/mlpol/ - My Little Politics

>>16850
I'm more in the camp "The Bible is the Word of God, but it's imperfect, because it was compiled over time by man and is subject to politics and agendas of the past"

>>16850

>>16877
Everyone should be aware of that prospect.

>>16877
Since I can't include like 30 different options I think option #2 is fitting enough.

>>16850
could only answer two of those

I think the political scale is bullshit. Yea I said it, fight me. It's just a way to tell people that if you hold a certain belief that you can't hold others. I mean,fascism and communism are very close in some ways, yet people bullshit about them being complete opposites. The only reason the idea of right wing and left wing exists is to turn people against each other.

>>16925
I agree to a certain extend.

This does not represent me.

I prefer this one
http://www.abtirsi.com/quiz2.php

>>16850
I used to be a white nationalist, but steadily switched to civic nationalism so to speak. Every precursor to white nationalism just failed to truly mobilize the people and ascend to power. A lot of the white nationalist movements now just don't make the connection to good old fascism, giving off that they didn't follow a good example. I still support banned immigration, deportation for illegals, voluntary deportation for non illegals, and breeding programs for whites. It's just that I want an environment for fascism to prosper.
(USER MADE ME PUKE IN MY MOUTH)

>>16850
>how ethno-nationalist are you
I'm not

>>16985
Nope. I'm a libertarian.

>>16925
I agree. Every time I take this thing I get vastly different results depending on my mood that day. Sometimes I get borderline right wing libertarian, sometimes I get close to fascism, and sometimes I end up in communism. I guess i'm just a populist ethno-nationalist. I want to preserve culture and keep it rich (arts, music, etc) but I want to keep it pure from other less than desirable cultures. Same with race. Whites should stick to white relationships. I'm not saying that is true for every circumstance, but for the vast majority it should be and racial purity should be encouraged. I don't think we should start loading people into concentration camps or anything. Free market is fine but companies should be regulated to protect the consumers. Monopolies should get busted. Schools should teach instill cultural values IE: what America was founded on, not what it has become. Immigration is alright but they should be racially similar to whites, the race that founded America, but other races from similar cultural backgrounds can immigrate as long as they have something to offer (same goes for whites) but it should be limited. Someone from Iraq? Not ok. Someone from Britain? ok. Someone from Japan? Sure if they have valuable knowledge or skills. Someone from Somalia? Not ok. Just take the cream of the crop from immigrants but discourage race mixing. Welfare is fine but should be vetted and drug testing should be mandatory. Public works projects are fine, but again, should be drug tested for. If you refuse to work but are able you are dead weight. War should be avoided unless it is a benefit to our people. I don't care what happens in some third world shit hole.

Basically make sure heritage and culture is preserved. Only let immigrants that can prove themselves as a benefit in. Discourage race mixing. Take care of the people that can't take care of themselves. Discourage degeneracy. Discourage laziness. Encourage pride in our race. That should be way more information than a stupid graph can give.

>>16925
the three different modern political ideologies exist on different points of a triangle. all three are similar to the other two in some fashion but differ in one aspect. all points of the triangle are authoritarian by nature. so yes, fascism is opposite of communism and anarchism, and that goes for the other three as well
(A FUCKING LEAF)

>>16988
How the fuck is anarchism authoritarian?

>>16989
nature of power

>>16990
let me rephrase that.
power always consolidates, no matter how 'free' you society is. it is something that cant be avoided

>>16988
Bull fucking shit. There is no way to quantify opinions. No matter how funky of a graph you have, you'll always end up trying to rationalize irrational opinions.

What if I'm half Kike and half melanin-deficient nigger (Irish)?
(GAS)

>>16996
Potato nigger

>>16993
until someone comes up with a political ideology that is radically different from all three of the modern ideologies, I am going to stick with the triangle

>>16999
Consider your trips x trips checked. Even if your idea is retarded.

I believe in State capitalism.
State capitalism is where the state owns the means of production, but that don't mean shit. Nigga, you still gotta work for money.
No welfare except in extreme cases
I agree with An-Caps that Taxation is theft, however I disagree that we should abolish the State.
The government under State capitalism would have a more business policy. Rather than a political structure. As political sovernity would go to local Regional government, instead of Federal government.
Since the employees are also customers. The money will be recycled back into the economy.

The reason why I prefer State capitalism is to accomplish two Objectives.

1: Unify the people of the Nation to compete with other Nation states, rather than private companies.

2: limit government SPENDING to only the surplus money.
(THAT'S JUST GOMMUNISM NIGGER)

>>16850
One of the two blond with blue eyes
>irl dubs

All these edgy, cool, new hip political ideologies. I just want the removal of the jew, everything else will sort itself out

All those polls do not include me. Next time add and Other option for everything. Plus Shinto is separate fro Buddhist. Yes religion in Japan is rainbow fucked with variety but as one is mainly for birth and the other death you should make a distinction.

>>17025
Wait. What do they not include. Buddhism? There is an option for religious-non-Christian

>>16987
Those survey are just data mining and poorly set up anyway. I took one on what generation I am and came out silent gen even though I am definitely in gen x. The big difference is that I preferred to watch Casablanca than Reality Bites. That is hardly a good way to determine a person whole outlook in life.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SQVw58aDt3Y
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w7IWLZcVU64

>>17027
>Sorta. I am a shinto-buddhist.
I would separate Shinto from Buddhist. Shinto is a pagan religion and Buddhist is basically the pre-cursor to Christianity.

Other as in not listed above.

>>17032
Good generation to be from though

>>16988
What do you believe is the difference between fascism and communism? I just need to know what I'm arguing with. And mods, please don't call the guy retarded, it doesn't promote rational discourse.

>>17154
I do not think that is true. Fascism, Communism and Anarchism all come from the same philosophical background. They are solutions to combat religious totalitarianism. In some ways F and C are almost the same. Both want rights for the people, both accept that the democratic approach can not achieve that. Both think of bottom-up process to create a leadership that would then become a political monarchy of ideals. They only real difference would be the economic model they think would work. Communism believing people can move freely from one job to another and Fascism believing people need to be skilled. A true Anarchy is an administration of people with ability making it possible for people and communities to decide their own futures which is very different from F a C which are both controlling from above not below.

>>17158
Ok, so we agree?

>>17154
Fuck you, I'll shitpost all I want to.

>>17154
fascists believe that the class system should be strictly enforced while communists believe that the class system doesn't exist and is created to enslave the lower classes

>>17167
It's just weird when I try to have an even grounds discussion with a guy, and he has little red text below him calling him a leaf. I guess it's fine, but I'm trying to promote the /pol/ aspect of this board.

>>17158
fascism has its roots as a rejection of liberalism during the french revolution and regained headway as a reaction to communism

>>17171
I'm from /pol/ too nigger. Your attitude and desires don't mirror the entirety of the board. Get the stick out of your ass.

>>17158
fascism had nothing to do with the rejection of religious totalitarianism

>>17168
Fair point, but I guess I like to look at the actual outcome of political ideologies rather than what they theoretically mean. I think we can all agree that the Soviet Union, for example ended up being heavily divided by class. It just seems that the outcomes of the two ideologies always end up fairly similar.

>>17173
>>17175
Go back to school and stop relying the internet and shitipedia for your political understanding. Better still read a fucking book.

>>17174
I never claimed I was from /pol/…

>>17184
Actually disregard this post, I'm not going to argue with a fucking mod. I actually kinda like this place.

>>17184
>trying to promote the /pol/ aspect of the board
>not from /pol/
>???
How do you even known what the "/pol/ aspect" is my dude

>>17185
I'm glad you do! I hope you know, I'd never ban you for disagreeing with me. Like I said, I'm just in a shitposting mood tonight.

>>17185

If you were banned for having a genuine discussion with a mod, not only would you be unbanned but we'd probably be looking for a new mod.

>>17185
kek, this isn't 4chan. We don't have a "Global Rule 4" here

>>17186
I just guessed it was political. I mean, it's not like I've never seen /pol/ in my life. Besides, the combo goes both ways.

>>17188
>>17187
Spam raid

>>17200
I don't see any spam

>>17202
The "reptilian" post

>>17202
Also the "mark ellis" thread was one that the poster was banned as a shill for and it's still up, and the "Lovecraft-Nigger" thread was evidently from the tor-raid earlier

>>17204
It's a single post

>>17206
Yeah I thought it was going to be the first of a wave

>>17206
AAAnd a second one the minute I post that

>>17206
The most recent post even uses the same thumbnail image raiders from Sunday used

>>17210
Good lookin out! Thank you.

>>17213
New spam thread. It uses identical text as a spam thread from Sunday

>>17220
The gas station one?

>>17222
Yes, we banned an identical post on Sunday, although I think it had an Applebloom image

>>17225
I'll be monitoring the poster but tbh it literally does not break any rules, and I've had discussions where I've explicitly allowed that exact kind of post. Shill or not, the thread itself is fine

>>17226
Goddamn it it's shill spam identical to shill spam that was posted on this site on Sunday. We are under a slow spam-raid and have been for about two hours now. The last thread before that used an image also used in the Sunday raid. These threads have consistently used extremely low quality posts that are either overly racist (and unsubstantial), or are extreme conspiracy theories.

We had a nigger poem thread

we had a "mark ellis is evil" thread

We had a thread about Hilary Clinton and North Korea

We had a "red pill me on anime" thread

We had another very similar thread that made liberal use of the word "nigger"

We had a thread about Reptilians and races.

Most all of them have already been deleted and their poster's bans. And surprise! The posters never saw their bans because they never looked back.

WE ARE BEING RAIDED

These are /pol/ grade shill threads from people who are not users of this site who post these to spam up the board

>>17230
>shills are so desperate to spam that they post on-topic, decent quality posts that evoke /pol/ tier discussion on the board
wew lads I think we won.

>>17233
I think you're right! Also
C H E C K E D
H
E
C
K
E
D

Am I the only one who feels uncomfortable feeding this information into the botnet?

>>17233
This is a "decent, quality post that evokes /pol/ tier discussion"?

The problem with /pol/, and we all knew it, was that the moderators did not care to remove shill threads. Instead, /pol/ is filled to the brim with posts as low quality as image related and made by the same malevolent people.

There was an image on /qa/ allegedly from the IRC of a 4chan moderator explicitly telling a /jp/ inhabitant that they did not care about spam or raiders on /qa/. We sent that image around to mock /jp/ and show the deliberate indifference of 4chan mods towards that board, but truly towards their users generally.

Now you tell me that you know a thread is shill spam identical to a deleted thread from Sunday, and you refuse to do anything about it. Unbelievable. There is a reason we left 4chan.

>>16850
>economics
the NatSoc model is a very efficient system, and adding scientific tweaks is guaranteed eternal prosperity
>religion
since i hate the fucking Jews and their g-d so much, i guess i stand with Satan-Lucifer
>race
flip manlet with a bit of chink genes
>racial policy
white people should be the majority of the world population again

>>17479
considering by the time I'd gotten to it, discussion had already started on the post… yes, it was literally a post that invokes discussion.

If you'd stop sperging out for 5 seconds and actually read responses to your tantrums you'd see what has been done about it.

tldr: this is a finished discussion, the thread is actually gaining traction, mostly because YOU keep bumping it, and the poster was banned based on other factors soon after the thread dropped. You can let go.

le free-market will fix it

>>17493
>reddit spacing
>tl;dr
>immune to horsepussi
THEY'RE ADAPTING!!!

>>17498
don't make me get the rake

>>17479
> Instead, /pol/ is filled to the brim with posts as low quality as image related and made by the same malevolent people.
We're not a country club, we don't check people's pedigrees at the door. If something looks like a legitimate question or statement people are likely to respond. If people start noticing the exact same text appearing in multiple threads they'll realize it's bait and leave it alone. The biggest problem with /pol/ is you have low-quality single-sentence bait posts and statements like "/pol/ btfo" or "how will they ever recover?" that get 400+ replies because either people are seriously dumb enough to respond or else they know it's bait and they don't care because they think they're on Reddit. The fact that trolls now have to type up entire paragraphs that mimic actual /pol/ discussion just to avoid having their threads deleted immediately, and still end up getting rooted out eventually, is testament to the moderation practices here.

it would be interesting to see a survey of age by generation. Or was there a survey like this already and I missed it?

>>17495

When you shoot your neighbour's escaped child sex slaves for starving on your lawn
(USER IS BEING WATCHED FOR THIS POST)

My political tests

Bit of a leftfag. Hope nobody minds.

You are a: Objectivist Anarchist Isolationist Humanist Progressive

Collectivism score: -83%
Authoritarianism score: -100%
Internationalism score: -50%
Tribalism score: -50%
Liberalism score: 50%

>>17802
This is how I stack up for the British election. Notice how I tend to agree with the immigration policies of all parties. I wonder how that could be possible.

>>17831
And a gift for the data mining though it has to be said I have already mentioned that I am an anarchist. Libertarian is more a US marker than a English one.