Leftists are now literally and explicitly arguing for Europe to be under Islamic rule. Writer Atossa Araxia Abrahamian, nominally writing a review of "Journeys into Europe" by Akbar Ahmed, argues for a form of pluralism under Islamic rule. And yes, I looked up the Author. She probably isn't Jewish - my best guess is Iranian.
>Rather than diagnosing tensions between Muslims and white Europeans as an innate clash of cultures, Ahmed blames a loosening of identities — religious, national, tribal and cultural — on all sides that’s further exacerbated by globalization.>His solution borrows from the past. He hopes Europeans can form new, hybrid identities that broaden the criteria for who belongs. Europe happens to have a homegrown example of this philosophy in medieval Andalusia, when people of multiple faiths in parts of modern-day Portugal and Spain enjoyed convivencia, a state of relative pluralism, peace and prosperity under Muslim rule. “The answer to the violence and tensions between religions in Europe today and the sense of alienation and confusion in Muslim youth is to revive and strengthen the Andalusian model as an alternative to that of a monolithic tribal society,” Ahmed writes.>Intellectually, his conclusion is hard to argue with. But since 9/11, popular perceptions of Islam in the West have been informed by emotion, not facts or reason... The mere suggestion that Europe was once better off under Muslim rule would be enough to end a conversation not just with conservatives but with many liberals, too. http://archive.is/hCd53http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2018/04/01/geller-new-york-times-asks-can-islamic-and-european-civilizations-coexist/>>135857>homegrown example of this philosophy in medieval Andalusia, when people of multiple faiths in parts of modern-day Portugal and Spain enjoyed convivencia, a state of relative pluralism, peace and prosperity under Muslim rule. “The answer to the violence and tensions between religions in Europe today and the sense of alienation and confusion in Muslim youth is to revive and strengthen the Andalusian model as an alternative to that of a monolithic tribal society,” Ahmed writes.I get this, but Musies are the minority. They do not rule, and by right should not rule. It is Islam that refuses to yield. Since they do not yield and instead seek dominion, there can only be bloodshed. This is the fate of modern western Europe.
>>135857Looks like The New York Times thinks that terrorism should be rewarded. Why the fuck should we yield to the terrorists and Islam because they say they will stop terrorism if we do.
You wanna know the best weapon for removing Islam?
The good old pigskin.
For you see, Elway is not 50% football, he is not 75% football, he is not 99.9999%; he is 101% football, and a football is 100% pigskin, and pigskin is 105% triggering to Islam.
So John Elway speaks the sacred words "Go long" and passes the pigskin. Any Islamic scum lucky enough to be hit by John Elways glorious pigskin passes immediately bursts into more footballs to spread the word of football. And John Elway sees this, and declares it to be good.
In the name of Rainbow Dash, and Dan Reeves.
Praise Elway, Praise American, Praise Football.
It's depressing how plausible this is. Islam is basically in a position to take over Europe in much the same way that Christianity did during the decadence of the Roman Empire. I don't even find it hard to imagine the current Pope converting to Islam.
On the other hand, at least women and gays will be back in their place, plus it's pretty much all the goats you can fuck. Got to take the good with the bad I guess.
I think I just popped a blood vessel. This is infuriating.
>>135871We should collect the teachings of John Elway into some sort of anthology before they are lost to the sands of time.
>>135857I got all the way to 'Ahmed' then stopped because I thought it was satire.