New amendment to the Constitution removes all your rights under the Constitution.
'''Text - H.J.Res.48 - 115th Congress (2017-2018)''': Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States providing that the rights extended by the Constitution are the rights of natural persons only. | Congress.gov | Library of Congress
https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th-congress/house-joint-resolution/48/text?q=%7B%22search%22%3A%5B%22nolan%22%5D%7D
It removes all your rights because all persons are registered as corporations when they are born. (This has been amply researched. Do not believe it, research it yourself).
The bill removes all the rights under the Constitution of those who are corporations.
Thus, everyone in the U.S., practically, under this bill, will loose '''ALL RIGHTS UNDER THE CONSTITUTION.'''
/mlpol/ - My Little Politics
Archived thread
File (): BFE70F8344509A20EFDAD010C6871BA6-461277.jpg (450.5 KB, 1024x751, Constitution.jpg)
New amendment to the Constitution removes all your rights under the Constitution!!
Anonymous
GP1JP
?
No.123545
H. J. RES. 48
“ section 1. The rights protected by the Constitution of the United States are the rights of natural persons only. Artificial entities, such as '''corporations''', limited liability companies, and other entities, established by the laws of any State, the United States, or any foreign state '''shall have no rights under this Constitution''' and are subject to regulation by the People, through Federal, State, or local law. The privileges of artificial entities shall be determined by the People, through Federal, State, or local law, and shall not be construed to be inherent or inalienable.
https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th-congress/house-joint-resolution/48/text?q=%7B%22search%22%3A%5B%22nolan%22%5D%7D
'''Got a Birth Certificate? You are a Fictitious Corporation Created by the British Accreditation Regency (BAR Association)'''
https://spktruth2power.wordpress.com/2009/06/07/got-a-birth-certificate-you-are-a-fictitious-corporation-created-by-the-british-accreditation-regency-bar-association/
PLEASE HELP SPREAD THIS FAR AND WIDE!
'''Please help to stop this crap being pushed by a compromised Congress now!'''
“ section 1. The rights protected by the Constitution of the United States are the rights of natural persons only. Artificial entities, such as '''corporations''', limited liability companies, and other entities, established by the laws of any State, the United States, or any foreign state '''shall have no rights under this Constitution''' and are subject to regulation by the People, through Federal, State, or local law. The privileges of artificial entities shall be determined by the People, through Federal, State, or local law, and shall not be construed to be inherent or inalienable.
https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th-congress/house-joint-resolution/48/text?q=%7B%22search%22%3A%5B%22nolan%22%5D%7D
'''Got a Birth Certificate? You are a Fictitious Corporation Created by the British Accreditation Regency (BAR Association)'''
https://spktruth2power.wordpress.com/2009/06/07/got-a-birth-certificate-you-are-a-fictitious-corporation-created-by-the-british-accreditation-regency-bar-association/
PLEASE HELP SPREAD THIS FAR AND WIDE!
'''Please help to stop this crap being pushed by a compromised Congress now!'''
I don't believe this bullshit.
Changing the Constitution isn't easy anyway.
Changing the Constitution isn't easy anyway.
>>123548
The link is legit. Read it and study it. Current Congress is sold-out and attempting to betray America the Beautiful.
The link is legit. Read it and study it. Current Congress is sold-out and attempting to betray America the Beautiful.
These Congressmen are a bunch of traitors to our Constitution and now are trying to remove all your rights under The Constitution!
>>123548
This, it won't happen. There have been 11,000 attempts to amend our constitution but only 27 have gone through. There is no way 3/4 of the states could agree on anything these days.
>>123552
A proposed amendment needs a 2/3 vote of both houses of Congress to even be proposed. Then We The People vote on it and it must be approved by 3/4 of States. It is almost impossible to amend our constitution and this bill hasn't even been proposed yet.
The strength of our constitution is that it is almost impossible to amend. Again, they haven't even proposed this amendment yet.
This, it won't happen. There have been 11,000 attempts to amend our constitution but only 27 have gone through. There is no way 3/4 of the states could agree on anything these days.
>>123552
A proposed amendment needs a 2/3 vote of both houses of Congress to even be proposed. Then We The People vote on it and it must be approved by 3/4 of States. It is almost impossible to amend our constitution and this bill hasn't even been proposed yet.
The strength of our constitution is that it is almost impossible to amend. Again, they haven't even proposed this amendment yet.
>>123556
Shown Here:
Introduced in House (01/30/2017)
115th CONGRESS
1st Session
H. J. RES. 48
Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States providing that the rights extended by the Constitution are the rights of natural persons only.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
January 30, 2017
Mr. Nolan (for himself, Ms. McCollum, Mr. Cartwright, Mr. Ellison, Mr. Pocan, Mr. Takano, Mr. Blumenauer, Mr. DeFazio, Mr. O'Rourke, Ms. Slaughter, Mr. Grijalva, Ms. Lee, Mr. Conyers, Mr. Engel, Mr. Tonko, Mr. Raskin, Mr. Khanna, Mr. Capuano, Mr. Ted Lieu of California, Mr. Norcross, and Mr. Jones) submitted the following joint resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary
JOINT RESOLUTION
Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States providing that the rights extended by the Constitution are the rights of natural persons only.
'''Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled (two-thirds of each House concurring therein)''', That the following article is proposed as an amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States:
Shown Here:
Introduced in House (01/30/2017)
115th CONGRESS
1st Session
H. J. RES. 48
Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States providing that the rights extended by the Constitution are the rights of natural persons only.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
January 30, 2017
Mr. Nolan (for himself, Ms. McCollum, Mr. Cartwright, Mr. Ellison, Mr. Pocan, Mr. Takano, Mr. Blumenauer, Mr. DeFazio, Mr. O'Rourke, Ms. Slaughter, Mr. Grijalva, Ms. Lee, Mr. Conyers, Mr. Engel, Mr. Tonko, Mr. Raskin, Mr. Khanna, Mr. Capuano, Mr. Ted Lieu of California, Mr. Norcross, and Mr. Jones) submitted the following joint resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary
JOINT RESOLUTION
Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States providing that the rights extended by the Constitution are the rights of natural persons only.
'''Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled (two-thirds of each House concurring therein)''', That the following article is proposed as an amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States:
>>123585
>>123586
Tbh learn how amendments to our constitution work.
The bill you quote is to the bill to propose it. It's right there in the first sentence! In other words, they have proposed proposing this constitutional amendment. If both houses of Congress vote in favor of the bill with a 2/3 supermajority, then it is proposed and goes to our State legislators, 3/4 of which must ratify it.
>>123586
Tbh learn how amendments to our constitution work.
The bill you quote is to the bill to propose it. It's right there in the first sentence! In other words, they have proposed proposing this constitutional amendment. If both houses of Congress vote in favor of the bill with a 2/3 supermajority, then it is proposed and goes to our State legislators, 3/4 of which must ratify it.
>>123673
This, first you gotta propose a proposal to propose your proposed amendment, all the while your people can propose amendments to your amendment.
This, first you gotta propose a proposal to propose your proposed amendment, all the while your people can propose amendments to your amendment.
Despite the red alert from the based soukie flagger, this isn't anything to worry about at this stage. Adding and removing amendments are nearly impossible, which is why democrats go for gun laws rather than striking out the 2nd amendment as a whole. It's also why they push the "hunting and sport" cop out in their unconstitutional bills/laws
>>123736
>Despite the red alert from the based soukie flagger, this isn't anything to worry about at this stage.
Nice try to deflect people away from a serious issue.
>Despite the red alert from the based soukie flagger, this isn't anything to worry about at this stage.
Nice try to deflect people away from a serious issue.
>>123774
>calling a Leaf a meddler for making a personal observation
>when your own flag is South Korean and you make posts on American politics, calling people to action
The doublethink is real, here. Also:
>>123776
>>123777
>>123778
Don't think I haven't been noticing you replying to EVERY post that runs counter to what you've been saying in individual posts. Clearly, someone's rustled your jimmies.
>calling a Leaf a meddler for making a personal observation
>when your own flag is South Korean and you make posts on American politics, calling people to action
The doublethink is real, here. Also:
>>123776
>>123777
>>123778
Don't think I haven't been noticing you replying to EVERY post that runs counter to what you've been saying in individual posts. Clearly, someone's rustled your jimmies.
I am not a lawyer, but I think you're misinterpreting this.
Whether or not people are registered as corporations, there remains the fact that as they are people in their own right. The US Code explicitly defines the term "person" to include all members of the species Homo Sapiens who are born alive at any stage of development. John Doe the corporation might not have rights, but John Doe the person does.
In any case, constitutional amendments almost never pass, since they require 3/4 of congress to agree on something, and right now, we can barely even get 1/2 of congress to agree on anything.
>>123551
The constitution of 1787 didn't have any of the amendments at all. Not even the first amendment. You're not even an American, so why are you trying to tell us what we need to do? Fuck off, Korea.
>>123773
There is no 47th amendment. There are 27 amendments to the constitution, the last of which was passed in 1992. Incidentally, the 27th amendment was the first amendment to be proposed, but the last to actually get ratified. It took over 200 years to make its way into the constitution.
Whether or not people are registered as corporations, there remains the fact that as they are people in their own right. The US Code explicitly defines the term "person" to include all members of the species Homo Sapiens who are born alive at any stage of development. John Doe the corporation might not have rights, but John Doe the person does.
In any case, constitutional amendments almost never pass, since they require 3/4 of congress to agree on something, and right now, we can barely even get 1/2 of congress to agree on anything.
>>123551
The constitution of 1787 didn't have any of the amendments at all. Not even the first amendment. You're not even an American, so why are you trying to tell us what we need to do? Fuck off, Korea.
>>123773
There is no 47th amendment. There are 27 amendments to the constitution, the last of which was passed in 1992. Incidentally, the 27th amendment was the first amendment to be proposed, but the last to actually get ratified. It took over 200 years to make its way into the constitution.
>>123782
That is just a proxy. Flag means nothing. The Canda flag dude however is really a Canadian munk. That is the difference. Canadians meddling. My Ip however is just spoofed.
That is just a proxy. Flag means nothing. The Canda flag dude however is really a Canadian munk. That is the difference. Canadians meddling. My Ip however is just spoofed.
>>123782
Nice try to riducule others shill. Your tactics are blatant lies and have been exposed shill.
Nice try to riducule others shill. Your tactics are blatant lies and have been exposed shill.
>>123783
''I am not a lawyer, but I think you're misinterpreting this.''
''Whether or not people are registered as corporations,''
If you do not know that people are corporations then you have not right to give an opinion, because you are just speaking non-sense not based upon any knowledge at all.
''I am not a lawyer, but I think you're misinterpreting this.''
''Whether or not people are registered as corporations,''
If you do not know that people are corporations then you have not right to give an opinion, because you are just speaking non-sense not based upon any knowledge at all.
>>123783
>In any case, constitutional amendments almost never pass, since they require 3/4 of congress to agree on something, and right now, we can barely even get 1/2 of congress to agree on anything.
Never pass? How did they then pass the 47th amendment? This should give you a clue.
>In any case, constitutional amendments almost never pass, since they require 3/4 of congress to agree on something, and right now, we can barely even get 1/2 of congress to agree on anything.
Never pass? How did they then pass the 47th amendment? This should give you a clue.
>exaggerates everything
>uses bold text and formats every post to be both eye catching as well as an eye sore
>uses a proxy
>posts under a rarely seen flag
>scrounges up the worst conspiracy bullshit he can find with google search
>dismisses all information debunking him
OP is actively giving out information, and he's vindictive about being called out.
>uses bold text and formats every post to be both eye catching as well as an eye sore
>uses a proxy
>posts under a rarely seen flag
>scrounges up the worst conspiracy bullshit he can find with google search
>dismisses all information debunking him
OP is actively giving out information, and he's vindictive about being called out.
>>123783
>You're not even an American,
How do you know if I am an American or not? Presumption is a dreaded disease.
Of course the Constitution of 1787 did not have any amendments. That is dumb remark and quite irrelevant in fact.
>You're not even an American,
How do you know if I am an American or not? Presumption is a dreaded disease.
Of course the Constitution of 1787 did not have any amendments. That is dumb remark and quite irrelevant in fact.
How was the 27th amendment to the Constitution passed? This should give you a clue.
>>123795
Proxys are good. Nobody is exagerating. Bold text at times is good. The flag is meaningless, it is retarded even to activate flag tracking. The word conspiracy was created by the CIA to ridule truth. Those opposing the truth are dismissing all information debunking them. You are vindictive about being called out for how wrong you are.
Proxys are good. Nobody is exagerating. Bold text at times is good. The flag is meaningless, it is retarded even to activate flag tracking. The word conspiracy was created by the CIA to ridule truth. Those opposing the truth are dismissing all information debunking them. You are vindictive about being called out for how wrong you are.
>>123799
Thout shalt not swear or cuss. You are a law breaker and an offense to the Father in Heaven.
Thout shalt not swear or cuss. You are a law breaker and an offense to the Father in Heaven.
File (): BF5A266E6A09976782CE7BE4FB965587-631160.png (616.4 KB, 1308x2628, 1491193726744.png)
>mfw this thread just got good
Well, at least you did one thing, shill: you made me laugh.
Well, at least you did one thing, shill: you made me laugh.
>>123809
That's clear bullshit. Stop believing in feeble nonsense, and actually attempt to find real corruption instead of bringing up old shit from 10 years ago.
That's clear bullshit. Stop believing in feeble nonsense, and actually attempt to find real corruption instead of bringing up old shit from 10 years ago.
>>123804
How is it then that judge Anna J. Brown is able to use her title of nobility, imparted upon her by the Bar, to patent land?
How is it then that judge Anna J. Brown is able to use her title of nobility, imparted upon her by the Bar, to patent land?
>>123817
>How specifically was it passed. More details please. That should give you a clue.
>It removes all your rights because all persons are registered as corporations when they are born. (This has been amply researched. Do not believe it, research it yourself).
Actually, the burden of proof falls on you, not me.
>How specifically was it passed. More details please. That should give you a clue.
>It removes all your rights because all persons are registered as corporations when they are born. (This has been amply researched. Do not believe it, research it yourself).
Actually, the burden of proof falls on you, not me.
>>123814
Call others shills when you do not agree with them. A tactic also of the clowns. Tactic two - call something a "conspiracy theory" to attempt to discredit it.
Call others shills when you do not agree with them. A tactic also of the clowns. Tactic two - call something a "conspiracy theory" to attempt to discredit it.
>>123815
I just replied to the lies spoken and refuted them is all. If you cannot handle that then sorry you are hopeless.
I just replied to the lies spoken and refuted them is all. If you cannot handle that then sorry you are hopeless.
>>123819
I am not going to waste my time with ignorant people who are not willing to research this, who have their head in the sand, who are here only to spread lies, mock, ridicule and lie. Get lost.
I am not going to waste my time with ignorant people who are not willing to research this, who have their head in the sand, who are here only to spread lies, mock, ridicule and lie. Get lost.
>>123823
>makes claims
>won't back them up
>when I ask for some sources I get called ignorant
Well when I can't find anything maybe you should provide a source
>makes claims
>won't back them up
>when I ask for some sources I get called ignorant
Well when I can't find anything maybe you should provide a source
>>123585
Under a state of martial law and military rule, with The Emergency Banking Act of 1933 having issolved the U.S. Fed Government, and the current state of inter-regnum, the normal process of the Electoral college and amendments have been aborted and now a fictitious entity is proposing to be the legit government. Do you homework shills.
Under a state of martial law and military rule, with The Emergency Banking Act of 1933 having issolved the U.S. Fed Government, and the current state of inter-regnum, the normal process of the Electoral college and amendments have been aborted and now a fictitious entity is proposing to be the legit government. Do you homework shills.
>>123830
>Do you homework
Well, if it means I'll actually learn correct grammar, sure. Maybe you should "do you homework", too.
>Do you homework
Well, if it means I'll actually learn correct grammar, sure. Maybe you should "do you homework", too.
>>123835
First I want the details on why the 27th amendment's ratification was in your opinion so fishy
First I want the details on why the 27th amendment's ratification was in your opinion so fishy
>>123831
>Also, no account exists of a Judge Anna J. Brown with nobility nor with a patent.
You can claim whatever you want but she is doing this -- using her title of nobility to patent land. Obviously something, some screw is missing in your brain.
>Also, no account exists of a Judge Anna J. Brown with nobility nor with a patent.
You can claim whatever you want but she is doing this -- using her title of nobility to patent land. Obviously something, some screw is missing in your brain.
File (): BE23AD45BAE96A1A120F6D455DBFDCAD-8166874.gif (7.8 MB, 864x486, angery.gif)
MAKE NO FRILL
KILL THE SHILL
KILL THE SHILL
File (): 501518A8757B7EB5A7674285870E274E-1080913.png (1.0 MB, 1600x2400, D.png)
File (): 53DAD8513B9730ADBB98EDC5A0428A07-1415989.png (1.4 MB, 1600x2400, E.png)
File (): CE1A9C6DFC4B438F829EC5C677EAA3FE-1267458.png (1.2 MB, 1600x2400, F.png)
File (): 4E33534D1AF6A1CE3B18F29E835C19AF-1286421.png (1.2 MB, 1600x2400, G.png)
If you cannot understand how the 27th amendment was ratified, you will not understand the 28th ratification.
>>123791
>If you do not know that people are corporations then you have not right to give an opinion
Your source to this claim is a fucking Wordpress blog, and not an official SCOTUS ruling, or a citation of the US Code, or a citation of the US Constitution. The Wordpress blog you linked to does not cite any legal statute either, and is therefore worthless. But since you didn't seem to understand me the first time, allow me to spell things out for you: Whether or not your claim that we are all corporations is true, that does not change the legal precedent that as humans, born alive, we are people, and distinguished from any fictitious corporation created on our behalf. My source for this claim? 1 USC 8.
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/1/8
>>123793
>>123801
>>123806
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Twenty-seventh_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution#Ratification_by_the_states
It was passed when a bunch of states, over time, ratified it.
>On May 18, 1992, the Archivist of the United States, Don W. Wilson, certified that the amendment's ratification had been completed.[19][20] Michigan's May 7, 1992, ratification was believed to be the 38th state, but it later came to light that the Kentucky General Assembly had ratified the amendment during that state's initial month of statehood,[17] making Missouri the state to finalize the amendment's addition to the Constitution.[a][3]
Not really any foul play here.
>>123800
You have a South Korean flag, idiot. It's pretty damn likely that you're a South Korean.
>Of course the Constitution of 1787 did not have any amendments. That is dumb remark and quite irrelevant in fact.
So you want to go back to a constitution that doesn't guarantee a right to free speech, or a right to bear arms? Kill yourself.
>If you do not know that people are corporations then you have not right to give an opinion
Your source to this claim is a fucking Wordpress blog, and not an official SCOTUS ruling, or a citation of the US Code, or a citation of the US Constitution. The Wordpress blog you linked to does not cite any legal statute either, and is therefore worthless. But since you didn't seem to understand me the first time, allow me to spell things out for you: Whether or not your claim that we are all corporations is true, that does not change the legal precedent that as humans, born alive, we are people, and distinguished from any fictitious corporation created on our behalf. My source for this claim? 1 USC 8.
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/1/8
>>123793
>>123801
>>123806
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Twenty-seventh_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution#Ratification_by_the_states
It was passed when a bunch of states, over time, ratified it.
>On May 18, 1992, the Archivist of the United States, Don W. Wilson, certified that the amendment's ratification had been completed.[19][20] Michigan's May 7, 1992, ratification was believed to be the 38th state, but it later came to light that the Kentucky General Assembly had ratified the amendment during that state's initial month of statehood,[17] making Missouri the state to finalize the amendment's addition to the Constitution.[a][3]
Not really any foul play here.
>>123800
You have a South Korean flag, idiot. It's pretty damn likely that you're a South Korean.
>Of course the Constitution of 1787 did not have any amendments. That is dumb remark and quite irrelevant in fact.
So you want to go back to a constitution that doesn't guarantee a right to free speech, or a right to bear arms? Kill yourself.
Under a state of martial law and military rule, with The Emergency Banking Act of 1933 having dissolved the U.S. Federal Government, and the current state of inter-regnum, the normal process of the Electoral college and amendments have been aborted and now a fictitious entity is proposing to be the legit government. Do you homework shills.
>>123844
>The Twenty-Seventh Amendment has one of the most unusual histories of any amendment ever made to the U.S. Constitution. Congress passed the Twenty-Seventh Amendment by a two-thirds vote of both Houses, in 1789, along with eleven other proposed constitutional amendments (the last ten of which were ratified by the states in 1791, becoming the Bill of Rights). The Amendment provides that: “No law, varying the compensation for the services of the Senators and Representatives, shall take effect, until an election of representatives shall have intervened.”
>It was submitted by Congress to the states for ratification on September 25, 1789, along with eleven other proposed amendments. While ten of these twelve proposals were ratified in 1791 to become the Bill of Rights, what would become the Twenty-seventh Amendment and the proposed Congressional Apportionment Amendment did not get ratified by enough states for them to also come into force with the first ten amendments. The proposed congressional pay amendment was largely forgotten until 1982 when Gregory Watson researched it as a student at the University of Texas at Austin and began a new campaign for its ratification. Watson's role has been widely popularized, since his original paper proposing the idea received a poor grade (although a current Professor at Texas, Zachary Elkins, engineered a grade change in 2017 in light of Watson's accomplishments). The amendment eventually became part of the United States Constitution on May 5, 1992, completing a record-setting ratification period of 202 years, 7 months, and 10 days.
Didn't take 200 years my ass
>The Twenty-Seventh Amendment has one of the most unusual histories of any amendment ever made to the U.S. Constitution. Congress passed the Twenty-Seventh Amendment by a two-thirds vote of both Houses, in 1789, along with eleven other proposed constitutional amendments (the last ten of which were ratified by the states in 1791, becoming the Bill of Rights). The Amendment provides that: “No law, varying the compensation for the services of the Senators and Representatives, shall take effect, until an election of representatives shall have intervened.”
>It was submitted by Congress to the states for ratification on September 25, 1789, along with eleven other proposed amendments. While ten of these twelve proposals were ratified in 1791 to become the Bill of Rights, what would become the Twenty-seventh Amendment and the proposed Congressional Apportionment Amendment did not get ratified by enough states for them to also come into force with the first ten amendments. The proposed congressional pay amendment was largely forgotten until 1982 when Gregory Watson researched it as a student at the University of Texas at Austin and began a new campaign for its ratification. Watson's role has been widely popularized, since his original paper proposing the idea received a poor grade (although a current Professor at Texas, Zachary Elkins, engineered a grade change in 2017 in light of Watson's accomplishments). The amendment eventually became part of the United States Constitution on May 5, 1992, completing a record-setting ratification period of 202 years, 7 months, and 10 days.
Didn't take 200 years my ass
>>123778
I'm the reporter who runs ANN lol Not that that means much but I'm definitely not a shill. I just think Sovereign Citizens are nutjobs.
I'm the reporter who runs ANN lol Not that that means much but I'm definitely not a shill. I just think Sovereign Citizens are nutjobs.
>>123853
>Your source to this claim is a fucking Wordpress blog,
That blog is just an intro for idiots like you. Kinda like info for idiots 101.
>or a citation of the US Constitution.
U.C.C. military rule law and law of the sea are specific frameworks of law under wartime shill.
''Whether or not your claim that we are all corporations is true, that does not change the legal precedent that as humans, born alive, we are people, and distinguished from any fictitious corporation created on our behalf. My source for this claim? 1 USC 8.''
But when you appear before a Federal Court, your fictitious corps is the one that is tried on their ship. You have no rights only priviledges.
Do not quote Wikipedia please.
Amendments to our constitution that had been ratified by the states were removed by a treasonous Congress. Do not give me that bull-shit.
Just because I have a korean flag as the ip does not prove I am Korean you idiot.
The right to free speech and to bear arms is not a reason for you to tell others to kill themselves fag. The amendments can all be preserved upon the legit version of our constitution and we do not need your fake organic constitution any more paid shill.
>Your source to this claim is a fucking Wordpress blog,
That blog is just an intro for idiots like you. Kinda like info for idiots 101.
>or a citation of the US Constitution.
U.C.C. military rule law and law of the sea are specific frameworks of law under wartime shill.
''Whether or not your claim that we are all corporations is true, that does not change the legal precedent that as humans, born alive, we are people, and distinguished from any fictitious corporation created on our behalf. My source for this claim? 1 USC 8.''
But when you appear before a Federal Court, your fictitious corps is the one that is tried on their ship. You have no rights only priviledges.
Do not quote Wikipedia please.
Amendments to our constitution that had been ratified by the states were removed by a treasonous Congress. Do not give me that bull-shit.
Just because I have a korean flag as the ip does not prove I am Korean you idiot.
The right to free speech and to bear arms is not a reason for you to tell others to kill themselves fag. The amendments can all be preserved upon the legit version of our constitution and we do not need your fake organic constitution any more paid shill.
File (): 14C780BB2A40D4DBA89227118586F3F6-814392.png (795.3 KB, 1280x2088, 1651370__explicit_artist-colon-shinodage_oc_oc-colon-delta vee_oc only_aftersex_blue underwear_blushing_clothes_creampie_crossed hooves_c.png)
File (): 3BCF1E8FB5C9AD8FC63EEA861422F0C0-396932.png (387.6 KB, 3300x2510, 1651648__explicit_artist-colon-badumsquish_derpibooru exclusive_edit_sphinx (character)_bedroom eyes_blushing_clitoris_dark genitals_drip.png)
File (): 99EFB1EFD06EAFF5D9362BBF82856BCD-11296910.png (10.8 MB, 5850x3900, 1651984.png)
>>123852
Not only have you repeatedly proven you don't know what the word "shill" means, you have just proven that you're an outsider.
Rule 10, bitch. Enjoy your porn.
Not only have you repeatedly proven you don't know what the word "shill" means, you have just proven that you're an outsider.
Rule 10, bitch. Enjoy your porn.
>>123859
Ok, good, so what was the last ratified amendment now in modern history and how was it passed?
Ok, good, so what was the last ratified amendment now in modern history and how was it passed?
File (): CBF8A188FA57E330B6DF368D3EFD02DB-1299219.png (1.2 MB, 2124x1425, 1652867__questionable_artist-colon-marsminer_oc_oc only_oc-colon-venus spring_anthro_breasts_nipples_nudity_shower_solo.png)
File (): 40FD83549335A83A2E8F947914203EC3-967059.png (944.4 KB, 1280x1280, 1652476__explicit_artist-colon-mkogwheel_oc_oc-colon-cookie dough_oc-colon-milky way_oc only_busty crotchy milky way_crotchboobs_egg_food.png)
File (): 046D89C4120C4E322E21D67047412868-353112.png (344.8 KB, 2560x1440, 1652984__questionable_artist-colon-bwaebutt_oc_oc-colon-bwae_3d_anthro_anthro oc_breasts_female_grin_nipples_nudity_purple background_sim.png)
File (): F670821EA2CB27CE27E990D02044CB6F-22670445.gif (21.6 MB, 1200x970, 1653220.gif)
File (): 096EF4F33B4FC07DAB9FBF3CAAF70928-24980188.gif (23.8 MB, 1200x971, 1653224.gif)
>>123866
The last one passed was the 27th, and it was passed gradually over time.
If your point is "Well it will be passed over time" then I raise you this:
What is to stop something passing making sure people aren't considered corporations?
>>123867
Sure
https://constitutioncenter.org/interactive-constitution/amendments/amendment-xxvii
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Twenty-seventh_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution
The last one passed was the 27th, and it was passed gradually over time.
If your point is "Well it will be passed over time" then I raise you this:
What is to stop something passing making sure people aren't considered corporations?
>>123867
Sure
https://constitutioncenter.org/interactive-constitution/amendments/amendment-xxvii
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Twenty-seventh_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution
>>123859
The article does not explain how it was ratified, thus incomplete. What is your source for this? Link?
The article does not explain how it was ratified, thus incomplete. What is your source for this? Link?
>>123865
You have proven that you are an outsider because you don´t know what the hell you are talking about porn fag.
File (): 6577BB160E130332764E0D777A326BF9-421307.png (411.4 KB, 1071x1578, 1656472__explicit_artist-colon-swiftsketchpone_oc_oc-colon-sugar rush_oc-colon-swiftsketch_bat pony.png)
File (): D956A1C70227638E340CAC66633CF8AE-5647753.gif (5.4 MB, 1640x1080, 1663129.gif)
File (): C11835C9BEB008494A25F88FF8B0D2E8-158433.png (154.7 KB, 487x668, 1646000.png)
File (): EA49D3C8844212BD706D9AA3B8F64876-692393.png (676.2 KB, 1000x1200, 1646914.png)
File (): 2311317E0B3CA12896965731E6ADF1E8-13833963.gif (13.2 MB, 1280x960, 1641661__explicit_artist-colon-eqamrd_oc_oc only_oc-colon-zedwin_ahegao_animated_balls_bedroom eyes_belly button_both cutie marks_female_.gif)
File (): 24CF0A1BA47AEB2D94D5C1443E04DAA7-395560.png (386.3 KB, 1400x1391, 1640274.png)
File (): 7AB116C6582568E770233296296523C3-408961.png (399.4 KB, 800x600, 1638751__explicit_artist-colon-niggerdrawfag_oc_oc-colon-milky way_oc only_anatomically correct_anus_blushing_crotchboobs_female_floppy e.png)
File (): DD47E0D12F387322C50AA0CE03638839-5076634.jpg (4.8 MB, 4376x6492, 1633403.jpg)
>>123869
No Wikipedia links please.
The National Constitution Center is the first and only institution in America established by Congress to “disseminate information about the United States Constitution on a nonpartisan basis in order to increase the awareness and understanding of the Constitution among the American people.” The Constitution Center brings the United States Constitution to life by hosting interactive exhibits and constitutional conversations and inspires active citizenship by celebrating the American constitutional tradition.
https://constitutioncenter.org/about
Congress itself is supporting the fake organic constitution and is acting on behalf of an illegitimate gov. so quoting this site has no validity whatsoever. The current gov is illegit and in inter-regnum.
No Wikipedia links please.
The National Constitution Center is the first and only institution in America established by Congress to “disseminate information about the United States Constitution on a nonpartisan basis in order to increase the awareness and understanding of the Constitution among the American people.” The Constitution Center brings the United States Constitution to life by hosting interactive exhibits and constitutional conversations and inspires active citizenship by celebrating the American constitutional tradition.
https://constitutioncenter.org/about
Congress itself is supporting the fake organic constitution and is acting on behalf of an illegitimate gov. so quoting this site has no validity whatsoever. The current gov is illegit and in inter-regnum.
All the lie fags have been busted and exposed in their lies.
Fags and lies will all be silenced. Do not even try it with me. I will blow you out of the water with your lies.
File (): 0A542FF7DB5831FCE2007CC344C4F5AD-105641.png (103.2 KB, 934x832, Twilight-NervousSweat.png)
>>123864
>That blog is just an intro for idiots like you. Kinda like info for idiots 101.
Look, man, I have a master's degree. I might not be a lawyer, but I can read fucking legalese. If you make a legal claim, I'm going to expect you to either link me to a law on the books, or a Supreme Court opinion.
>U.C.C. military rule law and law of the sea are specific frameworks of law under wartime shill.
Then cite where in the Uniform Commercial Code, Military Law, or Maritime Law that you are referencing.
>But when you appear before a Federal Court, your fictitious corps is the one that is tried on their ship. You have no rights only priviledges.
When you walk into any court, Federal or State, it is you the human being that is tried, and you the human being who gets sent to jail when you're found guilty of a crime.
Incidentally, judges really don't like it when you pretend like there's a separation of a legal person and the human being that stands before them. This is what it looks like when you try to pull that crap in court:
[YouTube] Sovereign Citizen Freeman Tries Usual BS on Judge. Judge Hysterically Spews it Back![]()
>Do not quote Wikipedia please.
You could always check their references...
>Amendments to our constitution that had been ratified by the states were removed by a treasonous Congress. Do not give me that bull-shit.
Which amendments? The only amendment that was removed was the 18th, which was removed via the 21st amendment.
>The right to free speech and to bear arms is not a reason for you to tell others to kill themselves fag. The amendments can all be preserved upon the legit version of our constitution and we do not need your fake organic constitution any more paid shill.
If you want to preserve the amendments, you should not ask to restore the constitution to the version it was in 1787. Try 1791 instead.
>That blog is just an intro for idiots like you. Kinda like info for idiots 101.
Look, man, I have a master's degree. I might not be a lawyer, but I can read fucking legalese. If you make a legal claim, I'm going to expect you to either link me to a law on the books, or a Supreme Court opinion.
>U.C.C. military rule law and law of the sea are specific frameworks of law under wartime shill.
Then cite where in the Uniform Commercial Code, Military Law, or Maritime Law that you are referencing.
>But when you appear before a Federal Court, your fictitious corps is the one that is tried on their ship. You have no rights only priviledges.
When you walk into any court, Federal or State, it is you the human being that is tried, and you the human being who gets sent to jail when you're found guilty of a crime.
Incidentally, judges really don't like it when you pretend like there's a separation of a legal person and the human being that stands before them. This is what it looks like when you try to pull that crap in court:
[YouTube] Sovereign Citizen Freeman Tries Usual BS on Judge. Judge Hysterically Spews it Back
>Do not quote Wikipedia please.
You could always check their references...
>Amendments to our constitution that had been ratified by the states were removed by a treasonous Congress. Do not give me that bull-shit.
Which amendments? The only amendment that was removed was the 18th, which was removed via the 21st amendment.
>The right to free speech and to bear arms is not a reason for you to tell others to kill themselves fag. The amendments can all be preserved upon the legit version of our constitution and we do not need your fake organic constitution any more paid shill.
If you want to preserve the amendments, you should not ask to restore the constitution to the version it was in 1787. Try 1791 instead.
Ad hominems, Ad hominems everywhere
File (): 92651A2D45D1D38627C6D0113F49F302-102328.jpg (99.9 KB, 600x358, dolphin_breathing_blow_hole_225919_.jpg)
File (): 017FE252509DFDDB21ACAADD10E05C0F-18993320.gif (18.1 MB, 889x500, 1626856__explicit_artist-colon-godoffury_princess celestia_3d_animated_anus_female_insertion_looking back_male_male pov_mare_nudity_offsc.gif)
File (): 5E1DCDD5FA74B4993CB11B997972ACE6-325547.png (317.9 KB, 1302x1026, 1625179__explicit_artist-colon-big-dash-mac-dash-115_octavia melody_ahegao_an egg being attacked by sperm_blushing_drool_egg cell_floppy .png)
File (): 0EBE040F299714932E25F2887F4E4B09-444574.png (434.2 KB, 1920x1080, 1622552.png)
File (): A5192664D5E3B141226DAE4BB3549915-120896.jpg (118.1 KB, 1100x858, 1620936__questionable_artist-colon-johnjoseco_applejack_lyra heartstrings_octavia melody_pinkie pie_princess luna_rainbow dash_assisted e.jpg)
File (): 95B9BB10AB7BAB4EC3F200AA59E1F4CB-14729195.gif (14.0 MB, 1125x1050, 1620448.gif)
>>123888
>If you make a legal claim, I'm going to expect you to either link me to a law on the books, or a Supreme Court opinion.
Do your homework, I am not going to waste time with people who know nothing about this.
''Then cite where in the Uniform Commercial Code, Military Law, or Maritime Law that you are referencing.''
You need to speak to a judge to get the insider secrets or hear from someone who has. You will not find it out in the open.
Courts operate under martial law - see the gold fringed flag. It is not about pretending to not be something. Obvioulsy you do not understand how the system works.
Again, do not quote Wikipedia. Give a reliable source.
''Which amendments? The only amendment that was removed was the 18th, which was removed via the 21st amendment.''
Sorry but you are missing a major amendment that was ratified by the states and was illegall removed.
''If you want to preserve the amendments, you should not ask to restore the constitution to the version it was in 1787. Try 1791 instead.''
We are just wanting to cast-off the fake organic constitution is all.
>If you make a legal claim, I'm going to expect you to either link me to a law on the books, or a Supreme Court opinion.
Do your homework, I am not going to waste time with people who know nothing about this.
''Then cite where in the Uniform Commercial Code, Military Law, or Maritime Law that you are referencing.''
You need to speak to a judge to get the insider secrets or hear from someone who has. You will not find it out in the open.
Courts operate under martial law - see the gold fringed flag. It is not about pretending to not be something. Obvioulsy you do not understand how the system works.
Again, do not quote Wikipedia. Give a reliable source.
''Which amendments? The only amendment that was removed was the 18th, which was removed via the 21st amendment.''
Sorry but you are missing a major amendment that was ratified by the states and was illegall removed.
''If you want to preserve the amendments, you should not ask to restore the constitution to the version it was in 1787. Try 1791 instead.''
We are just wanting to cast-off the fake organic constitution is all.
File (): 0D06696714249888C10083D36F643794-1376971.png (1.3 MB, 1145x1280, 1619941__questionable_artist-colon-omi_rainbow dash_anthro_ass_bed_black underwear_book_both cutie marks_cameltoe_cellphone_clothes_eyes .png)
File (): 62EF73733588C509FF05C05545B7EADB-19857251.gif (18.9 MB, 960x540, 1623844__explicit_artist-colon-godoffury_applejack_rainbow dash_3d_ahegao_animated_anus_appledash_ass to ass_bed_bedroom eyes_butt buddie.gif)
File (): 45EE46F300731177807A92395CA6245C-21545749.gif (20.5 MB, 800x450, 1623852__explicit_artist-colon-godoffury_applejack_rainbow dash_3d_animated_anus_appledash_ass to ass_bed_bedroom eyes_butt buddies_cutie.gif)
File (): 4930C998BBE07BCBCD5B0D4A69ADE321-450796.png (440.2 KB, 1000x1333, 1611757.png)
File (): D92DA3BBB7F8C2DA41CC58FCEF351190-157006.png (153.3 KB, 530x782, 1604609.png)
File (): 33642A7B31201A0F14B2EDFE7A5684E1-283485.png (276.8 KB, 901x682, 1604603.png)
File (): 1D126018A2D8FE05032ABAF17B7D4EB0-119853.png (117.0 KB, 484x666, 1603777.png)
File (): 951B56CD44B3BFC181A47DC09E74E640-208399.png (203.5 KB, 695x558, 1603776.png)
File (): 19014560221AE493202406634A11B709-165746.png (161.9 KB, 725x517, 1603775.png)
File (): AE44CDEF13DC2CC28595A86C2D8458AA-108221.png (105.7 KB, 527x515, 1603774.png)
File (): A7E8A6B073CFFE25FE3B34EF907CBB85-129797.png (126.8 KB, 618x526, 1603772.png)
File (): B0DC85D2224F9396D38D19850C540DDF-156091.png (152.4 KB, 668x726, 1603705.png)
File (): 1138CA21F876F34CD62794D2628CE775-370705.png (362.0 KB, 1097x999, 1603703.png)
File (): DB505BB49EE451599BD4880F21B71CB1-624401.png (609.8 KB, 2894x4093, 1601619.png)
File (): EE4DDA47CD86B0436BA3EE13BF5E8111-3914737.gif (3.7 MB, 1080x1080, 1615289.gif)
This porn fag dude is so ridiculous. He thinks he can derail the thread by posting shity porn characters.
>>123902
Nah, doing so would only bring on a storm of most false statements and shit posts. I am not going to argue with people not willing to look into this. Study it for a few months then come back when you know enough about the subject. Otherwise, I am just wasting my time.
Nah, doing so would only bring on a storm of most false statements and shit posts. I am not going to argue with people not willing to look into this. Study it for a few months then come back when you know enough about the subject. Otherwise, I am just wasting my time.
File (): 8B17C67BE001ADC5543733027EEA3B53-91094.jpg (89.0 KB, 800x575, blow-through.jpg)
File (): 352803E2B2120378DCE177803B7A9349-1935250.png (1.8 MB, 2509x1909, 1600498.png)
File (): A25074510A3F40DAD7232FFC6CB2A1CF-15192193.gif (14.5 MB, 670x706, 1584964.gif)
File (): 383CC79B2AD3E436F5825A089267ACB4-3102020.png (3.0 MB, 2500x2282, 1545021.png)
File (): E4C83578B94D628811BFC053DB6CF7A8-256435.png (250.4 KB, 783x766, 1532845__questionable_artist-colon-whatsapokemon_oc_oc-colon-heart song_oc-colon-jade shine_oc only_anthro_big breasts_breasts_clothes_cr.png)
File (): 87919C2056B595BDA46920F147A7FB60-438672.png (428.4 KB, 1920x1080, 1516523.png)
>>123906
Fair enough, porn threads are an excellent alternative to well-reasoned, well-thought, and well-cited discussions.
Fair enough, porn threads are an excellent alternative to well-reasoned, well-thought, and well-cited discussions.
File (): CB16291F6318D63793890F85AE1B957D-11812377.gif (11.3 MB, 1350x1080, 1527966__explicit_artist-colon-fensu-dash-san_artist-colon-htpot_quibble pants_rainbow dash_stranger than fan fiction_animated_backwards .gif)
File (): B0211E48BFD14E1C975AD4974AF19CCE-160519.png (156.8 KB, 1000x1000, 1525378__questionable_artist-colon-anontheanon_derpibooru exclusive_oc_oc-colon-juiceropone_oc only_blushing_colored_glass_juice_juicer_j.png)
File (): 1EF12538BB5978647229BE1955868946-4320522.png (4.1 MB, 2908x3000, 1514426.png)
File (): 23F25007DF2E02FB6EBA3ED974176F4F-208873.jpg (204.0 KB, 1366x768, 1366x768_blow-hole.jpg)
File (): CA9E2AB4AABB3C126BE6167CE6380A59-702657.gif (686.2 KB, 900x639, 1496617__explicit_artist-colon-whisperfoot_pinkie pie_anatomically correct_animated_anus_ass_balloonbutt_blue background_clitoris_dock_ea.gif)
File (): 43CC16303B984E2B6F822102BE2B2D04-172253.png (168.2 KB, 588x721, 1496959__explicit_artist-colon-whatsapokemon_oc_oc-colon-jade shine_oc only_against glass_anthro_anthro oc_breasts_delicious flat chest_f.png)
File (): A30E34FF09BFA68FECFEC1F0E9192508-966035.png (943.4 KB, 1512x1080, 1492214.png)
Sometimes, I feel lewd is just as pleasing as explicit.
File (): 69717D6C620F188E2E555430FAB12051-165032.png (161.2 KB, 480x480, bearing_zz FAG.png)
File (): AA482DD8FD6F5DB27A1E374E5AB80C17-398568.png (389.2 KB, 1292x1058, 1482220__explicit_grimdark_artist-colon-whatsapokemon_discord_princess celestia_strawberry sunrise_an egg being attacked by sperm_a straw.png)
File (): 2F1297417EED750ECA478F05D1A66AF5-39983.jpg (39.0 KB, 500x500, 1477518__safe_artist-colon-kushina13_starlight glimmer_bedroom eyes_clothes_looking back_pony_socks_solo_tongue out_unicorn.jpg)
File (): 88A9EA0E090408BA9260B978E612467A-329253.png (321.5 KB, 797x1071, 1450014__questionable_artist-colon-whatsapokemon_oc_oc-colon-historia_oc only_anthro_anthro oc_breasts_clothes_condom_crystal pony_dialog.png)
File (): CDE6B1A0E4F503269157F30916AE1190-166605.png (162.7 KB, 838x953, Twilight-StarryEyes.png)
>>123897
>Do your homework
You're the idiot making claims. If you aren't going to back up your arguments with actual citations to actual laws, you're nothing more than a troll.
>You need to speak to a judge
No, actually, I don't. If it was an enforceable law, it would be on the books.
>Courts operate under martial law - see the gold fringed flag
Okay, it's time for me to cite some actual law now:
https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/FSupp/912/224/1986395/
>Finally, Defendant Greenstreet's response to Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment identifies this Court as an "Admiralty Court" without further discussing his allegation. If his reference is to be construed as a jurisdictional challenge, his motion is denied. Others have attempted to persuade the judiciary that fringe on an American flag denotes a court of admiralty. In light of the fact that this Court has such a flag in its courtroom, the issue is addressed. The concept behind the theory the proponent asserts is that if a courtroom is adorned with a flag which happens to be fringed around the edges, such decor indicates that the court is one of admiralty jurisdiction exclusively. To think that a fringed flag adorning the courtroom somehow limits this Court's jurisdiction is frivolous. See Vella v. McCammon, 671 F. Supp. 1128, 1129 (S.D.Tex.1987) (describing petitioner's claim that court lacked jurisdiction because flag was fringed as "without merit" and "totally frivolous"). Unfortunately for Defendant Greenstreet, decor is not a determinant for jurisdiction.
>Sorry but you are missing a major amendment that was ratified by the states and was illegall removed.
Name it.
>We are just wanting to cast-off the fake organic constitution is all.
I prefer the real constitution on the books now. The one that recognizes that I have rights. The one that makes slavery illegal.
>Do your homework
You're the idiot making claims. If you aren't going to back up your arguments with actual citations to actual laws, you're nothing more than a troll.
>You need to speak to a judge
No, actually, I don't. If it was an enforceable law, it would be on the books.
>Courts operate under martial law - see the gold fringed flag
Okay, it's time for me to cite some actual law now:
https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/FSupp/912/224/1986395/
>Finally, Defendant Greenstreet's response to Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment identifies this Court as an "Admiralty Court" without further discussing his allegation. If his reference is to be construed as a jurisdictional challenge, his motion is denied. Others have attempted to persuade the judiciary that fringe on an American flag denotes a court of admiralty. In light of the fact that this Court has such a flag in its courtroom, the issue is addressed. The concept behind the theory the proponent asserts is that if a courtroom is adorned with a flag which happens to be fringed around the edges, such decor indicates that the court is one of admiralty jurisdiction exclusively. To think that a fringed flag adorning the courtroom somehow limits this Court's jurisdiction is frivolous. See Vella v. McCammon, 671 F. Supp. 1128, 1129 (S.D.Tex.1987) (describing petitioner's claim that court lacked jurisdiction because flag was fringed as "without merit" and "totally frivolous"). Unfortunately for Defendant Greenstreet, decor is not a determinant for jurisdiction.
>Sorry but you are missing a major amendment that was ratified by the states and was illegall removed.
Name it.
>We are just wanting to cast-off the fake organic constitution is all.
I prefer the real constitution on the books now. The one that recognizes that I have rights. The one that makes slavery illegal.
File (): 1EA8BEE13F54F6D1D9DCBC64241EC8A8-3233944.gif (3.1 MB, 982x945, 1440504.gif)
File (): 18088E020E8731AF90FE9939F9C7C7FE-382966.png (374.0 KB, 941x814, 1438179__questionable_artist-colon-whatsapokemon_oc_oc-colon-heart song_oc only_oc-colon-thunderbolt_anthro_anthro oc_big breasts_bikini_.png)
File (): D5ED116EA5386347755B674D9E82DEDF-181597.png (177.3 KB, 588x587, 1438178__questionable_artist-colon-whatsapokemon_oc_oc-colon-heart song_oc only_anthro_anthro oc_big breasts_bikini_breasts_cleavage_clot.png)
File (): 07F08C3D4D7237F71072B9548A8443DD-1758818.png (1.7 MB, 3000x2200, 1433687__suggestive_artist-colon-vistamage_bow hothoof_windy whistles_parental glideance_spoiler-colon-s07e07_bedroom eyes_drool_saliva t.png)
File (): 2F2F07C110188C227C4F47B1025A06E2-269730.png (263.4 KB, 1250x893, 1428053.png)
>>123924
You're the idiot making claims.
If you aren't going to back up your counter - arguments with actual citations to actual laws, you're nothing more than a troll.
''No, actually, I don't. If it was an enforceable law, it would be on the books.''
Reveals how dumb you are about how courts function. They never put in the books what they are doing in their legal legesse mumbo jumbo.
''If his reference is to be construed as a jurisdictional challenge, his motion is denied. Jurisdiction.''
That is because you cannot challenge them on jurisdiction while you accepted to be tried under their ship retard. You know nothing.
You're the idiot making claims.
If you aren't going to back up your counter - arguments with actual citations to actual laws, you're nothing more than a troll.
''No, actually, I don't. If it was an enforceable law, it would be on the books.''
Reveals how dumb you are about how courts function. They never put in the books what they are doing in their legal legesse mumbo jumbo.
''If his reference is to be construed as a jurisdictional challenge, his motion is denied. Jurisdiction.''
That is because you cannot challenge them on jurisdiction while you accepted to be tried under their ship retard. You know nothing.
I'' prefer the real constitution on the books now. The one that recognizes that I have rights. The one that makes slavery illegal.''
You have no rights under the fake organic constitution, only priviledges retard.
You have no rights under the fake organic constitution, only priviledges retard.
File (): DED54634A7E6C8057CA6A8E0E68C01EA-575393.png (561.9 KB, 1392x1922, 1430232.png)
File (): 646E45C6965D2A7FB07413372BB00ECF-576938.png (563.4 KB, 776x1021, 1415578__suggestive_artist-colon-whatsapokemon_oc_oc-colon-heart song_oc only_absolute cleavage_anthro_anthro oc_arm under breasts_big br.png)
File (): 225DC70AC81E21FB019EEC041F239698-1124985.png (1.1 MB, 1600x2000, 1402591.png)
File (): 448586A5CF6C8EBC5B8A7FAE7C373931-406089.png (396.6 KB, 1280x1346, 1374419__suggestive_artist-colon-pabbley_pinkie pie_bondage_dock_drool_featureless crotch_female_implied twilight sparkle_limited palette.png)
File (): DA224D09EE1E7D48EBC2BC9BF5D03471-193410.png (188.9 KB, 900x818, 1373888.png)
>>123924
I love trials featuring Sovereign Citizens. Reading about their insane doublethink and admirality laws presented in court is always kek worthy.
I love trials featuring Sovereign Citizens. Reading about their insane doublethink and admirality laws presented in court is always kek worthy.
>>123928
Friendly note anon, there are legal experts amongst the Mlpol userbase,... you'll have to do better desu. I'm not above tin-foil hat shit, but you're clearly tilting at windmills to a degree that is not complimentary
Friendly note anon, there are legal experts amongst the Mlpol userbase,... you'll have to do better desu. I'm not above tin-foil hat shit, but you're clearly tilting at windmills to a degree that is not complimentary
You quote Wikipedia and a web page produced by an illegit Congress while we are in inter-regnum and expect to use that as proof. Then you have no clue what the organic fake consitution is. Then you expect someone to challenge jurisdiction by claiming the court is admiralty court. Shows how dumb you actually are.
>>123935
Obviously that was some dumb person who tried to fight the captain while on his ship. A stupid person in fact. Not representative of any legit well informed group.
Obviously that was some dumb person who tried to fight the captain while on his ship. A stupid person in fact. Not representative of any legit well informed group.
File (): F15DC6DFBD2CF1792F5890414C5EF33E-1560600.png (1.5 MB, 1672x1080, 1373527__suggestive_artist-colon-papadragon69_rarity_spike_3d_aloe vera_anthro_clothed female nude male_clothes_dialogue_nudity_older_old.png)
File (): 19823E53BD054D4630A9241DF45FFC73-243818.png (238.1 KB, 838x1098, 1373748__suggestive_artist-colon-mostazathy_edit_rainbow dash_bad touch_blushing_both cutie marks_butt grab_covering_cute_denied_dialogue.png)
File (): 0A4D3D1FC6112D31757E405038606090-4169820.png (4.0 MB, 2400x3600, 1368257__suggestive_artist-colon-captainpudgemuffin_nurse redheart_adorasexy_blushing_both cutie marks_bun_cute_earth pony_female_heart e.png)
File (): 74D8919DC7D80A38739A6A93F8BF8F61-400874.png (391.5 KB, 1200x1212, 1367049.png)
File (): CE405E4C2286F0EDC5762AB734EF25AC-22749.jpg (22.2 KB, 360x320, 1517778273104.jpeg)
>>123928
>That is because you cannot challenge them on jurisdiction while you accepted to be tried under their ship retard. You know nothing.
>That is because you cannot challenge them on jurisdiction while you accepted to be tried under their ship retard. You know nothing.
>>123937
Hostility is met back in equal appropriation of duly imparted change, in the same coin it is given.
Hostility is met back in equal appropriation of duly imparted change, in the same coin it is given.
File (): 631E0DD1FA5E8A3B093C696E234F83CF-150535.png (147.0 KB, 900x706, 1517031677064.png)
Oh hey a very active thread. Maybe we aren't dea...
Oh wait its drama bullshit.
Why the hell do we even care about a stupid piece of paper that will likely be thrown away in the next 10-30 years anyways? Its not like we can change it in this polarized climate.
Oh wait its drama bullshit.
Why the hell do we even care about a stupid piece of paper that will likely be thrown away in the next 10-30 years anyways? Its not like we can change it in this polarized climate.
File (): 0E8A5D6B459E22A791E3DB4C2E459450-172205.png (168.2 KB, 1564x1432, 1363002__suggestive_artist-colon-oshitsukiryuu_angel wings_anatomically incorrect_bedroom eyes_bow_female_hair bow_pegasus_plot_pony_solo.png)
File (): 1A4346EA4CB56A4B6F2A9DA0BDA7805E-74193.png (72.5 KB, 779x569, 1361652__suggestive_artist-colon-jargon scott_shining armor_bedroom eyes_dock_gleaming shield_laying down_looking at you_looking back_ope.png)
File (): 4411E6DAD782B3B43550B07E61C37F05-5979806.png (5.7 MB, 4001x3123, 1355284.png)
File (): C8D025A7A56A560FA9E9F8E22039C613-24955285.gif (23.8 MB, 860x484, 1353815.gif)
File (): 11977821662BF44C350FEC306B3FAFCE-145440.png (142.0 KB, 1200x716, 1348667.png)
Hey everyone, post some of your favorite lewds/porn.
File (): 7D21FE489B132C80CA8CCD3B689059E4-193346.jpg (188.8 KB, 1572x1357, Blow-Away.jpg)
File (): 4F49E4FEBD8284BAB008A2D9962E0C10-72186.gif (70.5 KB, 276x352, 1347294__artist needed_source needed_safe_twilight sparkle_animated_do a little shake.gif)
File (): 712BEF680DD82407AEAEACE946AE604C-340870.png (332.9 KB, 1280x1388, 1345855__suggestive_artist-colon-pabbley_daring do_grammar error_imminent tentacle rape_missing accessory_monochrome_simple background_so.png)
File (): 94ED1BF7279C3C6900B7387F058A2839-304410.png (297.3 KB, 1280x1225, 1340515__suggestive_artist-colon-pabbley_spoiled rich_dialogue_dock_featureless crotch_looking back_monochrome_plot_simple background_sol.png)
File (): 4F09DBD86820E4D9262029A33FE02C66-2288174.png (2.2 MB, 1280x1920, 1500180508975.png)
File (): 4761E6F9B140DEA20B954EBCEE2D8621-1367977.png (1.3 MB, 1650x1254, 1249579__explicit_artist-colon-devo87_cheerilee_the cart before the ponies_spoiler-colon-s06e14_anatomically correct_anus_bottomless_cheerileeder_cheer.png)
File (): CBFD6AE069B02669112F3AC7ED191C1C-8052396.webm (7.7 MB, Resolution:1920x1080 Length:00:00:09, 1507933__explicit_artist-colon-htpot_artist-colon-ratofdrawn_nightmare moon_princess cadance_anatomically correct_animated_anus_bedroom eyes_bush_candy.webm) [play once] [loop]
File (): D4D1C352C316A5B6E2E113244410A80E-1889963.png (1.8 MB, 2005x1394, 1514422061587.png)
File (): 185466E7945C443604D132F1FF49CAC9-1584074.png (1.5 MB, 3000x2000, 1513043390635.png)
>>123888
>Look, man, I have a master's degree.
I don´t care if you are the Prince of Saudi Arabia with a masters in scamming. You have been blown-away in ignorance.
>Look, man, I have a master's degree.
I don´t care if you are the Prince of Saudi Arabia with a masters in scamming. You have been blown-away in ignorance.
File (): 60CD8F8DD90F85DE7B6D44B2942A35FD-137245.jpg (134.0 KB, 1280x1045, 1337658__suggestive_artist-colon-pabbley_spitfire_dock_looking back_monochrome_plot_sexy spitfire_simple background_sketch_solo_solo fema.jpg)
File (): EB0D03D67A33D539E8A3C8375D8879C2-131934.jpg (128.8 KB, 1280x1280, 1332372__solo_nudity_fluttershy_anthro_breasts_blushing_questionable_nipples_hootershy_30 minute art challenge.jpg)
File (): 4140F2CAA7F7B7360B8A88A57BA2988F-341928.png (333.9 KB, 2508x1830, 1329945__suggestive_artist-colon-silverwing_starlight glimmer_ass up_bed_bedroom_blanket_butt only_close-dash-up_cute_dialogue_dock_glimm.png)
File (): 81C91E47C5C87B1ED10A2A5A0ACAAAEC-5263786.png (5.0 MB, 3160x3200, 1329471__explicit_artist-colon-ratofdrawn_applejack_2017_anatomically correct_anus_applebutt_bedroom eyes_blushing_champagne_clitoris_col.png)
File (): 413958A0B9B54687A0A83B2E440B93FE-3507655.gif (3.3 MB, 1963x1233, 1324451.gif)
File (): 9581E9179BAFDD29F31FBAB9C48BF6DF-1088786.jpg (1.0 MB, 1983x2588, 0010-1359743835040.jpg)
File (): 37D4D5FAA137B59884A9B2148F913418-478582.png (467.4 KB, 1000x1000, 0196 - UDnPq.png)
File (): F032FC2CA51DB23F1250982EABF4A2FB-602803.gif (588.7 KB, 381x358, 1313023676991.gif)
File (): F065B9BBE1ECE1D280537AC82485A167-370901.png (362.2 KB, 1280x1274, 1313023999909.png)
File (): 83DD5985819F557853A122C55D9410B9-594276.png (580.3 KB, 1200x900, vg (6).png)
>>123953
Anon /mlpol/ is a nice board.
Also I do agree with most of the others, the last amendment under our republic has passed before we either devolve into bloodshed or Mexico.
Anon /mlpol/ is a nice board.
Also I do agree with most of the others, the last amendment under our republic has passed before we either devolve into bloodshed or Mexico.
>>123960
>Also I do agree with most of the others, the last amendment under our republic has passed before we either devolve into bloodshed or Mexico.
What is that comment supposed to mean?
Sorry...
>Also I do agree with most of the others, the last amendment under our republic has passed before we either devolve into bloodshed or Mexico.
What is that comment supposed to mean?
Sorry...
File (): FA03013618299B1C38E61AE9A5261B47-1883382.png (1.8 MB, 2000x2000, 1319268__pinkie pie_anthro_clothes_breasts_blushing_suggestive_edit_panties_underwear_armpits.png)
File (): 859499D234DB827C391A8341A553DB65-254094.jpg (248.1 KB, 1920x1080, 1310775__solo_rainbow dash_suggestive_plot_3d_food_source filmmaker_pillow_cake_face down ass up.jpg)
File (): 7AD037DA39E48124C49AF0193EEB07CD-3010598.png (2.9 MB, 2312x2423, 1308936__explicit_artist-colon-meggchan_applejack_anatomically correct_anus_apple_armpits_bedroom eyes_blushing_bucket_casual nudity_clit.png)
File (): B8A8BC0BC6DC413FE35B4CA113BD790D-4285768.png (4.1 MB, 3000x3000, 1308407.png)
Must go now. Do your homework and I will be back in a week to see what you fags have learned...out of here..see ya suckers...
File (): 9127889FA4CEF21014E64E7B0FE47D11-215363.png (210.3 KB, 1041x1013, 1305688__oc_oc only_blushing_suggestive_straight_tongue out_licking_chibi_patreon_hornjob.png)
File (): E737BFC8BC9887C8C254D4198DDCDBE5-3006923.gif (2.9 MB, 529x500, 1295260__suggestive_artist-colon-szafir87_derpibooru exclusive_octavia melody_animated_butt only_plot_plot shake_plump_shaking_simple bac.gif)
File (): D161592833518C8959C950DE4CED842E-760517.jpg (742.7 KB, 2880x1800, 1284945.jpg)
File (): 8D83FD3AC30723F4CF0FAD7DF610BFF2-1243100.png (1.2 MB, 1280x1435, 1269788__solo_oc_solo female_blushing_suggestive_looking at you_plot_bedroom eyes_both cutie marks_bandage.png)
File (): FA109EFF012B6C592CB975948A13E433-950481.png (928.2 KB, 1941x2000, 1263507.png)
>>123961
Well to put it simply.
Our republic is unstable and people and states will never agree to pass an amendment. If we have a republic after our impending civil war we might have a new Constitution, but I doubt it since we will more likely just end up a monarchy or dictatorship.
Well to put it simply.
Our republic is unstable and people and states will never agree to pass an amendment. If we have a republic after our impending civil war we might have a new Constitution, but I doubt it since we will more likely just end up a monarchy or dictatorship.
>>123969
The shill Congress is not even allowing a Convention of the States. As I have stated, we are in inter-regnum. Only restoring the Constitution of 1787 - 1789 will resolve it. End the martial law, military rule and re-instate the common law courts as they existed prior to the U.S. Civil War, which never ended. See U. Hope you do some homework and catch you in a week!
The shill Congress is not even allowing a Convention of the States. As I have stated, we are in inter-regnum. Only restoring the Constitution of 1787 - 1789 will resolve it. End the martial law, military rule and re-instate the common law courts as they existed prior to the U.S. Civil War, which never ended. See U. Hope you do some homework and catch you in a week!
>>123969
By the way, a Constitutional Convetion is not what we need. That will make things only worse by allowing the shills to mess it up even more. We need a convention of The States. Will post more info next time I come...after the shills are gone... see u!
By the way, a Constitutional Convetion is not what we need. That will make things only worse by allowing the shills to mess it up even more. We need a convention of The States. Will post more info next time I come...after the shills are gone... see u!
File (): A49208A4470FF293166AB37B5C745C15-705372.gif (688.8 KB, 733x533, 1517453509731.gif)
>>123971
>>123970
>Constitutional Convetion
>Only restoring the Constitution of 1787 - 1789
No the document in itself is flawed. Read up on arrow's therm, democracy is trash we need an Absolute Monarchy to rule over this god forsaken land to ensure that we never have a left wing presence in this state again. That and reaffirm the blood right citizenship that we had till the mid 19th century.
>>123970
>Constitutional Convetion
>Only restoring the Constitution of 1787 - 1789
No the document in itself is flawed. Read up on arrow's therm, democracy is trash we need an Absolute Monarchy to rule over this god forsaken land to ensure that we never have a left wing presence in this state again. That and reaffirm the blood right citizenship that we had till the mid 19th century.
File (): D2DBA94FB6E3C62D7B3ACCF7659CA561-119266.png (116.5 KB, 672x524, 1261299.png)
File (): 438314562FB1D5A4B970458007BB6D69-1653173.gif (1.6 MB, 1292x906, 1258488__suggestive_artist-colon-arareroll_princess luna_alternate hairstyle_animated_frown_funny_glare_-colon-p_plot_plot shake_raised t.gif)
File (): E87C79F9EDB2B56E019BAA16E0B5F72A-359252.png (350.8 KB, 1058x1500, 1256370__solo_clothes_solo female_blushing_suggestive_looking at you_plot_looking back_dock_cheerilee.png)
File (): 894B439D618EFEBF97A18D48D8C78F64-10314237.gif (9.8 MB, 810x1080, 1252507__explicit_artist-colon-htpot_artist-colon-ratofdrawn_applejack_absurd file size_absurd gif size_anatomically correct_animated_anu.gif)
File (): B9DDAF8324B73137DECFDF78481D090D-21055904.gif (20.1 MB, 960x960, 1247330.gif)
>>123974
The issue with monarchy is that it tends to be hereditary, and ignores potentially superior candidates for rulers in favor of blood-relations only.
Now, if you had an elective monarchy or just some form of dictatorship, I'd be on board with you.
The issue with monarchy is that it tends to be hereditary, and ignores potentially superior candidates for rulers in favor of blood-relations only.
Now, if you had an elective monarchy or just some form of dictatorship, I'd be on board with you.
File (): EDD07918D481133C805C08A0EAE493BC-158709.jpg (155.0 KB, 1000x1000, 0393 - LJ9Os.jpg)
File (): 6EB530CA76A7076064D0B877605B7610-159708.jpg (156.0 KB, 1000x1000, 0422 - 6Xv1m.jpg)
File (): 95E22DB5D8F2160724BAE30F5171C6DB-226956.jpg (221.6 KB, 990x1005, 0075-1359621869157.jpg)
File (): E91C1E56684D32C96239E34A193F8B86-512689.png (500.7 KB, 1366x1410, 0047-1359621129460.png)
File (): 8B3DC076933A9B53A59773652E4931C4-3257808.gif (3.1 MB, 1024x768, 1515825265631.gif)
File (): 3ED89E9CD5DDB4C8D77C7ADF9AD16AA4-72435.png (70.7 KB, 518x659, 1248414__solo_oc_anthro_solo female_breasts_suggestive_glasses_big breasts_cleavage_crystal pony.png)
File (): E4F0D1EE90AD63A7577D617317371D0E-483040.png (471.7 KB, 1920x1080, 1241427__solo_anthro_clothes_solo female_blushing_suggestive_cute_smiling_looking at you_floppy ears.png)
File (): D3BBA7610EA1FE27AB15904023238C73-15018236.gif (14.3 MB, 810x1080, 1240235.gif)
File (): C8E092DE6FFC57F0AE807FBB745ECDF8-18677760.gif (17.8 MB, 960x720, 1238890.gif)
File (): F853730C89460C8C7810E25EE5A10679-90972.gif (88.8 KB, 650x450, Twilight-Words.gif)
>>123928
>Reveals how dumb you are about how courts function. They never put in the books what they are doing in their legal legesse mumbo jumbo.
On the contrary, all of their "legalese mumbo jumbo" is on the books. At the federal level (and on the state level in every state but Louisiana), the US uses a common law system, whereby precedent from previous court decisions is used to form new court decisions. If none of this shit were written down, it would be impossible to cite in court.
The site I linked to you, law.justia.com, is one resource for looking up any US court decision, whether it be state or federal. If you want to cite a court decision, you would go there. If you wanted to cite a statute, you should look at law.cornell.edu, which hosts both the US Code, and the Uniform Commercial Code, among other important legal texts.
>That is because you cannot challenge them on jurisdiction while you accepted to be tried under their ship retard. You know nothing.
It wasn't a ship, it was a courthouse. In Amarillo, Texas. Around 550 miles away from the nearest body of water that could actually hold a US Navy ship. And the jurisdictional challenge was not denied on the grounds that he had accepted to be tried there, but on the grounds that, in the judge's own words, "decor is not a determinant for jurisdiction." In other words, the gold fringe on the flag does NOT imply that it is an admiralty court.
>>123933
A clue? I'm not here to play guessing games.
>Reveals how dumb you are about how courts function. They never put in the books what they are doing in their legal legesse mumbo jumbo.
On the contrary, all of their "legalese mumbo jumbo" is on the books. At the federal level (and on the state level in every state but Louisiana), the US uses a common law system, whereby precedent from previous court decisions is used to form new court decisions. If none of this shit were written down, it would be impossible to cite in court.
The site I linked to you, law.justia.com, is one resource for looking up any US court decision, whether it be state or federal. If you want to cite a court decision, you would go there. If you wanted to cite a statute, you should look at law.cornell.edu, which hosts both the US Code, and the Uniform Commercial Code, among other important legal texts.
>That is because you cannot challenge them on jurisdiction while you accepted to be tried under their ship retard. You know nothing.
It wasn't a ship, it was a courthouse. In Amarillo, Texas. Around 550 miles away from the nearest body of water that could actually hold a US Navy ship. And the jurisdictional challenge was not denied on the grounds that he had accepted to be tried there, but on the grounds that, in the judge's own words, "decor is not a determinant for jurisdiction." In other words, the gold fringe on the flag does NOT imply that it is an admiralty court.
>>123933
A clue? I'm not here to play guessing games.
>>123983
>It wasn't a ship, it was a courthouse
I think he was using a metaphor
Also, I may know the lawyer who tried the case you are talking about
>It wasn't a ship, it was a courthouse
I think he was using a metaphor
Also, I may know the lawyer who tried the case you are talking about
>>123986
The attorney I know was a city attorney in what I think was a civil matter or a basic traffic fine. The story I got about his encounters with these people claiming these were Admiralty courts was pretty based
The attorney I know was a city attorney in what I think was a civil matter or a basic traffic fine. The story I got about his encounters with these people claiming these were Admiralty courts was pretty based
So here's something interesting I just learned. I was trying to figure out where a case would be tried for admiralty jurisdictions and the answer is... in federal district courts!
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/28/1333
So yes, a federal court is an admiralty court... in addition to its normal functions for dealing with federal law. It would therefore make sense for it to have the gold-trimmed flag.
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/28/1333
So yes, a federal court is an admiralty court... in addition to its normal functions for dealing with federal law. It would therefore make sense for it to have the gold-trimmed flag.
Thank you , MLPOL. I have regained my confidence in this site.
File (): 8DBCAB0887FD5E69749D3E985986DA37-58273.jpg (56.9 KB, 640x800, Twilight-Yawn.jpg)
>>124047
I'm too autistic to let some retarded Korean talk like an idiot about US law and not prove him wrong.
I'm too autistic to let some retarded Korean talk like an idiot about US law and not prove him wrong.
>>124047
We just need something to argue over, a project to throw autism into, and some faggots to try and raid this place and then we'd be much more lively.
We just need something to argue over, a project to throw autism into, and some faggots to try and raid this place and then we'd be much more lively.
File (): 49D662CE656FA46BB9776187B85BA62C-501513.png (489.8 KB, 4033x3416, 240_preview.png)
>>123944
What a childish assertion. While you're away, I suggest cuz, I'm not arrogant enough to "assign homework" under a pretense may I suggest "The Constitution of No Authority" by Lysander Spooner?
I love it when anons act like they're "leaving" and then lurk their own threads
What a childish assertion. While you're away, I suggest cuz, I'm not arrogant enough to "assign homework" under a pretense may I suggest "The Constitution of No Authority" by Lysander Spooner?
I love it when anons act like they're "leaving" and then lurk their own threads
File (): 632D9CD46DF2AD0BEB7AD822D1B8C0A9-561004.png (547.9 KB, 1280x894, MKPony.png)
>>124068
Leslie Faire would be a better pic choice for that book. I'm planning on reading it once I get through Mein Kampf.
We need another book thread.
Leslie Faire would be a better pic choice for that book. I'm planning on reading it once I get through Mein Kampf.
We need another book thread.
File (): 9C0C85B241D2D2B99E2F603DF065BD00-124779.png (121.9 KB, 500x501, 1498592522201.png)
Okay, koreanon, I was being nice in your last thread, extending the olive branch like that, and now you've gone and trodden all over my very nice horsefuckers-in-arms. Not the best way to introduce yourself.
Apologize for your rudeness, make nice with the anons you've insulted, and make an effort to discuss things like a real person, mister.
Otherwise, I shall send you to your room without supper. And you will live to see man-made pasta horrors beyond your comprehension
Also fuck I missed the drama I'm so sorry fellas please forgive me
Apologize for your rudeness, make nice with the anons you've insulted, and make an effort to discuss things like a real person, mister.
Otherwise, I shall send you to your room without supper. And you will live to see man-made pasta horrors beyond your comprehension
Also fuck I missed the drama I'm so sorry fellas please forgive me
File (): 9EA3B93915812CDA6EBA822E92445D0F-2801733.png (2.7 MB, 1700x2250, 1458355.png)
File (): 73442DC81270E4DF94AE0FB87EDB6CC4-1446045.png (1.4 MB, 2223x2379, 487530.png)
File (): F047BF264F896654C42645828815ED7E-1820069.png (1.7 MB, 2380x1785, 1597775.png)
File (): 2AAE9206FB7B96BC8A3528F23E5E881E-3067391.png (2.9 MB, 1931x2732, 1495297.png)
File (): AC97677A44DAD58F7585E3D73FE5D2AB-1658567.png (1.6 MB, 1280x1531, 1640054.png)
File (): AA63F8FACB01E1B23A51D6BBB35A0B72-1353956.png (1.3 MB, 2000x2500, 1636366.png)
File (): 96E9CB6450D4871040D5EC5018F00E82-3817580.png (3.6 MB, 3200x2600, 1357791.png)
File (): 801CF0123088BC07F2916FEF971E889D-2734930.png (2.6 MB, 2815x3231, 1623166.png)
File (): B888957F4C51E2462DB260BC49328E86-2220725.png (2.1 MB, 3840x2160, 1321652.png)
File (): 76CF85587F918EC153B94E54A051D471-1300336.png (1.2 MB, 1563x1473, 1602605.png)
>>123974
What monarchy will work and not turn into a despot rule such as China and communist countries?
What monarchy will work and not turn into a despot rule such as China and communist countries?
>>123983
>At the federal level (and on the state level in every state but Louisiana), the US uses a common law system, whereby precedent from previous court decisions is used to form new court decisions. If none of this shit were written down, it would be impossible to cite in court.
All common law courts were shut-down prior to the U.S. Civil war, which never ended. Now all federal courts are admiralty courts as we are in secret martial law and state of emergency. You still do not get it. Try to defend yourself under the Constitution and common law in a Federal Admiralty court and you will fail.
"It wasn't a ship, it was a courthouse. "
You do not understand the concept how court houses under Admiralty law are ships and you are the carcass on their ship. So you cannot challenge jurisdiction while you are on the ship of the admiralty court. I bumped the clue again.
>At the federal level (and on the state level in every state but Louisiana), the US uses a common law system, whereby precedent from previous court decisions is used to form new court decisions. If none of this shit were written down, it would be impossible to cite in court.
All common law courts were shut-down prior to the U.S. Civil war, which never ended. Now all federal courts are admiralty courts as we are in secret martial law and state of emergency. You still do not get it. Try to defend yourself under the Constitution and common law in a Federal Admiralty court and you will fail.
"It wasn't a ship, it was a courthouse. "
You do not understand the concept how court houses under Admiralty law are ships and you are the carcass on their ship. So you cannot challenge jurisdiction while you are on the ship of the admiralty court. I bumped the clue again.
>>123992
They are admiralty courts but do not come-out and admit iit.
See this here, confirmed:
>>123998
>>124049
I am not Korean and I have already proven you wrong porn fags.
>>124068
You are the one making childish assertions.
>>124088
You ignored all the anons attacking and insulting me. They get back what they ask for. So stop it now.
They are admiralty courts but do not come-out and admit iit.
See this here, confirmed:
>>123998
>>124049
I am not Korean and I have already proven you wrong porn fags.
>>124068
You are the one making childish assertions.
>>124088
You ignored all the anons attacking and insulting me. They get back what they ask for. So stop it now.
>>124285
Ya, like stealing land and then creating a patent on it using their foreign title of nobility, defending criminals like the AWAN brothers and other things.
Ya, like stealing land and then creating a patent on it using their foreign title of nobility, defending criminals like the AWAN brothers and other things.
I am the one who has been proven correct so everyone who offended and attack me, OWES ME THE APOLOGY, NOT THE OTHER WAY AROUND!
File (): EFF154AB13430437E9755A6B152E4020-237826.png (232.3 KB, 1000x1000, 1520053837818-1.png)
File (): 8366F3A055195A1FF414E38AE9EF6AF7-3943395.png (3.8 MB, 3860x2560, 1520053837818-0.png)
File (): F6538954AEBD3A3B3C386E0059B748B6-478336.png (467.1 KB, 1626x1153, 1520053837818-2.png)
File (): E5F52C8724EA3BE4EC9E064174999774-465237.jpg (454.3 KB, 2333x2507, 1519919198457-2.jpg)
File (): B7B5BFA450306C6B7EB37B76F4C8CDF3-6695436.gif (6.4 MB, 878x1024, 1519729520921-0.gif)
Back for more delicious pony pussy? I know you are.
Rail-roading attempts still not working...only helps visibility, thanks.
>>124298
We don’t owe you shit. Just give your info and leave. Have a nice day.
We don’t owe you shit. Just give your info and leave. Have a nice day.
File (): 4DCC8AF314217F06AD03CD5C761339EC-8674930.gif (8.3 MB, 1032x720, 1519192356730-4.gif)
File (): D9369D6D8B158385277D86D0255BEB88-68860.png (67.2 KB, 781x656, 1520046890381.png)
File (): 36D3B9AC2397BDACF2CF43850DC0BF52-9713691.gif (9.3 MB, 850x817, 1519058603816-1.gif)
>>124307
The key to any nice day is enjoy the board and not be autistic about your position. So please continue, it’s down right funny.
The key to any nice day is enjoy the board and not be autistic about your position. So please continue, it’s down right funny.
>>124289
Upon being questioned in your first thread, you insulted the anons.
Upon being questioned in this thread, you insulted the anons.
And now you're surprised when they insult you back?
Do unto others as you would have them do unto you.
I'll expect your apology in your next thread.
Upon being questioned in your first thread, you insulted the anons.
Upon being questioned in this thread, you insulted the anons.
And now you're surprised when they insult you back?
Do unto others as you would have them do unto you.
I'll expect your apology in your next thread.
File (): 0101E4C0773A9F4419462E0151FC1793-582301.png (568.7 KB, 800x868, Twilight-SexyCoworker.png)
>>124286
>>124289
>>124290
I love how you make 3 fucking posts to respond to what I have to say despite the fact that /mlpol/ allows posts as large as 6000 characters.
Now look, you clearly don't understand anything about how the law works. You're not a lawyer, and you don't read any legal texts. While I will disclose that I am also not a lawyer, and nothing I say should ever be construed to be legal advice, I can say that all the shit you are talking about is nonsense and contradicts not only the laws on the books, but also the laws that are practiced. The very fact that the Supreme Court makes judgments based on the constitution, and that all federal courts interpret the US Code as is, rather than by the rules of admiralty, should give you a clue to the fact that you are very much wrong.
Yes, federal district courts do have the ability to hold admiralty cases. That might be why they have the gold fringed flag. But that does not mean that all cases tried there are held under the jurisdiction of admiralty law. In the case I cited for you, the judge denied the right to challenge jurisdiction on the grounds that the reasoning for the challenge was fallacious. Which law is employed in the court is not determined by the courthouse's decorum. If it were based on the fact that you can't challenge jurisdiction while in the courthouse, he would have said so. Except that would contradict existing precedence. There have been successful challenges to federal jurisdiction in the past. This would not be possible if, as you so claim, all federal courts are exclusively admiralty courts, and that it is not possible to challenge jurisdiction in an admiralty court.
>>124289
>>124290
I love how you make 3 fucking posts to respond to what I have to say despite the fact that /mlpol/ allows posts as large as 6000 characters.
Now look, you clearly don't understand anything about how the law works. You're not a lawyer, and you don't read any legal texts. While I will disclose that I am also not a lawyer, and nothing I say should ever be construed to be legal advice, I can say that all the shit you are talking about is nonsense and contradicts not only the laws on the books, but also the laws that are practiced. The very fact that the Supreme Court makes judgments based on the constitution, and that all federal courts interpret the US Code as is, rather than by the rules of admiralty, should give you a clue to the fact that you are very much wrong.
Yes, federal district courts do have the ability to hold admiralty cases. That might be why they have the gold fringed flag. But that does not mean that all cases tried there are held under the jurisdiction of admiralty law. In the case I cited for you, the judge denied the right to challenge jurisdiction on the grounds that the reasoning for the challenge was fallacious. Which law is employed in the court is not determined by the courthouse's decorum. If it were based on the fact that you can't challenge jurisdiction while in the courthouse, he would have said so. Except that would contradict existing precedence. There have been successful challenges to federal jurisdiction in the past. This would not be possible if, as you so claim, all federal courts are exclusively admiralty courts, and that it is not possible to challenge jurisdiction in an admiralty court.
>>124316
>Yes, federal district courts do have the ability to hold admiralty cases.
They are admiralty courts by definition. I am not going to waste any time arguing with you. Get lost.
"Which law is employed in the court is not determined by the courthouse's decorum. "
You liar piece of shit get lost.
All Federal courts are admiralty courts you piece of shit liar you.
>Yes, federal district courts do have the ability to hold admiralty cases.
They are admiralty courts by definition. I am not going to waste any time arguing with you. Get lost.
"Which law is employed in the court is not determined by the courthouse's decorum. "
You liar piece of shit get lost.
All Federal courts are admiralty courts you piece of shit liar you.
>>124316
B-but relation-SHIP, birth CANAL, NAVAL, birth CERTIFICATE, which according to a banking terms dictionary implies ownership, therefore we MUST be boats right? It's the only explanation that makes sense, and if you disagree you're just a shill.
B-but relation-SHIP, birth CANAL, NAVAL, birth CERTIFICATE, which according to a banking terms dictionary implies ownership, therefore we MUST be boats right? It's the only explanation that makes sense, and if you disagree you're just a shill.
>>124334
You only become owned if you agree to their shit. You can separate yourself from their ship.
You only become owned if you agree to their shit. You can separate yourself from their ship.
File (): 5DE68A7B8F7140A3CFEF3F42AACB660F-69771.jpg (68.1 KB, 800x800, 1204646__safe_shipping_blushing_comic_lesbian_edit_kissing_incest_marble pie_wet mane.jpg)
File (): A1FC601697290EDBE86EE6765D25785D-24140423.gif (23.0 MB, 720x959, 1197303.gif)
File (): 1F214E463D40F6AA997DEE52B119C59C-24152764.gif (23.0 MB, 756x420, 1191107.gif)
File (): CE66ABE7DAC238E25DC706E3A3440D84-192957.jpg (188.4 KB, 1000x1000, 1177427__suggestive_artist-colon-sharpy_apple bloom_scootaloo_sweetie belle_blushing_cutie mark crusaders_implied foalcon_plot.jpg)
File (): 66F85D94171D0B4331A14D822C66D1AE-33737.png (32.9 KB, 523x438, 1176438 - Button_Mash Friendship_is_Magic My_Little_Pony tiarawhy.png)
File (): DEDE89CA8BBB08154D1C9906241A5F1A-250860.jpg (245.0 KB, 1000x1000, 1172927 - Apple_Bloom Cradeelcin Cutie_Mark_Crusaders Friendship_is_Magic My_Little_Pony Scootaloo Sweetie_Belle.jpg)
File (): B0C38A726663C3533C5890A2091DB226-21983.gif (21.5 KB, 350x400, 1169752__solo_nudity_fluttershy_anthro_monochrome_breasts_questionable_animated_nipples_text.gif)
File (): 72214D9A917481736C04DFF01A6FD154-291196.png (284.4 KB, 1280x1302, 1165245.png)
File (): 152DECE9EC25EB2850D0C6E665668545-4581321.jpg (4.4 MB, 3673x2113, 1162893__explicit_artist-colon-sodiav_applejack_aftersex_anal creampie_anus_applebutt_balls_bedroom eyes_blushing_creampie_cum_dock_femal.jpg)
File (): 859F5C483A35DCBFFE6A55CBE24456D6-899533.png (878.5 KB, 2194x1970, 1160104.png)
File (): 8289A0797117CA7CEECB8F6A67897A0B-149146.png (145.7 KB, 1910x1080, 1150741.png)
File (): ABC6F6C312B6A129C6F1DAB98D9B38B9-48475.png (47.3 KB, 625x487, 1153039__suggestive_artist-colon-shoutingisfun_oc_bedroom eyes_belly button_blushing_burger_chubby_draw me like one of your french girls_.png)
File (): EAC237B1003911E134794DC570B03128-5907196.png (5.6 MB, 2601x3369, 1143581.png)
File (): 1CED1BDEA6E701FA204E4D0EE9603AB6-119213.gif (116.4 KB, 560x420, 1143474.gif)
File (): A6A90DA2E5FDB8D062FAE8C7A1834B2C-131595.png (128.5 KB, 796x775, 1136607__solo_oc_oc only_suggestive_edit_plot_unicorn_underhoof_ass_collar.png)
File (): AB913194B99470A517C6BF21C05826A6-10096896.gif (9.6 MB, 718x404, 1131351__solo_rainbow dash_solo female_suggestive_animated_looking at you_plot_3d_source filmmaker_dancing.gif)
File (): 223868498BAF74AD18FEA544D4EFDD47-919433.png (897.9 KB, 1280x905, 1122547 - Apple_Bloom Cutie_Mark_Crusaders Featherweight Friendship_is_Magic My_Little_Pony Pipsqueak Rumble Scootaloo Sweetie_Belle smog.png)
File (): 1D85F67EED53C4CCDB34FB78CA9F2D6C-370065.png (361.4 KB, 1500x1560, 1117759.png)
File (): 3F3A505C2801D29FD0D081775682AFC9-56462.jpg (55.1 KB, 1024x768, 1116181.jpg)
File (): 991A17064A6920AB25EE4E6C1A6262AF-2181988.jpg (2.1 MB, 1968x2080, 1097366.jpg)
File (): 0F59A2633C4D8D91B4902B4197FC9CFE-393165.png (384.0 KB, 1280x720, Pinkie_Pie_holding_popcorn_S1E04.png)
File (): D422B3DB582393399020019E567E0568-262263.png (256.1 KB, 451x412, 1514929012562.png)
File (): D4F95470DCE262228B65693705FC87DD-159388.png (155.7 KB, 486x603, 1088820__suggestive_artist-colon-whydomenhavenipples_twilight sparkle_oc_oc-colon-anon_oc-colon-filly anon_abuse_age regression_assisted .png)
File (): 3B5EDD880F429D30CEF13927B8CD6AC5-381347.jpg (372.4 KB, 1600x1200, 1083899__suggestive_artist-colon-jcosneverexisted_moondancer_twilight sparkle_-dot--dot--dot-_30 minute art challenge_anthro_belly button.jpg)
File (): 61CAB517F217C5BE2A92E573904FA62B-90179.png (88.1 KB, 412x517, 1082166__suggestive_artist-colon-mcsadat_sweetie belle_ahegao_blushing_colored_drool_foalcon_open mouth_simple background_solo_solo femal.png)
File (): 651685AF03C9BBC3836508D30931F4C3-1714921.png (1.6 MB, 1273x1873, 1066245__solo_anthro_applejack_clothes_solo female_suggestive_plot_panties_underhoof_ass.png)
File (): E1E4716679FAE1DC2CF89BADE8B04CBB-1317097.png (1.3 MB, 1068x2096, 1062207.png)
File (): 6D402F18D9EC5E51E4CC9BB57EAC09FC-400370.png (391.0 KB, 3000x3000, 1056911__questionable_artist-colon-vectorfag_oc_oc-colon-aryanne_oc only_bipedal_bondage_collar_female_implied bdsm_leash_looking at you_.png)
File (): 5A300B333F146386E395AEDBE6788CC9-784054.png (765.7 KB, 2692x2508, 1056906__suggestive_artist-colon-badumsquish_derpibooru exclusive_twilight sparkle_twilight sparkle (alicorn)_-colon-__body swap_dialogue.png)
File (): DAEEFDADBFFB5F65210AE85130902D27-396763.png (387.5 KB, 900x900, 1047284__suggestive_artist-colon-alorix_arizona cow_velvet reindeer_blushing_community related_cow_deer_eyes on the prize_hot springs_les.png)
File (): 6E6E95A7FB3B949A8E40F2BABCBC54D3-78929.png (77.1 KB, 200x255, 1518505114777.png)
File (): D81B3E4707396FC92FC9A1A259B17F86-96339.png (94.1 KB, 500x500, Twilight-SeenSomeShit.png)
>>124319
>They are admiralty courts by definition. I am not going to waste any time arguing with you. Get lost.
Article III of the US Constitution and the Judiciary Act of 1789 both confirm that the federal courts have jurisdiction over the cases of admiralty, but neither makes any claim that admiralty law is the only law practiced in those courts. The very fact that so many cases tried in US courts every day use common law precedent to draw their conclusions means that we cannot be under admiralty law. Simply put, we would all be running our cases by an incorrect procedure if that were the case.
>You liar piece of shit get lost
I literally pulled that straight from judicial precedent.
>>124334
I remember once being told that my birth certificate had a bond number associated with it that could be found on the back or whatever. Looked all over that damn thing front and back, couldn't find anything.
People believe way too much horse shit, and should probably take a BAR exam before trying to spout that everything the layman understands about law is incorrect.
>They are admiralty courts by definition. I am not going to waste any time arguing with you. Get lost.
Article III of the US Constitution and the Judiciary Act of 1789 both confirm that the federal courts have jurisdiction over the cases of admiralty, but neither makes any claim that admiralty law is the only law practiced in those courts. The very fact that so many cases tried in US courts every day use common law precedent to draw their conclusions means that we cannot be under admiralty law. Simply put, we would all be running our cases by an incorrect procedure if that were the case.
>You liar piece of shit get lost
I literally pulled that straight from judicial precedent.
>>124334
I remember once being told that my birth certificate had a bond number associated with it that could be found on the back or whatever. Looked all over that damn thing front and back, couldn't find anything.
People believe way too much horse shit, and should probably take a BAR exam before trying to spout that everything the layman understands about law is incorrect.
>>124355
>Article III of the US Constitution and the Judiciary Act of 1789 b
Because the treason took place after the Civil War is why.
"I literally pulled that straight from judicial precedent."
Sorry, but you are pulling things from the wrong place.
And yes your birth certificate is associated with a TDA account. Get lost with your lies.
>Article III of the US Constitution and the Judiciary Act of 1789 b
Because the treason took place after the Civil War is why.
"I literally pulled that straight from judicial precedent."
Sorry, but you are pulling things from the wrong place.
And yes your birth certificate is associated with a TDA account. Get lost with your lies.
File (): 482C81CD291837D43D2716E0A6224850-306443.png (299.3 KB, 900x692, 1016594__solo_suggestive_cute_bedroom eyes_looking back_bed_artist-colon-radiantrealm_spoiled rich_backside.png)
File (): 1C98CBAA8A5A3BED0BE95230F33CC59C-108582.jpg (106.0 KB, 920x737, 1015161__explicit_artist-colon-randy_edit_oc_oc-colon-aryanne_oc only_bipedal_blushing_boom_chest fluff_clothes_cum_ear fluff_explosion_f.jpg)
File (): 957EBC8E322E6FC15E98D6C2F5390EE7-24915814.gif (23.8 MB, 860x484, 1003487.gif)
File (): 74596296D2B044A1D5033A85C78480CE-2184516.png (2.1 MB, 2200x2000, 998049.png)
Well, I've got to get off for now. Family is coming over and I fear they wouldn't take too kindly to horsepussy. Fellas, keep up the porn dumping, will ya?
>>124356
I,ɯ snɹǝ ᴉɟ ʎon ɹǝdǝɐʇ ᴉʇ ǝuonƃɥ ʇᴉɯǝs' ᴉʇ,ll ǝʌǝuʇnɐllʎ ɔoɯǝ ʇɹnǝ˙
Even upside down, the chant should work.
I,ɯ snɹǝ ᴉɟ ʎon ɹǝdǝɐʇ ᴉʇ ǝuonƃɥ ʇᴉɯǝs' ᴉʇ,ll ǝʌǝuʇnɐllʎ ɔoɯǝ ʇɹnǝ˙
Even upside down, the chant should work.
>>124360
˙ǝnɹʇ ǝɯoɔ ʎllɐnʇuǝʌǝ ll,ʇᴉ 'sǝɯᴉʇ ɥƃnouǝ ʇᴉ ʇɐǝdǝɹ noʎ ɟᴉ ǝɹns ɯ,I
I do believe it's time for a thread theme.
[YouTube] Pendulum - The Other Side [Lyrics]![]()
˙ǝnɹʇ ǝɯoɔ ʎllɐnʇuǝʌǝ ll,ʇᴉ 'sǝɯᴉʇ ɥƃnouǝ ʇᴉ ʇɐǝdǝɹ noʎ ɟᴉ ǝɹns ɯ,I
I do believe it's time for a thread theme.
[YouTube] Pendulum - The Other Side [Lyrics]
File (): 78D8CF7B87D2A4BAD7D511CAC81CD60D-157426.png (153.7 KB, 500x677, Twilight-Ponytail.png)
>>124358
Do you have any evidence of this treason occurring? Do you have any evidence of a standard US legal case being tried under admiralty law? How would the 1.22 million lawyers in the US keep secret the fact that everything they have read in the US constitution, the US Code, and the Supreme Court's judicial precedent, are all completely illegitimate and not actually usable in a court of law?
>>124363
Did you even read my post? Like actually process the meaning of the individual words put together within the context of each other? Or did you just see that I contradicted you and somehow felt the need to repeat what you just said (which I had countered), rather than addressing the points I made?
Do you have any evidence of this treason occurring? Do you have any evidence of a standard US legal case being tried under admiralty law? How would the 1.22 million lawyers in the US keep secret the fact that everything they have read in the US constitution, the US Code, and the Supreme Court's judicial precedent, are all completely illegitimate and not actually usable in a court of law?
>>124363
Did you even read my post? Like actually process the meaning of the individual words put together within the context of each other? Or did you just see that I contradicted you and somehow felt the need to repeat what you just said (which I had countered), rather than addressing the points I made?
File (): DC0EAC2CA80F1AD46C56FED8072E495B-145237.jpg (141.8 KB, 900x600, 045E2F78-21AC-498C-9265-9CD7E57AFD65.jpeg)
>>124365
˙ǝnɹʇ ǝɯoɔ ʎllɐnʇuǝʌǝ ll,ʇᴉ 'sǝɯᴉʇ ɥƃnouǝ ʇᴉ ʇɐǝdǝɹ noʎ ɟᴉ ǝɹns ɯ,I
Maybe if you say it in Russian enough times, you will make your delusion come true.
˙ǝnɹʇ ǝɯoɔ ʎllɐnʇuǝʌǝ ll,ʇᴉ 'sǝɯᴉʇ ɥƃnouǝ ʇᴉ ʇɐǝdǝɹ noʎ ɟᴉ ǝɹns ɯ,I
Maybe if you say it in Russian enough times, you will make your delusion come true.
File (): 894E209AB71300A845B7A13063C751B0-620593.png (606.0 KB, 1600x1067, The caption for this was _AU Pinkie in jail_.png)
>>124279
>What monarchy will work and not turn into a despot rule such as China and communist countries?
>China and communist countries
I think you answered your own question anon. China isn't a monarchy its a single party dictatorship which both have very different forms of legitimacy and succession.
>What monarchy will work and not turn into a despot rule such as China and communist countries?
>China and communist countries
I think you answered your own question anon. China isn't a monarchy its a single party dictatorship which both have very different forms of legitimacy and succession.
File (): 3C0DFD424FADFF7EF47B447A62E2CD8A-1801508.png (1.7 MB, 2250x2250, 1564711.png)
File (): 1241B0253825FED7BE08E0D4EB209161-4034566.png (3.8 MB, 1931x2732, 1495298.png)
File (): 0632C17BD3E5EBDE26324CC3448100FE-2327848.png (2.2 MB, 2500x1684, 1227788.png)
File (): C7C08A60965F2DCCE8C2292335DF2F5D-4522223.png (4.3 MB, 3000x2846, 1304430.png)
File (): AAB175739BEC25F4A2B653B637C8B2D1-1372088.png (1.3 MB, 1650x1275, 1334407.png)
>>124369
Lawyers are not taught in school that U.C.C. and case law is actually a cover for Admiralty law.
And yes, I read what you wrote but you still do not get it.
Lawyers are not taught in school that U.C.C. and case law is actually a cover for Admiralty law.
And yes, I read what you wrote but you still do not get it.
>>124367
Я уверен, что если вы повторите это достаточно времени, это со временем осуществится.
>>124371
Я впевнений, що якщо ви повторюєте це достатньо разів, це зрештою збудеться.
Я уверен, что если вы повторите это достаточно времени, это со временем осуществится.
>>124371
Я впевнений, що якщо ви повторюєте це достатньо разів, це зрештою збудеться.
>>124372
>>China and communist countries
Read my lips.
1. China.
2. Communist countries.
Two separate items on the list yet China is communist and a single party dictatorship but I did not say it is a monarchy. You read into what I wrote.
>>China and communist countries
Read my lips.
1. China.
2. Communist countries.
Two separate items on the list yet China is communist and a single party dictatorship but I did not say it is a monarchy. You read into what I wrote.
File (): B231EA6A2DC1F71A093D30CDF72411FB-143743.jpg (140.4 KB, 899x889, 241547AE-0FD2-4003-8442-DDF32CBC40B9.jpeg)
>>124375
>tfw worst Korea can’t tell Confederates from monarchists
But hey, that could work too. I’m just the secede kind of guy though.
>tfw worst Korea can’t tell Confederates from monarchists
But hey, that could work too. I’m just the secede kind of guy though.
File (): D62ACD3F2F67709A3A7F926D5497D24C-258820.png (252.8 KB, 1438x1391, Twilight-SexyGlasses.png)
>>124365
>Pendulum
Good taste, leaf friend.
>>124374
If lawyers are not taught that the law that is being practiced is wrong, then why are they not contradicted by judges when they make their legal arguments on the basis of what they have learned in school and been tested on by the BAR exam?
>>124373
More Glim Glam please.
>Pendulum
Good taste, leaf friend.
>>124374
If lawyers are not taught that the law that is being practiced is wrong, then why are they not contradicted by judges when they make their legal arguments on the basis of what they have learned in school and been tested on by the BAR exam?
>>124373
More Glim Glam please.
>>124381
They are not contracted by the judges because they are only doing what they have been taught to do and do not know it - follow case law, U.C.C (and secretively Admiralty law without knowing it).
They are not contracted by the judges because they are only doing what they have been taught to do and do not know it - follow case law, U.C.C (and secretively Admiralty law without knowing it).
File (): 5D2A992D9FBAF8911278AA96EF7D6729-287087.png (280.4 KB, 759x819, Twilicorn-Pretzel.png)
And while we're on that subject, what do you know about the process by which people become judges in the United States, particularly at the federal level?
File (): B3857BBD605E880AACE645CC25506E5E-1983429.png (1.9 MB, 1650x1800, 1470862.png)
File (): F370936583DC28B799DB28A79F08CD49-2589287.jpg (2.5 MB, 2801x1827, 1392627.jpeg)
File (): 901B20CC78BCDE5EB4C29DA217B4C07B-1997814.jpg (1.9 MB, 2480x2246, 1550458.jpeg)
File (): 9A74E7BDA933F2B59C51AF5D85B69D74-224755.png (219.5 KB, 1096x1024, 1505005821285.png)
>>124379
Re-state what you said, not sure if its a language barrier but I have no idea what you just said.
Re-state what you said, not sure if its a language barrier but I have no idea what you just said.
>>124380
Succeed into a new king of gov that is not what we have without going back to the Constitution of 1787 is what then? Someone suggested the solution would be a monarchy, not me.
Succeed into a new king of gov that is not what we have without going back to the Constitution of 1787 is what then? Someone suggested the solution would be a monarchy, not me.
File (): 3060DDA2C222FD286D1C30087928736C-537022.png (524.4 KB, 876x613, 1512367460681.png)
Judges, bar members, all members of the same click of power given foreign titles of nobility (by the British Crown, the VAtican whom they serve actually)...consider the Vicar Generals also.
File (): 2D2C106CFCA4E133C0B8FDF10539ECDD-142625.png (139.3 KB, 895x1024, 1509228057469.png)
>>124395
Enlighten me anon to my original point and from here on in how I'm trying to use words to entrap you?
Enlighten me anon to my original point and from here on in how I'm trying to use words to entrap you?
File (): E20A0423C6850567089B4925172FB573-106038.jpg (103.6 KB, 746x894, 1484930544216.jpg)
File (): B214CDE32E6A173E164F7F166957CA75-254875.png (248.9 KB, 372x349, 1484933655175.png)
File (): 4005865B7B8569ACCDB730B1E9622356-841547.png (821.8 KB, 1054x964, 1484933655596.png)
File (): C9B3495452483432FB8275E0A61E212A-890325.png (869.5 KB, 640x1136, 1485707042809.png)
File (): 99AF05D53B45C0A4109AAE7761D585EF-324509.png (316.9 KB, 1793x1313, 1478706849316.png)
>>124382
Я҉ ҉вп҉евнений, щ҉о҉ я҉к҉що в҉и повт҉орює҉т҉е це достатньо разів҉, це зр҉ешто҉҉ю ҉збуд҉еться҉.
Я҉ ҉вп҉евнений, щ҉о҉ я҉к҉що в҉и повт҉орює҉т҉е це достатньо разів҉, це зр҉ешто҉҉ю ҉збуд҉еться҉.
File (): F149A788A58063915EE91928D1B6F057-162735.png (158.9 KB, 1000x667, 264564564356.png)
>>124406
Yet again not sure if its a language barrier or not but I have no idea what your saying is my point.
Yet again not sure if its a language barrier or not but I have no idea what your saying is my point.
>>124408
Does not matter. The fact is, all I am saying is 100% correct. If you do not understand, it is because you need to research this as I have...
Does not matter. The fact is, all I am saying is 100% correct. If you do not understand, it is because you need to research this as I have...
File (): 785B183F24036D008D8EB43D151E34A7-52442.png (51.2 KB, 509x444, 1OXnZhj.png)
File (): 89417AC6099C18B5DA4E2AF48465FED8-198358.jpg (193.7 KB, 1002x1190, 1463734140072.jpg)
File (): F444CD32468EB4DE895646B74C987765-428100.png (418.1 KB, 726x748, 1469536556203.png)
File (): 514E174C87F18514C17970BD01916CC2-513543.jpg (501.5 KB, 2000x1000, 1469538355769.jpg)
File (): FED6C8AEF09F229180E3E727F14E68CD-10832.jpg (10.6 KB, 206x258, 1487272945519.jpg)
>>124407
>like holy shit you literally can't talk about this until you've studied at least 9000 hours in Judeo-Wymyn's Studies you literal rapist shitlxrd
>like holy shit you literally can't talk about this until you've studied at least 9000 hours in Judeo-Wymyn's Studies you literal rapist shitlxrd
File (): C28568DED43C2DCD8D3ED786C45C618B-177731.png (173.6 KB, 900x1001, Twilight-LookingUpAtYou.png)
>>124386
So if admiralty law comes in conflict with the law being practiced by the lawyers, and the judges accept the legal arguments based on the non-admiralty law, in what way can you claim that the law being practiced is admiralty law?
If everyone is playing that same charade that the US law is the law of the land, in what way is it no the law of the land?
>>124392
If an individual wants to become a judge, they must first be a lawyer. You have admitted that lawyers are taught a false standard of the law. But if the false standard is what they know, then surely the judges who come from the same stock as those lawyers would also know and practice the false standard.
I am curious where you think that it is along a judge's career path, after graduating from law school, that they end up being taught that it is actually admiralty law, and exclusively admiralty law, that is to be practiced in US courts.
>>124394
To become a judge at any level in the federal courts, one must be appointed by the President of the United States. Neither the British Government nor the Vatican have any authority in this matter. And if you claim I am lying in this matter, let me ask you a question: what would happen if the British queen gave Donald Trump an order and he disobeyed? Would they declare war? Their military is weaker than ours and they would lose. Would they challenge him in court? Which laws would they cite? If we consider that the judges in question were pulled from a stock that only knows the same standard of law commonly understood by the public, how would they guarantee that the case would be tried under their "true" standard of law, rather than the one we've all tacitly accepted?
So if admiralty law comes in conflict with the law being practiced by the lawyers, and the judges accept the legal arguments based on the non-admiralty law, in what way can you claim that the law being practiced is admiralty law?
If everyone is playing that same charade that the US law is the law of the land, in what way is it no the law of the land?
>>124392
If an individual wants to become a judge, they must first be a lawyer. You have admitted that lawyers are taught a false standard of the law. But if the false standard is what they know, then surely the judges who come from the same stock as those lawyers would also know and practice the false standard.
I am curious where you think that it is along a judge's career path, after graduating from law school, that they end up being taught that it is actually admiralty law, and exclusively admiralty law, that is to be practiced in US courts.
>>124394
To become a judge at any level in the federal courts, one must be appointed by the President of the United States. Neither the British Government nor the Vatican have any authority in this matter. And if you claim I am lying in this matter, let me ask you a question: what would happen if the British queen gave Donald Trump an order and he disobeyed? Would they declare war? Their military is weaker than ours and they would lose. Would they challenge him in court? Which laws would they cite? If we consider that the judges in question were pulled from a stock that only knows the same standard of law commonly understood by the public, how would they guarantee that the case would be tried under their "true" standard of law, rather than the one we've all tacitly accepted?
Goodbye will be back in a week. Do your homework kiddies. Maybe you will learn a lesson or two. And get lost fucktards.
File (): 3FC5729D3369FB27B8474A503789C54C-718593.gif (701.8 KB, 598x405, 1517674869674.gif)
File (): CC79E473D93A8ACA3FCFAF5C654AD4D8-337485.png (329.6 KB, 540x584, 1513130677032.png)
File (): A59CB4FCC3F35899974829B7DD9BA8A2-68266.jpg (66.7 KB, 631x445, 1502564760865.jpg)
File (): 49B2E9D1C8A4DC3E2D513ACE295E06FF-1770220.gif (1.7 MB, 480x539, 1516957195378.gif)
File (): 98BBC775DA7182CD16F8C5490729BDD0-406574.gif (397.0 KB, 562x540, 1511462208986.gif)
File (): B5687C84CE825D3836242C0CA87C5B2F-255703.png (249.7 KB, 1280x720, 1516174280666.png)
File (): 9E7A81223D0DF0F0E8232E25932A7E0A-255499.png (249.5 KB, 1280x1291, Twilight-Angry.png)
God fucking dammit.
How am I supposed to win with Socratic questioning if you don't answer my fucking questions?
How am I supposed to win with Socratic questioning if you don't answer my fucking questions?
File (): D05D84B4391757913103874F9B8A7C2A-862310.gif (842.1 KB, 480x270, 1519579571447.gif)
What the hell is going on in this thread?
File (): 44D96720AC81C4035915E8FEDE8C75B3-374071.png (365.3 KB, 828x900, 148136__UNOPT__.png)
>>124431
Chink Chank Chong can't speak English and is super paranoid and wants a lot of (you)s.
Tl;dr rule 10.
Chink Chank Chong can't speak English and is super paranoid and wants a lot of (you)s.
Tl;dr rule 10.
File (): 44CEE40A4775A901643BF4A903F973C8-146652.jpg (143.2 KB, 665x665, 1504622288676.jpg)
File (): 25277F1129DE8CD129EF6589006285FD-301019.jpg (294.0 KB, 468x700, damnit pinkie.jpg)
File (): 7A7C8B0137FC0FA1EB55F2DB84041DAD-1861204.png (1.8 MB, 1949x1714, 546575634523.png)
>>124444
>Only the Diogenes Approach will work.
So basically... posting porn all day and telling him to fuck off?
>Only the Diogenes Approach will work.
So basically... posting porn all day and telling him to fuck off?
File (): F09E0A65D490A275BB7985310F520A82-401471.png (392.1 KB, 640x640, 3456789.png)
File (): 881074525279A75C3B0EF2EF56891E41-478855.gif (467.6 KB, 960x1040, 1515824576740.gif)
>124454
The absolute madman keeps posting!
The absolute madman keeps posting!
File (): E77E2A5FA980B1F7EA7D76B8F6E2F660-85250.jpg (83.3 KB, 960x960, 1503527781689-0.jpg)
>>124450
Now you're getting it!
Linguistic and ideological jiu-jitsu is the favoured approach, however. For example:
'a man is a featherless biped'
'BEHOLD, I HAVE BROUGHT YOU A MAN!'
'do your homework on this vague topic, random person on the Internet, I COMMAND YOU!'
'LITERALLY LIKE IT'S NOT MY JOB TO EDUCATE YOU, YOU ABSOLUTE NAZI RAPPIST SHITLXRD'
Now you're getting it!
Linguistic and ideological jiu-jitsu is the favoured approach, however. For example:
'a man is a featherless biped'
'BEHOLD, I HAVE BROUGHT YOU A MAN!'
'do your homework on this vague topic, random person on the Internet, I COMMAND YOU!'
'LITERALLY LIKE IT'S NOT MY JOB TO EDUCATE YOU, YOU ABSOLUTE NAZI RAPPIST SHITLXRD'
>>124465
>>124466
>>124467
>>124469
>Korean switches to a Jap VPN to make it appear he has "support".
>>124466
>>124467
>>124469
>Korean switches to a Jap VPN to make it appear he has "support".
File (): AD55C617BEEA09B40845491DC288CB25-4444332.mp3 (4.2 MB, , 12 Kill Yourself.mp3)
>>124467
I've always been a strong believer in leading by example.
I've always been a strong believer in leading by example.
>>124476
Shit, you got banned, Koreanon?
Mods, think you missed a spot.
Shit, you got banned, Koreanon?
Mods, think you missed a spot.
>>124482
>ADMITTING YOU ARE USING A VPN TO ESCAPE A BAN
>ADMITTING YOU ARE USING A VPN TO ESCAPE A BAN
>>124482
>I was banned
So you confirm yourself to be the same one?
>I was banned
So you confirm yourself to be the same one?
File (): 261EFD01755A14F0604E80C067AE5564-22758.png (22.2 KB, 1280x280, banlist.PNG)
File (): A2085FE9BC1EC6AFC26B10DE4E16C860-335518.jpg (327.7 KB, 843x658, 14214141298.jpg)
>124482
File (): 2C82FB25C7C9F7A5822E1627054BC9F0-5998003.webm (5.7 MB, Resolution:1280x720 Length:00:00:32, shiningtwioral.webm) [play once] [loop]
>He was ban evading
Okay, this thread is now a porn thread.
Okay, this thread is now a porn thread.
>>124493
동성애자
ホモ
Fag.
동성애자
ホモ
Fag.
File (): EE03B9CBA9800BDE085F93783F2CF4CC-2262140.png (2.2 MB, 2480x3507, 1517523511374.png)
I don't think all that LARPing is very healthy for you, Koreanon. May I suggest something healthier to do with your boundless autism?
I hear tulpamancy is popular this time of year. Just don't make a Jackie Chan tulpa, he's a total shitgoblin who ruins everything.
I hear tulpamancy is popular this time of year. Just don't make a Jackie Chan tulpa, he's a total shitgoblin who ruins everything.
File (): FCFD4964A75CC9B86B6AEC58097CF34B-16213.png (15.8 KB, 1200x122, A warning (2).png)
There was no Ban, only a warning
File (): 466B01A5430E55B8C31C6779C7E88562-251059.png (245.2 KB, 400x528, 1112361339218.png)
Still waiting for the mods to = Gods.
File (): 105E08E1C4EC3073996BBB2A614832D9-2427660.mp4 (2.3 MB, Resolution:1280x720 Length:00:00:37, Rarity_Fucked_By_Human.mp4) [play once] [loop]
>>124505
Well he doesn't respond to Socratic questioning and he doesn't cite his sources. Clearly can't have passed middle school.
Well he doesn't respond to Socratic questioning and he doesn't cite his sources. Clearly can't have passed middle school.
File (): 12C6A6CE0781800C099CC0483C29FEFD-783366.png (765.0 KB, 1280x1970, 1520111387441.png)
File (): 63F24FC998A1E4E478AFB47CA37CCFED-536056.gif (523.5 KB, 389x540, 23907432498.gif)
File (): 927280C14512C4EB9299C9E975DA2D6F-8102062.webm (7.7 MB, Resolution:1280x720 Length:00:00:41, Twilight-AnalWithHuman.webm) [play once] [loop]
Does /mlpol/ not support giant red text ban messages?
>>124507
You clearly are either ignorant or lying, as there was a ban, not only a warning. So stop it now.
You clearly are either ignorant or lying, as there was a ban, not only a warning. So stop it now.
File (): 9397AE1928AACA3D0CCDF0B117CEC4E7-515356.gif (503.3 KB, 1144x946, 1106344306177-4.gif)
File (): 85F836C3A2B65B9A2DFF1D2227355BAC-113384.jpg (110.7 KB, 510x504, 4B5F1351-5C4C-4F3A-859C-6B364A0BF36C.jpeg)
The mod on this board is clearly a piece of shit liar.
And now you seek to sully the flag of our resident Argentinians and Italians with your falsehoods, Koreanon?
A thousand years of scat and cockvore upon you!
A thousand years of scat and cockvore upon you!
No use to ban me shit head mod. I am back and there is NOTHING YOU CAN DO ABOUT IT YOU PIECE OF SHIT LIAR YOU!!
GET LOST YOU PIECE OF SHIT MOD!
GET LOST YOU LYING FAG!!
File (): 73076F4D7D14D84B6243EFD7211BE331-2024368.png (1.9 MB, 1680x1080, 8849__safe_artist-colon-scratch42_rainbow dash_sniper.png)
MY
FUCKING
SIDES
FUCKING
SIDES
I ALREADY WARNED YOU PIECE OF SHIT MOD!
YOU CANNOT BAN ME YOU LYING FAGGOT!!
YOU CANNOT BAN ME YOU LYING FAGGOT!!
No use to ban me shit head mod. I am back and there is NOTHING YOU CAN DO ABOUT IT YOU PIECE OF SHIT LIAR YOU!!
GET LOST YOU PIECE OF SHIT MOD!
File (): 042D3497F774F534C2E8B6AEB6BA0B93-381803.gif (372.9 KB, 777x991, 1109414374302.gif)
Who else here is /comfy/ watching this faggot get banned over and over again?
File (): 06497E3DEB04C5C80173D0D263C4BCA8-523230.png (511.0 KB, 1684x1605, comfy filly.png)
I ALREADY WARNED YOU PIECE OF SHIT MOD!
YOU CANNOT BAN ME YOU LYING FAGGOT!!
YOU CANNOT BAN ME YOU LYING FAGGOT!!
File (): E73861353EEA2BFD897A9E6ECC8C56F1-211623.png (206.7 KB, 809x530, 1491142583584.png)
Well, I'm starting to run out of things to shitpost about, so I think I'll call it a night pretty soon. Let my scored quads do the rest of the Facebook banishment.
But before I leave, a moment of prayer for our moderation team.
Our mods, who art on /mlpol/,
Honoured be thy names,
Thy imageboard come,
Thy autism be done,
On /mlpol/ as it is in Equestria.
Give us this day our daily shitposts,
And forgive us for our faggotry,
As we forgive those who reject horsepussy,
And lead us not into LARPing,
But deliver us from Reddit.
Amen.
But before I leave, a moment of prayer for our moderation team.
Our mods, who art on /mlpol/,
Honoured be thy names,
Thy imageboard come,
Thy autism be done,
On /mlpol/ as it is in Equestria.
Give us this day our daily shitposts,
And forgive us for our faggotry,
As we forgive those who reject horsepussy,
And lead us not into LARPing,
But deliver us from Reddit.
Amen.
File (): E0EBC902EB23259DE2D7B9754F0423BE-65888.jpg (64.3 KB, 356x500, 23098439284.jpg)
No use to ban me shit head mod. I am back and there is NOTHING YOU CAN DO ABOUT IT YOU PIECE OF SHIT LIAR YOU!!
I ALREADY WARNED YOU PIECE OF SHIT MOD!
YOU CANNOT BAN ME YOU LYING FAGGOT!!
YOU CANNOT BAN ME YOU LYING FAGGOT!!
File (): 258D8A9062581BD26BAC7F0E48321F04-95988.jpg (93.7 KB, 819x1024, 1518756066165m.jpg)
File (): 1D01251E31E8DF5268BFEC0A1E61982D-235096.jpg (229.6 KB, 815x1200, 1514546905245.jpg)
Maaan, I fucking love this place.
And I love you all, fagets.
No homo
And I love you all, fagets.
No homo
File (): 48849ABC4F6EE7C4C9E61934E6D7B8B1-7070995.png (6.7 MB, 3600x4200, 1409229.png)
File (): 52DD075266976B07E83B2F7FFE968958-1285727.png (1.2 MB, 1557x1193, 1204296.png)
File (): B08CAE674AFF8D7A158766740F0FC88E-13529662.png (12.9 MB, 3508x2480, 1327008.png)
I ALREADY WARNED YOU PIECE OF SHIT MOD!
YOU CANNOT BAN ME YOU LYING FAGGOT!!
I AM GOING TO KEEP YOU TIED-UP ALL NIGHT REGRETTING YOUR LIES YOU PIECE OF SHIT!!
>>124566
You are going to be here all night in this game, no use.
YOU CANNOT BAN ME YOU LYING FAGGOT!!
I AM GOING TO KEEP YOU TIED-UP ALL NIGHT REGRETTING YOUR LIES YOU PIECE OF SHIT!!
>>124566
You are going to be here all night in this game, no use.
No use to ban me shit head mod. I am back and there is NOTHING YOU CAN DO ABOUT IT YOU PIECE OF SHIT LIAR YOU!!
File (): 3B9C97DF70A99BB49EC1226D98DFE32F-88865.jpg (86.8 KB, 894x894, 015_oh_come_on___by_speccysy-d4pcqpm.jpg)
File (): 993DC4E574F84545507E267A4D409A52-2495660.gif (2.4 MB, 800x600, 1519193210559.gif)
>>124582
Fuck off fag!
Fuck off fag!
File (): E62DD00E8F438EF87162B38797260B5B-354148.jpg (345.8 KB, 1543x1474, 1498577204573-0.jpg)
>>124582
Do you think you're the first sperging script kiddie autist I've dealt with?
Do you think you're the first sperging script kiddie autist I've dealt with?
This thread is fun
MODS = GODS
MODS = GODS
MODS = GODS
MODS = GODS
MODS = GODS
MODS = GODS
MODS = GODS
>>124588
We literally have the best mods. Hey mod, I plan on issuing a whole bunch of commissions in the future for art. Who is your favorite pone that needs more art?
We literally have the best mods. Hey mod, I plan on issuing a whole bunch of commissions in the future for art. Who is your favorite pone that needs more art?
File (): 107B2114CC83D600A9A6106A70DC3360-53128.jpg (51.9 KB, 736x827, 29edf274eb0b8e6ebfd07c90964eefaa.jpg)
>>124619
D'aww, thanks! For the pony, I think we need more of our mlpol ponies. Syrianna, or Leslie Fair
D'aww, thanks! For the pony, I think we need more of our mlpol ponies. Syrianna, or Leslie Fair
>>124636
Get a new flag Faggot!REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
Get a new flag Faggot!REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
>>124636
>Lol, I win because when you guys asked for facts I spamed the entire board lol
>Lol, I win because when you guys asked for facts I spamed the entire board lol
File (): 58AEC2FC0810B3017579D05A9CC934DD-494825.png (483.2 KB, 2927x2341, AnonFilly-FuckOff.png)
>>124636
STAY OUT OF OUR FUCKING ANON FILLY THREAD YOU CUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUNNNNNTTT
STAY OUT OF OUR FUCKING ANON FILLY THREAD YOU CUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUNNNNNTTT
File (): 4F2D7E477760F53F18E669DA9EDC02D9-350883.jpg (342.7 KB, 1280x1280, FIRE FOR EFFECT!.jpeg)
File (): F6CDC594DBBB2F807EB047CDF0950122-146380.jpg (142.9 KB, 1024x1069, Bombshell booty.jpg)
File (): E51F5ED0ADE849346A9A5FF34163F733-2117730.png (2.0 MB, 1023x1228, Bon Bon in the Fallout.png)
File (): 70690E02BED4F5B31B1D3F7BE5A752C4-71337.jpg (69.7 KB, 322x403, 1A8135CF-076B-4E05-BA81-006E90E48CD0.jpeg)
File (): 7655557833C7AF7AF7CBFF67CE3EE872-1647269.jpg (1.6 MB, 4000x4500, E9C7252C-338A-405D-80AF-2C77F927196B.jpeg)
File (): 89B838AF71258BF6BD85BAB3CA96D3B0-835850.png (816.3 KB, 1094x950, E58CEEF7-92DF-42EF-998D-6A1FE1C189DB.png)
File (): 50900A941321E037269E35ACEF00D665-241712.jpg (236.0 KB, 1134x861, EB212C12-911B-4FFC-B95E-A18DE9E2EDFB.jpeg)
>>124545
First I was curious, then angry and now I’m /laughing/
South Korea-anon, I hope North Korea rapes your country out of existence
First I was curious, then angry and now I’m /laughing/
South Korea-anon, I hope North Korea rapes your country out of existence
394 replies | 307 files | 39 UUIDs | Archived