Oh, you are not a citizen but want to have a say in our elections? Well sure. Just say that you’re not a citizen on the form and one of our friendly people will be by to collect you shortly.
Mobilefagging so I can't give a more in depth post, but here's the gist.
>Illegals are criminals, this is a simple fact not an oppinion.
>People choosing to not participate in the census are also criminal
>It doesn't matter if you feel like following the laws of the land when the law is in this case, in fact, just.
>democrats don't understand the Constitution and never have
>Democrats want to repeal rights and break the Constitution on a daily basis but at the same time use it as a sheild for their rhetoric
>democrats weild the law like a sword while they themselves ignore it, case and point illegals are not citizens
>Sactuary cities and states are unconstitutional in the most basic of forms
>Federal power supersedes state power as decided by the civil war they so easily explain as a war of slavery that THEY THEMSELVES started and lost.
>Adding a question doesn't mean they don't take the census so thier argument is bullshit, not even bullshit. It's horseshit.
I've got more but I'm at work looking at a Nazi pony board instead of building a customers computer and I don't want to waste more of my employers time.
>>134552No rest always, work work work. About damn time
now if only this was required when collecting any kind of welfare or applying for a job
>the reality is that such a question would only do harm
sure it would, to democrats and leftists.
They count on illegal aliens to participate in the election, because thats the only way the would be able to win.
So let me get this straight:
They are preparing a law suit to enable people that shouldnt even be able to live in the US, to vote because it would take away their power. Sorry, I meant because it "would hurt immigrants". How exactly would it hurt completely legal immigrants? Oh right, it doesnt.
The greatest of logics has been used in that argumentation.
>New York state Attorney General Eric Schneiderman said March 27 he would lead a multistate lawsuit to block the decision.
>Schneiderman
At this point, he might as well be named Schlomo Goldbergstein. I swear, these (((names))) are becoming less and less subtle.
>>134564i dont know about naming in the USA, but Eric Schneider is a german name.
>>134559"people are blatantly breaking the law but don't be mean to them about it"
I'll never understand this weird attitude they have
>>134569>"german"https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eric_Schneiderman>Schneiderman was born to a Jewish family in New York City; he is the son of Abigail Heyward and Irwin Schneiderman, a lawyer.get out (((shill)))
>>134570Schneider and Schneiderman are both German but the latter has a yiddish version.
I really hope they get to add the citizenship question on the census. I also hope they get Voter ID in place soon.
>If they manage to block the question is there a way for me to order some of the census forms so I can fill them out on behalf of states that would otherwise loose out?
>>134569many jewish names have german origins.
>>134570>"The migrants we love because they aren't the citizens we loathe from this country we loathe are blatantly breaking this country's law but don't be mean to them about it because we want more lawbreakers and less of you"Fixed. Liberals are cancer. Some realize it, some don't.
>>134564>>134569More like Dan Schneider amirite lads?
This would buy us several more years at least if this manages to go through. You can bet Demoncrats will fight tooth and nail.
>>134621most liberals are cuck beta numale white men and single white women
>>134554>Adding a question doesn't mean they don't take the census so thier argument is bullshit, not even bullshit. It's horseshit.It’s the same argument they make about voter IDs. There’s nothing unreasonable about it and they know it, so they go with an appeal to emotion instead. Illegals will be “afraid” to answer questions about citizenship so they won’t take the census, blacks will be “afraid” to show ID so they won’t vote. Completely speculative in both cases and totally irrelevant to the law.