/mlpol/ - My Little Politics


If you want to see the latest posts from all boards in a convenient way please check out /overboard/


Archived thread


1525565104390.png
Anonymous
????
?
No.145658
145660 145662
https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=27&v=4HsexpGeSrY

Have you guys seen this!?
Anonymous
????
?
No.145659
145662
1525570056479.jpg

Anonymous
????
?
No.145660
145666
>>145658
The more I think of it he might be at the right place to do it. The chances a Republican will win in CA is small so he will not damage the Republican party by running. He will be able to make the message heard and open the possibility for a larger movement. Sadly he will probably not be allowed by the media to participate in public debates, but this will also make it clear that the freedom of speech is heavily under attack by the left. So all in all I think I approve.
If he had run in a state the Republicans were poised to win, and he had managed to split the Republican votes handing the election to the Democrats I would likely been of another opinion.
Anonymous
????
?
No.145662
BF5A0D22-FEB6-4DDA-9F08-F1….gif
>>145659
>>145658
[pleased nazi noises]
Anonymous
????
?
No.145666
145667 145676 146520
>>145660
I'm not sure if you pay attention to US politics, but the (((Republikikes))) and (((Jewmocrats))) are owned by the same people.
Anonymous
????
?
No.145667
145671 145672 145676
>>145666
That is true, but I see it like this. One set of Jews wants to take your guns, the other set will loose most of their voters if they tried. So before there is a strong group that is ready to take the place of the Republicans, there is a chance too much rocking of the boat would make Democrats win most elections. I think it is better to wait for the Democrats to split, before splitting the Republican party.
Anonymous
????
?
No.145671
145672
>>145667
The only reason Trump won was because both the Republican AND Democratic parties were in disarray. Grassroots candidates can and do take advantage of chaos on both ends.
Anonymous
????
?
No.145672
145673
>>145667
>>145671

Let them both fall, not like you can synchronize it or something.
Anonymous
????
?
No.145673
>>145672
Agree, it looks like the splits are inevitable. But I think the Democrats are closer to a split than Republicans. And the route of least resistance I think would be to get a Jill Stein or a new Sanders promoted and get SJW to vote for it and split the Dems. This will in turn open up the Republicans to the idea of splitting the republican party. The Teaparty people had a great opportunity to take over the Republican party, but they did not push hard enough (or they were taken over).
Anonymous
????
?
No.145676
146503
>>145667
>>145666
Trump's hijacking of the Republican party has already started bleeding some of the cucks off. Republican primary candidates are basically competing with each other to see who can be the most Trump-like, meanwhile McConnell and a few others from the old guard are retiring because they see the writing on the wall. Republicans are basically going to become the right populist party and the few remaining cucked Rs will probably retire or join with the Dems into the globalist centrist party. Dems will also have to contend with the segmentation within their own party. They're basically united now since they have a common enemy in Trump, but they've got several different factions competing over which direction to take the party. Most progressives you meet on the street are either fixated on identity politics or are Bernouts, the neocon/neolib moderate center has almost no support from the base but that's the direction the party leadership wants to go. If we can hold on to Congress this year and BTFO them again in 2020 a lot of these resentments will probably boil over into a major schism in the party. We might even see the formation of a third party or even see the neocon/neolibs pushed completely into the background. The Right would be stupid to try and split the Republican party now, it makes far more sense to just stick with the party we have while pushing it slowly but surely rightward.

I like this guy but it's not quite time for the Republicans to go full 1488 just yet. Though if he can get people to start seriously thinking about ending our support for Israel it will definitely be a step in the right direction.
Anonymous
????
?
No.146503
146505
>>145676
>it's not quite time for the Republicans to go full 1488 just yet
When will it be time? African population is set to double in a few decades, while white people are sub-replacement in birthrates. Spics are flooding California, Texas, and every state near the border, and we're GIVING THEM SAFE SPACES FROM ICE. Being as charitable as possible, we only have a few decades before we've been de-clawed, de-beaked, and had every tooth in our mouths pulled, to be left to the goddamn wolves.

THERE IS NO TIME LEFT. If we DON'T go full 1488 within this coming decade, we're fucked.
Anonymous
????
?
No.146505
146506
>>146503
>African population is set to double in a few decades
We are going to run out of money to keep feeding them before that happens.
Anonymous
????
?
No.146506
>>146505
>Running out of money=mass poverty
>Mass poverty=starvation
>Starvation=1488 rebellion
Maybe vrill was right about the cycle thing
Anonymous
????
?
No.146520
>>145666
not exactly, the two party system itself is the jewish tool used to control the country rather than either party specifically
;