>TM Eye is now believed to bring more private convictions than any other organisation except for the RSPCA, Daily Mail reports.
>The company has a service called "My Local Bobby", which costs wealthy homeowners around £200 a month and involves a guard patrolling their streets.
>TM Eye are also looking three murder cases that cops were unable to solve and are helping out in rape, missing persons, burglary, theft, stalking and blackmail cases.
>In two years, the company has successfully convicted 403 criminals for fraud, intellectual property theft and other offences.
"Hurr durr how will you protect your property without the government lmao checkmate racist"
>mfw ancapistan is real and it is british
/mlpol/ - My Little Politics
Archived thread
File (): 44705C09524D043BD89B96B9A7C4F4D5-144938.jpg (141.5 KB, 744x1024, 31AC53A6-9657-4B1C-9007-B….jpeg)
File (): C82DAE3EB038BEA351184E9E044827DC-85144.png (83.1 KB, 800x800, Leslie Fair suit.png)
That's pretty great, but I think the "intellectual property" thing might be a concern, although I haven't looked to much into the arguments on that.
File (): F80D7B7B2ECE0EC575FE0DE0F3BBE85B-135485.jpg (132.3 KB, 796x1024, LeslieFaireRaisingFlag.jpg)
I was going to post this article yesterday, but I got sidetracked and forgot. Glad to see someone else saw the article.
Maybe soon we'll get privately-funded Crusader squads who'll take care of the Muzzie problem
Im glad the brits are starting to remove kebab.
File (): ED155E4E6BF877198935DA8BBE5750BE-115360.png (112.7 KB, 444x500, Capitalism Ho!.png)
File (): D0A81CF362D73C6388022471C5D6786F-209869.png (205.0 KB, 1024x865, LeslieFaire.png)
This is the best thing I've seen all day.
>tfw random citizens can solve crime better than actual police
>tfw Anarchocapitalism isn't as stupid as people said
>tfw random citizens can solve crime better than actual police
>tfw Anarchocapitalism isn't as stupid as people said
>>114666
>education and healthcare
both are an absolute shitfest BECAUSE of the government monopolization.
>education and healthcare
both are an absolute shitfest BECAUSE of the government monopolization.
File (): F72EA228F7FF83DD7F17A1319B1F1AD2-683834.png (667.8 KB, 4408x3368, anclop.png)
>>114573
If you mean you are not sure what your opinion on intellectual property in general is.
For:
A farmer (who owns himself, the land, the seed etc. and put the time in to grow the crops) owns his crops and any money he earns from selling those crops, if anyone tries to take them away from him that is theft regardless if it is taken but the state or his neighbor.
Therefore a musician(, architect, painter, scientist…) who owns himself, the paper etc. writes a song (while the farmer used his body to water the plants the musician used his brain to do his work), he owns the song and any money he earns from selling his work, if anyone tries to reduce the money he makes from it that is still theft.
Nobody would work for nothing, by giving intellectual property rights you ensure that a person gets all the money from it. I know the cure for cancer would be valuable but hard to discover, if I go into debt to find it and there is intellectual property rights I'm rich, if not I'm fucked.
Against:
All monopoly turns out shit, if the government has a monopoly on something it is almost always worse than free market alternatives and if government gives monopoly rights to a company then the company turns to shit.
Intellectual property rights do not say "you can make this" they say "everyone else cannot make this", so a monopoly, why would we think that this monopoly would turn out any better.
If you know how to play a set of musical notes in an order that people want to listen what right does the government have banning you from making those noises?
Imagine how good the music today would be if there was no youtube, limewire, radio etc. Each person takes massive inspiration from what is already created and builds upon it, intellectual property just stops that.
There have not been any strong studies done to prove that strong intellectual property laws means lots more creations.
IP laws do mean more time and money going to lawyers ensuring these laws are not breached.
Less money and interest goes into areas of research that can not be protected for example a mathematical equation can not be protected but a slight modification on an engine or the McDonalds logo can be.
Of course there are a few different types of intellectual property; trademark, copyright, patent, trade secrets… and each has good and bad points.
In regards to being concerned with this "My Local Bobby" company, they are just enforcing the law if you have a problem with their actions then it is the law that needs to be changed not the company that enforces it.
If you mean you are not sure what your opinion on intellectual property in general is.
For:
A farmer (who owns himself, the land, the seed etc. and put the time in to grow the crops) owns his crops and any money he earns from selling those crops, if anyone tries to take them away from him that is theft regardless if it is taken but the state or his neighbor.
Therefore a musician(, architect, painter, scientist…) who owns himself, the paper etc. writes a song (while the farmer used his body to water the plants the musician used his brain to do his work), he owns the song and any money he earns from selling his work, if anyone tries to reduce the money he makes from it that is still theft.
Nobody would work for nothing, by giving intellectual property rights you ensure that a person gets all the money from it. I know the cure for cancer would be valuable but hard to discover, if I go into debt to find it and there is intellectual property rights I'm rich, if not I'm fucked.
Against:
All monopoly turns out shit, if the government has a monopoly on something it is almost always worse than free market alternatives and if government gives monopoly rights to a company then the company turns to shit.
Intellectual property rights do not say "you can make this" they say "everyone else cannot make this", so a monopoly, why would we think that this monopoly would turn out any better.
If you know how to play a set of musical notes in an order that people want to listen what right does the government have banning you from making those noises?
Imagine how good the music today would be if there was no youtube, limewire, radio etc. Each person takes massive inspiration from what is already created and builds upon it, intellectual property just stops that.
There have not been any strong studies done to prove that strong intellectual property laws means lots more creations.
IP laws do mean more time and money going to lawyers ensuring these laws are not breached.
Less money and interest goes into areas of research that can not be protected for example a mathematical equation can not be protected but a slight modification on an engine or the McDonalds logo can be.
Of course there are a few different types of intellectual property; trademark, copyright, patent, trade secrets… and each has good and bad points.
In regards to being concerned with this "My Local Bobby" company, they are just enforcing the law if you have a problem with their actions then it is the law that needs to be changed not the company that enforces it.
File (): B98FEACCE541C69D2A1266BDFC7D1445-157352.jpg (153.7 KB, 900x506, George-Soros.jpg)
Reminder that the international money market is anarcho-capitalistic and George Soros is the result.
Allow me to explain. He is responsible for the 1997 Asian financial crisis, among others. The simplified version of the type of currency manipulation he does is the following. Trade a billion Euros for the equivalent of a billion Thai Bahts. Thailand has a small economy and there are now significantly fewer Thai Bahts in circulation, causing currency deflation in Thailand and driving down the exchange rate of Thai Bahts to Euros. Now trade your Thai Bahts back for Euros again at this higher exchange rate that you caused and profit. Soros made a billion dollars in one day doing this. Repeat this tactic indefinitely for infinite wealth at the cost of small economies.
This is why anarcho-capitalism is a flawed idea.
Allow me to explain. He is responsible for the 1997 Asian financial crisis, among others. The simplified version of the type of currency manipulation he does is the following. Trade a billion Euros for the equivalent of a billion Thai Bahts. Thailand has a small economy and there are now significantly fewer Thai Bahts in circulation, causing currency deflation in Thailand and driving down the exchange rate of Thai Bahts to Euros. Now trade your Thai Bahts back for Euros again at this higher exchange rate that you caused and profit. Soros made a billion dollars in one day doing this. Repeat this tactic indefinitely for infinite wealth at the cost of small economies.
This is why anarcho-capitalism is a flawed idea.
>>115588
Exactly, we need some basic control and commonsense. Again how come nobody killed this fucker yet?
Exactly, we need some basic control and commonsense. Again how come nobody killed this fucker yet?
11 replies | 7 files | 1 UUIDs | Archived