.

>>170880
Never, EVER, trust the (((Jew))).

Little update on the Swedish election (sorry for shit translation)

>The red-green coalition get 144 seats, the Alliance gets 143, while Sverigedemokraterna (SD) gets 62 seats. Shows the preliminary election results when all votes are counted.

>This is a preliminary count and the final result comes first on Friday. At the same time that the last vote is now counted, a recount of all votes given in Sunday's election is also underway. This is done to check the numbers.

>There have been small margins under the count which started Wednesday by an estimated 190.000 votes released abroad and other advance votes. There has been linked great excitement to one mandate, which during the count on Wednesday tilted back and forth between the Center and Sverigedemokraterna. The center ended with 31 seats.

>Who will form a government is still in the blue. "The Bourgeois" (political right) believes they are the greatest and points out that Vänsterpartiet (the left party), who received 28 mandates, is not included in Prime Minister Stefan Löfvens coalition.
>"The Alliance is the governmental option that is clearly greater than Socialdemokraterna and clearly greater than the incumbent government," said Christian Democrats leader Ebba Busch Thor on Wednesday.

>The Alliance had invited Prime Minister Stefan Löfven and his Social Democrats to be the support party for a "Bourgeois government". Stefan Löfven rejected this blank out.

– "The bourgeois is only the greatest if one considers the Sverigedemokraterna (SD)", stated Löfven firmly.
>The Prime Minister recalls that Socialdemokraterna, Greens and Vänsterpartiet together have created eight budgets over the last four years.

>Löfven described it as "illegal and undemocratic" if the four bourgeois parties would form a government, even if they are smaller than the red Green alternative.

>Here are the results with the change from 2014 in parentheses:
>Socialdemokraterna: 28.3 percent (-2.8)-100 mandates (-13)
>Vänsterpartiet: 8 percent (+ 2.3) – 28 mandates (+ 7)
>Greens: 4.4 per cent (-2.5)-16 mandates (-9)
>Moderaterna: 19.8 per cent (-3.5)-70 mandates (-14)
>Centerpartiet: 8.6 percent (+ 2.5) – 31 mandates (+ 9)
>Christian Democrats: 6.3 percent (+ 1.8) – 22 mandates (+ 6)
>Liberalerna: 5.5 percent (+ 0.1) – 20 mandates (+ 1)
>Sverigedemokraterna: 17.5 percent (+ 4.7) – 62 mandates (+ 13)
>Other parties: 1.4 percent (no mandates)

>>171172

thanks for the update, Norway Anon. How long will it take until a government will form? will SD join the Bourgoise or will the marxists form a minority coalition?

>>171177
From the sound of it the Marxists will try to go at it alone. But if they get enough votes in parliament (over 50%) in order to actually form a government is unsure. It the marxist manages to bitch and moan enough for this to happen the next hurdle they have is to get an budget approved in parliament (over 50% votes).
I am not sure if Sweden can do as some countries and have a "government" that can't pass any budgets and only the essentials of government is kept running (most of it because cucked), but no new laws are passed or anything.
But as I understand it if either of these fails, no government formed or a budget is voted down, there will be new elections in Sweden.

There Was Meddling In The Swedish Election
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CnRs01KPHkY
18 minute video from Red Ice TV

independent Danish Election Observer said the 2018 danish election was the MOST UNDEMOCRATIC and most unprofessional he has evern seen. And this men was assigned to election supervision in Russia.

>>172147
The most crazy about his findings is that it is brushed away because he was not an official member of the OSSE inspectors, he was only an independent consultant to the OSSE team, and an expert on democratic voting processes. So because he was not an official member his views on the election is not considered "valid".

>>172152
Or was that another observer I was thinking of that also said it was most undemocratic election he had seen..