/mlpol/ - My Little Politics


If you want to see the latest posts from all boards in a convenient way please check out /overboard/


Archived thread


1527554601034.gif
Anonymous
????
?
No.160740
160743 160747
How did the alt-right got screw?, it was charlottesville is the movement still alive?
Anonymous
????
?
No.160743
160744
>>160740
It's never had a great reputation, and was never going to be given much leniency
Anonymous
????
?
No.160744
160747 160748
>>160743
So the identitarians might be the new pillar?
Anonymous
????
?
No.160747
160751
>>160740
>>160744
What are you even trying to convey, here?
Anonymous
????
?
No.160748
160752
>>160744
Identitarians have barely even been heard of in North America. The term "identity politics" is used as way of referring to Neo-Marxist racialism and feminism, so that name might make people think the movement is just inverted Neo-Marxism
Anonymous
????
?
No.160751
160755 160780
1521981426708-0.gif
>>160747
I don't know, i don't really know…
I blame sargon.
Anonymous
????
?
No.160752
>>160748
Well they maked Salvini to win.
Anonymous
????
?
No.160755
160757
>>160751
It's just really bad English that's throwing me off, I think.
Anonymous
????
?
No.160757
>>160755
Maybe, :v
Anonymous
????
?
No.160780
160781
>>160751
You're giving the Soyfather too much credit. In attacking the alt-right he only exposed himself as a doctrinaire, bitter cynic who is completely intellectually dishonest.

What happened was because Trump was elected, the sense of urgency that motivated the American section of the alt-right tapered off. People return to their daily lives when they're no longer worried about the world ending. Also, our public confidence, which had been steadily growing, took a hit at Charlottesville because we looked like a bunch of spergs. The alt-right has still been growing, but public demonstrations are avoided due to optics and fear of reprisals.
Anonymous
????
?
No.160781
160790 160793 161053
1491948034241.jpg
>>160780

We can't forget that there are suspect individuals within the movement itself that seems to be there to create bad optics and nothing else. The asshats who thought it was a good idea to march with tiki torches should be mocked without reprieve.

If the activist and public part of the alt-right weren't led by spergs, hypocritical characters (Laura Southern is one of several I can think of; I view her as someone who is larping as a tradthot), and emotional thinkers I'd have more hope for the movement.

>MFW degenerate horsefuckers understands the principal content above better than most within alt-right.


Or am I giving people here too much credence?
Anonymous
????
?
No.160790
160798
1411197798359.png
>>160781
Anonymous
????
?
No.160793
160798
>>160781
No, you're absolutely right. We unironically need a Mr. H these days, less so to gas the Griffons but rather to be a striking and unifying leader. The second half of MK tells how he turned a motley club (of which there are no shortage these days) to a disciplined organization that regularly turned out thousands in speaking areas. This requires passion and perseverance but also a shrewd knowledge of how to spread ideas and convince the opposing side. He also had a surprisingly good handle on optics as, although he was painted as "dangerous" by the Griffon press, he merely kept a well-disciplined body of stormtroopers to clear out ruffians. By keeping them in line and finishing fights rather than starting them he appeared competent and what Germany needed.

However, these tactics cannot simply be copied down for obvious reasons, but must be adapted and integrated into a modern, highly cynical setting.
Anonymous
????
?
No.160798
1522862000043.jpg
>>160790

I'm sorry for being a daft fuck but I just fail to find a proficient use of words to convey my deep frustration at how inept the alt-right is realizing that normies won't look an provocative statement whether there's truth in it — the GQ comes to mind here — and that optics do fucking matters.

Yes, I realize I'm implying that I'm not a sperg or any pertinent counter to whichever claim I've made or that I know anything.

>>160793

I guess the first step is to read about what one speaks whereof, to create an unassailable core that one can't shoo away with emotions and obfuscations through study. Then the one with the most gumption may rise to the challenge and create a top-down organization with precise goals. The creator behind CounterCurrentsTV comes to mind when thinking of the kind of character I'm imagining: knowledgeable, socially pleasant, respectful, self-controlled, a wordsmith, and courage.

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC94FYUJYBqq4CHPhfJUCxDw
Anonymous
????
?
No.161053
161071 161106
>>160781
Or those who call people who made some really good stuff for the alt-right like Lauren Southern with farmlands, "jewish controlled opposition".
Anonymous
????
?
No.161071
161106
Spoilered
>>161053
This. Ppl like Southern and Rudowski et al are self-promoters, but their content is quality (and often dangerous) even if they won't name the jew
Anonymous
????
?
No.161072
totally wrong image
Anonymous
????
?
No.161106
1492558555821.jpg
>>161053
>>161071

Yeah, there's too many that do that. Annoying that these spergs scream "Jew" instantly a person they've designated as a member of their clique without realizing they end up hurting their cause more than the person they accuse of a misstep or faux pas.

There are two channels I could drop here (I won't without being explicitly asked to do so) that discusses several alt-right ideas (Not only or mainly) that, in my opinion, is much more interesting than Lauren.
;