The now infamous case was decided by justices in favor of the Bakery, and the fags are probably butt-hurt about it.
Justice notes indicate that this will not set precedence, as there were particulars to this case that disqualify it as being a definitive ruling on whether or not a business can decline services on religious grounds.
/mlpol/ - My Little Politics
Archived thread
>>151257
Hahahhaaha, the leftists will be up in roar over this. And there is nothing they can do about it.
Hahahhaaha, the leftists will be up in roar over this. And there is nothing they can do about it.
File (): 8AFEEC12CE98AFF0EC3C185FF631B1F2-19637.jpg (19.2 KB, 207x243, e616c13239fb38b09bcc38f77c….jpg)
Who would even want to buy a cake from a bakery that was legally forced to do it anyway? Go find another Baker to bake your faggot cake.
>>151265
Because it's not about the cake, it's about getting the moral high ground because someone in a position of power said you were right and forcing someone who doesn't share your beliefs to accept them. That's probably why they went to this specific bakery in the first place.
Because it's not about the cake, it's about getting the moral high ground because someone in a position of power said you were right and forcing someone who doesn't share your beliefs to accept them. That's probably why they went to this specific bakery in the first place.
>>151271
This the faggots likely did this on purpose if this guy said he wouldn't make Halloween cakes of coarse who wouldn't make one for a bunch of faggots. Too bad this won't be bringing back freedom of association but baby steps I guess.
This the faggots likely did this on purpose if this guy said he wouldn't make Halloween cakes of coarse who wouldn't make one for a bunch of faggots. Too bad this won't be bringing back freedom of association but baby steps I guess.
>>151290
it's a step in the right direction. I'm still really hoping that either Ginsberg kicks off or that other guy retires during Trump's term
it's a step in the right direction. I'm still really hoping that either Ginsberg kicks off or that other guy retires during Trump's term
File (): ABF9EC53E5EB9F3619698147971BBCC3-63039.png (61.6 KB, 272x301, ChristundVolk.png)
>>151266
According to the advertisement I saw on YouTube about her legal battle, Roy (or whatever his name was) accepted the lady's rejection of arranging flowers for a homosexual "wedding". She did so respectively and all.
According to her, Roy would have never reported her for it. Roy's partner however posted something - Probably bitchy, but I don't know - on facebook about it. Some Washington State Bureaucrat took notice and she was sent a formal demand to cater to homosexual needs in this way.
She, rightfully so, refused to accept this ruling and turned to higher courts. Not all faggots are whiney, anti-sanity people. If anything, this is on the Democratic bureaucracy in many states. Not the faggots themselves.
According to the advertisement I saw on YouTube about her legal battle, Roy (or whatever his name was) accepted the lady's rejection of arranging flowers for a homosexual "wedding". She did so respectively and all.
According to her, Roy would have never reported her for it. Roy's partner however posted something - Probably bitchy, but I don't know - on facebook about it. Some Washington State Bureaucrat took notice and she was sent a formal demand to cater to homosexual needs in this way.
She, rightfully so, refused to accept this ruling and turned to higher courts. Not all faggots are whiney, anti-sanity people. If anything, this is on the Democratic bureaucracy in many states. Not the faggots themselves.
File (): B922C22BDD9A2EF8B33874DEC713E926-478399.png (467.2 KB, 800x558, gay_cake.png)
The cake's not feeling so good.
File (): A146D3AF527C66423AFA8F7A7FD100AD-110852.jpg (108.3 KB, 750x532, 1528176740856.jpg)
File (): 06A0380099A849B9230CA30D0FB91308-447149.jpg (436.7 KB, 750x984, 1528178187922.jpg)
lol I think they mad
>>151377
Even if not all fags are annoying shits, gays don't even deserve a right to marry or adopt kids.
Even if not all fags are annoying shits, gays don't even deserve a right to marry or adopt kids.
File (): 5F72E45744CE6EE7FEE7B9E59FCABF77-30558.jpg (29.8 KB, 600x510, Bake my damned cake.jpg)
>>151477
Look at how many gay couples abuse their kids. Look at how many gay men got intestinal parasites from licking the anuses of random strangers during random stranger sex. Look at how many gay men act like faggots.
Look at how many children act like faggots for attention/the approval of their libtard parents.
No child deserves to be put through that.
Look at how many gay couples abuse their kids. Look at how many gay men got intestinal parasites from licking the anuses of random strangers during random stranger sex. Look at how many gay men act like faggots.
Look at how many children act like faggots for attention/the approval of their libtard parents.
No child deserves to be put through that.
>>151501
Gay "families" aren't common here, since family is protected by the government. But I've heard about those abuse rates.
Gay "families" aren't common here, since family is protected by the government. But I've heard about those abuse rates.
>>151477
Absolutely, I support the complete prohibition of sodomy. It's a moral abomination and gay "families" ruin children. I was just trying to not let us run away with "HOW DARE THESE FAGGOTS?" when in this case, they didn't do anything to the lady.
Still, ban sodomy and disband all of those "gay rights".
Absolutely, I support the complete prohibition of sodomy. It's a moral abomination and gay "families" ruin children. I was just trying to not let us run away with "HOW DARE THESE FAGGOTS?" when in this case, they didn't do anything to the lady.
Still, ban sodomy and disband all of those "gay rights".
>>151520
It might be gross, sure, but there's a fine line between banning something that has been proven to be harmful to society and just trying to be the moral police. Get rid of gay rights, sure, but how do you expect us to try to ban sodomy when it's none of our business what a married couple do in their own bedroom?
It might be gross, sure, but there's a fine line between banning something that has been proven to be harmful to society and just trying to be the moral police. Get rid of gay rights, sure, but how do you expect us to try to ban sodomy when it's none of our business what a married couple do in their own bedroom?
>>151521
>"Married" couple
>None of our (the state's) business
You're playing with some enlightenment & liberal ideology there kid, it's like fire. Satan's fire.
>"Married" couple
>None of our (the state's) business
You're playing with some enlightenment & liberal ideology there kid, it's like fire. Satan's fire.
>>151523
Okay then, o' wise one, explain how the hell you could even begin to enforce a ban on sodomy? Once you can satisfactorily answer that, explain WHY we should.
Okay then, o' wise one, explain how the hell you could even begin to enforce a ban on sodomy? Once you can satisfactorily answer that, explain WHY we should.
>>151525
It's simple, we enforce a ban upon homosexuality as we did in the olden days. Like any crime. With reasonable evidence, homosexuals can be punished in accordance with the state's ruling. I'd say that community service, fines, short jail stays, and chemical castrations could be reasonable punishments. Although I'd be open to worse, stopping at short jail terms and couple separation.
As to why; the preservation of our morality and extinguishing the flame of deviancy which has became so, so tolerated. 50% of pedophiles molest a child of the same sex, most LGB relationships are very abusive towards one-another, homosexuals often harm themselves through contracting and spreading HIV and other sexually transmitted diseases.
It's simple, we enforce a ban upon homosexuality as we did in the olden days. Like any crime. With reasonable evidence, homosexuals can be punished in accordance with the state's ruling. I'd say that community service, fines, short jail stays, and chemical castrations could be reasonable punishments. Although I'd be open to worse, stopping at short jail terms and couple separation.
As to why; the preservation of our morality and extinguishing the flame of deviancy which has became so, so tolerated. 50% of pedophiles molest a child of the same sex, most LGB relationships are very abusive towards one-another, homosexuals often harm themselves through contracting and spreading HIV and other sexually transmitted diseases.
>>151527
Ah, you seem to have misread my original reply. I'll state it again:
Get rid of gay rights, sure, but how do you expect us to try to ban sodomy when it's none of our business what a married couple do in their own bedroom?
Please, ban homosexuality, like you said it's been a detriment to our society, but heterosexual couples also practice sodomy on occasion. Are you really going to walk up to straight, loving couple like that and tell them that they can't have buttsex because "the gays do it"?
Ah, you seem to have misread my original reply. I'll state it again:
Get rid of gay rights, sure, but how do you expect us to try to ban sodomy when it's none of our business what a married couple do in their own bedroom?
Please, ban homosexuality, like you said it's been a detriment to our society, but heterosexual couples also practice sodomy on occasion. Are you really going to walk up to straight, loving couple like that and tell them that they can't have buttsex because "the gays do it"?
>>151530
Ah, sorry.
Banning heterosexual sodomy is just unpractical. So you've got me there bub. It's still immoral and I'd advise against it as a Christian. My bad for misunderstnading.
Ah, sorry.
Banning heterosexual sodomy is just unpractical. So you've got me there bub. It's still immoral and I'd advise against it as a Christian. My bad for misunderstnading.
>>151533
Banning gay buttsecks is not necessary, stripping off voting rights, speech rights, family rights etc is enough
Banning gay buttsecks is not necessary, stripping off voting rights, speech rights, family rights etc is enough
>>151533
No problem there. I'm a pagan, myself. I don't see an issue with sodomy, besides that I personally find it disgusting, but to each his own I suppose.
No problem there. I'm a pagan, myself. I don't see an issue with sodomy, besides that I personally find it disgusting, but to each his own I suppose.
Only good faggot is a dead faggot.
>>151527
Here's the issue. I get you don't believe in "enlightenment era" rights and stuff, but what needs to be thrown out are "positive rights" which basically can be extended to any special interest group, for us or against us. There are precisely two rights that exist: the right to personal autonomy and the right to property. Now, technically, this doesn't keep one from homosexual actions on one's property, but it does stop cake-mandators and pride-marchers from interfering with other people.
How then do you strike at the root of the problem? Namely, public perception. A government decree wouldn't do much good unless if you had a Stasi-like police state, and sooner or later skilled manipulators would be able to turn these powers against us again. A firm moral and cultural distaste for sodomy, however, will heavily discourage any new deviants from forming. Those that exist would face severe isolation if discovered, forcing homosexuals to leave, withdraw from public life, or off themselves.
Here's the issue. I get you don't believe in "enlightenment era" rights and stuff, but what needs to be thrown out are "positive rights" which basically can be extended to any special interest group, for us or against us. There are precisely two rights that exist: the right to personal autonomy and the right to property. Now, technically, this doesn't keep one from homosexual actions on one's property, but it does stop cake-mandators and pride-marchers from interfering with other people.
How then do you strike at the root of the problem? Namely, public perception. A government decree wouldn't do much good unless if you had a Stasi-like police state, and sooner or later skilled manipulators would be able to turn these powers against us again. A firm moral and cultural distaste for sodomy, however, will heavily discourage any new deviants from forming. Those that exist would face severe isolation if discovered, forcing homosexuals to leave, withdraw from public life, or off themselves.
>>151540
This is probably the best solution tbh, just make homosexuality as a bad thing in the eyes of the public and not banned per say. People would just have to act like they did in the past where they would keep this shit behind closed doors and because of it you wouldn't have these freely moving around groups of faggots trying to fuck as many other faggots as possible.
Honestly people should see how miserable these fags who ride the cock carousel are and how disguising sodomy is in general.
This pretty much fits with my thoughts on the whole thing. https://www.lifesitenews.com/blogs/sodomy-is-the-glue-that-binds-the-lgbt-movement
This is probably the best solution tbh, just make homosexuality as a bad thing in the eyes of the public and not banned per say. People would just have to act like they did in the past where they would keep this shit behind closed doors and because of it you wouldn't have these freely moving around groups of faggots trying to fuck as many other faggots as possible.
Honestly people should see how miserable these fags who ride the cock carousel are and how disguising sodomy is in general.
This pretty much fits with my thoughts on the whole thing. https://www.lifesitenews.com/blogs/sodomy-is-the-glue-that-binds-the-lgbt-movement
>>151525
>Okay then, o' wise one, explain how the hell you could even begin to enforce a ban on sodomy?
>Okay then, o' wise one, explain how the hell you could even begin to enforce a ban on sodomy?
File (): 4EF2C8A9A5994C3A3C5BA0BEB4FDC2B2-150859.gif (147.3 KB, 390x324, 1491177528039.gif)
>>151961
you can glue it yourself if that makes you more comfortable, but one way or the other that fucker is getting glued, it's for your own protection. you'll have to learn to poop in reverse, though.
you can glue it yourself if that makes you more comfortable, but one way or the other that fucker is getting glued, it's for your own protection. you'll have to learn to poop in reverse, though.
>>151963
No no, your reasoning makes perfect sense to me uh, its just that I uh already glued my butthole so I'll just sit here on my glued butthole waiting for everyone else to glue their buttlholes. Better still, I'll go and see if I can find
No no, your reasoning makes perfect sense to me uh, its just that I uh already glued my butthole so I'll just sit here on my glued butthole waiting for everyone else to glue their buttlholes. Better still, I'll go and see if I can find
42 replies | 11 files | 1 UUIDs | Archived