>>139352I don't think it is necessarily all (((their))) fault, people have had weird fetishes for ages, however I think the acceptance and popularization may have something to do with it.
As for whether one can be ideologically pure, I think one can. You can't, in my experience at least, really control such things, so whatever, as long as you keep it away from kids and people who don't want to be involved. As long as you genuinely do not want to do it in real life due to the fact that you would feel guilty, I don't think you should feel bad about morally grey or black fetishes.
About my fetishes, poners obviously, I think this applies to most of us. Also other males. And rape, but only if I am the victim because if I am the perpetrator or someone else is the victim I am too upset at the idea of it to be aroused. Watersports and more so bondage also turn me on. I can't really say why for any of these, they just do.
>>139376I wouldn't go that far. Fetishism can be rather inane as liking a specific style of dress, while the internet is extremely useful for communication, organization, and transmission of data to the point that most jobs at this point would require use of it.
>>139506>As long as we can still enjoy regular pornHonestly, I have to disagree there. I think the regular porn industry is a lot more degenerate than some poor folks doing weird commissions on over tumblr. Because it involves actual people doing that stuff, and is run by Jews who want to influence culture
>>139643If you think it involves fucking you clearly don't understand. You will have to wait to become ascended.
>>140354>socially acceptable>>140367There is a distinction. One can love people in sexual and non-sexual ways, and both can be equally strong
>>140386Anonfilly isn't really pædophilia since she is actually an anon and so unless she is [quote]>underage banned[/quote]
>>141150Maybe it is just me but I don't think punishment makes what happened any better. I would rather we just make sure it doesn't happen again, preferably without killing since we don't want to kill an innocent man, as has happened so many times before, but I could go onto that for a while so I will just cut it short here. Really, I would rather make sure whoever was harmed directly or indirectly is OK.
>>141258>Never thought I'd see the day where /mlpol/ revealed pedos among our ranks.I don't know what you were expecting in
this thread. Just remember that it isn't nearly a majority of users and that every group is going to have some pædos. Also, I think you may have replied to the wrong post because I didn't read the first one as mentioning underage stuff and the second one said no prepubescent children no matter how much you want to secure the white race.
>>141872No, there is such a thing as too young. The difference between two fifteen-year-olds having sex and an adult having sex with a fifteen-year-old is that if they are both "too stupid to make that descision on their own" then neither is being exploitative. There is nothing inherently wrong with sex, but there are healthy and unhealthy ages for it and ages which are very easy to exploit into doing things they really ought not to be doing. Also, by the logic of "old enough to breed" that can include practically anyone who has had a period. At very young ages as those, there are severe risks in giving birth and I don't want to have any unnecessary abortions occurring/girls dying in pregnancy because some moron who doesn't understand it thinks "old enough to bleed old enough to breed".
>>141875Nothing wrong with tights. I wear them occasionally during the winter when I need something thin to go under snow pants. I mean, you haven't really said why you wear them. Do you wear them for pragmatism, because you have a really weird sense of style, because you get sexual pleasure from it?
>>141877At least old enough to have relatively low chance of severe injury during birth.
>>142098I have been a fourteen-year-old, and let me tell you, fourteen-year-olds are not ready for sex. In fact, the first time I ejaculated consciously was when I was fourteen. Also, giving human trafficking a death penalty is a bad idea, given what is legally considered human trafficking and how stupid some shit can be. As I said earlier, I am against the death penalty, and will not go into it because it will take a while.
>>142166Personally, I am annoyed when I see tights worn by women. It isn't sexy if you see it everywhere you go. Unless I know the person is
actually just wearing it because they find it comfortable I just think they are an
Allah forgive me for saying this word, thot>>142812Same here. Never really "developed" a fetish as it were, it just occurred since a rather young age. It's weird though, since I had a pretty normal childhood and cannot think of anything to do with the stuff that I am into.
>>143253I would say you can blame others for stuff as long as you remember that finding a solution is your job.
>>144050Honestly, I don't know why non-pædos would look at lolis but if a pædo decides to look at it to get his rocks off I would prefer that to him doing it to real kids or with real kids. Basically, accept the fact that lolis make you at least kind of a pædo. I suspect the reason that some people find lolis but not real kids attractive might be similar to my thoughts on the attractiveness of the idea of >rape.