>>136296OHBOY.PNG
This is a lot of autism so lets just go over it and hope its not just some cow.
>Then allow me to examine the myriad factors of cuckstainity:Sure lets look and see if your nitpicking or if your overall right.
>suppression of historyEh, not really true, you could make an argument about muh dark ages were caused by Christianity, but it was the monks who mainly kept western literature safe and the eastern empire under Christianity that left it alive. Sure they kept things alive that they liked but thats not suppression.
>Falsification of historical eventsNeed more here, if we're talking old testament, maybe, but it took a while for it to get written down, so its not really clear if any of the historical events are true on many of the sides considered.
>establishing jewISH sacrificial rituals involving the flesh and blood of humans as canonAll Semitic religions were very big on human sacrifices. We can see this with Cartage, a Semitic colony in North Africa. However, its worth noting by the time of Christ this was metaphoric not literal, and Romans knew this even though, a certain batshit insane emperor would try and falsify otherwise.
>book burningAre you against this? Wewdoyouthinkyouare.jpg
>destruction of other religionsIf you are against the survival of the fittest then I have no sympathy for you.
>the total destructions of science and knowledge as a wholeScience didn't exist yet dumbass, and knowledge was preserved by Christianity, not in spite of.
>illegitimate succession via inbreedingNow I'm curious, I want a story anon!
>selective canonization protocolsMeh
>untestable "faith"Testing things wasn't even seen as a good way to acquire useful information yet anon. Yet again science that you use was made by Christians, and didn't exist before. People philosophized, and never really tested things.
>batshit insane doctrine & dgmaRelative, especially when you compare it to paganist beliefs of the time and Islam, which were the only neighboring religions. Christianity is hardly "insane" and the more conservative branches and hardcore dogma are good.
>and finally degenerate syncretism.The other option was outright replacement, which wouldn't be considered moral due to the universality of Christianity. If a certain race is phenotypically predisposed in certain characteristics on a societal basis the best way to get them to implement something is through syncretism rather then just giving up on them and kill them off. But then again, it might have been better off for use to have extermainated all these subhumans so that we wouldn't have brainlets like you running around saying shit like >MUH PAGAN ANCESTORS.
:^) >CHRISTIANITY IS JEWISHUm, no sweetie here, watch this
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lm8--TwK7To