https://twitter.com/ANCParliament/status/1025715433092128768?s=03)
>"We want to build South Africa together as a people. Let's work together to make sure that the land is evenly distributed. "
oh fuck. looks like south africa is going communist.
/mlpol/ - My Little Politics
Archived thread
>niggers
>communist
Gee I wonder who might be behind this…
>communist
Gee I wonder who might be behind this…
File (): D3A92119069037A9C102EEF9FAC332F3-321994.png (314.4 KB, 500x1512, 2014-world-mugabe-whites-c….png)
>>164343
>Mugabe tried land distribution in Zimbabwe
>…
>SA: That was not real land distribution, this time it will be real land distribution and it will work this time
I wonder if Africans will have better luck this time?
>Mugabe tried land distribution in Zimbabwe
>…
>SA: That was not real land distribution, this time it will be real land distribution and it will work this time
I wonder if Africans will have better luck this time?
>>164345
Niggers never learn. They are like locust. They will simply run to Europe when they exhaust yet another place of its resources.
Niggers never learn. They are like locust. They will simply run to Europe when they exhaust yet another place of its resources.
>>164346
We need to create the global conditions that will ensure the success of a white "European Reclamation".
What's stopping white organizations from fighting back against the governments that hate them and their nigger weapons? The threat of getting crushed by the local police, the local government's armies, and the armies of other countries.
Can you see NATO/UN "Cracking down" on any "White Supremacist" uprisings?
Yes. So we need to defund and abolish NATO and UN.
We need to create the global conditions that will ensure the success of a white "European Reclamation".
What's stopping white organizations from fighting back against the governments that hate them and their nigger weapons? The threat of getting crushed by the local police, the local government's armies, and the armies of other countries.
Can you see NATO/UN "Cracking down" on any "White Supremacist" uprisings?
Yes. So we need to defund and abolish NATO and UN.
Oh this is going to end well.
I'm conflicted about SA, honestly. On the one hand, every time I hear about the way whites in that country are being treated it makes my blood boil. On the other hand, it's going to be really really funny when the blacks steal all the land and "redistribute" it to lazy nogs who aren't going to do shit with it, and the whole country ends up starving like Zimbabwe. Plus I'm generally of the opinion that whites should get the hell out of Africa anyway because I think all the niggers should be "gently" encouraged to return there.
File (): 5BB0BD752DC185B5D408ED6BAE219A50-159807.png (156.1 KB, 611x404, 52fc7dce071d40464388b1d761….png)
Zimbabwe yesterday, South Africa today. Hope it isn't your town tomorrow.
File (): AE02897111ED05ECED548A06DD36096A-55675.jpg (54.4 KB, 460x456, south africa ball.jpg)
Nelson Mandela is a Communist.
File (): BC4DF7697616A4D147F15AA74E641B74-1750156.png (1.7 MB, 1896x3504, 1533652417807.png)
found this on 4/pol/
>>164362
I'm gonna have to agree with >>164364 here. South African whites have been there for hundreds of years peacefully, and their family trees are deeply rooted in SA. As much as we might want them to leave for their safety, I don't think we can force most of them to do it. So either we was our hands of Africa and let our guys starve and be assaulted for their resources, or we fight alongside the Afrikaners in a decade-plus-long, costly war that may just royally screw us over in our (((current))) economic system.
I'm gonna have to agree with >>164364 here. South African whites have been there for hundreds of years peacefully, and their family trees are deeply rooted in SA. As much as we might want them to leave for their safety, I don't think we can force most of them to do it. So either we was our hands of Africa and let our guys starve and be assaulted for their resources, or we fight alongside the Afrikaners in a decade-plus-long, costly war that may just royally screw us over in our (((current))) economic system.
>>164371
Love that post. It lays out a line of events that has high likelihood of coming true.
If war broke out and it became a race war, or resembling it, the amount of aid the white population in SA would get would dwarf any other event in history. There would be nations backing it, a few openly, many many more covertly. People willing to participate would be more than enough to win it. And best of it all no one could blame people for wanting to help the white population. The rest of the world would have to watch it happen without being able to stop it.
Love that post. It lays out a line of events that has high likelihood of coming true.
If war broke out and it became a race war, or resembling it, the amount of aid the white population in SA would get would dwarf any other event in history. There would be nations backing it, a few openly, many many more covertly. People willing to participate would be more than enough to win it. And best of it all no one could blame people for wanting to help the white population. The rest of the world would have to watch it happen without being able to stop it.
File (): F0E768548740F6A834CAA390FD9190B9-62079.png (60.6 KB, 629x453, HMMMM.png)
File (): 93E29EB14EB6D292E1B61C78840CDC3F-1818425.gif (1.7 MB, 443x243, _trump it's happening.gif)
They will become a parasite to the west that will be increasing the foreing support on it; if you wipe Whites out, you wipe out the middle class, and everyone knows what happens next.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dekulakization
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dekulakization
>>167238
Farmlands was a total strike on it, first Russia starts taking SA White farmers and now this.
Farmlands was a total strike on it, first Russia starts taking SA White farmers and now this.
File (): 2393670FC15E36C36E57BC5CC901D03C-222364.png (217.2 KB, 1024x1313, 1507247704083-0.png)
>>167245
>They will become a parasite to the west that will be increasing the foreing support on it
i thought that you meant it was a bad idea when you said this.
>They will become a parasite to the west that will be increasing the foreing support on it
i thought that you meant it was a bad idea when you said this.
>>167246
I think he was referring to the country South Africa, who will, like Zimbabwe, beg the very whites they demonized to support them when their own anti-white and communistic policies come back to bite them in the ass.
I think he was referring to the country South Africa, who will, like Zimbabwe, beg the very whites they demonized to support them when their own anti-white and communistic policies come back to bite them in the ass.
>>167246
Sorry, i was talking about Black SA's, if they wipe Whites out, they will starvate and the country will become a parasite for the West, since is has happened before with Zimbabwe.
Sorry, i was talking about Black SA's, if they wipe Whites out, they will starvate and the country will become a parasite for the West, since is has happened before with Zimbabwe.
>>167238
Lets hope this brings the issue into the foreground. But I assume the media will keep quiet about it. Then when the inevitable starvation sets in because the farmlands is turned to shit they will say there is a drought, or perhaps in these days blame climate change, and that the world needs to help them by sending money. Also if they blame climate change they will reiterate the mantra "climate refugees" and how this is our own fault.
>>167248
I wish what you say would not happen, but it will.
Lets hope this brings the issue into the foreground. But I assume the media will keep quiet about it. Then when the inevitable starvation sets in because the farmlands is turned to shit they will say there is a drought, or perhaps in these days blame climate change, and that the world needs to help them by sending money. Also if they blame climate change they will reiterate the mantra "climate refugees" and how this is our own fault.
>>167248
I wish what you say would not happen, but it will.
File (): 8B6C62478A3CD86055C895F1A9817582-40762.jpg (39.8 KB, 799x799, BBMkfUg.jpg)
CBS wrote a hit piece against Trump.
It is funny how they say in the title that "South Africa hits back" and the "story" only references statements made by the "journalists" and nothing from officials.
>South Africa hits back at Trump over land seizure tweet
>South Africa accused United States President Donald Trump of sowing division Thursday after he tweeted that the U.S. State Department would probe "land and farm seizures… and the large scale killing of farmers."
>As elections due in 2019 approach, South African President Cyril Ramaphosa has intervened to accelerate land reform in order to "undo a grave historical injustice" against the black majority during colonialism and the apartheid era that ended in 1994. 24 years later, the white community that makes up eight percent of the population "possess 72 percent of farms" compared to "only four percent" in the hands of black people who make up four-fifths of the population, according to Ramaphosa.
>To remedy the imbalance, the president recently announced that the constitution would be altered to allow for land to be seized and redistributed without compensation to the current owners.
>U.S. President Donald Trump tweeted early Thursday that the state department would investigate "land and farm seizures… and the large scale killing of farmers" in South Africa. His statement was in response to a Fox News report by Tucker Carlson, which claimed that the South African government had begun seizing land from white citizens based on the color of their skin. That report is blatantly untrue, CBS News correspondent Debora Patta reports.
>Earlier this month, Ramaphosa announced that the policy of his party, Nelson Mandela's African National Congress (ANC), was to look at changing the constitution in order to allow for land appropriation without compensation and would proceed with plans carry out that change.
>No land has been seized yet, and in order to change the constitution, Ramaphosa would need a two-thirds majority in parliament, which the ANC does not have. They could potentially join forces with another party to get the votes they need, but even if they managed that, they would most likely be a number of legal challenges, and the issue would be tied up in constitutional court for some time, Patta reports.
>Land reform is one of South Africa's biggest unresolved issues, and Ramaphosa is under pressure from the left in his party to deal with it. He has not, however, provided any details of what expropriation without compensation would actually mean in practice, and the South African business community is treating his statements as party politics rather than a serious change in policy. The ANC is concerned it could lose substantial support in next year's general election following a decade of corrupt rule under former President Jacob Zuma.
>Beyond misunderstanding the context of land expropriation in South Africa, Patta says, what Mr. Trump has done in his tweet is conflate two South African issues: land expropriation and what is known as "farm murders."
>South Africa has high rates of violent crime, Patta reports, but there has been a well-funded campaign by white right-wing South Africans to promote the idea that white farmers are being deliberately killed at higher rates than people of other skin colors, and that this constitutes a "white genocide." There is no such thing in South Africa, she says.
>Farmers are easy targets for violent crime because they live on remote properties with little protection. A high murder rate has nothing to do with land seizures or anti-white sentiment. It is a crime issue, Patta reports.
>The proposed seizure of land is a concern to many in South Africa, especially given the fact that the country's economy is in recession, and the issue will most likely become an even one bigger closer to next year's election.
http://archive.is/SlSK6
Funny how the "journalists" don't understand plain English language like
>what does "expropriation without compensation" actually mean
It is funny how they say in the title that "South Africa hits back" and the "story" only references statements made by the "journalists" and nothing from officials.
>South Africa hits back at Trump over land seizure tweet
>South Africa accused United States President Donald Trump of sowing division Thursday after he tweeted that the U.S. State Department would probe "land and farm seizures… and the large scale killing of farmers."
>As elections due in 2019 approach, South African President Cyril Ramaphosa has intervened to accelerate land reform in order to "undo a grave historical injustice" against the black majority during colonialism and the apartheid era that ended in 1994. 24 years later, the white community that makes up eight percent of the population "possess 72 percent of farms" compared to "only four percent" in the hands of black people who make up four-fifths of the population, according to Ramaphosa.
>To remedy the imbalance, the president recently announced that the constitution would be altered to allow for land to be seized and redistributed without compensation to the current owners.
>U.S. President Donald Trump tweeted early Thursday that the state department would investigate "land and farm seizures… and the large scale killing of farmers" in South Africa. His statement was in response to a Fox News report by Tucker Carlson, which claimed that the South African government had begun seizing land from white citizens based on the color of their skin. That report is blatantly untrue, CBS News correspondent Debora Patta reports.
>Earlier this month, Ramaphosa announced that the policy of his party, Nelson Mandela's African National Congress (ANC), was to look at changing the constitution in order to allow for land appropriation without compensation and would proceed with plans carry out that change.
>No land has been seized yet, and in order to change the constitution, Ramaphosa would need a two-thirds majority in parliament, which the ANC does not have. They could potentially join forces with another party to get the votes they need, but even if they managed that, they would most likely be a number of legal challenges, and the issue would be tied up in constitutional court for some time, Patta reports.
>Land reform is one of South Africa's biggest unresolved issues, and Ramaphosa is under pressure from the left in his party to deal with it. He has not, however, provided any details of what expropriation without compensation would actually mean in practice, and the South African business community is treating his statements as party politics rather than a serious change in policy. The ANC is concerned it could lose substantial support in next year's general election following a decade of corrupt rule under former President Jacob Zuma.
>Beyond misunderstanding the context of land expropriation in South Africa, Patta says, what Mr. Trump has done in his tweet is conflate two South African issues: land expropriation and what is known as "farm murders."
>South Africa has high rates of violent crime, Patta reports, but there has been a well-funded campaign by white right-wing South Africans to promote the idea that white farmers are being deliberately killed at higher rates than people of other skin colors, and that this constitutes a "white genocide." There is no such thing in South Africa, she says.
>Farmers are easy targets for violent crime because they live on remote properties with little protection. A high murder rate has nothing to do with land seizures or anti-white sentiment. It is a crime issue, Patta reports.
>The proposed seizure of land is a concern to many in South Africa, especially given the fact that the country's economy is in recession, and the issue will most likely become an even one bigger closer to next year's election.
http://archive.is/SlSK6
Funny how the "journalists" don't understand plain English language like
>what does "expropriation without compensation" actually mean
File (): AFCF93C6D737B38226D6C04763AB75D9-302653.gif (295.6 KB, 300x300, 1478669460104.gif)
>>167254
Thus the best solution would be to educate everyone about it. Make the knowledge so far and wide that it enters regular discussion.
Forcing the media to acknowledge it to some degree. After all, the fact they have been caught lying since the election is the very reason why they are doing everything they can to control the narrative.
Thus the best solution would be to educate everyone about it. Make the knowledge so far and wide that it enters regular discussion.
Forcing the media to acknowledge it to some degree. After all, the fact they have been caught lying since the election is the very reason why they are doing everything they can to control the narrative.
>>167383
So that is why they want us gone. Us big bad Europeans are the reason their stupid system failed to create a utopia. Whitey is standing in the way of paradise.
So that is why they want us gone. Us big bad Europeans are the reason their stupid system failed to create a utopia. Whitey is standing in the way of paradise.
I had an idea for a flier campaign. "Ask about South Africa" it doesn't even mention white genocide and the media would flip out about it if enough fliers were posted.
File (): 32A21FF1D5C63A7C1D16E8B26F14D1D6-95150.jpg (92.9 KB, 599x722, 1478796330041.jpg)
https://www.wnd.com/2018/08/i-have-the-right-to-defend-my-property-by-force-and-i-will/
>(Daily Mail) The owner of the first South African farm lined up to have his land seized without payment or fair compensation blasted the government today saying: ‘Whichever way they dress it up it is theft’.
>Johan Steenkamp who co-owns a £10million hunting farm in Limpopo province, has been ordered to hand over his land, following a ten-year battle to stop the government buying it for a tenth of its value.
>Mr Steenkamp says Prime Minister Cyril Ramaphosa’s plans of redistribution of white-owned land to South Africa’s black poor is just a cover so that the government can get their hands on valuable coal deposits found under his farm land.
>The 67-year-old farmer said he is ready to defend his property by force if the government tries to take his land, saying; ‘If it comes to a fight so be it, I am not going to leave the country and I am not going to leave my farm.’
>(Daily Mail) The owner of the first South African farm lined up to have his land seized without payment or fair compensation blasted the government today saying: ‘Whichever way they dress it up it is theft’.
>Johan Steenkamp who co-owns a £10million hunting farm in Limpopo province, has been ordered to hand over his land, following a ten-year battle to stop the government buying it for a tenth of its value.
>Mr Steenkamp says Prime Minister Cyril Ramaphosa’s plans of redistribution of white-owned land to South Africa’s black poor is just a cover so that the government can get their hands on valuable coal deposits found under his farm land.
>The 67-year-old farmer said he is ready to defend his property by force if the government tries to take his land, saying; ‘If it comes to a fight so be it, I am not going to leave the country and I am not going to leave my farm.’
>>167482
To be fair, Draft our daughters was just a hashtag on top of a military woman with the Clinton Foundation logo on the bottom. Same can be done with just South Africa pictures of black atrocities and the caption of "Ask about South Africa" on top of it in white font.
To be fair, Draft our daughters was just a hashtag on top of a military woman with the Clinton Foundation logo on the bottom. Same can be done with just South Africa pictures of black atrocities and the caption of "Ask about South Africa" on top of it in white font.
File (): 883C1AC2CFC6055AE125B30FA0DCFDE5-167840.jpg (163.9 KB, 600x534, mmexport1535203716431.jpg)
File (): 3F53330D5A9215D7CEA82127C934F7A9-187263.jpg (182.9 KB, 1501x1080, mmexport1535203729288.jpg)
File (): 3DDF5B167E0404ED2F818213DAEFB348-59245.jpg (57.9 KB, 600x400, mmexport1535203731970.jpg)
File (): B9D5F3EE4D230D93F4C9BE655378965F-152388.jpg (148.8 KB, 960x720, mmexport1535203734441.jpg)
File (): 3F26ED233BE8EB211FC63FB62C9CD064-41680.jpg (40.7 KB, 600x414, mmexport1535203736550.jpg)
Are these okay? I figured the hashtag might be a good idea to get it viral on Twitter. Of course (((Twatter))) will shut it down but that might make more people ask.
File (): 4C0C6BFD86E12A7FB4ACC8231DC82BF8-8989.jpg (8.8 KB, 286x176, mmexport1535203738742.jpg)
File (): 9FD9180DF0277FD2022E420E600F140D-27763.jpg (27.1 KB, 300x370, mmexport1535203740773.jpg)
38 replies | 18 files | 1 UUIDs | Archived