/mlpol/ - My Little Politics

>>137820
Ban contraceptives and offer significant tax breaks for having 1,2, and a maximum of 3 children while married.

Men dominate science. always have, always will. women did few and only minor improvements to research and development of society. I guess its acceptable losses, but in general it is preferable for the woman to not pursue a career in higher education for the price of her fertility. Dumb people fuck a lot more and get frankyl paid to do so. Thats just how it is. As long as we keep dragging the weak and worthless along with us without encouraging our best to have offspring, we will steadyly slip into an Idiocracy.

>>137820
The higher you place on your IQ test, the more kids you are allowed and encouraged to have via tax breaks and benefits. Yes, even for working people, kids are expensive in today's jew-run society if you don't have the government or some cuck paying your bills.

Offer some kind of incentive for women to have children. Maybe tax cuts, one year of free university for every child they raise to the age of six, or mortgage forgiveness.

>>137820
I think I recall looking at the actual statistics on this. It's mostly Liberal women not producing. Conservative smart women mostly have more children, or at least there is a smaller gap, and religious smart women especially reproduce at about the same rate as less intelligent women. In Mormons, the trend is reversed. I believe that when you organize the correlations by Big 5 Personality traits, it's primarily Conscientiousness that is being selected for in Intelligent woman, specifically because those women prioritize college and career over family

>>137836
I Would like to see those stats if you can find a link. Not that I find them hard believe, I would just like to read them.

My IQ would dictate I should have an actual harem.

>>137820
Kill the welfare state and rescind women's rights, so that women are financially dependent on men, this will reinforce traditional gender roles so those smart women will be having kids again. The welfare state is the whole reason the west is in a dysgenic state, as welfare programs reward the stupid for having more children, so removing that would allow the state to lower taxes. No more feminism also makes marriage more viable for men, with the tax cuts involved combined with not having to pay for Abdul's 12 kids, puts more money in the hands of the middle class. Which means they can obviously afford to have more children.

Bringing back religion for it's strict moral code wouldn't hurt either, modern women are degenerate thots, and this has proven to lower the stability of relationships and marriage. As for Marie Curie and the like, there are obviously exceptions, and in those extraordinary circumstances I would say go ahead. However, for the 99.9% of women who do not fall under this category, family should always come first.

>>137845
Do you watch Rick and Morty?

>>137847
I tried, found it to be utter shit.
I got the impression the writers looked up random Wikipedia factoids, shoved them in the show, then drew scrotums on everything.

>>137820
>How would a nation encourage it's best and brightest women to have more children
make it illegal for them to work, vote, get abortions, and use birth control

>>137820
>best and brightest women
Who will leave the workforce after ten years and be a negative investment.
>>137829
This, but 'ironically.'

>>137820
>without preventing the next Mary Curie
You shouldn't even take it into consideration the chance a woman is a super genius is extremely low. anything you do with this goal in mind you will lose 5 high IQ males to find one high IQ female.
Since men are the disposable gender evolution works best with them at the extreme of all areas women are average not very high IQ not very low.

Imagine a virus kills all the men in the world except 10 boys (and all their children and they are very fertile) not only could the world be repopulated but with good genetic diversity (no incest). Now imagine it kills all women but 10 girls human kind would go down to the size of a town.

If you want more smart people stop the dumb people (men) from reproducing and encourage smart people to reproduce more for example:
If your IQ is below 80 you are sterilised
Just this on it's own will give the country a massive amount more people wanting to adopt (solving other problems too), keep the population numbers manageable and the people who can still breed will want to more.
If your IQ is above 120 you get tax breaks for each child you have.

Since you've chopped the "idiots" balls off you can ban condoms and not worry about the general population getting dumber.

Or just offer sterilization free of charge to low IQ people, many would accept if you explain statistics on their prospects later in life (you are less likely to make lots of money, do you really want a child taking up what little you do have?)

Eventually we will be able to modify genes so we are all the same intelligence so we only need to hold on a little longer.

I recommend reading the attached book or at least listen to the chopped up version.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i1YYZjsDsxQ

(Also Brave New World)

>>137829
Agreed, national socialist germany solved this problem by encouraging women to not persue a carrier. But not only that, they subsadized hostpital bills, and made having children more affordable by creating programs for married couples to have cheaper funture and easier abilities to afford housing by madating banks give easier loans to married couples looking ot have children. If you had over a certain number of children these loans would be removed entirely.

So if you want smart people to reproduce more making being a housewife a respected job and more affordable is the best way to do it in my mind.

hear me out on this, we should just cut the hands off of female children. it will inhibit them learning to read or write, they wouldn't be able to type, and they wouldn't be able to work. Hell, not being able to work a phone they wouldn't be very able to cheat on you either

>>137904
Too far anon, too far.
Just abuse them so they learn to fear men, instead.

>>137846
This.

>>137836
The problem is primarily social and no amount of government would be able to solve it so long as the liberal attitude persists.

We need a religious revival to shift emphasis from work and materialism to family and culture. We need to bring back gender roles.