/mlpol/ - My Little Politics

i recommend you call in some experts from Syria General on this, looks like a Fackelmann Maneuver from the Rebels to me.

I think I recall seeing pics of the people "Killed by this chemical attack" laughing on facebook after the fact.

>>138366
I would say that the chance this is SAA is next to zero. It is not the first time ISIS and other Islamic terror groups have gassed people. They experimented with nerve-gas, chemical-weapons, poisonous-gases early in the war.
Examples:
https://www.liveleak.com/view?t=375_1476804598
https://www.liveleak.com/view?t=9cf_1479036597

>>138366
Shit's blowing up, why aren't you soy goys in here?

>US going to pull out of Syria
>gas attack next day
>oy vey US must stay
>hand rubbing intensifies
>airstrikes on Syrian forces
>looks like US and/or Israel
>russia upset
>pentagon denies US involvement
>russia+syria will fuck the yids
>oy vey
o
y

v
e
y

https://archive.fo/ybbH2
OY

>>138765
Big nowthwing awon, gwo back to sweepies.

>>138765
Russia says 'we might start ww3 if you do it.' America says 'nah lets not then yeah?' Israel thinks 'hmm ww3 sounds good.'

>>138765
VEY

>>138409
While I haven't been closely monitoring the situation in Syria, I agree that I find it difficult to believe that they would perform a chemical weapon attack.

My limited understanding is that the war was going in Syria's favor. A chemical attack would invite foreign intervention on a scale capable of crushing them. It makes about as much sense as Syria doing something outlandish like declaring war on the United States.

The only way that the narrative makes sense is if you're a blue pilled normie who trusts the media's claim that Assad is essentially a Saturday morning cartoon villain with a stupid-evil alignment. Someone who will do cruel and evil things for the sake of being cruel and evil.

Israel has literally sent a military strike recently. This is all pre-emptive slander to justify future war.

Leave it to the Jews to start WW3.

It's been fairly conclusively proven that most of the chemical attacks in the past were done by Assad's forces, despite the best attempts of russian fake news shills to try and argue otherwise: remember all the tantrums thrown by people about how it was a "hoax" when Mattis pointed out it wasn't the Americans who had proof, despite all the available facts, especially flight path data of the projectiles, pointing to the origin of being within territory controlled by the loyalists? If you're a second rate commie dictator and want to end a conflict sooner rather than later, use of weapons that cause terror among a populace are definitely the way to go.

>>138963
Hi Shekelburg

>>138963
(You)

>>138963
obvious shitpost is obvious

>>138963
>>138965
>>138964
>>138966
>>138968
To be fair it's not like the loyalists haven't experimented with or launched CW, but it makes no difference between even in normal strikes collateral is still going to happen. So I don't see why normies think the fact they're CW makes a difference, it's hardly anymore unethical than bleeding out from a strike.

>>138969
I don't see US media and establishment crying over famine in Yemen Saudis are causing. Gee I wonder why…

>>138966
The Ba'athist is immunized against all dangers: one may call him a scoundrel, swindler, profiteer, it all runs off him like water off a raincoat. But point out he's an anti-Christian, anti-Western commie parasite and you will be astonished at how he recoils, how injured he is, how he suddenly shrinks back: “I’ve been found out.”

>>138986
Good to know.